Earl S. Snavely
Mobil
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Earl S. Snavely.
Journal of Petroleum Technology | 1971
Earl S. Snavely
Dissolved oxygen usually increases the corrosion rate of steel in natural waters. The effect is particularly severe in brines, because the presence of dissolved oxygen causes pitting. Therefore, various methods are employed to remove oxygen from oil-field waters, both fresh and brine, to protect the enormous investments in steel pipe and process equipment. Both mechanical and chemical methods are used to remove dissolved oxygen from water. Probably the most widely used mechanical method in the oil field is to strip the dissolved oxygen from water by countercurrent contact with a gas. This process requires a source of oxygen-free gas, usually methane. The most common chemical way of removing oxygen from oil-field waters is to add sulfur dioxide or sodium sulfite, because very little capital investment is required. A relatively simple apparatus was used to measure the rate of reaction of dissolved oxygen with hydrogen sulfide and with added chemical scavengers in oil-field waters. Results show that natural waters may catalyze or retard the reaction of sulfur dioxide or sodium sulfite with dissolved oxygen. Kinetic data for the sulfite-oxygen reaction can be obtained rapidly and accurately with a polarographic oxygen sensor.
Journal of Petroleum Technology | 1983
Earl S. Snavely; Henry F Yarbrough
Various oily-water separation devices were evaluated for deoiling drilling-rig deck drainage. A loose-media coalescer selected for the application averaged 92% removal of free oil over a 1-year period of operation when it was fitted for solids removal and media cleaning. Dispersed-air flotation cells were found to remove the same amount of oil from water that could be removed by filtration with a filter retaining particles with diameters greater than 8 microns. Filtration is a simple and accurate method for determining the oil-removal efficiency that can be expected from a flotation separator for a particular application.
Archive | 1987
Earl S. Snavely; John Hen
Archive | 1983
Earl S. Snavely; Daniel N. Hopkins
Archive | 1985
Earl S. Snavely; Timothy A. Jones
Archive | 1970
Earl S. Snavely
Archive | 1984
Daniel N. Hopkins; Earl S. Snavely
Archive | 1982
Earl S. Snavely; Timothy A. Jones
Archive | 1977
William R. Foster; Earl S. Snavely
Archive | 1978
Earl S. Snavely; Herbert P. Singleton