E. Galán

Properties and applications of palygorskite-sepiolite clays

Abstract The palygorskite-sepiolite group of clay minerals has a wide range of industrial applications derived mainly from its sorptive, rheological and catalytic properties which are based on the fabric, surface area, porosity, crystal morphology, structure and composition of these minerals. For assessing potential industrial uses, the mineralogical and chemical composition of the clay and its basic physical and physico-chemical parameters must be determined. Then some particular properties of commercial interest can be modified and improved by appropriate thermal, mechanical and acid treatments, surface active agents, organo-mineral derivatives formation, etc. In this paper, a revision of the principal characteristics of commercial palygorskite-sepiolite clays is presented, and potential uses are suggested according to these data. New products and applications are being investigated and those concerning environmental protection in particular, are noted. Finally, possible health effects of these elongate clay minerals are discussed.

Structure and Mineralogy of Clay Minerals

Abstract Phyllosilicates, and among them clay minerals, are of great interest not only for the scientific community but also for their potential applications in many novel and advanced areas. However, the correct application of these minerals requires a thorough knowledge of their crystal chemical properties. This chapter provides crystal chemical and structural details related to phyllosilicates and describes the fundamental features leading to their different behaviour in different natural or technical processes, as also detailed in other chapters of this book. Phyllosilicates, described in this chapter, are minerals of the (i) kaolin-serpentine group (e.g. kaolinite, dickite, nacrite, halloysite, hisingerite, lizardite, antigorite, chrysotile, amesite, carlosturanite, greenalite); (ii) talc and pyrophyllite group (e.g. pyrophyllite, ferripyrophyllite); (iii) mica group, with particular focus to illite; (iv) smectite group (e.g. montmorillonite, beidellite, nontronite, saponite, hectorite, sauconite); (v) vermiculite group; (vi) chlorite group; (vii) some 2:1 layer silicates involving a discontinuous octahedral sheet and a modulated tetrahedral sheet such as kalifersite, palygorskite and sepiolite; (viii) allophane and imogolite and (ix) mixed layer structures with particular focus on illite-smectite.

Heavy metal partitioning in river sediments severely polluted by acid mine drainage in the Iberian Pyrite Belt

This study provides a geochemical partitioning pattern of Fe, Mn and potentially toxic trace elements (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) in sediments historically contaminated with acid mine drainage, as determined by using a 4-step sequential extraction scheme. At the upperstream, the sediments occur as ochreous precipitates consisting of amorphous or poorly crystalline oxy-hydroxides of Fe, and locally jarosite, whereas the estuarine sediments are composed mainly of detrital quartz, illite, kaolinite, feldspars, carbonates and heavy minerals, with minor authigenic phases (gypsum, vivianite, halite, pyrite). The sediments are severely contaminated with As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn, especially in the vicinity of the mining pollution sources and some sites of the estuary, where the metal concentrations are several orders of magnitude above background levels. Although a significant proportion of Zn, Cd and Cu is present in a readily soluble form, the majority of heavy metals are bonded to reducible phases, suggesting that Fe oxy-hydroxides have a dominant role in the metal accumulation. In the estuary, the sediments are potentially less reactive than in the riverine environment, because relevant concentrations of heavy metals are immobilised in the crystalline structure of minerals.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF NOMENCLATURE COMMITTEES RELEVANT TO CLAY MINERALOGY: REPORT OF THE ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR L'ETUDE DES ARGILES (AIPEA) NOMENCLATURE COMMITTEE FOR 2006

Brindley et al. (1951) reported the earliest efforts to obtain international collaboration on nomenclature and classification of clay minerals, initiated at the International Soil Congress in Amsterdam in 1950. Since then, national clay groups were formed, and they proposed various changes in nomenclature at group meetings of the International Clay Conferences. Most of the national clay groups have representation on the Nomenclature Committee of the Association Internationale pour l’Etude des Argiles (AIPEA, International Association for the Study of Clays), which was established in 1966. The precursor committee to the AIPEA Nomenclature Committee was the Nomenclature Subcommittee of the Comite International pour l’Etude des Argiles (CIPEA, International Committee for the Study of Clays). The AIPEA Nomenclature Committee has worked closely with other international groups, including the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names (CNMMN) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA), which is responsible for the formal recognition of new minerals and mineral names, and the International Union of Crystallography (IUCr), which considered extensions to the nomenclature of disordered, modulated and polytype structures (Guinier et al. , 1984) published earlier by a joint committee with the IMA (Bailey, 1977). In contrast to the other national clay groups, however, The Clay Minerals Society (CMS) Nomenclature Committee, which was established in 1963 at the same time as the CMS and predates the AIPEA Nomenclature Committee, remains in existence and occasionally produces recommendations. The precursor to this committee was the Nomenclature SubCommittee, which was organized in 1961 by the (US) National Research Council. The Chair of the AIPEA Nomenclature Committee is a standing member of the CMS Nomenclature Committee so that the committees are in close contact. The purpose of the AIPEA Nomenclature Committee has been to make general and specific recommendations concerning: (1) definitions of mineralogical and crystallographic clay-related terms; (2) classification and terminology …

Chapter 2 Structures and Mineralogy of Clay Minerals

Publisher Summary This chapter describes structures and mineralogy of clay minerals. Phyllosilicates considered in this chapter ideally contain a continuous tetrahedral sheet. Each tetrahedron consists of a cation, T, coordinated to four oxygen atoms and linked to adjacent tetrahedra by sharing three corners (the basal oxygen atoms, Ob) to form an infinite two-dimensional hexagonal mesh pattern along the a, b crystallographic directions. The free corners (the tetrahedral apical oxygen atoms, Oa) of all tetrahedra point to the same side of the sheet and connect the tetrahedral and octahedral sheets to form a common plane with octahedral anionic position Ooct. Ooct anions lie near to the center of each tetrahedral 6-fold ring, but are not shared with tetrahedra. The 1:1 layer structure consists of the repetition of one tetrahedral and one octahedral sheet, while in the 2:1 layer structure one octahedral sheet is sandwiched between two tetrahedral sheets. In the 1:1 layer structure, the unit cell includes six octahedral sites (i.e., four cis and two trans-oriented octahedral) and four tetrahedral sites. Six octahedral sites and eight tetrahedral sites characterize the 2:1 layer unit cell. Structures with all the six octahedral sites occupied are known as “trioctahedral.” If only four of the six octahedra are occupied, the structure is referred to as “dioctahedral.” The structural formula is often reported based on the half unit-cell content—that is, it is based on three octahedral sites.

REPORT OF THE ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR L’ÉTUDE DES ARGILES (AIPEA) NOMENCLATURE COMMITTEE FOR 2001: ORDER, DISORDER AND CRYSTALLINITY IN PHYLLOSILICATES AND THE USE OF THE “CRYSTALLINITY INDEX”

The purpose of this report is to describe the appropriate use of indices relating to crystallinity, such as the ‘crystallinity index’, the ‘Hinckley index’, the ‘Kubler index’, and the ‘Arkai index’. A ‘crystalline’ solid is defined as a solid consisting of atoms, ions or molecules packed together in a periodic arrangement. A ‘crystallinity index’ is purported to be a measure of crystallinity, although there is uncertainty about what this means (see below). This report discusses briefly the nature of order, disorder and crystallinity in phyllo-silicates and discusses why the use of a ‘crystallinity index’ should be avoided. If possible, it is suggested that indices be referred to using the name of the author who originally described the parameter, e.g. ‘Hinckley index’ or ‘Kubler index’, or in honor of a researcher who investigated the importance of the parameter extensively, e.g. ‘Arkai index’. In contrast to a crystalline solid, an ‘amorphous’ solid is one in which the constituent components are arranged randomly. However, many variations occur between the two extremes of crystalline vs. amorphous. For example, one type of amorphous material might consist simply of atoms showing no order and no periodicity. Alternatively, another amorphous material may consist of atoms arranged, for example, as groups of tetrahedra ( i.e. limited order) with each group displaced or rotated ( e.g. without periodicity) relative to another. Thus, this latter material is nearly entirely amorphous, but differs from the first. Likewise, disturbance of order and periodicity may occur in crystalline materials. The terms ‘order’ and ‘disorder’ refer to the collective nature or degree of such disturbances. Although seemingly simple notions, ‘crystalline’ and ‘amorphous’ are complex concepts. Crystalline substances may show a periodic internal structure based on direction. For example, two-dimensional periodicity is common in phyllosilicates where two adjacent sheets or layers must mesh. For example, in serpentine, …

A NEW APPROACH TO COMPOSITIONAL LIMITS FOR SEPIOLITE AND PALYGORSKITE

Most bulk chemical analyses of sepiolite and palygorskite available in the literature are erroneous because samples analyzed are admixtures of minerals that are difficult to separate or identify by other techniques. Some chemical analyses performed on selected individual particles by energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) are also influenced by the same problem. Chemical analyses are summarized for sepiolite and palygorskite reported in the literature (bulk and EDX analyses). The analyses are evaluated by comparison to three sepiolite and three palygorskite pure samples analyzed by EDX techniques. Results indicate that sepiolite is a true trioctahedral mineral, very pure (near end-member) with negligible structural substitution and with eight octahedral positions filled with magnesium, close to the theoretical formula Mg8Si12O30(OH)4(OH2)4(H2O)8. Palygorskite is intermediate between di- and trioctahedral phyllosilicates. The octahedral sheet contains mainly Mg, Al, and Fe with a R2/R3 ratio close to 1, and with four of the five structural positions occupied. The theoretical formula is close to (Mg2R23+?1)(Si8-xAlx)O20(OH)3(OH2)4·R2+x/2(H2O)4, where x = 0–0.5. Sepiolite and palygorskite are thus more compositionally limited than previously reported.

Clay mineral and heavy metal distributions in the lower estuary of Huelva and adjacent Atlantic shelf, SW Spain

Abstract The Huelva estuary, on the south-western Spanish Atlantic coast, is an environment strongly polluted by acid mine drainage and industrial effluents. Clay mineralogy, heavy metal and particle-size distribution in estuarine and adjacent shelf sediments have been analyzed in order to identify the sources and transport pathways of the contaminated sediments. The estuarine sediments consist of detrital terrigenous minerals (illite, kaolinite, quartz, feldspars, dolomite and heavy minerals) derived from river catchments and coastal erosion, with biogenic components (calcite and aragonite) and minor authigenic minerals (pyrite and possibly gypsum). Mineral distribution pattern in the estuary-shelf system is controlled by grain-size sediment, physico-chemical conditions of waters and hydrodynamic factors. Important proportions of fine-grained sediments highly enriched in sulphide-associated heavy metals are supplied by the Tinto-Odiel river system. Most of these sediments are trapped when river waters reach the estuary because of flocculation processes during estuarine mixing, thus the estuary acts as a storage basin for metallic pollutants. In terms of public health, this estuary is well above recommended safety guidelines for most metals. Although the shelf sediments show metal concentration levels close to background values, eventually, a metallic plume emerges from the estuary to ocean, and consequently elevated metal concentrations can be locally detected on the inner shelf.

Mineralogical interference on kaolinite crystallinity index measurements

This study examines the influence of minerals and amorphous phases associated with kaolin and kaolinitic rocks on kaolinite crystallinity indices (KCI) derived from X-ray diffraction (XRD) data in order to select the best index for systematic studies of commercial kaolins or geological sequences. For this purpose, 8 kaolins of differing structural order were chosen and used to prepare mixtures containing different weight fractions of quartz, feldspar, illite, smectite, chlorite, halloysite and iron hydroxide and silica gels. An additional 17 samples of kaolin were also studied to test the results and evaluate the restrictions. KCIs used included Hinckley (HI), Range and Weiss (QF), Liètard (R2), Stoch (IK), Hughes and Brown (H&B) and Amigó et al. (full width at half maximum, FWHM), and the “expert system” of Plançon and Zacharie.Based on more than 15,000 KCI determinations, the HI and QF are influenced by quartz, feldspar, iron hydroxide gels, illite, smectite and halloysite. IK can be used in the presence of quartz, feldspar and iron hydroxide and silica gels. Also, R2 is the only KCI that could be measured in the presence of halloysite; FWHM indices should not be used in the presence of chlorite and/or halloysite; and H&B should only be used with pure kaolinite samples. The “expert system” of Plançon and Zacharie is strongly affected by the presence of other mineral phases, particularly with more than 25% of well-ordered kaolinite. Their system is less sensitive to other mineral phases when only disordered kaolinite is present, and it should not be used with kaolinite of medium order-disorder because the well-ordered phase is present in an inappreciable proportion (<10%). KCI is only measurable in kaolinitic rocks if kaolinite is >20 wt% and the precision increases with an increase in the quantity of kaolinite. In all cases, the reliability will depend on the other minerals present. When a KCI can be measured accurately, the others can be obtained by using the empirical relationships reported in this paper.

Report of the Association Internationale pour l’Etude des Argiles (AIPEA) Nomenclature Committee for 2001: Order, disorder and crystallinity in phyllosilicates and the use of the ‘Crystallinity Index’

The purpose of this report is to describe the appropriate use of indices relating to crystallinity, such as the ‘crystallinity index’, the ‘Hinckley index’, the ‘Kubler index’, and the ‘Arkai index’. A ‘crystalline’ solid is defined as a solid consisting of atoms, ions, or molecules packed together in a periodic arrangement. A ‘crystallinity index’ is purported to be a measure of crystallinity, although there is uncertainty about what this means (see below). This report discusses briefly the nature of order, disorder and crystallinity in phyllosilicates and discusses why the use of a ‘crystallinity index’ should be avoided. If possible, it is suggested that indices be referred to using the name of the author who originally described the parameter, as in ‘Hinckley index’ or ‘Kubler index’, or in honour of a researcher who investigated the importance of the parameter extensively, as in ‘Arkai index’. In contrast to a crystalline solid, an ‘amorphous’ solid is one in which the constituent components are arranged randomly. However, many variations occur between the two extremes of crystalline vs. amorphous. For example, one type of amorphous material might consist simply of atoms showing no order and no periodicity. Alternatively, another amorphous material may consist of atoms arranged, for example, as groups of tetrahedra (i.e. limited order) with each group displaced or rotated (e.g. without periodicity) relative to another. Thus, this latter material is nearly entirely amorphous, but differs from the first. Likewise, disturbance of order and periodicity may occur in crystalline materials. The terms ‘order’ and ‘disorder’ refer to the collective nature or degree of such disturbances. Although seemingly simple notions, ‘crystalline’ and ‘amorphous’ are complex concepts. Crystalline substances may show a periodic internal structure based on direction. For example, two-dimensional periodicity is common in phyllosilicates where two adjacent sheets or layers must mesh. For example, …