E. Holman

Comparison of 150 Simultaneous Bilateral and 300 Unilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomies

Purpose: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. Results: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20% in 12.2% of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4%. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the ...

Simultaneous bilateral compared with unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Objective To compare simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPCNL) and unilateral PCNL in separate sessions in patients with bilateral renal stones for several variables before and after surgery.

Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.

In the paediatric section, two papers relating to the upper urinary tract are presented. The first, from Hungary, describes simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 13 patients, where it was deemed feasible; this is the first such report. Authors from London report on unilateral nephrectomy in patients with nephrogenic hypertension, and found that it was successful in normalising blood pressure in patients with renal hypertension with a normal contralateral kidney.

Percutaneous Suprapubic Cystolithotripsy for Pediatric Bladder Stones in a Developing Country

Objective: To evaluate our experience with percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy (PCCL) in Yemeni children with endemic urinary bladder stones. Patients and Methods: Between January 1993 and December 1998, 117 children underwent percutaneous suprapubic lithotripsy in Arabia Felix Modern Hospital, Sana’a Republic of Yemen. The patients’ ages ranged from 8 months to 14 years (average 3.7 years). Ninety patients (77%) were under 5 years old; 20 patients (16%) were between 6 and 10 years old, and 7 patients (6%) were between 11 and 14 years old. There were 116 boys and 1 girl. The stone size ranged from 0.7 to 4 (average 2.3) cm. Five patients had coexisting urinary bilharziasis and another 5 patients had coexisting renal stone. In 10 patients, the stone was in the urethra. The procedure was done under general anesthesia. Dilation of the tract was made under fluoroscopy. The instrument was an adult 26–french nephroscope, the same as that used for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Ultrasound disintegration was needed for stones of >1 cm. A suprapubic catheter was left for 24 h, and a urethral catheter was kept for 48 h. Results: All patients became stone free. The average operating time was 15 (5–50) min. The average hospital stay was 2.7 (2–5) days. No severe intra– or postoperative complication was observed. The nucleus and/or the main component of the stones were ammonium acid urate in 109 patients (93%). Conclusion: Based on our experience we can conclude that percutaneous suprapubic lithotripsy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of bladder stones in children. It reduces morbidity and hospital stay and thus the cost of treatment. Our series proves the nutritional etiology of endemic pediatric bladder stones. To our knowledge, this is the largest series reported on percutaneous suprapubic management of endemic bladder stones in children.

Laparoscopic Repair of Circumcaval Ureter: One-year Follow-up of Three Patients and Literature Review

OBJECTIVES To describe our experience and 1-year follow-up of 3 patients with circumcaval ureter (CU) treated laparoscopically, with the introduction of a new stenting method and review of the published data. Because of its rarity, more reports are needed to advocate more comprehensive knowledge about the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of CU. METHODS Since November 2005, 3 patients with symptomatic CU have undergone laparoscopic repair of their anomaly at our institutes. In all 3 cases, the ureter was transected and positioned anteriorly with an end-to-end anastomosis. In 2 cases, the retrocavally located ureteral segment was resected. RESULTS The mean operative time in our series was 210 minutes, without any intraoperative or early postoperative complications. In 1 patient, a slight ureteral stricture was detected that resolved with reinsertion of a double-J stent. Histopathologic examination of the resected ureteral segments revealed sclerosis and muscular hypertrophy. All patients remained symptom free during the 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS With all the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure and preserving therapeutic efficacy, the laparoscopic approach should be considered a standard choice for surgical treatment of CU in symptomatic patients. Care should be taken to diagnose and excise the pathologically narrowed ureteral segment.

A special terpene combination (Rowatinex®) improves stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in urolithiasis patients: results of a placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial.

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of a special terpene combination in the treatment of patients with urolithiasis after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Patients and Methods: 222 patients with clinically stable kidney or ureter stones of 0.3–2.0 cm undergoing complication-free ESWL were randomised to receive a special terpene combination (Rowatinex®; 3 × 2 capsules/day) or placebo. The study consisted of a 12-week active treatment phase and a 2-week follow-up phase. All patients had a physical examination, and diagnosis of kidney stones was made by X-ray, intravenous pyelogram or ultrasound at weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12 as well as after 2 weeks of follow-up. Stone-free status was defined as obviously successful expulsion of calculi/fragments, being without any stone. Results: In all, when compared to placebo, significantly more patients receiving the terpene combination treatment in the intent-to-treat (ITT) group [72 (67.9%) vs. 49 (50.0%); p = 0.0009] and the per-protocol (PP) group [69 (78.4%) vs. 48 (52.2%); p = 0.0004] were stone-free at the end of the study. Treatment with the terpene combination was also more effective when analysed with respect to the size of the treated stone. In addition, treatment with the terpene combination significantly reduced the median time to stone-free status from 85.0 to 56.0 days (p = 0.0061) and from 85.0 to 49.5 days (p = 0.0028) in the ITT and PP populations, respectively. Nine mild-to-moderate adverse events (AE; terpene combination group: 7 AE in 4 patients; placebo group: 2 AE in 2 patients) were assessed as drug-related. Conclusions: Treatment with the terpene combination is well tolerated and safe. The terpene combination was found to be an efficacious treatment in eliminating calculi fragments generated by ESWL as compared to placebo. The pharmacodynamic properties of the terpene combination (antilithogenic, antibacterial, antiinflammatory, spasmolytic and analgesic effects), which have been also confirmed in preclinical studies, represent a valuable alternative to the different drugs used in the treatment of urolithiasis.

Laparoscopic Management of Ureteral Perforation During Ureterolithotripsy

The author presents a case of successful laparoscopic repair of a ureteral perforation happening during ureterolithotripsy (URS). The perforation of the mid-ureter was managed by a retroperitoneal approach: the stone from the retroperitoneum was removed, a double-J stent was inserted up to the kidney, the perforation opening was sutured, and the retroperitoneum was drained. The patient healed without any complication. Similar management of a ureteral perforation has not been found in the literature.