E. Oomen-de Hoop
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. Oomen-de Hoop.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
H. Tekatli; M. Duijm; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Wilko F.A.R. Verbakel; W. Schillemans; B.J. Slotman; Joost J. Nuyttens; S. Senan
PURPOSEnToxa0evaluate clinical pulmonary and radiographic bronchial toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy and hypofractionated radiation therapy for central lung tumors, and perform normal tissue complication probability modeling and multivariable analyses to identify predictors for toxicity.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA pooled analysis was performed of patients with a central lung tumor treated using ≤12 fractions at 2 centers between 2006 and 2015. Airways were manually contoured on planning computed tomography scans, and doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2xa0Gy per fraction with an α/β ratio of 3. Grade ≥3 (≥G3) clinical pulmonary toxicity was evaluated by 2 or more physicians. Radiographic toxicity was defined as a stenosis or an occlusion with or without atelectasis using follow-up computed tomography scans. Logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analyses.nnnRESULTSnA total of 585 bronchial structures were studied in 195 patients who were mainly treated using 5 or 8 fractions (60%). Median patient survival was 27.9xa0months (95% confidence interval 22.3-33.6xa0months). Clinicalxa0≥G3 toxicity was observed in 24 patients (12%) and radiographic bronchial toxicity in 55 patients (28%), both mainly manifesting ≤12xa0months after treatment. All analyzed dosimetric parameters correlated with clinical and lobar bronchial radiographic toxicity, with V130Gy,EQD having the highest odds ratio. Normal tissue complication probability modeling showed a volume dependency for the development of both clinical and radiographic toxicity. On multivariate analyses, significant predictors forxa0≥G3 toxicity were a planning target volume overlapping the trachea or main stem bronchus (P = .005), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .034), and the total V130Gy,EQD (P = .012). Radiographic bronchial toxicity did not significantly correlate with clinical toxicity (P = .663).nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe identified patient and dosimetric factors associated with clinical and radiographic toxicity after high-dose radiation therapy for central lung tumors. Additional data from prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
M. Duijm; H. Tekatli; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Wilko F.A.R. Verbakel; W. Schillemans; B.J. Slotman; S. Senan; Joost J. Nuyttens
PURPOSEnTo correlate esophagus toxicity and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters in order to assess risks, and derive a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnPatients with a central lung tumor from 2 centers, who underwent stereotactic or hypofractionated radiotherapy (≤12 fractions), were analyzed. Doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2u202fGy with an α/β ratio of 10 (EQD210). The esophagus was manually delineated and DVH-parameters (Dmax,EQD2, D1cc,EQD2, D2cc,EQD2, D5cc,EQD2) were analyzed and used for NTCP modeling based on logistic regression analysis.nnnRESULTSnTwo-hundred-and-thirty-one patients with 252 tumors were eligible. No acute or late grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity was reported. Acute grade 1-2 esophagus toxicity was recorded in 38 patients (17%). All DVH-parameters were significantly higher in patients with toxicity. NTCP models showed a 50% probability of acute grade 1-2 toxicity at a Dmax of 67u202fGy EQD210 and D1cc of 42u202fGy EQD210. No difference in overall survival was observed between patients with and without toxicity (pu202f=u202f0.428).nnnCONCLUSIONnAs no grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity was observed in our cohort, a Dmax of 56u202fGy EQD210 and a D5cc of 35.5u202fGy EQD210 could be delivered without high risks of severe toxicity. The NTCP models of this study might be used as practical guidelines for the treatment of central lung tumors with stereotactic radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
Natalie Desiree Klass; I. de Pree; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Mauro Loi; L. Otto-Vollaard; A. Swaak-Kragten; C. Van Zwienen; Joost J. Nuyttens
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
H. Tekatli; M. Duijm; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Wilko F.A.R. Verbakel; W. Schillemans; B.J. Slotman; Joost J. Nuyttens; S. Senan
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
M. Duijm; H. Tekatli; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Wilko F.A.R. Verbakel; W. Schillemans; B.J. Slotman; S. Senan; Joost J. Nuyttens
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
F. Pos; R.C. Wortel; W.D. Heemsbergen; E. Oomen-de Hoop; L. Incrocci
Annals of Oncology | 2018
Bodine P.S. Belderbos; K G A M Hussaarts; L van Harten; E. Oomen-de Hoop; P. de Bruijn; P. Hamberg; R. J. Van Alphen; B C M Haberkorn; R J van Soest; R. de Wit; Ron H.J. Mathijssen
Annals of Oncology | 2018
F M de Man; K G A M Hussaarts; E. Oomen-de Hoop; H. K. van Halteren; N C H P van der Burg-De Graauw; Ferry A.L.M. Eskens; T. van Gelder; R.W. van Leeuwen; Ron H.J. Mathijssen
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017
A. Sharma; M. Duijm; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Joachim Aerts; Cornelis Verhoef; Mischa S. Hoogeman; Joost J. Nuyttens
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017
A. Sharma; M. Duijm; E. Oomen-de Hoop; Joachim Aerts; Cornelis Verhoef; Mischa S. Hoogeman; Joost J. Nuyttens