E. J. Shpall

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support as consolidation after standard-dose adjuvant therapy for high-risk primary breast cancer.

PURPOSEnWe studied high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine (CPA/cDDP/BCNU) with autologous bone marrow support (ABMS) as consolidation after standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy treatment of primary breast cancer involving 10 or more axillary lymph nodes.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnOne hundred two women with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIB breast cancer involving 10 or more lymph nodes at surgery were registered; 85 were eligible, treated, and assessable. Patients were treated with four cycles of standard-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF), followed by high-dose CPA/cDDP/BCNU with ABMS.nnnRESULTSnActuarial event-free survival for the study patients at a median follow-up of 2.5 years is 72% (95% confidence interval, 56% to 82%). Comparison to three historical or concurrent Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) adjuvant chemotherapy trials selected for similar patients showed event-free survival at 2.5 years to be between 38% and 52%. Therapy-related mortality was 12%; pulmonary toxicity of variable severity occurred in 31% of patients. Quality-of-life evaluations indicate that patients are functioning well without major impairments.nnnCONCLUSIONnHigh-dose consolidation with CPA/cDDP/BCNU and ABMS after standard-dose CAF results in a decreased frequency of relapse in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer compared with historical series at the median follow-up of 2.5 years. Evaluation in a prospective, randomized trial is warranted and currently underway.

Transplantation of enriched CD34-positive autologous marrow into breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy: influence of CD34-positive peripheral-blood progenitors and growth factors on engraftment.

PURPOSEnTo evaluate the capacity of enriched CD34-positive (CD34+) progenitor cells to reconstitute hematopoiesis in poor-prognosis breast cancer patients following administration of a high-dose alkylating agent chemotherapy regimen.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnForty-four breast cancer patients received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow support (ABMS) with CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells in five sequentially treated cohorts. Following infusion of CD34+ marrow, cohort no. 1 received no growth factor, cohort no. 2 received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and cohort no. 3 received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Cohort no. 4 received the CD34+ fractions of both marrow and peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) plus G-CSF. Cohort no. 5 received only the CD34+ PBPCs plus G-CSF. Immunohistochemical staining for breast cancer was performed on all hematopoietic cell products before and after the positive selection procedure, to assess quantitatively the level of tumor-cell contamination.nnnRESULTSnCohorts no. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 achieved a granulocyte count > or = 500 x 10(9)/L in a median of 23, 10, 16, 11, and 11 days, with a platelet count greater than 20,000 x 10(9)/L documented in a median of 22, 23, 32, 12, and 10 days, respectively. The time to granulocyte reconstitution was significantly shorter for patients who received CD34+ PBPCs alone (cohort no. 5), or in combination with CD34+ marrow (cohort no. 4), when compared with those who received only the CD34+ marrow fraction (P < .01). From 1 to greater than 4 logs of breast cancer cell depletion were documented after CD34-selection, for patients in whom tumor was initially detected.nnnCONCLUSIONnCD34+ marrow and/or PBPCs provide reliable and timely hematopoietic reconstitution in breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. Contamination of both marrow and PBPCs with breast cancer cells was reduced using this positive selection technique.

High-dose combination alkylating agents with bone marrow support as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

To evaluate the effect of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, we performed a phase II trial of a single treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (5,625 mg/m2), cisplatin (165 mg/m2), and carmustine (600 mg/m2), or melphalan (40 mg/m2) and bone marrow support as the initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-two premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor negative, measurable metastatic disease were treated. Twelve of 22 patients (54%) obtained a complete response at a median 18 days. The overall response rate is 73% (complete and partial response). Median duration of response in the patients achieving complete response was 9.0 months with a median duration of survival for complete responders that is currently undefined. Relapse occurred predominantly at sites of pretreatment bulk disease or within areas of previous radiation therapy. Toxicity was frequent and five patients died of therapy-related complications. The results indicate that a single treatment with intensive combination alkylating agents with bone marrow support can produce more rapid and frequent complete responses than conventional chemotherapy when used as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, although median disease-free and overall survival is not improved. Three patients (14%) remain in unmaintained remission beyond 16 months.

4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide purging of breast cancer from the mononuclear cell fraction of bone marrow in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous marrow support: a phase I trial.

We designed an ex vivo bone marrow treatment for breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support (ABMS), using 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC), an active derivative of cyclophosphamide with known activity against breast cancer. This phase I bone marrow purging trial used ficoll-separated mononuclear cells (MNC) (devoid of granulocytes and RBCs), as opposed to the buffy coat. Twenty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer were studied. Patients received three cycles of the Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), fluorouracil, and methotrexate (Duke AFM) regimen, followed by marrow harvest. An MNC fraction of marrow was prepared and treated with 4-HC in concentrations of 20 micrograms/mL (four patients), 40 micrograms/mL (four patients), 60 micrograms/mL (nine patients), or 80 micrograms/mL (eight patients) and cryopreserved. Patients then received high-dose systemic cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine, followed by infusion of the purged marrow. The study end point was marrow engraftment, defined as WBC count greater than 1,000 cells per microliter. At the first three dose levels (20, 40, and 60 micrograms/mL 4-HC), there was no significant delay in time to engraftment (19, 20, and 23 days, respectively) compared with the unpurged historical controls (17 days). At 80 micrograms/mL, engraftment was significantly delayed compared with the lower concentrations (P = .027), and further escalation of 4-HC was not attempted. A significant correlation was observed between the time of leukocyte engraftment and the 4-HC concentration (P = .017). With a methylcellulose-based tissue culture assay, we demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) content in the purged marrow and the days to engraftment. Ninety-five percent of patients responded clinically to the entire program, 55% of them completely. Longer follow-up is required to assess the ultimate benefit of intensive therapy on long-term survival.

Modification of the pharmacokinetics of high-dose cyclophosphamide and cisplatin by antiemetics.

Interpatient variability in exposure to certain chemotherapy agents can influence patient outcome, particularly with high-dose chemotherapy. We evaluated the possibility of a pharmacokinetic (PK) drug–drug interaction between the antiemetic agents and high- dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and BCNU (CPA/cDDP/BCNU). Twenty-three self-selected patients treated with high-dose CPA/cDDP/BCNU followed by autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support (AHPCS) received ondansetron, lorazepam and diphenhydramine as antiemetics. PK parameters for each chemotherapeutic drug in the regimen were compared with those of 129 patients who received exactly the same chemotherapy but an antiemetic regimen substituting prochlorperazine for ondansetron. In addition, we performed a review of the English literature for reported drug–drug interactions between antiemetics and chemotherapy agents that led to modifications in any PK parameters of the chemotherapy agent. Our retrospective study showed that the mean area under the curve (AUC) for both cyclophosphamide (76u2009600 vs90u2009600u2009μg/ml/min, Pu2009=u20090.001) and cisplatin (525 vs 648u2009μg/ml/min, Pu2009=u20090.01) were significantly lower in the ondansetron group when compared with the prochlorperazine group. The AUC for BCNU was not significantly different in both groups (544 vs 677, Pu2009=u20090.43). We found only one report of modifications of the PK parameters of high-dose chemotherapy agents due to drug–drug interactions with the most commonly used antiemetics in a review of the English literature between 1966 and 1995. We concluded that the AUC of high-dose cyclophosphamide and cisplatin are significantly lower when ondansetron, as opposed to prochlorperazine, is used as the antiemetic. The small sample size and heterogeneity of this group of patients precludes any outcome analysis of pharmacodynamic endpoints such as toxicity or antitumor effect. Nevertheless, the potential for interactions between antiemetics and chemotherapy agents should be taken into account when using different high-dose chemotherapy regimens.

Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Undergoing Aggressive Induction Therapy Followed by High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Support

PURPOSEnWe performed a retrospective review to determine predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer who received induction therapy, and, if they responded to treatment, high-dose chemotherapy.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients with metastatic breast cancer received induction therapy with doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM). Partial responders then received immediate high-dose chemotherapy, whereas those who achieved complete remission were randomized to immediate or delayed high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support. We performed a retrospective review of data from these patients and used Cox proportional hazards regression models for analyses.nnnRESULTSnThe overall response rate for the 425 patients enrolled was 74% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 78%). Multivariate analysis of data from all 425 patients revealed that positive estrogen receptor status (P =.0041), smaller metastatic foci (</= 2 v > 2 cm) (P =. 0165), a longer disease-free interval from initial diagnosis to diagnosis of metastases (</= 2 v > 2 years) (P =.0051), and prior treatment with tamoxifen (P =.0152) were good prognostic signs for overall survival. Patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P =.0001) and those who developed liver metastases (P =.0001) had decreased long-term survival. In the subgroup of responders to AFM induction, multivariate analysis showed that those with visceral metastases did less well (P =.0006), as did patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P =.0023). However, those who had received tamoxifen therapy in the adjuvant setting did better (P =. 0143).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe chance for long-term remission with induction therapy with AFM and high-dose chemotherapy is increased for hormone receptor positive-patients with nonvisceral metastases who have not received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and have long disease-free intervals.

High-dose paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell support: a phase I trial.

PURPOSEnTo determine the maximal-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel in combination with high-dose cyclophosphamide (CPA) and cisplatin (cDDP) followed by autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell support (AHPCS).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnForty-nine patients with poor-prognosis breast cancer, non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), or ovarian cancer were treated with escalating doses of paclitaxel infused over 24 hours, followed by CPA (5,625 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 hour in three divided doses) and cDDP (165 mg/m2 intravenously as a continuous infusion over 72 hours) and AHPCS. Pharmacokinetic measurements for each drug were performed.nnnRESULTSnDose-limiting toxicities were encountered in two patients at 825 mg/m2 of paclitaxel; one patient died of multiorgan failure that involved the lung, CNS, and kidneys, and the other developed grade 3 respiratory, CNS, and renal toxicity, which resolved. The MTD of this combination was determined to be paclitaxel 775 mg/m2, CPA 5,625 mg/m2, and cDDP 165 mg/m2 followed by AHPCS. Sensory polyneuropathy and mucositis were prominent toxicities, but both were reversible and tolerable. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel correlated significantly with the severity of mucositis (P < .001) and peripheral neuropathy (P < .00004). Eighteen of 33 patients (54%) with measurable, heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer achieved a partial response (PR). Responses were also observed in patients with NHL (four of five patients) and ovarian cancer (two of two).nnnCONCLUSIONnIt is possible to escalate the dose of paclitaxel to 775 mg/m2 in combination with 5,625 mg/m2 of CPA, 165 mg/m2 of cDDP, and AHPCS. An encouraging response rate in poor-prognosis patients with breast cancer, NHL, and ovarian cancer warrants further study.

Acute pancreatitis during immunosuppression with tacrolimus following an allogeneic umbilical cord blood transplantation

Tacrolimus is increasingly used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and therapy in the allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) setting. Pancreatitis, previously described as a side-effect of cyclosporine, has not been reported in allo-SCT recipients receiving tacrolimus. We present here a case of acute pancreatitis in a 28-year-old patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) who received an unrelated umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) and tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. On day +31 post-transplant, she developed severe acute pancreatitis with multiorgan failure, from which she recovered completely. Tacrolimus was the probable cause of pancreatitis in this patient. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 109–111.

Optic disc and retinal microvasculopathy after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the retinal and optic nerve changes in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support (AHPCS). One hundred and forty patients undergoing HDC and AHPCS underwent extensive pre- and post-transplant ophthalmologic evaluations for development of retinal microvascular complications. One hundred and ten patients received high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and BCNU; thirty received identical doses of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin, but received paclitaxel instead of BCNU. Thirty-four patients (24%) had retinal findings of either cotton wool spots (CWS) (nu2009=u200920) or retinal hemorrhages (nu2009=u200918) during follow-up, which ranged from 1 to 12 months. Ten (7%) of these patients, all of whom received BCNU, showed ocular toxicity characterized by CWS 1 to 4 months post transplant (nu2009=u200910); optic disc edema (nu2009=u20093); and variable vision loss associated with the onset of BCNU-induced pulmonary toxicity. Retinal and optic disc microvascular complications may occur after high-dose chemotherapy followed by AHPCS. The association of ischemic retinal lesions and/or optic disc edema with BCNU-induced pulmonary toxicity and the lack of ocular toxicity in patients that did not receive BCNU may suggest that BCNU is the etiologic agent.

Graft-versus-leukemia-induced complete remission following unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation for acute leukemia

A 15-year-old female received an unrelated three of six HLA antigen matched umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplant for refractory, relapsed T-cell ALL. Conditioning consisted of TBI, melphalan, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), with cyclosporin A (CsA) and solumedrol for GVHD prophylaxis. She engrafted and a day 34 bone marrow aspirate showed 100% donor cells and no evidence of leukemia. The post-transplant course was complicated by mild grade I acute GVHD involving skin, and limited chronic GVHD of the gut which resolved with the addition of 1 mg/kg/day of steroids to her CsA prophylaxis. One hundred and ninety days after transplantation the patient developed pancytopenia and was subsequently found to have a leukemic relapse. Immunosuppression was discontinued and she was started on G-CSF and erythropoietin. Moderate skin and gut GVHD developed which was treated with both topical and low-dose oral steroids. Over the next few weeks she became transfusion independent and a follow-up bone marrow aspirate showed complete remission. She continued in complete remission for 4 months, at which time localized leukemic relapse was found in a soft tissue breast mass in spite of continued bone marrow remission. While the patient ultimately died of progressive disease, this case demonstrates that mismatched UCB in conjunction with G-CSF is capable of generating a GVL effect that can induce a complete remission. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 1251–1254.