E. Kotlyar

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Inhibition Ameliorates the Transition to Myocardial Failure and Decreases Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Mice With Chronic Pressure Overload

Background—Although aldosterone, acting via mineralocorticoid receptors, causes left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in experimental models of high-aldosterone hypertension, little is known about the role of aldosterone or mineralocorticoid receptors in mediating adverse remodeling in response to chronic pressure overload. Methods and Results—We used the mineralocorticoid receptor–selective antagonist eplerenone (EPL) to test the role of mineralocorticoid receptors in mediating the transition from hypertrophy to failure in mice with chronic pressure overload caused by ascending aortic constriction (AAC). One week after AAC, mice were randomized to regular chow or chow containing EPL (200 mg/kg per day) for an additional 7 weeks. EPL had no significant effect on systolic blood pressure after AAC. Eight weeks after AAC, EPL treatment improved survival (94% versus 65%), attenuated the increases in LV end-diastolic (3.4±0.1 versus 3.7±0.1 mm) and end-systolic (2.0±0.1 versus 2.5±0.2 mm) dimensions, and ameliorated the decrease in fractional shortening (42±2% versus 34±4%). EPL also decreased myocardial fibrosis, myocyte apoptosis, and the ratio of matrix metalloproteinase-2/tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-2. These beneficial effects of EPL were associated with less myocardial oxidative stress, as assessed by 3-nitrotyrosine staining, reduced expression of the adhesion molecule intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and reduced infiltration by macrophages. Conclusions—Mineralocorticoid receptors play an important role in mediating the transition from LV hypertrophy to failure with chronic pressure overload. The effects of mineralocorticoid receptor stimulation are associated with alterations in the interstitial matrix and myocyte apoptosis and may be mediated, at least in part, by oxidative stress and inflammation.

Parenteral administration of recombinant human neuregulin‐1 to patients with stable chronic heart failure produces favourable acute and chronic haemodynamic responses

Neuregulin‐1 (NRG‐1) plays a critical role in the adaptation of the heart to injury, inhibiting apoptosis and inducing cardiomyocyte proliferation. We have shown previously that rhNRG‐1 improves cardiac function and survival in animal models of cardiomyopathy. Here we report the first human study aimed at exploring the acute and chronic haemodynamic responses to recombinant human NRG‐1 (beta2a isoform; rhNRG‐1) in patients with stable chronic heart failure (CHF).

Adult heart transplantation with distant procurement and ex-vivo preservation of donor hearts after circulatory death: a case series

BACKGROUND Orthotopic heart transplantation is the gold-standard long-term treatment for medically refractive end-stage heart failure. However, suitable cardiac donors are scarce. Although donation after circulatory death has been used for kidney, liver, and lung transplantation, it is not used for heart transplantation. We report a case series of heart transplantations from donors after circulatory death. METHODS The recipients were patients at St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia. They received Maastricht category III controlled hearts donated after circulatory death from people younger than 40 years and with a maximum warm ischaemic time of 30 min. We retrieved four hearts through initial myocardial protection with supplemented cardioplegia and transferred to an Organ Care System (Transmedics) for preservation, resuscitation, and transportation to the recipient hospital. FINDINGS Three recipients (two men, one woman; mean age 52 years) with low transpulmonary gradients (<8 mm Hg) and without previous cardiac surgery received the transplants. Donor heart warm ischaemic times were 28 min, 25 min, and 22 min, with ex-vivo Organ Care System perfusion times of 257 min, 260 min, and 245 min. Arteriovenous lactate values at the start of perfusion were 8·3-8·1 mmol/L for patient 1, 6·79-6·48 mmol/L for patient 2, and 7·6-7·4 mmol/L for patient 3. End of perfusion lactate values were 3·6-3·6 mmol/L, 2·8-2·3 mmol/L, and 2·69-2·54 mmol/L, respectively, showing favourable lactate uptake. Two patients needed temporary mechanical support. All three recipients had normal cardiac function within a week of transplantation and are making a good recovery at 176, 91, and 77 days after transplantation. INTERPRETATION Strict limitations on donor eligibility, optimised myocardial protection, and use of a portable ex-vivo organ perfusion platform can enable successful, distantly procured orthotopic transplantation of hearts donated after circulatory death. FUNDING NHMRC, John T Reid Charitable Trust, EVOS Trust Fund, Harry Windsor Trust Fund.

Differences Between Beta-Blockers in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease A Randomized Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the respiratory, hemodynamic, and clinical effects of switching between beta1-selective and nonselective beta-blockers in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND Carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol are established beta-blockers for treating CHF. Whether differences in beta-receptor specificities affect lung or vascular function in CHF patients, particularly those with coexistent COPD, remains incompletely characterized. METHODS A randomized, open label, triple-crossover trial involving 51 subjects receiving optimal therapy for CHF was conducted in 2 Australian teaching hospitals. Subjects received each beta-blocker, dose-matched, for 6 weeks before resuming their original beta-blocker. Echocardiography, N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide, central augmented pressure from pulse waveform analysis, respiratory function testing, 6-min walk distance, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were assessed at each visit. RESULTS Of 51 subjects with a mean age of 66 +/- 12 years, NYHA functional class I (n = 6), II (n = 29), or III (n = 16), and left ventricular ejection fraction mean of 37 +/- 10%, 35 had coexistent COPD. N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide was significantly lower with carvedilol than with metoprolol or bisoprolol (mean: carvedilol 1,001 [95% confidence interval (CI): 633 to 1,367] ng/l; metoprolol 1,371 [95% CI: 778 to 1,964] ng/l; bisoprolol 1,349 [95% CI: 782 to 1,916] ng/l; p < 0.01), and returned to baseline level on resumption of the initial beta-blocker. Central augmented pressure, a measure of pulsatile afterload, was lowest with carvedilol (carvedilol 9.9 [95% CI: 7.7 to 12.2] mm Hg; metoprolol 11.5 [95% CI: 9.3 to 13.8] mm Hg; bisoprolol 12.2 [95% CI: 9.6 to 14.7] mm Hg; p < 0.05). In subjects with COPD, forced expiratory volume in 1 s was lowest with carvedilol and highest with bisoprolol (carvedilol 1.85 [95% CI: 1.67 to 2.03] l/s; metoprolol 1.94 [95% CI: 1.73 to 2.14] l/s; bisoprolol 2.0 [95% CI: 1.79 to 2.22] l/s; p < 0.001). The NYHA functional class, 6-min walk distance, and left ventricular ejection fraction did not change. The beta-blocker switches were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Switching between beta1-selective beta-blockers and the nonselective beta-blocker carvedilol is well tolerated but results in demonstrable changes in airway function, most marked in patients with COPD. Switching from beta1-selective beta-blockers to carvedilol causes short-term reduction of central augmented pressure and N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide. (Comparison of Nonselective and Beta1-Selective Beta-Blockers on Respiratory and Arterial Function and Cardiac Chamber Dynamics in Patients With Chronic Stable Congestive Cardiac Failure; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12605000504617).

Tolerability of carvedilol in patients with heart failure and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.

BACKGROUND A substantial proportion of the population with congestive heart failure (CHF) has concomitant airway disease. Little information exists on the tolerability of carvedilol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we assessed the tolerability and efficacy of carvedilol in patients with CHF and concomitant COPD or asthma. METHODS Between 1996 and 2000, a total of 487 patients began receiving open-label carvedilol. Forty-three (9%) had COPD (n = 31) or asthma (n = 12). Spirometry supported clinical diagnosis in all, and full pulmonary function testing supported diagnosis in 71%. Sixty percent began carvedilol therapy in the hospital and underwent measurement of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) before and after dosing. RESULTS In patients with COPD, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) was 62% +/- 13% predicted, reversibility was 4% +/- 4% with bronchodilators, and FEV(1)/FVC was 62% +/- 8%. Mean PEFR was 325 +/- 115 liter/min before the dose and increased by 17% 2 hours after the carvedilol dose (p = 0.04). In patients with asthma, mean FEV(1) was 80% +/- 17% predicted, reversibility was 13% +/- 7%, and FEV(1)/FVC was 74% +/- 11%. Mean PEFR was 407 +/- 161 liter/min before the dose with no significant change 2 hours after the dose. Carvedilol was introduced safely in 84% of patients with COPD, with only 1 patient withdrawn from therapy for wheezing. In contrast, only 50% of patients with asthma tolerated carvedilol. Survival at 2.5 years was 72%. In survivors, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased from 76 +/- 11 mm to 72 +/- 14 mm (p = 0.01), left ventricular end-systolic diameter decreased from 65 +/- 13 mm to 60 +/- 15 mm (p = 0.01), and fractional shortening increased from 14% +/- 7% to 17% +/- 7% (p = 0.05) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CHF and COPD tolerated carvedilol well with no significant reversible airflow limitation, but patients with CHF and asthma tolerated carvedilol poorly. The effect of carvedilol on left ventricular dimensions and function in patients with concomitant airway diseases was similar to that seen in our general group of patients. Asthma remains a contraindication to beta-blockade.

Right heart failure and "failure to thrive" after left ventricular assist device: Clinical predictors and outcomes

BACKGROUND This study determined predictors of early post-operative right heart failure (RHF) and its consequences, as well as predictors of those who clinically thrive longer term after insertion of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS Pre-operative and latest follow-up data were analyzed for 40 consecutive patients who received third-generation centrifugal-flow LVADs. RHF was defined using previously described criteria, including post-operative inotropes, pulmonary vasodilator use, or right-sided mechanical support. Patients were also categorized according to clinical outcomes after LVAD insertion. RESULTS LVADs were implanted as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) in 33 patients and as destination therapy in 7. Before LVAD implant, 22 patients were Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) level 1, and 17 were at level 2. Temporary mechanical assistance was present in 50% of the cohort at LVAD implantation. The 6-month survival/progression to transplant was 92.5%. Average LVAD support time was 385 days (range, 21-1,011 days). RHF developed postoperatively in 13 of 40 patients (32.5%). RHF patients had more severe pre-operative tricuspid incompetence than non-RHF patients. The BTT patients with evidence of RHF had poorer survival to transplant (6 of 11 [54.5%]) than those without RHF (20 of 22 [90.9%]), p = 0.027). There were no other hemodynamic or echocardiographic predictors of short-term RHF. After LVAD, 22 of the 40 patients (55%) thrived clinically. For BTT patients, 20 of 21 (95%) of those who thrived progressed to transplant or were alive at latest follow-up vs 6 of 12 (50%) of those who failed to thrive (FTT; p < 0.005). The thrivers had lower New York Heart Association class (1.5 vs 2.9, p < 0.001), spent less time in the hospital, and had less ventricular tachycardia than the FTT patients. However, no differences were noted in pre-operative INTERMACS level, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and biochemical indices, or in early post-operative RHF. Age was the only significant predictor: the thrivers were significantly younger (43.7 ± 15.9 vs 60.3 ± 12.6 years; p < 0.001). This age difference was unchanged after exclusion of destination strategy patients. RV function deteriorated in the FTT patients and remained stable in those who thrived. CONCLUSIONS Early post-operative RHF results in poorer survival/progression to transplantation for BTT patients and is predicted by greater pre-operative tricuspid incompetence. The most important predictor for those who will clinically thrive longer-term after LVAD insertion is younger age.

Primary Graft Failure after Heart Transplantation

Primary graft failure (PGF) is a devastating complication that occurs in the immediate postoperative period following heart transplantation. It manifests as severe ventricular dysfunction of the donor graft and carries significant mortality and morbidity. In the last decade, advances in pharmacological treatment and mechanical circulatory support have improved the outlook for heart transplant recipients who develop this complication. Despite these advances in treatment, PGF is still the leading cause of death in the first 30 days after transplantation. In todays climate of significant organ shortages and growing waiting lists, transplant units worldwide have increasingly utilised “marginal donors” to try and bridge the gap between “supply and demand.” One of the costs of this strategy has been an increased incidence of PGF. As the threat of PGF increases, the challenges of predicting and preventing its occurrence, as well as the identification of more effective treatment modalities, are vital areas of active research and development.

Left Ventricular Mechanical Assist Devices and Cardiac Device Interactions: An Observational Case Series

Background: Nonpulsatile left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for treatment of refractory heart failure. A majority of such patients have implanted cardiac devices, namely implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy‐pacemaker (CRT‐P) or cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillator (CRT‐D) devices. However, potential interactions between LVADs and cardiac devices in this category of patients remain unknown.

Thrombolysis for Suspected Intrapump Thrombosis in Patients With Continuous Flow Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device

The current recommended anticoagulation regimen during continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular device support is a combination of antiplatelet therapy as well as oral anticoagulation. Despite this, pump thrombosis occurs in rare situations. We report the risk factors and nonsurgical management and outcomes of five patients implanted with continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular assist devices who displayed clinical, hemodynamic, and laboratory features of intrapump thrombosis. This information may support the use of intravenous thrombolytics for suspected pump thrombus in these newer generation devices.

Survival after the initiation of combination therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: an Australian collaborative report.

Background:  Several cellular pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and attempts to arrest disease progression with a single drug would not be expected to succeed in the medium term. In clinical practice, combination therapy is often used in patients deteriorating on monotherapy, despite the absence of firm evidence from randomized controlled controls.