Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where E. Shaposhnikova is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by E. Shaposhnikova.


HIGH INTENSITY AND HIGH BRIGHTNESS HADRON BEAMS: 33rd ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Intensity and High Brightness Hadron Beams | 2005

Transverse Mode‐Coupling Instability in the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron

E. Métral; G. Arduini; Elena Benedetto; H. Burkhardt; E. Shaposhnikova; G. Rumolo

A vertical single‐bunch instability has been observed in 2003 right after injection at 26 GeV/c in the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS). High‐intensity proton bunches (∼1.2 1011 p/b) with low longitudinal emittance (∼0.2 eVs) are affected by heavy losses after less than one synchrotron period. Such phenomenon has already been observed with leptons in many machines, e.g. in the SPS, or with protons at transition, e.g. in the CERN Proton Synchrotron (PS). However, to the authors’ knowledge, it is the first time with protons far from transition. The absence of transverse mode‐coupling instability in hadron machines is generally explained by three mechanisms: (i) the intensity threshold for the longitudinal microwave instability is generally lower than for the transverse mode‐coupling instability, (ii) the intensity threshold due to mode‐coupling between the two lowest azimuthal modes increases with space charge, and (iii) the intensity threshold increases with bunch length (in the long‐bunch regime). In t...


IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science | 2016

Beam Instabilities in Hadron Synchrotrons

Elias Métral; Theodoros Argyropoulos; Hannes Bartosik; Nicolo Biancacci; Xavier Buffat; J.Esteban Muller; Werner Herr; Giovanni Iadarola; Alexandre Lasheen; Kevin Li; A. Oeftiger; Danilo Quartullo; G. Rumolo; Benoit Salvant; Michael Schenk; E. Shaposhnikova; Claudia Tambasco; Helga Timko; Carlo Zannini; A. Burov; D. Banfi; Javier Barranco; N. Mounet; Oliver Boine-Frankenheim; U. Niedermayer; V. Kornilov; Shawnte L. White

Beam instabilities cover a wide range of effects in particle accelerators and they have been the subjects of intense research for several decades. As the machines performance was pushed new mechanisms were revealed and nowadays the challenge consists in studying the interplays between all these intricate phenomena, as it is very often not possible to treat the different effects separately. The aim of this paper is to review the main mechanisms, discussing in particular the recent developments of beam instability theories and simulations.


Archive | 2012

Performance potential of the injectors after LS1

Hannes Bartosik; Heiko Damerau; G. Rumolo; Alessandra Lombardi; M. Vretenar; Raginel; K. Hanke; E. Shaposhnikova; C. Carli; B. Goddard; S. Gilardoni; S. Hancock; R Garoby; B Mikulec

The main upgrades of the injector chain in the framework of the LIU Project will only be implemented in the second long shutdown (LS2), in particular the increase of the PSB-PS transfer energy to 2GeV or the implementation of cures/solutions against instabilities/e-cloud effects etc. in the SPS. On the other hand, Linac4 will become available by the end of 2014. Until the end of 2015 it may replace Linac2 at short notice, taking 50MeV protons into the PSB via the existing injection system but with reduced performance. Afterwards, the H− injection equipment will be ready and Linac4 could be connected for 160MeV H− injection into the PSB during a prolonged winter shutdown before LS2. The anticipated beam performance of the LHC injectors after LS1 in these different cases is presented. Space charge on the PS flat-bottom will remain a limitation because the PSB-PS transfer energy will stay at 1.4GeV. As a mitigation measure new RF manipulations are presented which can improve brightness for 25 ns bunch spacing, allowing for more than nominal luminosity in the LHC.


Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2005

Beam Transfer Functions and Beam Stabilisation in a Double RF System

E. Shaposhnikova; T. Bohl; Trevor Paul R Linnecar

The high intensity proton beam for LHC accelerated in the CERN SPS is stabilised against coupled-bunch instabilities by a 4th harmonic RF system in bunch-shortening mode. Bunch-lengthening mode, which could also be useful to reduce peak line density and alleviate problems from e-cloud and kicker heating, does not give desirable results for beam stability. In this paper an analysis of the limitations of these two different modes of operation is presented together with measurements of the Beam Transfer Function for the double RF system. As predicted by theory, for sufficiently long bunches with the same noise excitation, the measured amplitude of the beam response in bunch-lengthening mode is an order of magnitude higher than that for bunch-shortening mode or for a single RF system.


Archive | 2014

LIU: EXPLORING ALTERNATIVE IDEAS

Heiko Damerau; R Tomas; G. Rumolo; Y Papaphilippou; Hannes Bartosik; E. Shaposhnikova; S. Gilardoni; S. Hancock; R Garoby; B Mikulec

The baseline upgrade scenarios for the injector complex cover the connection of Linac4 to the PSB, the increase of the PSB-PS transfer energy from 1.4 GeV to2 GeV and the major SPS RF upgrade during LS2. The achievable beam characteristics will nonetheless remain below the expectation of the HL-LHC project. Therefore, alternative or additional options like, e.g., special bunch distributions, the use of injection optics optimized for high space charge or extra RF systems will be discussed. The expected beam parameters, possible implementation and impact on beam availability for these more exotic options will be analysed and compared to the LIU baseline plan. Moreover, the potential interest of further batch compression schemes will be evaluated.


Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2005

Recent Intensity Increase in the CERN Accelerator Chain

E. Shaposhnikova; G. Arduini; T. Bohl; M. Chanel; S. Hancock; K. Hanke; R. Garoby; T. Linnecar; E. Meetral; R. Steerenberg; B. Vandorpe

Future requests for protons from the physics community at CERN, especially after the start-up of the CNGS experiments in 2006, can only be satisfied by a substantial increase in the SPS beam intensity per pulse. In September 2004 a three-week beam run was dedicated to high intensity; all accelerators in the chain were pushed to their limits to study intensity restrictions and find possible solutions. New record intensities were obtained in the accelerators of the PS & SPS Complex with this type of beam which is different from the nominal LHC beam. The challenges in producing this high-intensity beam are described, together with the measures needed to make it fully operational.


arXiv: Accelerator Physics | 2013

Synchronous Phase Shift at LHC

J Esteban-Muller; G. Rumolo; T. Mastoridis; Giulia Papotti; E. Shaposhnikova; P. Baudrenghien; Giovanni Iadarola; Daniel Valuch

The electron cloud in vacuum pipes of accelerators of positively charged particle beams causes a beam energy loss which could be estimated from the synchronous phase. Measurements done with beams of 75 ns, 50 ns, and 25 ns bunch spacing in the LHC for some fills in 2010 and 2011 show that the average energy loss depends on the total beam intensity in the ring. Later measurements during the scrubbing run with 50 ns beams show the reduction of the electron cloud due to scrubbing. Finally, measurements of the individual bunch phase give us information about the electron cloud build-up inside the batch and from batch to batch.


ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007

Longitudinal coupled-bunch instabilities in the CERN PS

H.Damerau; S. Hancock; C. Rossi; E. Shaposhnikova; Joachim Tuckmantel; J.-L. Vallet; M. Mehler

Longitudinal coupled bunch instabilities in the CERN PS represent a major limitation to the high brightness beam delivered for the LHC. To identify possible impedance sources for these instabilities, machine development studies have been carried out. The growth rates of coupled bunch modes have been measured, and modes have been identified using mountain range data. Growth rate estimations from coupled bunch mode theory are compared to these results. It is shown that the longitudinal impedance of the broad resonance curve of the main 10 MHz RF system can be identified as the most probable source. Several modes are driven simultaneously due to the large width of the resonance, which is considered for the analysis.


bipolar/bicmos circuits and technology meeting | 2003

Nominal longitudinal parameters for the LHC beam in the CERN SPS

P. Baudrenghien; T. Bohl; Trevor Paul R Linnecar; E. Shaposhnikova; Joachim Tuckmantel

A proton beam with the basic structure defined by the LHC requirements was first available for injection into the SPS in 1998. At the end of 2002, following a significant beam-studies and RF hardware upgrade programme, a beam having both the nominal LHC intensity and the correct longitudinal parameters was obtained at top energy for the first time. This beam, characterized by high local density, must satisfy strict requirements on bunch length, longitudinal emittance and bunch to bunch phase modulation for extraction to the LHC, where only very limited particle losses are acceptable. The problems to be solved came mainly from the high beam loading and microwave and coupled bunch instabilities which led both to beam losses and to unacceptably large longitudinal emittance on the flat top. In this paper the steps taken to arrive at these nominal beam parameters are presented.


CERN Yellow Reports | 2015

Expected Impact of Hardware Changes on Impedance and Beam-induced Heating during Run 2

Benoit Salvant; F. Caspers; Christine Vollinger; O E Berrig; M. Zobov; J. Esteban Muller; A. Passarelli; Nicolo Biancacci; E. Shaposhnikova; Stefano Redaelli; G. Rumolo; N. Minafra; J. Varela; Joseph Kuczerowski; O. Frasciello; M.J. Barnes; A. Nosych; Nicolas Mounet; Carlo Zannini; Elias Métral; Hugo Day; Manfred Wendt; Alexej Grudiev; G. Arduini

Following the significant impedance related issues that occurred during the LHC Run 1, all involved equipment groups made an impressive effort to assess and reduce the impedance of their near-beam components. Concerning beam induced RF heating, many problems in Run 1 were linked to unexpected non-conformities. Mitigations were put in place but new non-conformities are likely to appear in Run 2, and this is why efficient monitoring and alarms are currently put in place. Besides, known limitations that led to increase the bunch ength from 1 ns to 1.25 ns were removed, which would open the possibility to try and reduce the target bunch length at top energy. Regardless of the target bunch length, many components will need careful follow up in 2015 (e.g. TDI, BSRT, Roman pots, MKI, BGV). Concerning the LHC impedance, announced hardware changes are expected to be transparent, but the new TCTP and TCSP collimators with BPMs and ferrites should be monitored closely, as well as the modified Roman pots, new TCL4 and especially new TCL6 collimators if they approach the beam with very low gaps at high beam intensity.

Collaboration


Dive into the E. Shaposhnikova's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge