Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ed Cullerton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ed Cullerton.


Journal of Instrumentation | 2015

Precision vector control of a superconducting RF cavity driven by an injection locked magnetron

Brian Chase; Ralph J. Pasquinelli; Ed Cullerton; Philip Varghese

The technique presented in this paper enables the regulation of both radio frequency amplitude and phase in narrow band devices such as a Superconducting RF (SRF) cavity driven by constant power output devices i.e. magnetrons. The ability to use low cost high efficiency magnetrons for accelerator RF power systems, with tight vector regulation, presents a substantial cost savings in both construction and operating costs compared to current RF power system technology. An operating CW system at 2.45 GHz has been experimentally developed. Vector control of an injection locked magnetron has been extensively tested and characterized with a SRF cavity as the load. Amplitude dynamic range of 30 dB, amplitude stability of 0.3% r.m.s, and phase stability of 0.26 degrees r.m.s. has been demonstrated.


ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007

A 96 channel receiver for the ILCTA LLRF system at fermilab

Uros Mavric; Brian Chase; Julien Branlard; Ed Cullerton; Dan Klepec

The present configuration of an ILC main LINAC RF station has 26 nine cell cavities driven from one klystron. With the addition of waveguide power coupler monitors, 96 RF signals will be down-converted and processed. A down-converter chassis is being developed that contains 12 eight-channel analog modules and a single up- converter module. This chassis will first be deployed for testing a cryomodule composed of eight cavities located at New Muon Laboratory (NML) - Fermilab. Critical parts of the design for LLRF applications are identified and a detailed description of the circuit with various characteristic measurements is presented. The board is composed of an input band-pass filter centered at 1.3 GHz, followed by a mixer, which down-converts the cavity probe signal to a proposed 13 MHz intermediate frequency. Cables with 8 channels per connector and good isolation between channels are being used to interconnect each down-converter module with a digital board. As mixers, amplifiers and power splitters are the most sensitive parts for noise, nonlinearities and crosstalk issues, special attention is given to these parts in the design of the LO port multiplication and distribution.


Journal Name: AIP Conf.Proc.821:242-246,2006; Conference: Presented at International Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL05), Eagle Ridge, Galena, IL, USA, 18 - 23 Sep 2005 | 2005

Performance and Upgrades of the Fermilab Accumulator Stacktail Stochastic Cooling

P.F. Derwent; Ed Cullerton; David P. McGinnis; Ralph J. Pasquinelli; D. Sun; David Tinsley

We report on the performance and planned upgrades to the Fermilab Accumulator Stacktail Stochastic Cooling System. The current system has achieved a maximum flux of 16.5e10/hour, limited by the input flux of antiprotons. The upgrades are designed to handle flux in excess of 40e10/hour.


17th International Conference on RF Superconductivity (SRF2015), Whistler, BC, Canada, Sept. 13-18, 2015 | 2015

Integrated High-Power Tests of Dressed N-doped 1.3 GHz SRF Cavities for LCLS-II

Nikolay Solyak; Tug Arkan; Brian Chase; Anthony Crawford; Ed Cullerton; Ivan Gonin; Anna Grassellino; Chuck Grimm; Andy Hocker; Jeremiah Holzbauer; Timergali Khabiboulline; Oleksandr Melnychuk; Joseph Ozelis; T. Peterson; Yuriy Pischalnikov; Ken Premo; Alexander Romanenko; Allan Rowe; Warren Schappert; Dmitri Sergatskov; Richard Stanek; Genfa Wu

New auxiliary components have been designed and fabricated for the 1.3 GHz SRF cavities comprising the LCLS-II linac. In particular, the LCLS-II cavity’s helium vessel, high-power input coupler, higher-order mode (HOM) feedthroughs, magnetic shielding, and cavity tuning system were all designed to meet LCLS-II specifications. Integrated tests of the cavity and these components were done at Fermilab’s Horizontal Test Stand (HTS) using several kilowatts of continuous-wave (CW) RF power. The results of the tests are summarized here. INTRODUCTION The LCLS-II 4 GeV superconducting linac [1] is based on XFEL/ILC technology intensively developed over the last couple of decades. A major difference however is that LCLS-II operates in the CW regime, whereas the XFEL/ILC will operate in pulsed mode. This required modifications to or complete re-design of some of the basic components: cavity Helium vessel, tuner, power coupler, and other cryomodule parts in order to accommodate the much higher cryogenic loads expected in the CW regime. To accelerate the production of two pre-production cryomodules, it was decided to use existing ILC bare cavities and fundamental power couplers, which led to some constraints. The major LCLS-II modifications of the dressed cavity and auxiliaries are as follows:  Nitrogen doped cavity to reduce losses in CW regime. LCLS-II requirements: Q0 > 2.7 x 10 at the nominal gradient of 16 MV/m.  Helium vessel with a larger diameter two-phase connection to accommodate higher heat flux, and two helium supply inlets to provide more uniform thermal gradients during cooldown, which are crucial to effective magnetic flux expulsion, and hence low surface resistance.  Two layers of magnetic shielding to reduce residual magnetic field at the cavity below 5mG.  New end-lever tuner design which had to remain compatible with the “short-short” version of the ILC cavity adopted for the pre-production cryomodule. This design must also fit the “short-long” XFEL version of the cavity, which was adopted for production cryomodules.  Design of the fundamental power coupler (FPC) was modified to fulfil LCLS-II requirements: loaded Q=4 x 10 and average power up to 6.4kW (includes 1.6kW of reflected power). Major modifications include reduction of the antenna length by 8.5mm and increase in the thickness of copper plating on the inner conductor of warm section to reduce coupler temperature. To minimize the risks to the project all technical solutions and new designs have to be prototyped and tested in a cryomodule. Testing was focused on the most critical components and technical solutions, and performed in the Horizontal Test Stand cryostat (HTS) under conditions approximating the final cryomodule configuration. An integrated cavity test was the last stage of the design verification program. In this test a nitrogen doped cavity (AES021), previously qualified in a vertical cryostat, was dressed and fully assembled with all components (fundamental power coupler, two-layer magnetic shielding, XFEL-type feedthroughs, end-lever tuner). All components were previously individually tested in the HTS with cavities, but not as a complete integrated system. One major goal of this integrated test was to demonstrate that high Q0 values demonstrated in vertical test can be preserved even when additional sources of heating from the power coupler and tuner and potential additional external magnetic fields from auxiliary components are present. Other important studies related to design verification included thermal performance and power handling of the power coupler, heating of HOM couplers and tuner components, tuner performance, sensitivity to microphonics, and frequency control. Data from this test program allows component design to be verified and certain other aspects of cryomodule design (e.g., component thermal anchoring) to be finalized. TEST PREPARATION AND CAVITY CONFIGURATION Dressed cavity AES021 was tested previously in a vertical test stand (VTS) without HOM feedthroughs. HOM feedthroughs were later installed in a clean room and after a brief high pressure water rinse, a pumping manifold was installed, the cavity evacuated, and successfully leak checked. The cavity field probe was not removed or replaced. The cavity was transported to a different clean room for installation of the coupler cold section. No additional cleaning of the cavity surfaces took place either as part of or subsequent to coupler installation. HOM feedthroughs were later installed in a clean room and after brief high pressure water rinsing, a pumping manifold was installed and cavity was leak tight. Cavity was transported to assembly clean room for ___________________________________________ # [email protected] N. Solyak , T. Arkan, B. Chase, A. Crawford, E. Cullerton, I. Gonin, A. Grassellino, C. Grimm, A. Hocker, J. Holzbauer, T. Khabiboulline, O. Melnychuk, J. Ozelis, T. Peterson, Y. Pischalnikov, K. Premo, A. Romanenko, A. Rowe, W. Schappert, D. Sergatskov, R. Stanek, G. Wu, FNAL, Batavia, IL 60510, USA MOPB087 Proceedings of SRF2015, Whistler, BC, Canada ISBN 978-3-95450-178-6 342 C op yr ig ht


arXiv: Accelerator Physics | 2011

RF TEST RESULTS FROM CRYOMODULE 1 AT THE FERMILAB SRF BEAM TEST FACILITY

Elvin Harms; Kermit Carlson; Brian Chase; Ed Cullerton; A. Hocker; C. Jensen; P. Joireman; Arkadiy Klebaner; T. Kubicki; Michael Kucera; A. Legan; Desy


arXiv: Accelerator Physics | 2012

TEST RESULTS OF TESLA-STYLE CRYOMODULES AT FERMILAB *

Elvin Harms; Kermit Carlson; Brian Chase; Darren Crawford; Ed Cullerton; Dean Edstrom; A. Hocker; Michael Kucera; Jerry Leibfritz; O. Nezhevenko; Dennis Nicklaus


Archive | 2015

THE LCLS-II LLRF SYSTEM #

Lawrence Doolittle; Gang Huang; A. Ratti; Carlos Serrano; Ramakrishna Bachimanchi; J. Curt Hovater; Sandeep Babel; Bo Hong; D. Van Winkle; Brian Chase; Ed Cullerton; P. Varghese


Archive | 2006

MASTER OSCILLATOR FOR FERMILAB ILC TEST ACCELERATOR

Julien Branlard; Brian Chase; Ed Cullerton


arXiv: Accelerator Physics | 2018

Low Level RF Control for the PIP-II Accelerator

Jonathan Edelen; Brian Chase; Ed Cullerton; J. Einstein-Curtis; Jeremiah Holzbauer; D. Klepec; Yuriy Pischalnikov; Warren Schappert; P. Varghese; G. Joshi; S. Khole; D. Sharma


Archive | 2018

RF Controls for High-Q Cavities for the LCLS-II

Carlos Serrano; Kerri Campbell; Joshua Einstein-Curtis; Alessandro Ratti; Warren Schappert; Ramakrishna Bachimanchi; Jeremiah Holzbauer; Gregorio Dalit; Garth Brown; Leo R. Dalesio; Andre McCollough; Brian Chase; Andrew Benwell; Daniel Klepec; John Jones; David Nam Sul Cha; Ed Cullerton; Gang Huang; Michael Davidsaver; Curt Hovater; Lawrence Doolittle; Jorge Diaz Cruz; Richard Kelly; Yuriy Pischalnikov; Matt Boyes

Collaboration


Dive into the Ed Cullerton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gang Huang

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julien Branlard

Illinois Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence Doolittle

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alessandro Ratti

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge