Ed Johnstone

Review: Modelling placental amino acid transfer--from transporters to placental function.

Amino acid transfer to the fetus is dependent on several different factors. While these factors can be understood in isolation, it is still not possible to predict the function of the system as a whole. In order to do this an integrated approach is required which incorporates the interactions between the different determinants of amino acid transfer. Computational modelling of amino acid transfer in the term human placenta provides a mechanism by which this integrated approach can be delivered. Such a model would be invaluable for understanding amino acid transfer in both normal and pathological pregnancies. In order to develop a computational model it is necessary to determine all the biological factors which are important contributors to net amino acid transfer and the ways in which they interact. For instance, how different classes of amino acid transporter must interact to transfer amino acids across the placenta. Mathematically, the kinetics of each type of transporter can be represented by separate equations that describe their transfer rate as a non-linear function of amino acid concentrations. These equations can then be combined in the model to predict the overall system behaviour. Testing these predictions experimentally will demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of the model, which can then be refined with increasing complexity and retested in an iterative fashion. In this way we hope to develop a functional computational model which will allow exploration of the factors that determine amino acid transfer across the placenta. This model may also allow the development of strategies to optimise placental transfer in pathologies associated with impaired amino acid transfer such as fetal growth restriction.

Computational modelling of amino acid exchange and facilitated transport in placental membrane vesicles

Placental amino acid transport is required for fetal development and impaired transport has been associated with poor fetal growth. It is well known that placental amino acid transport is mediated by a broad array of specific membrane transporters with overlapping substrate specificity. However, it is not fully understood how these transporters function, both individually and as an integrated system. We propose that mathematical modelling could help in further elucidating the underlying mechanisms of how these transporters mediate placental amino acid transport. The aim of this work is to model the sodium independent transport of serine, which has been assumed to follow an obligatory exchange mechanism. However, previous amino acid uptake experiments in human placental microvillous plasma membrane vesicles have persistently produced results that are seemingly incompatible with such a mechanism; i.e. transport has been observed under zero-trans conditions, in the absence of internal substrates inside the vesicles to drive exchange. This observation raises two alternative hypotheses; (i) either exchange is not fully obligatory, or (ii) exchange is indeed obligatory, but an unforeseen initial concentration of amino acid substrate is present within the vesicle which could drive exchange. To investigate these possibilities, a mathematical model for tracer uptake was developed based on carrier mediated transport, which can represent either facilitated diffusion or obligatory exchange (also referred to as uniport and antiport mechanisms, respectively). In vitro measurements of serine uptake by placental microvillous membrane vesicles were carried out and the model applied to interpret the results based on the measured apparent Michaelis–Menten parameters Km and Vmax. In addition, based on model predictions, a new time series experiment was implemented to distinguish the hypothesised transporter mechanisms. Analysis of the results indicated the presence of a facilitated transport component, while based on the model no evidence for substantial levels of endogenous amino acids within the vesicle was found.

IFPA Meeting 2011 workshop report I: Placenta: Predicting future health; roles of lipids in the growth and development of feto-placental unit; placental nutrient sensing; placental research to solve clinical problems – A translational approach

Workshops are an important part of the IFPA annual meeting as they allow for discussion of specialized topics. At IFPA meeting 2011 there were twelve themed workshops, four of which are summarized in this report. These workshops related to both basic science and clinical research into placental growth and nutrient sensing and were divided into 1) placenta: predicting future health; 2) roles of lipids in the growth and development of feto-placental unit; 3) placental nutrient sensing; 4) placental research to solve clinical problems: a translational approach.

IFPA meeting 2015 workshop report III: nanomedicine applications and exosome biology, xenobiotics and endocrine disruptors and pregnancy, and lipid

Workshops are an important part of the IFPA annual meeting, as they allow for discussion of specialized topics. At the IFPA meeting 2015 there were twelve themed workshops, three of which are summarized in this report. These workshops were related to various aspects of placental biology but collectively covered areas of pregnancy pathologies and placental metabolism: 1) nanomedicine applications and exosome biology; 2) xenobiotics and endocrine disruptors and pregnancy; 3) lipid mediators and placental function.

OP19.10: Maternal cardiovascular changes secondary to sildenafil intake in pregnancies complicated by severe fetal growth restriction: STRIDER trial: Short oral presentation abstracts

A. Khalil1,2, A. Sharp3, C. Cornforth4, R. Jackson4, H. Mousa5, S. Stock6, J. Harrold4, M. Turner3, L. Kenny7, P. Baker8, E. Johnstone9, P. von Dadelszen10, L. Magee10, A.T. Papageorghiou11, Z. Alfirevic3 1Fetal Medicine Unit, St George’s Hospital Medical School, University of London, London, United Kingdom; 2Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom; 3Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 4University of Liverpool, Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 5University Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom; 6University of Edinburgh, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 7University College, Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Cork, Republic of Ireland; 8University of Leicester, College of Life Sciences, Leicester, United Kingdom; 9Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; 10Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, School of Life Course Sciences, London, United Kingdom; 11St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom