E. Pfanner

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

PURPOSE The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). METHODS Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). RESULTS A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). CONCLUSION The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Enables Surgical Resection of Metastases in Patients With Initially Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundThe prognosis of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer might be improved if a radical surgical resection of metastases could be performed after a response to chemotherapy.MethodsWe treated 74 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (not selected for a neoadjuvant approach) with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI and simplified FOLFOXIRI). Because of the high activity of these regimens (response rate, 72%), a secondary curative operation could be performed in 19 patients (26%).ResultsFour patients underwent an extended hepatectomy, nine patients underwent a right hepatectomy, three patients underwent a left hepatectomy, and three patients had a segmental resection. In five patients, surgical removal of extrahepatic disease was also performed. In seven patients, surgical resection was combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. The median overall survival of the 19 patients who underwent operation is 36.8 months, and the 4-year survival rate is 37%. The median overall survival of the 34 patients who were responsive to chemotherapy, but who did not undergo operation, is 22.2 months (P = .0114).ConclusionsThe FOLFOXIRI regimens we studied have significant antitumor activity and allow a radical surgical resection of metastases in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer not selected for a neoadjuvant approach and also those with extrahepatic disease. The median survival of patients with resected disease is promising.

Biweekly Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Infusional Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin: A Pilot Study in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE To determine the feasibility, recommended doses, plasma pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of a biweekly chemotherapy regimen with oxaliplatin (L-OHP), irinotecan (CPT-11), infusional fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received CPT-11 followed by L-OHP and LV 200 mg/m(2) and followed by 5-FU 3,800 mg/m(2) as a 48-hour infusion, repeated every 2 weeks. In the first part of the study, an escalation of CPT-11 dose and/or a decrease of the L-OHP dose were planned. Once the recommended doses of CPT-11 and L-OHP were determined, all subsequent patients were treated at the recommended doses. RESULTS Forty-two patients entered the study. CPT-11 175 mg/m(2) and L-OHP 100 mg/m(2) in combination with LV 200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 3,800 mg/m(2) could be administered with acceptable toxicities; 39 patients were treated at these dose levels. The pharmacokinetics parameters of the agents used and their metabolites did not seem to be influenced by the concomitant use of the other drugs. The most relevant toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia, with 14% of patients experiencing one episode of febrile neutropenia. In five patients (11.9%) a complete and in 25 (59.5%) a partial response was demonstrated, for an objective response rate of 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 47% to 83%). In 11 patients (26%), a surgical resection of residual disease could be performed. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 10.4 and 26.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION This biweekly regimen is feasible and has acceptable and manageable toxicities and no apparent relevant pharmacokinetics interactions. This combination is associated with a promising antitumor activity, time to progression, and survival. A phase III randomized trial in Italy planned by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest has just started.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND BRAF V600E mutation plays a negative prognostic role in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), leading to a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 4-6months with first-line conventional treatments. Our group recently reported in a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase II trial that FOLFOXIRI (5-FU/LV+Oxaliplatin+Irinotecan) plus bevacizumab might allow to achieve remarkable results in terms of PFS and Overall Survival (OS) also in this poor-prognosis subgroup. The aim of this work was to prospectively validate our retrospective finding. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II trial was designed to detect an increase in 6month-Progression Free Rate (6m-PFR) from 45% to 80% in a population of BRAF mutant mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Secondary end-points were PFS, OS, response rate (RR) and the analysis of outcome parameters in the pooled population consisting of both retrospectively and prospectively included patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437618. RESULTS Two-hundred-fourteen potentially eligible mCRC patients were screened for BRAF mutational status. Fifteen BRAF mutant patients (7%) were included in the validation cohort. At a median follow up of 25.7months, 6m-PFR was 73%. Median PFS and OS were 9.2 and 24.1months, respectively. In the pooled population, at a median follow up of 40.4months, 6m-PFR was 84%. Median PFS and OS were 11.8 and 24.1months, respectively. Overall RR and disease control rate were 72% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION Lacking randomised trials in this specific molecular subgroup, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab might be a reasonable option for the first-line treatment of BRAF mutant mCRC patients.

Sequence Effect of Irinotecan and Fluorouracil Treatment on Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity in Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

PURPOSE To investigate the sequence effect of irinotecan and a 48-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin (LV) on the plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, the toxicity profile of this combination, and irinotecans maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-three metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomized to receive a 60-minute infusion of irinotecan before or after a 48-hour infusion of 5-FU modulated by LV. The reverse sequence was used after 21 days for the second cycle. 5-FU 3,500 mg/m2 was preceded by l-LV 250 mg/m2. Irinotecan 150 mg/m2 (starting dose) was administered to the first three patients. The dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2 in subsequent groups of three to six patients to determine the MTD for both sequences. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites was performed after each cycle. RESULTS Toxicities were affected by the sequence of administration of irinotecan and 5-FU, with an improved tolerability for irinotecan followed by 5-FU. The irinotecan MTD was reached at 300 mg/m2 when irinotecan followed 5-FU and at 450 mg/m2 when it preceded 5-FU. In seven of 23 patients who received both sequences at identical irinotecan doses, the dose-limiting toxicity was observed only when irinotecan followed 5-FU. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the administration sequence significantly affected the SN-38 area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), which was 40.1% lower (P <.05) when irinotecan preceded 5-FU. CONCLUSION The sequence of treatment with irinotecan and infusional 5-FU affects the tolerability of this combination. This can be explained in part by a reduced SN-38 AUC when irinotecan preceded infusional 5-FU. Well-defined 5-FU/irinotecan regimens are needed because the administration sequence or the interval between the agents might affect treatment tolerance and perhaps also activity.

Infusions of fluorouracil and leucovorin: effects of the timing and semi-intermittency of drug delivery.

Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the circadian modulation of 5-FU delivery may reduce toxicities and improve antitumor activity. However, the relative importance of the timing of 5-FU delivery has not been clinically addressed. The aims of this study were to determine the toxicities, the maximum tolerable doses and the activity of a regimen with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) administered as a 14-day continuous infusion according to a flat or three different chronomodulated rhythms in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal carcinomas. A total of 113 patients entered the study and their characteristics were comparable among the four groups. Toxicities included mainly stomatitis and diarrhea, and a reduced toxicity was observed in all the three chronogroups that allowed the delivery of higher dose intensities. Response rates were not significantly different among the four groups. These results suggest that a reduction in 5-FU+LV toxicity and an increase in 5-FU dose intensity can be obtained by a nonsinusoidally circadian modulated infusion. However, the reduction in toxicity observed seems to be dependent mainly on the quasi-intermittency and not on the timing of 5-FU+LV delivery.

Intravenous azidothymidine with fluorouracil and leucovorin: a phase I-II study in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE To determine the plasma pharmacokinetics and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous (IV) azidothymidine (AZT) administered 90 to 120 minutes after fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin and to preliminarily evaluate the antitumor activity of this combination in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV bolus was administered once a week in the middle of a 2-hour infusion of leucovorin; AZT was given as a 90 to 120-minute IV infusion 60 minutes after 5-FU. Initial AZT dose was 0.5 g/m2, and it was escalated in successive cohorts of three patients by 0.5 to 2 g/m2. RESULTS Thirty-five chemotherapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer patients were entered onto the study, and AZT doses ranged from 0.5 to 10 g/m2. The peak AZT plasma concentration increased from 21.9 to 995.6 micromol/L. The area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) also showed a progressive, but not linear increase from 40.34 to 3,108 h x micromol/L. The most relevant toxicity was diarrhea, which was severe in six patients (17%). Toxicities were not AZT-dose-related, except fpr hypotension, which occurred in patients treated at AZT doses > or = 7 g/m2 and became dose-limiting for AZT 10 g/m2. Among 34 assessable patients, 15 objective responses were observed (44%; 95% confidence interval 27 to 62), lasting a median of 44 weeks; five (15%) were complete. CONCLUSION AZT doses > or = 6 g/m2 administered IV over 90 to 120 minutes produce maximum plasma concentration and AUC similar to those previously reached in murine tumor models. Dose-limiting toxicity is hypotension, which occurs at AZT 10 g/m2. The recommended AZT dose for further studies is 8 g/m2. The combination of 5-FU plus leucovorin plus AZT is feasible with acceptable toxicities, and has promising activity in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Protracted continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil bolus-based chemotherapy : a phase II study

Abstract Continuous-infusion (c.i.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can overcome resistance to bolus 5-FU, and leucovorin (LV) enhances the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU, mainly when the duration of exposure to the latter is prolonged. The main objective of this study was therefore to determine the activity of a prolonged infusion schedule of 5-FU + LV in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to a 5-FU bolus-based chemotherapy. Only patients with metastatic measurable disease in progression during or within 2 months of the end of a 5-FU bolus ± LV-based chemotherapy were eligible for the study. 5-FU and l-LV were given as a 14-day c.i. every 28 days, the 5-FU dose being 200 mg/m2 per day and the l-LV dose being 5 mg/m2 per day. A total of 59 patients entered the study, of which 48 were resistant to 5-FU + LV and 11, to 5-FU + levamisole. Treatment was well tolerated, and WHO grade 3–4 toxicities were uncommon (11% of patients developed stomatitis and 7%, diarrhea). According to an intent-to-treat analysis, 10 of 59 patients obtained an objective response (1 complete response, 9 partial responses), for an objective response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval 8–25%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4 and 9 months, respectively. The protracted 5-FU + LV c.i. schedule used in the present study is a well-tolerated and moderately active regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer patients resistant to 5-FU bolus ± LV. Only randomized studies can determine whether this palliative treatment has advantages in comparison with other second-line therapies such as 5-FU c.i. without LV, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin.

Maximum tolerable doses of intravenous zidovudine in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients Clinical evidence of significant antitumor activity and enhancement of zidovudine-induced DNA single strand breaks in peripheral nuclear blood cells

BACKGROUND Experimental studies have demonstrated that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) enhances zidovudine (AZT)-induced DNA strand breaks and cytotoxicity. Phase I studies have demonstrated that the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of AZT is 8000 mg/sqm when administered i.v. over two hours after weekly 5-FU + l-leucovorin (LV), and that this combination has promising antitumor activity. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the antitumor activity of weekly bolus 5-FU + LV + AZT, administered at its MTD, and to determine whether 5-FU enhances AZT-induced DNA strand breaks in blood nuclear cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine chemotherapy-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer patients with measurable disease entered the study to evaluate the activity of a weekly 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. bolus + LV 250 mg/m2 i.v. two-hour infusion + AZT 8000 mg/m2 i.v. two-hour infusion. In 10 different patients, who during three different weeks received 5-FU + LV, AZT and 5-FU + LV + AZT, DNA strand breaks in blood nuclear cells were determined by a fluorescent analysis of DNA unwinding. RESULTS Treatment was generally well tolerated and WHO grades III-IV toxicities, consisting mostly of diarrhea (17%), were uncommon. One patient died of severe diarrhea with consequent hypokalemia and cardiac arrhythmia. All patients were considered evaluable for response, and 3 (10%) complete and 10 (35%) partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 45% (95% confidence limit interval 26%-64%). Both 5-FU + LV and AZT decreased the percentage of double stranded DNA in nuclear blood cells. The greatest effect was observed with 5-FU + LV + AZT, which reduced the percentage of double stranded DNA to 50% and 36% after 24 and 48 hours, respectively, and this interaction between 5-FU + LV and AZT was found to be cumulative. CONCLUSIONS These studies demonstrate that the present dose and schedule of AZT in combination with 5-FU + LV has significant activity in metastatic colorectal cancer and that the combination of 5-FU + LV with AZT increases the amount of DNA damage. Therefore, AZT in combination with 5-FU + LV warrants further study in colorectal cancer.

5-Fluorouracil Administered as a 48-Hour Chronomodulated Infusion in Combination with Leucovorin and Cisplatin: A Randomized Phase II Study in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Objective: The primary objective of this trial was to determine the objective response of two regimens with CDDP administered every 2 weeks immediately before or after an ‘optimal’ 48-hour chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated with leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, 5-FU and its metabolites, plasma pharmacokinetics and progression-free and overall survival. Methods: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with measurable disease who were chemotherapy-naive or pretreated only with a 5-FU-bolus-based chemotherapy were eligible for this study. The study was designed as a randomized phase II clinical trial. Results: Eighty-three patients were entered into the study. Forty-two were randomized to CDDP given before 5-FU and 41 to CDDP given after 5-FU. Patient characteristics were similar among the two groups. Toxicities were also similar among the two arms and the most frequent WHO grade III–IV toxicities were stomatitis (14%) and neutropenia (39–50%). Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of 5-FU and 5-FUH2 were not significantly affected by the sequence of CDDP and 5-FU administration. Antitumor activity was similar in the two arms and was very promising both in pretreated patients (response rate 29%; 95% confidence interval 15–46%) and in chemotherapy-naive patients (response rate 56%, complete response 9%, 95% confidence interval 40–71%). Median survival of the patients with and without pretreatment was 12 and 16 months, respectively. Conclusions: These results do not suggest a sequence dependence of the synergism between CDDP and 5-FU. However, they challenge the need of oxaliplatin to improve 5-FU/LV activity in advanced colorectal cancer. In fact, our results with an ‘optimal’ 5-FU dose and scheduling are very similar to those obtained with oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV. However, only a randomized phase III study will be able to give an answer to the hypotheses raised by this study.