E. Spinei

Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

[1] We review the standard nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data product (Version 1.0.), which is based on measurements made in the spectral region 415–465 nm by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the NASA Earth Observing System-Aura satellite. A number of ground- and aircraft-based measurements have been used to validate the data product’s three principal quantities: stratospheric, tropospheric, and total NO2 column densities under nearly or completely cloud-free conditions. The validation of OMI NO2 is complicated by a number of factors, the greatest of which is that the OMI observations effectively average the NO2 over its field of view (minimum 340 km 2 ), while a ground-based instrument samples at a single point. The tropospheric NO2 field is often very inhomogeneous, varying significantly over tens to hundreds of meters, and ranges from 10 16 cm � 2 over urban and industrial areas. Because of OMI’s areal averaging, when validation measurements are made near NO2 sources the OMI measurements are expected to underestimate the ground-based, and this is indeed seen. Further, we use several different instruments, both new and mature, which might give inconsistent NO2 amounts; the correlations between nearby instruments is 0.8–0.9. Finally, many of the validation data sets are quite small and span a very short length of time; this limits the statistical conclusions that can be drawn from them. Despite these factors, good agreement is generally seen between the OMI and ground-based measurements, with OMI stratospheric NO2 underestimated by about 14% and total and tropospheric columns underestimated by 15–30%. Typical correlations between OMI NO2 and ground-based measurements are generally >0.6.

NO2 column amounts from ground‐based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct‐sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation

[1] Vertical column amounts of nitrogen dioxide, C(NO 2 ), are derived from ground-based direct solar irradiance measurements using two new and independently developed spectrometer systems, Pandora (Goddard Space Flight Center) and MFDOAS (Washington State University). We discuss the advantages of C(NO 2 ) retrievals based on Direct Sun - Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DS-DOAS). The C(NO 2 ) data are presented from field campaigns using Pandora at Aristotle University (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece; a second field campaign involving both new instruments at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, Maryland; a Pandora time series from December 2006 to October 2008 at GSFC; and a MFDOAS time series for spring 2008 at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington. Pandora and MFDOAS were compared at GFSC and found to closely agree, with both instruments having a clear-sky precision of 0.01 DU (1 DU = 2.67 × 10 16 molecules/cm 2 ) and a nominal accuracy of 0.1 DU. The high precision is obtained from careful laboratory characterization of the spectrometers (temperature sensitivity, slit function, pixel to pixel radiometric calibration, and wavelength calibration), and from sufficient measurement averaging to reduce instrument noise. The accuracy achieved depends on laboratory-measured absorption cross sections and on spectrometer laboratory and field calibration techniques used at each measurement site. The 0.01 DU precision is sufficient to track minute-by-minute changes in C(NO 2 ) throughout each day with typical daytime values ranging from 0.2 to 2 DU. The MFDOAS instrument has better noise characteristics for a single measurement, which permits MFDOAS to operate at higher time resolution than Pandora for the same precision. Because Pandora and MFDOAS direct-sun measurements can be made in the presence of light to moderate clouds, but with reduced precision (~0.2 DU for moderate cloud cover), a nearly continuous record can be obtained, which is important when matching OMI overpass times for satellite data validation. Comparisons between Pandora and MFDOAS with OMI are discussed for the moderately polluted GSFC site, between Pandora and OMI at the AUTH site, and between MFDOAS and OMI at the PNNL site. Validation of OMI measured C(NO 2 ) is essential for the scientific use of the satellite data for air quality, for atmospheric photolysis and chemistry, and for retrieval of other quantities (e.g., accurate atmospheric correction for satellite estimates of ocean reflectance and bio-optical properties). Changes in the diurnal variability of C(NO 2 ) with season and day of the week are presented based on the 2-year time series at GSFC measured by the Pandora instrument.

Direct Sun measurements of NO2 column abundances from Table Mountain, California: Intercomparison of low- and high-resolution spectrometers

The NO_2 total column abundance, C_(NO_2) was measured with a direct Sun viewing technique using three different instruments at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratorys (JPL) Table Mountain Facility in California during an instrument intercomparison campaign in July 2007. The instruments are a high‐resolution (∼0.001 nm) Fourier transform ultraviolet spectrometer (FTUVS) from JPL and two moderate‐resolution grating spectrometers, multifunction differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MF‐DOAS) (∼0.8 nm) from Washington State University and Pandora (∼0.4 nm) from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. FTUVS uses high spectral resolution to determine the absolute NO_2 column abundance independently from the exoatmospheric solar irradiance using rovibrational NO_2 absorption lines. The NO_2 total column is retrieved after removing the solar background using Doppler‐shifted spectra from the east and west limbs of the Sun. The FTUVS measurements were used to validate the independently calibrated measurements of multifunction differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MF‐DOAS) and Pandora. The latter two instruments start with measured high‐Sun spectra as solar references to retrieve relative NO_2 columns and then apply modified Langley or “bootstrap” methods to determine the amounts of NO_2 in the references to obtain the absolute NO_2 columns. The calibration offset derived from the FTUVS measurements is consistent with the values derived from Langley and bootstrap calibration plots of the NO_2 slant column measured by the grating spectrometers. The calibrated total vertical column abundances of NO_2, C_(NO_2) from all three instruments are compared showing that MF‐DOAS and Pandora data agree well with each other, and both data sets agree with FTUVS data to within (1.5 ± 4.1)% and (6.0 ± 6.0)%, respectively.