E. Müller

Pharyngeal lavage lymphocytosis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a preliminary observation.

Background Upper airway inflammation has been previously demonstrated in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, investigation has been hampered by the necessity of invasive tissue biopsies. Objective To evaluate the pharyngeal lavage (PHAL) as a new tool to analyze mucosal inflammation in the pharynx of patients with sleep-related disordered breathing. Patients and Methods 36 patients with a diagnosis of OSA, 14 patients with heavy snorer syndrome (HS) or body position dependent OSA (bd-OSA), and 14 healthy volunteers underwent PHAL. Inflammatory cell counts were compared. Results Neutrophils were the predominant cells in PHAL in all groups (94.3%±0.7%, 98.5%±0.6%, 94.3%±0.7%, and 96.2%±1.4%). OSA patients had significantly increased numbers of lymphocytes (3.2%±0.4%) compared to bd-OSA/HS and controls group (0.5%±0.1% and 0.6%±0.2%, respectively; P<0.05). Patients with moderate to severe OSA had significantly higher numbers of lymphocytes compared to patients with mild OSA (P<0.05). Conclusions Data from this study suggest that PHAL is a feasible tool to investigate upper airway inflammation in OSA. In addition, PHAL demonstrates lymphocytic inflammation of the pharynx in OSA patients. Future studies are warranted to evaluate whether PHAL can be used to monitor disease and whether lymphocytic inflammation is affected by OSA treatment.

Erlotinib and bevacizumab versus cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab in unselected nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer

Erlotinib with bevacizumab showed promising activity in recurrent nonsquamous (NS) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The INNOVATIONS study was designed to assess in first-line treatment of unselected cisplatin-eligible patients this combination compared to cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab. Stage IIIB/IV patients with NS-NSCLC were randomised on erlotinib (150 mg daily) and bevacizumab (15 mg·kg−1 on day 1, every 3 weeks) (EB) until progression, or cisplatin (80 mg·m−2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) and gemcitabine (1250 mg·m−2 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) up to six cycles and bevacizumab (15 mg·kg−1 on day 1, every 3 weeks) (PGB) until progression. 224 patients were randomised (EB n=111, PGB n=113). The response rate (12% versus 36%; p<0.0001), progression-free survival (median 3.5 versus 6.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.85, 95% CI 1.39–2.45; p<0.0001) and overall survival (median 12.6 versus 17.8 months; HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.97; p=0.04) clearly favoured PGB. In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (n=32), response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not superior with EB. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care in first-line treatment of unselected NS-NSCLC. Molecular targeted approaches strongly mandate appropriate testing and patient selection. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care in first-line treatment of unselected NS-NSCLC http://ow.ly/ITkNj

Nutzen und Sicherheit der Behandlung von Pleuraergüssen mit dem PleurX-Katheter: eine retrospektive Analyse

BACKGROUND The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an indwelling pleural device (PleurX, Denver Biomedical, USA) for the treatment of recurrent pleural effusions. In cases when life expectancy tends to be very short and also surgical decortication is not recommended, pleurodesis is another treatment option but requires complete drainage of the whole pleural fluid for optimal results which is sometimes hard to achieve. The PleurX catheter is an alternative therapeutic option. METHODS AND RESULTS We retrospectively analysed the clinical data from a total of 21 patients who were treated with a PleurX alone (11 patients) or who initially received pleurodesis and afterwards a PleurX catheter (10 patients). Mean survival was 25 weeks after initial diagnosis of the underlying disease. The mean amount of pleural effusion drained per week was 725 mL. 16 patients used the catheter until they died at least 1 - 2 times a week. The complication rate was 19 % and thus within a reasonable range when compared to other treatment options for recurrent pleural effusions. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcome in both groups (pleurodesis and subsequent PleurX vs. PleurX alone). The amount of evacuated pleural effusion was inversely correlated with the remaining life time. CONCLUSION The use of an indwelling pleural device is a safe alternative treatment option for patients with chronic pleural effusions and trapped lung signs. We should be aware of this device and propagate its use at an earlier stage of malignant diseases with recurrent pleural effusions, especially when the remaining life time is short.