E. S. Newlands

Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856).

Temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856) is an analogue of mitozolomide displaying similar broad spectrum activity in mouse tumours, but showing considerably less myelosuppression in the toxicology screen. Temozolomide was initially studied intravenously at doses between 50-200 mg m-2 and subsequently was given orally up to 1,200 mg m-2. A total of 51 patients were entered on the single dose schedule. Temozolomide exhibits linear pharmacokinetics with increasing dose. Myelotoxicity was dose limiting. Experimentally, temozolomide activity was schedule dependent and therefore oral administration was studied as a daily x 5 schedule between total doses of 750 and 1,200 mg m-2 in 42 patients. Myelosuppression was again dose limiting. The recommended dose for Phase II trials is 150 mg m-2 po for 5 days (total dose 750 mg m-2) for the first course, and if no major myelosuppression is detected on day 22 of the 4 week cycle, the subsequent courses can be given at 200 mg m-2 for 5 days (total dose 1 g m-2) on a 4 week cycle. Mild to moderate nausea and vomiting was dose related but readily controlled with antiemetics. Clinical activity was detected using the 5 day schedule in four (2CR, 2PR 17%) out of 23 patients with melanoma and in one patient with mycosis fungoides (CR lasting 7 months). Two patients with recurrent high grade gliomas have also had partial responses. Temozolomide is easy to use clinically and generally well tolerated. In the extended Phase I trial temozolomide only occasionally exhibited the unpredictable myelosuppression seen with mitozolomide.

Comparison of ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy

Ondansetron, a serotonin antagonist, is effective in controlling the emesis associated with cancer chemotherapy; however, emesis in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin is poorly controlled by ondansetron alone. Dexamethasone is an effective antiemetic with no known interaction with serotonin receptors and was thus chosen for study in combination with ondansetron. 31 patients (30 male, 1 female; median age 28.5 years, range 18-49) receiving a 4-day course of a chemotherapy regimen containing cisplatin (100-120 mg/m2) for metastatic germ-cell tumours were entered in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing oral ondansetron plus placebo with oral ondansetron plus dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis. Ondansetron (8 mg every 8 h) was given to all patients for 8 days from the start of chemotherapy. Patients were given 8 mg of dexamethasone or placebo every 8 h starting 2 h before cisplatin (on day 4) and continuing for six doses (ie, for 2 days only). A second course of chemotherapy began 14 days after the start of the first, during which patients crossed over to the alternative antiemetic regimen. Results were available from 27 patients. In the 24-48 h after cisplatin 78% of patients taking ondansetron plus dexamethasone reported complete or major control of emesis compared with 30% of those taking ondansetron plus placebo (p = 0.001). Cross-over analysis showed a significant advantage for ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the control of nausea (p = 0.013) and emesis (p less than 0.001) over the 8-day study. 24 of 26 patients expressed a preference for the combination therapy (p less than 0.001). Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is effective antiemetic prophylaxis for high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy, has few side effects, and is active when given orally.

Multicentre CRC phase II trial of temozolomide in recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma

Purpose: Patients with progressive or recurrent supratentorial high-grade gliomas were entered into a multicentre phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of temozolomide. Methods: The treatment schedule was 150–200 mg/m2 per day orally for 5 days repeated every 28 days. Response evaluation was by a combination of neurological status evaluation (MRC scale) and imaging. Results: Of 103 eligible patients enrolled, 11 (11%) achieved an objective response and a further 48 (47%) had stable disease. The median response duration was 4.6 months. Response rates were similar for anaplastic astrocytomas (grade III) and glioblastoma multiforme (grade IV) tumours. Predictable myelosuppression was the major toxicity. Conclusions: The observation of objective responses and tolerable side effects in this heterogeneous population of patients supports the further investigation of this agent in high-grade gliomas.

The charing cross hospital experience with temozolomide in patients with gliomas

Temozolomide, a new oral cytotoxic agent, was given to 75 patients with malignant gliomas. The schedule used was for the first course 150 mg/m2 per day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 750 mg/m2), escalating, if no significant myelosuppression was noted on day 22, to 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 1000 mg/m2) for subsequent courses at 4-week intervals. There were 27 patients with primary disease treated with two courses of temozolomide prior to their radiotherapy and 8 (30%) fulfilled the criteria for an objective response. There were 48 patients whose disease recurred after their initial surgery and radiotherapy and 12 (25%) fulfilled the criteria for an objective response. This gave an overall objective response rate of 20 (27%) out of 75 patients. Temozolomide was generally well tolerated, with little subjective toxicity and predictable myelosuppression. However, the responses induced with this schedule were of short duration and had relatively little impact on overall survival. In conclusion, temozolomide given in this schedule has activity against high grade glioma. However, studies evaluating chemotherapy in primary brain tumours should include a quality-of-life/performance status evaluation in addition to CT or MRI scanning assessment.

The role of low‐dose methotrexate and folinic acid in gestational trophoblastic tumours (GTT)

Summary. Between 1964 and 1986, 487 patients with gestational trophoblastic tumour (GTT) were treated with methotrexate and folinic acid. The patients comprise two groups: between 1964 and 1974, 126 patients were treated but were not systematically stratified using a prognostic score before the start of treatment. These patients formed part of the 317 women who were analysed to identify a number of prognostic variables (Bagshawe 1976). Retrospective analysis of these 126 patients using these prognostic factors showed that in the true low‐risk group 85/88 (96%) are alive while 20/22 (91%) of the medium‐risk group and only 5/16 (31%) of the high‐risk group are alive. Overall the survival was 110/126 (87%) with a minimum follow‐up of 14 years. From 1974 all patients were stratified on admission into prognostic groups. Of the true low‐risk patients 347/348 survived (99·7%); 13 patients were underscored and treated as low risk when they should have been treated as medium risk, 12 (92%) of these are alive, but nine (69%) needed to change treatment because of drug resistance. While the overall survival in the 1974–1986 group was 359/361 (99%) with a minimum follow‐up of 16 months, the survival in all patients (1964–1986) was 469/487 (96%). Although the survival in these patients is excellent it should be noted that 69/348 (20%) low‐risk patients had to change treatment because of the development of drug resistance, and a further 23 (6%) needed to change treatment because of drug‐induced toxicity. Low‐dose methotrexate and folinic acid given in the schedule described remains the treatment of choice in patients with low‐risk GTT because of its effectiveness and minimal short‐ and long‐term toxicity. Patients presenting with medium‐ and high‐risk GTT need to start with combination chemotherapy from the outset to avoid the development of drug resistance.

3-aminobenzamide and/or O6-benzylguanine evaluated as an adjuvant to temozolomide or BCNU treatment in cell lines of variable mismatch repair status and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity.

O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) and 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB) inhibit the DNA repair proteins O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) respectively. The effect of O6-BG and/or 3-AB on temozolomide and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-nitrosourea (BCNU) cytotoxicity, was assessed in seven human tumour cell lines: six with an AGT activity of > 80 fmol mg-1 protein (Mer+) and one with an AGT activity of < 3 fmol mg-1 protein (Mer-). Three of the Mer+ cell lines (LS174T, DLD1 and HCT116) were considered to exhibit resistance to methylation by a mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-), each being known to exhibit microsatellite instability, and DLD1 and HCT116 having well-characterised defects in DNA mismatch binding. Potentiation was defined as the ratio between an IC50 achieved without and with a particular inhibitor treatment. Temozolomide or BCNU cytotoxicity was not potentiated by either inhibitor in the Mer- cell line. Preincubation with O6-BG (100 microM for 1 h) was found to potentiate the cytotoxicity of temozolomide by 1.35- to 1.57-old in Mer+/MMR+ cells, but had no significant effect in Mer+/MMR- cells. In comparison, O6-BG pretreatment enhanced BCNU cytotoxicity by 1.94- to 2.57-fold in all Mer+ cell lines. Post-incubation with 3-AB (2 mM, 48 h) potentiated temozolomide by 1.35- to 1.59-fold in Mer+/MMR+ cells, and when combined with O6-BG pretreatment produced an effect which was at least additive, enhancing cytotoxicity by 1.97- to 2.16-fold. 3-AB treatment also produced marked potentiation (2.20- to 3.12-fold) of temozolomide cytotoxicity in Mer+/MMR- cells. In contrast, 3-AB produced marginal potentiation of BCNU cytotoxicity in only three cell lines (1.19- to 1.35-fold), and did not enhance the cytotoxicity of BCNU with O6-BG treatment in any cell line. These data suggest that the combination of an AGT and PARP inhibitor may have a therapeutic role in potentiating temozolomide activity, but that the inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation has little effect on the cytotoxicity of BCNU.

Surveillance for stage I testicular germ cell tumours: results and cost benefit analysis of management options.

Between 1979 and 1996 303 men with stage I testicular germ cell tumours (120 seminoma and 183 non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT)) were enrolled onto a programme of surveillance. In our institutions the frequency of computed tomography (CT) scans is reduced compared with other centres. For all 303 men, the median follow-up is 5.1 years (range: 0.1-21.7 years) and there have only been 3 deaths (1 from disease, 1 from neutropenic sepsis and 1 from secondary leukaemia). 52/183 (28%) patients with NSGCT and 18/120 (15%) patients with seminoma have relapsed. The relapse-free survival at 5 years is 82% for seminoma and 69% for NSGCT (Logrank P=0.004). All men who relapsed, except 1 man with NSGCT, were in the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good or intermediate prognosis group at relapse. Half of the seminoma relapses presented with symptoms and 31% of the NSGCT relapses. The remaining relapses were detected serologically or radiologically by the surveillance programme. 5 men (2%) on surveillance, 3 with initial diagnosis of seminoma and 2 with NSGCT, have developed second contralateral testis tumours (all stage I seminomas). In a well motivated centre a policy of surveillance for stage I testicular germ cell tumours (both NSGCT and seminoma) is associated with a low mortality rate (3/303, 1%) and may have the advantage of sparing overtreatment with potentially toxic therapies in this group of young men.

Phase II trials of flavone acetic acid in advanced malignant melanoma and colorectal carcinoma

Flavone acetic acid (FAA), 8.6 gm-2 has been administered by 6h intravenous infusion to 19 patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and 15 patients with advanced malignant melanoma. The drug associated toxicity was generally mild and as predicted from the phase I study. No responses were seen in either disease.

Chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic tumours hastens menopause by 3 years

Chemotherapy may induce acute ovarian failure, but in women who retain gonadal function throughout chemotherapy, the late effects upon ovarian function are unknown. A retrospective controlled survey was performed to ascertain whether chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic tumours (GTT) results in premature menopause. Questionnaires were sent to 1,489 women diagnosed between 1971 and 1990 with GTT, including 1089 who had received chemotherapy and 400 who had not received chemotherapy (controls). Responses were obtained from 972 chemotherapy-treated patients and 327 controls. 124 women were not evaluable for menopause date as they had undergone hysterectomy as part of the treatment for GTT or had developed permanent amenorrhoea during chemotherapy. Overall, 172 women reported that they were postmenopausal, including 157 women who had received chemotherapy. The median age at menopause for the evaluable population was 50 years (range 25-56 years). The age at menopause was significantly earlier in the treated arm (median 50, range 25-56 years) than in the controls (median 53, range 40-57 years) (logrank test chi 2 = 12.6, P = 0.0004). Menopause occurred significantly earlier in women treated with combination chemotherapy (median 49, range 25-56 years) compared with single agent methotrexate (median 51, range 25-56 years) (logrank test chi 2 = 8.3, P = 0.004). However, the age at completion of chemotherapy in the treated arm did not influence the age of menopause (proportional Hazards chi 2 = 1.99, P = 0.16). Chemotherapy for GTT induces menopause 3 years earlier than it occurs in women with GTT who do not receive chemotherapy. Although the difference is statistically significant, the magnitude is modest and most women can be reassured that neither fertility nor postmenopausal osteoporosis will be greatly affected.

Effect of single and multiple administration of an O 6-benzylguanine/temozolomide combination: an evaluation in a human melanoma xenograft model

Abstract The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) on the antitumour activity and toxicity of 8-carbamoyl-3-methylimidazo [5, 1-d ] -1,2,3,5-tetrazine-4(3H)-one (temo-zolomide) in a human malignant melanoma xenograft model following single and multiple administration of the combination. O6-BG irreversibly inactivates the DNA-repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), which confers resistance to temozolomide. Preadministration of O6-BG (35 mg/kg, i.p.) 1 h prior to temozolomide (i.p.) was examined using single and daily × 5 dosing regimens in athymic mice bearing subcutaneous A375P xenografts. The AGT activity of A375P tumors was 95 ± 8 fmol/mg protein (mean ± SE, n = 4). O6-BG alone completely suppressed xenograft AGT activity within 1 h of administration but had no effect upon tumor growth. O6-BG did not significantly increase the tumor growth delay induced by a single 200-mg/kg dose of temozolomide (P>0.05, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test) but did increase the associated mean body weight loss (P<0.025). In contrast, when the same dose of temozolomide was divided into five equal fractions (40 mg/kg) and given with O6-BG on 5 consecutive days, a comparable increase in toxicity was accompanied by a very significant increase in tumor growth delay (P<0.0025), equivalent to that produced by a 3-fold greater dose of temozolomide alone. O6-BG with temozolomide also produced a greater antitumour effect than an equitoxic dose of temozolomide alone on this schedule (P<0.005). These data indicate that the enhancement of temozolomide antitumour activity by O6-BG preadministration is dependent upon the schedule of drug administration, with multiple dosing of O6-BG + temozolomide producing the greatest effect. The results also suggest that prolonged administration of the combination can lead to an increase in the therapeutic index of temozolomide.