Eadbhard O’Callaghan
University College Dublin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eadbhard O’Callaghan.
European Psychiatry | 2001
Gary Donohoe; Nicholas Owens; C O’Donnell; Teresa Burke; L Moore; A Tobin; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
OBJECTIVE To identify clinically useful predictors of adherence to medication among persons with schizophrenia. METHOD We evaluated levels of compliance with neuroleptic medication among 32 consecutive admissions with DSM-III-R schizophrenia from a geographically defined catchment area using a compliance interview. We also assessed symptomatology, insight, neurological status and memory. RESULTS Less than 25% of consecutive admissions reported being fully compliant. Drug attitudes were the best predictor of regular compliance, symptomatology the best predictor of noncompliance, and memory the best predictor of partial compliance with neuroleptic medication. CONCLUSIONS These data emphasise the complexity of factors that influence whether a person adheres to his medication regimen. Furthermore, they suggest that these factors may vary within the same person over time.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2010
B. O’Donoghue; John Lyne; Michele Hill; Conall Larkin; Larkin Feeney; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
BackgroundInvoluntary admission legislation and rates differ greatly throughout the European Union Member States. In Ireland, the Mental Health Act 2001 has introduced significant changes in the care for patients admitted involuntarily, including mental health tribunals that review the involuntary admission orders.AimsTo investigate (1) peoples perception of the involuntary admission, (2) awareness of legal rights and perception of tribunal, (3) the impact of being admitted involuntarily on the relationship with their family, consultant psychiatrist and prospects for future employment.MethodsOver a 15-month period patients admitted involuntarily to a Dublin Hospital were interviewed using a semi structured interview.ResultsEighty-one people participated in the study. Seventy-two percent of patients believed that their involuntary admission was necessary at the time and this was associated with greater insight into illness. A total of 77.8% of patients felt that the treatment they received had been beneficial. A total of 86.4% of patients were aware that they had been admitted involuntarily and 45.5% of patients found it easier to accept that they had been admitted involuntarily as their case was reviewed by a tribunal. A total of 27.5% experienced a negative impact upon the relationship with their family as a result of the involuntary admission, while for 15% there was a positive impact. For 26.6% of patients the doctor-patient relationship was negatively impacted upon and a third felt their prospects for employment could be affected.ConclusionThe majority of patients reflect positively on their involuntary admission and this opportunity should be used to engage patients in follow-up treatment.
Biological Psychiatry | 2008
Derek W. Morris; Kevin Murphy; Niamh Kenny; Shaun Purcell; Kevin A. McGhee; Siobhan Schwaiger; Jeanne-Marie Nangle; Gary Donohoe; Sarah Clarke; Paul Scully; John P. Quinn; David Meagher; Patrizia Baldwin; Niall Crumlish; Eadbhard O’Callaghan; John L. Waddington; Michael Gill; Aiden Corvin
BACKGROUND The DTNBP1 gene, encoding dysbindin, has been strongly implicated in schizophrenia (SZ) susceptibility by a series of independent genetic association and gene expression studies. Among its known functions, dysbindin is part of a protein complex, termed the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1), the molecular components of which might be involved in the regulation of vesicular trafficking and dendrite branching. METHODS A systematic investigation of the other seven BLOC-1 genes (MUTED, PLDN, CNO, SNAPAP, BLOC1S1, BLOC1S2, and BLOC1S3) for evidence of association with SZ was undertaken in a sample of 373 SZ cases and 812 control subjects. Possible epistasis between combinations of BLOC-1 genes, including DTNBP1, was tested with a novel method of investigating for gene-gene interaction. Quality control measures were incorporated into genotyping strategy, and all results were corrected for multiple testing to prevent false positive results. RESULTS We identified significant evidence of association between BLOC1S3 and SZ (odds ratio = 1.45, confidence interval = 1.13-1.86, p = .0028, corrected p = .0389). We also report evidence for epistatic interaction between DTNBP1 and MUTED contributing to SZ in the absence of a significant main effect at MUTED (p = .0009, corrected p = .0252). Single marker and epistasis results remained significant after correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS Together these data provide evidence for the involvement of the BLOC-1 protein complex in SZ pathogenesis.
European Psychiatry | 2012
Kevin Madigan; Patrick Egan; D. Brennan; Shane Hill; B. Maguire; F. Horgan; C. Flood; Anthony Kinsella; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
In a RCT of family psychoeducation, 47 carers of 34 patients were allocated to one of three groups; Multifamily Group Psychoeducation, Solution Focussed Group Therapy or Treatment as Usual. Carers in both the MFGP intervention and the SFGP arm demonstrated greater knowledge and reduction in burden than those in the TAU arm.
Schizophrenia Bulletin | 2013
Olabisi Owoeye; Tara Kingston; Paul Scully; Patrizia Baldwin; David Browne; Anthony Kinsella; Vincent Russell; Eadbhard O’Callaghan; John L. Waddington
While recent research on psychotic illness has focussed on the nosological, clinical, and biological relationships between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, little attention has been directed to the most common other psychotic diagnosis, major depressive disorder with psychotic features (MDDP). As this diagnostic category captures the confluence between dimensions of psychotic and affective psychopathology, it is of unappreciated heuristic potential to inform on the nature of psychotic illness. Therefore, the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of MDDP were compared with those of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder within the Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study (n = 370). Epidemiologically, the first psychotic episode of MDDP (n = 77) was uniformly distributed across the adult life span, while schizophrenia (n = 73) and bipolar disorder (n = 73) were primarily disorders of young adulthood; the incidence of MDDP, like bipolar disorder, did not differ between the sexes, while the incidence of schizophrenia was more common in males than in females. Clinically, MDDP was characterized by negative symptoms, executive dysfunction, neurological soft signs (NSS), premorbid intellectual function, premorbid adjustment, and quality of life similar to those for schizophrenia, while bipolar disorder was characterized by less prominent negative symptoms, executive dysfunction and NSS, and better quality of life. These findings suggest that what we currently categorize as MDDP may be more closely aligned with other psychotic diagnoses than has been considered previously. They indicate that differences in how psychosis is manifested vis-à-vis depression and mania may be quantitative rather than qualitative and occur within a dimensional space, rather than validating categorical distinctions.
CNS Drugs | 1997
John L. Waddington; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
SummaryCurrent usage of the term ‘atypical’ in relation to antipsychotics lacks clear theoretical underpinnings and rigour in application. The prevailing definition of atypicality is a reduced liability to induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). However, this definition appears incomplete in the face of numerous other limitations associated with antipsychotics that can impact adversely on patient well-being; these encompass issues of efficacy, non-motoric physiology and quality of life.On this basis, more conservative, operationalised criteria for atypical antipsychotic activity can be offered and applied to representative classical versus more recently introduced antipsychotics. These criteria include a reduced liability to induce EPS, but also superior efficacy, efficacy in patients who do not respond to classical antipsychotics, and no induction of subjective dysphoria, sedation, autonomic/cardiac effects, sexual dysfunction and bodyweight gain, and no elevation of prolactin levels or other endocrine effects. Such criteria codify yet higher aspirations for treatment with the welcome array of newer agents that is currently emerging.
European Psychiatry | 2010
B. O’Donoghue; John Lyne; M. Hill; Conall Larkin; Larkin Feeney; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the level of procedural justice experienced by individuals at the time of involuntary admission and whether this influenced future engagement with the mental health services. METHODS Over a 15-month period, individuals admitted involuntarily were interviewed prior to discharge and at one-year follow-up. RESULTS Eighty-one people participated in the study and 81% were interviewed at one-year follow-up. At the time of involuntary admission, over half of individuals experienced at least one form of physical coercion and it was found that the level of procedural justice experienced was unrelated to the use of physical coercive measures. A total of 20% of participants intended not to voluntarily engage with the mental health services upon discharge and they were more likely to have experienced lower levels of procedural justice at the time of admission. At one year following discharge, 65% of participants were adherent with outpatient appointments and 18% had been readmitted involuntarily. Insight was associated with future engagement with the mental health services; however, the level of procedural justice experienced at admission did not influence engagement. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that the use of physical coercive measures is a separate entity from procedural justice and perceived pressures.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry | 2015
Ann Sheridan; Jonathan Drennan; Barbara Coughlan; Donal O’Keeffe; Kate Frazer; Mary Kemple; Denise Alexander; Frances Howlin; Anne Fahy; Veronica Kow; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
Background: This randomised controlled trial examined if for people with enduring mental illness, being supported to socialise leads to improved social functioning, increased self-esteem and extended social networks; a reduction in social isolation, social, emotional and family loneliness and a reduction in illness symptoms, namely depression. Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken from November 2007 to September 2011. Service users with a diagnosis of enduring mental illness (>18 years) were invited to participate. Participants were randomly allocated to intervention or control group conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Intervention group participants were matched with a volunteer partner, asked to engage in social/leisure activities for 2 hours weekly over a 9-month period, and received a €20 stipend monthly. Control group participants received a €20 monthly stipend and were asked to engage in a weekly social/leisure activity. Social functioning, the primary outcome, was measured using the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) at three time points (baseline, midpoint and endpoint). Findings: In all, 107 people completed this study. There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups at the commencement of the intervention on demographic characteristics or the main outcome measures of interest. Overall social functioning positively changed throughout the three time points from a mean of 99·7 (standard deviation (SD) = 15.1) at baseline, to a mean of 106.0 (SD = 27.0) at the endpoint for the control group, and from a mean of 100·4 (SD = 15.0) at Time 1 for the intervention group, to a mean of 104.1 (SD = 23.4) at the endpoint for the intervention group. Conclusions: The intervention showed no statistical differences between the control and intervention groups on primary or secondary outcome measures. The stipend and the stipend plus volunteer partner led to an increase in recreational social functioning; a decrease in levels of social loneliness, in depression and in the proportion living within a vulnerable social network.
European Psychiatry | 2012
Stephen McWilliams; Shane Hill; Nora Mannion; Alastair Fetherston; Anthony Kinsella; Eadbhard O’Callaghan
INTRODUCTION There is evidence that psycho-education courses for caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia improve the short-term outcome of the condition. However, most of the outcome studies are limited to two-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a five-year retrospective case-control follow-up of an original cohort of 63 patients and their 101 caregivers who completed a six-week Caregiver Psycho-education Programme (CPP) for schizophrenia and psychosis between 2002 and 2005, and 60 controls, matched for age, gender and severity of their psychotic illness. RESULTS Patients whose caregivers learned more from the six-week psycho-education course had a significantly longer time to relapse (P = 0.04) and a significantly shorter length of stay during their first relapse (P < 0.05). Patients whose caregivers attended the six-week psycho-education course (regardless of how much the caregivers learned) had a significantly better outcome than controls. This included a significantly smaller number of relapses (P < 0.01), longer time to relapse (P < 0.01), shorter length of stay during their first relapse (P < 0.01) and smaller number of bed days over five years (P < 0.01). The odds ratio of controls relapsing, although insignificant at one year, was 4.13 (1.85-9.21) at five years. Outcome was not affected by either the numbers of caregivers attending for each patient, or caregiver gender. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This study, which is among the first to examine outcome over five years, supports the efficacy of psycho-education for caregivers in improving outcome for patients. Caregivers should be encouraged to take up psycho-education where it is available.
European Psychiatry | 2011
C. Haley; Eadbhard O’Callaghan; Shane Hill; N. Mannion; B. Donnelly; Anthony Kinsella; A. Murtagh; Niall Turner
OBJECTIVE Despite the scientific evidence, most families of people with schizophrenia in Europe never receive a carer education programme. We evaluated whether a carer education course delivered by telepsychiatry was as effective as a carer education course delivered in situ. METHOD We delivered the carer education course for schizophrenia simultaneously to a carers group in rural north west Ireland (remote) via three ISDN lines and live to a carers group in a city (host). We compared knowledge gains using the Knowledge Questionnaire before and after each course. RESULTS Fifty-six carers of people with schizophrenia participated in the trial. At baseline, participants at the remote and host centers did not differ in terms of knowledge about schizophrenia. After the course, carers at both centers improved significantly and the knowledge gains between groups were equivalent at 6 weeks. CONCLUSION Telepsychiatry can deliver effective carer education programmes about schizophrenia and may provide one solution to bridging the chasm between scientific evidence and clinical reality.