E. Mercier
Laval University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. Mercier.
BMJ | 2013
E. Mercier; Amélie Boutin; François Lauzier; Dean Fergusson; Simard Jf; Lynne Moore; Lauralyn McIntyre; Patrick Archambault; Francois Lamontagne; Légaré F; Randell E; Nadeau L; François Rousseau; Alexis F. Turgeon
Objectives To determine the ability and accuracy of the S-100β protein in predicting prognosis after a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BIOSIS (from their inception to April 2012), conference abstracts, bibliographies of eligible articles, and relevant narrative reviews. Study selection Two reviewers independently reviewed citations and selected eligible studies, defined as cohort studies or randomised control trials including patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury and evaluating the prognostic value of S-100β protein. Outcomes evaluated were mortality, score on the Glasgow outcome scale, or brain death. Data extraction Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardised form and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Pooled results were presented with geometric means ratios and analysed with random effect models. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed to explain heterogeneity. Results The search strategy yielded 9228 citations. Two randomised controlled trials and 39 cohort studies were considered eligible (1862 patients). Most studies (n=23) considered Glasgow outcome score ≤3 as an unfavourable outcome. All studies reported at least one measurement of S-100β within 24 hours after traumatic brain injury. There was a significant positive association between S-100β protein concentrations and mortality (12 studies: geometric mean ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval 2.02 to 3.21, I2=56%) and score ≤3 (18 studies: 2.62, 2.01 to 3.42, I2=79%). Sensitivity analysis based on sampling time, sampling type, blinding of outcome assessors, and timing of outcome assessment yielded similar results. Thresholds for serum S-100β protein values with 100% specificity ranged from 1.38 to 10.50 µg/L for mortality (six studies) and from 2.16 to 14.00 µg/L for unfavourable neurological prognosis as defined by the Glasgow outcome score. Conclusions After moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, serum S-100β protein concentrations are significantly associated with unfavourable prognosis in the short, mid, or long term. Optimal thresholds for discrimination remain unclear. Measuring the S-100β protein could be useful in evaluating the severity of traumatic brain injury and in the determination of long term prognosis in patients with moderate and severe injury.
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2017
Audrey-Anne Brousseau; Marcel Émond; Marie-Josée Sirois; Raoul Daoust; Lauren Griffith; Eddy Lang; Jacques Lee; Jeffrey J. Perry; Marie-Christine Ouellet; René Verreault; Simon Berthelot; E. Mercier; Nadine Allain-Boulé; V. Boucher; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Natalie Le Sage
OBJECTIVESnThe consequences of minor trauma involving a head injury (MT-HI) in independent older adults are largely unknown. This study assessed the impact of a head injury on the functional outcomes six months post-injury in older adults who sustained a minor trauma.nnnMETHODSnThis multicenter prospective cohort study in eight sites included patients who were aged 65 years or older, previously independent, presenting to the emergency department (ED) for a minor trauma, and discharged within 48 hours. To assess the functional decline, we used a validated test: the Older Americans Resources and Services Scale. The cognitive function of study patients was also evaluated. Finally, we explored the influence of a concomitant injury on the functional decline in the MT-HI group.nnnRESULTSnAll 926 eligible patients were included in the analyses: 344 MT-HI patients and 582 minor trauma without head injury. After six months, the functional decline was similar in both groups: 10.8% and 11.9%, respectively (RR=0.79 [95% CI: 0.55-1.14]). The proportion of patients with mild cognitive disabilities was also similar: 21.7% and 22.8%, respectively (RR=0.91 [95% CI: 0.71-1.18]). Furthermore, for the group of patients with a MT-HI, the functional outcome was not statistically different with or without the presence of a co-injury (RR=1.35 [95% CI: 0.71-2.59]).nnnCONCLUSIONnThis study did not demonstrate that the occurrence of a MT-HI is associated with a worse functional or cognitive prognosis than other minor injuries without a head injury in an elderly population, six months after injury.
Perspectives on medical education | 2017
E. Mercier; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Marcel Émond; Natalie Le Sage
Shortly after publishing our first article, we (EM, PAT) started receiving daily electronic invitations to submit additional manuscripts to unfamiliar journals and present at questionable conferences. Unfortunately, our experience is not unique. Considering the intense pressure to publish during medical training, limited knowledge of predatory publishing entities, and lack of local institutional policies to guide trainees’ responses to these flattering invitations, this trend is especially concerning. Publishing in medical journals and presenting at health conferences are valued accomplishments across the continuum of medical education. For example, the number of publications is often used as a metric of productivity and postgraduate trainees are expected to possess lengthy bibliographies to compete for positions, promotions, and grants. Specific to novice researchers, their number of research accomplishments is associated with successful applications in competitive residency programs [1]. However, despite the numerous barriers to publishing in well-established journals
CJEM | 2017
E. Mercier; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Peter Cameron; B. Batomen Kuimi; Marcel Émond; Lynne Moore; Biswadev Mitra; Jérôme Frenette; É. De Guise; Marie-Christine Ouellet; M. Bordeleau; N. Le Sage
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic value of S-100β protein to identify patients with post-concussion symptoms after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). A search strategy was submitted to seven databases from their inception to October 2016. Individual patient data were requested. Cohort studies evaluating the association between S-100β protein level and post-concussion symptoms assessed at least seven days after the mTBI were considered. Outcomes were dichotomized as persistent (≥3 months) or early (≥7 days <3 months). Our search strategy yielded 23,298 citations of which 29 studies including between seven and 223 patients (nu2009=u20092505) were included. Post-concussion syndrome (PCS) (16 studies) and neuropsychological symptoms (9 studies) were the most frequently assessed outcomes. The odds of having persistent PCS (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-1.12, pu2009=u20090.11, I2 0% [nu2009=u2009five studies]) in patients with an elevated S-100β protein serum level were not significantly different from those of patients with normal values while the odds of having early PCS (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 0.98-2.85, pu2009=u20090.06, I2 38% [nu2009=u2009five studies]) were close to statistical significance. Similarly, having an elevated S-100β protein serum level was not associated with the odds of returning to work at six months (OR 2.31, 95% CI: 0.50-10.64, pu2009=u20090.28, I2 22% [nu2009=u2009two studies]). Overall risk of bias was considered moderate. Results suggest that the prognostic biomarker S-100β protein has a low clinical value to identify patients at risk of persistent post-concussion symptoms. Variability in injury to S-100ß protein sample time, mTBI populations, and outcomes assessed could potentially explain the lack of association and needs further evaluation.
CMAJ Open | 2016
E. Mercier; Amélie Boutin; Michèle Shemilt; François Lauzier; Dean Fergusson; Lynne Moore; Lauralyn McIntyre; Patrick Archambault; François Rousseau; Francois Lamontagne; Linda Nadeau; Alexis F. Turgeon
Critical Care | 2012
E Laroche; Alexis F. Turgeon; Amélie Boutin; E. Mercier; François Lauzier; Lynne Moore; John Granton; Patrick Archambault; Francois Lamontagne; François Rousseau; F Légaré; E Randell; J Lapointe; Jacques Lacroix; Dean Fergusson
CJEM | 2018
Marcel Émond; A. Laguë; T. O’Brien; Biswadev Mitra; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; N. Le Sage; M. D Astous; E. Mercier
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2017
Simon Berthelot; E. Lang; Marcel Émond; M. Mallet; H. Stelfox; R. Lavergne; F. Légaré; L. Bissonnette; S. Blais; Forest Jc; E. Mercier; Chantal Guimont; Lynne Moore
CJEM | 2017
E. Mercier; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; N. Le Sage; Peter Cameron
CJEM | 2017
N. Le Sage; V. Harton; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; X. Neveu; Patrick Archambault; Marcel Émond; Jean-Marc Chauny; E. Mercier; É. De Guise; V. Bergeron-Larose