Edda Simoncini

International Expert Consensus on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Early Breast Cancer: Highlights of the Fifth Symposium on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Breast Cancer, Cremona, Italy (2013).

Expert consensus-based recommendations regarding key issues in the use of primary (or neoadjuvant) systemic treatment (PST) in patients with early breast cancer are a valuable resource for practising oncologists. PST remains a valuable therapeutic approach for the assessment of biological antitumor activity and clinical efficacy of new treatments in clinical trials. Neoadjuvant trials provide endpoints, such as pathological complete response (pCR) to treatment, that potentially translate into meaningful improvements in overall survival and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant trials need fewer patients and are less expensive than adjuvant trial, and the endpoint of pCR is achieved in months, rather than years. For these reasons, the neoadjuvant setting is ideal for testing emerging targeted therapies in early breast cancer. Although pCR is an early clinical endpoint, its role as a surrogate for long-term outcomes is the key issue. New and better predictors of treatment efficacy are needed to improve treatment and outcomes. After PST, accurate management of post-treatment residual disease is mandatory. The surgery of the sentinel lymph-node could be an acceptable option to spare the axillary dissection in case of clinical negativity (N0) of the axilla at the diagnosis and/or after PST. No data exists yet to support the modulation of the extent of locoregional radiation therapy on the basis of the response attained after PST although trials are underway.

Glutamine synthetase expression as a valuable marker of epilepsy and longer survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND Glutamine synthetase (GS) is an astrocytic enzyme catalyzing the conversion of glutamate and ammonia to glutamine. Its up-regulation has been related to higher tumor proliferation and poor prognosis in extra-cerebral tumors. We have previously reported a GS deficiency in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who also developed epilepsy, which is a favorable prognostic factor in glioma. Here, we investigated the prognostic value of GS expression in patients with GBM with or without epilepsy and its correlation with survival. METHODS We conducted a clinical and histopathological study on 83 (52 males) consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Immunohistochemical expression of GS was scored semi-quantitatively on the basis of cell number, staining intensity, and distribution of immunoreactive cells. Several clinical and neuropathological variables were analyzed in relation to survival and GS expression. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 62 years. At the last evaluation, with a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 1.5-58 months), 5 patients (6%) were still alive and 78 (94%) were dead. GS expression patterns in neoplastic cells were inversely correlated to the presence of epilepsy (P < .0001 for intensity and P < .009 for homogeneity of GS distribution, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that RPA score, epilepsy, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGM)T status, application of Stupp protocol, and GS intensity pattern had a significant impact on survival. Absent/low intensity of GS expression was significantly associated with a longer survival in both uni- (19 vs 8 months; P < .0005) and multivariate (P = .003) analyses. CONCLUSIONS Absent/low-intensity GS expression pattern represents a valuable biomarker of both epilepsy and overall survival in GBM.

Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and β-Blockers During Adjuvant Trastuzumab Chemotherapy for Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: Marker of Risk or Cardioprotection in the Real World?

BACKGROUND Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy improves the outcome of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) and overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). However, it is potentially cardiotoxic. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs) and/or β-blockers and development of heart failure (HF) and/or left ventricular dysfunction during 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy. METHODS A total of 499 women receiving adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for EBC entered in a multicenter registry and were divided into four subgroups according to treatment with ACEi/ARBs and/or β-blockers. Occurrence of HF and decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; minimum 10 percentage points) were recorded. RESULTS HF occurred in 2% of patients who did not take either ACEi/ARBs or β-blockers, 8% of patients receiving ACEi/ARBs alone, 8% receiving β-blockers alone (p = .03), and 19% receiving both medications (p < .01). The prevalence of patients with LVEF that decreased by at least 10 percentage points was similar in all groups. Combined ACEi/ARBs and β-blocker therapy was independently associated with hypertension and a significant reduction of LVEF from baseline to 3-month evaluation. The use of ACEi/ARBs alone or β-blockers alone was predicted only by hypertension. Combined therapy of ACEi/ARBs plus β-blockers predicted LVEF recovery from the 3-month to 12-month evaluation. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice, the degree of hypertension and decrease in LVEF during the first 3 months of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for EBC are associated with the use of ACEi/ARBs and β-blockers. The combined use of these two medications is associated with a recovery of LVEF during months 3-12 of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy.

Safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2–negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer progressing on prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors: primary results of a phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm, expanded-access multicenter trial (BALLET)

BACKGROUND This European phase IIIb, expanded-access multicenter trial evaluated the safety of EVE plus EXE in a patient population similar to BOLERO-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS Post-menopausal women aged ≥18 years with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor-receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) recurring/progressing during/after prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors were enrolled. The primary objective was safety of EVE plus EXE based on frequency of adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The secondary objective was to evaluate AEs of grade 3/4 severity. RESULTS The median treatment duration was 5.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-5.6] for EVE and 5.3 months (95% CI 4.8-5.6) for EXE. Overall, 2131 patients were included in the analysis; 81.8% of patients experienced EVE- or EXE-related or EVE/EXE-related AEs (investigator assessed); 27.2% were of grade 3/4 severity. The most frequently reported non-hematologic AEs were (overall %, % EVE-related) stomatitis (52.8%; 50.8%) and asthenia (22.8%; 14.6%). The most frequently reported hematologic AEs were (overall %, % EVE-related) anemia (14.4%; 8.1%) and thrombocytopenia (5.9%; 4.6%). AE-related treatment discontinuations were higher in elderly (≥70 years) versus non-elderly patients (23.8% versus 13.0%). The incidence of EVE-related AEs in both elderly and non-elderly patients appeared to be lower in first-line ABC versus later lines. The incidence of AEs (including stomatitis/pneumonitis) was independent of BMI status (post hoc analysis). Overall, 8.5% of patients experienced at least one EVE-related SAE. Of the 121 on-treatment deaths (5.7%), 66 (3.1%) deaths were due to disease progression and 46 (2.2%) due to AEs; 4 deaths were suspected to be EVE-related. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest ever reported safety dataset on a general patient population presenting ABC treated with EVE plus EXE and included a sizeable elderly subset. Although the patients were more heavily pretreated, the safety profile of EVE plus EXE in BALLET was consistent with BOLERO-2. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT Number: 2012-000073-23.

INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: A multicentre randomised controlled trial-the INCA study protocol

Introduction Studies on patient involvement show that physicians make few attempts to involve their patients who ask few questions if not facilitated. On the other hand, the patients who participate in the decision-making process show greater treatment adherence and have better health outcomes. Different methods to encourage the active participation during oncological consultation have been described; however, similar studies in Italy are lacking. The aims of the present study are to (1) assess the effects of a preconsultation intervention to increase the involvement of breast cancer patients during the consultation, and (2) explore the role of the attending companions in the information exchange during consultation. Methods and analysis All female patients with breast cancer who attend the Oncology Out-patient Services for the first time will provide an informed consent to participate in the study. They are randomly assigned to the intervention or to the control group. The intervention consists of the presentation of a list of relevant illness-related questions, called a question prompt sheet. The primary outcome measure of the efficacy of the intervention is the number of questions asked by patients during the consultation. Secondary outcomes are the involvement of the patient by the oncologist; the patients perceived achievement of her information needs; the patients satisfaction and ability to cope; the quality of the doctor–patient relationship in terms of patient-centeredness; and the number of questions asked by the patients companions and their involvement during the consultation. All outcome measures are supposed to significantly increase in the intervention group. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Hospital Trust of Verona. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01510964

Nodal staging in localized melanoma. The experience of the Brescia Melanoma Unit

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We report our experience with patients affected by cutaneous melanoma undergoing sentinel node (SN) biopsy. METHODS From November 1997 to October 2000 we performed 128 selective lymphadenectomies (SN biopsy) on 127 patients with cutaneous melanoma with Breslow thickness>1 mm or regression or ulceration. Age, sex, tumour location ad histology were recorded. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty eight SNs were identified by lymphoscintigraphy in 167 lymphatic stations, 236 of them were identified intraoperatively using a gamma probe and patent blue V injection. Twenty-one patients had SNs with melanoma metastases (15.8%), 12 patients in the groin, eight patients in the axilla and one patient in the neck. After therapeutic lymphadenectomy eight more lymph nodes with metastases of melanoma were found in the specimens of three patients. After a follow-up ranging from 10 to 56 months the results are that 111 patients are free of disease. Ten patients died. Three patients have visceral metastases and are alive. One patient has developed two more melanomas. One patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our data confirm the clinical reliability of the SN technique in melanoma; for optimisation of the therapeutic strategy, this technique might be considered the standard method of nodal staging in the evaluation of melanoma patients.

Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (super-FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: preliminary results

Forty patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with a new combination regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (super-FEC). A major objective response was observed in 32 patients (80%). Among these, 11 patients (27%) experienced a complete remission. The median duration of response was 10+ and 12+ months for CR and PR, respectively. The most common side-effect was oral mucositis (Grade III = nine patients; grade IV = two patients), while haematological toxicity was virtually absent. Considering the high-risk characteristics of the vast majority of the enrolled patients (75% had dominant visceral disease), these preliminary results suggest that super-FEC has a powerful activity in poor-prognosis metastatic breast cancer with an acceptable degree of toxicity.

MITOMYCIN-C, VINBLASTINE, AND LONIDAMINE AS SALVAGE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED BREAST CANCER : A PILOT STUDY

Thirty-two patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 IV and vinblastine 6 mg/m2 IV every 21 days in combination with lonidamine 450 mg/ day P.O. and prednisone 15 mg/day P.O. given continuously. Among the 29 evaluable patients (all but three pretreated with an anthracycline-based regimen), one complete remission (CR) and six partial remissions (PR) (response rate, 24%) were seen. The median duration of response was 14 months (range, 4–30 months). Median survival for responders was 18 months (range, 4–30 months). Hematological toxicity was uncommon; the main lonidamine-related side effects were myalgia, abdominal cramps, and reversible deafness; these side effects were severe in two, one. and one patients, respectively. The regimen seems to have a reasonable degree of activity and toxicity in advanced, refractory breast cancer. The role of lonidamine in the treatment of this disease warrants further evaluation.

Everolimus Plus Exemestane in Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety Results of the BALLET Study on Patients Previously Treated Without and with Chemotherapy in the Metastatic Setting

BACKGROUND The BALLET study was an open-label, multicenter, expanded access study designed to allow treatment with everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer progressed following prior endocrine therapy. A post hoc analysis to evaluate if previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting affects the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane was conducted on the Italian subset, as it represented the major part of the patients enrolled (54%). PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand one hundred and fifty-one Italian patients were included in the present post hoc analysis, which focused on two sets of patients: patients who never received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (36.1%) and patients who received at least one chemotherapy treatment in the metastatic setting (63.9%). RESULTS One thousand one hundred and sixteen patients (97.0%) prematurely discontinued the study drug, and the main reasons reported were disease progression (39.1%), local reimbursement of everolimus (31.1%), and adverse events (AEs) (16.1%). The median duration of study treatment exposure was 139.5 days for exemestane and 135.0 days for everolimus. At least one AE was experienced by 92.5% of patients. The incidence of everolimus-related AEs was higher (83.9%) when compared with those that occurred with exemestane (29.1%), and the most commonly reported everolimus-related AE was stomatitis (51.3%). However, no significant difference in terms of safety related to the combination occurred between patients without and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. CONCLUSION Real-life data of the Italian patients BALLET-related cohort were an adequate setting to state that previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE With the advent of new targeted agents for advanced or metastatic breast cancer, multiple lines of therapy may be possible, and components of the combined regimens can overlap from one line to another. Thus, it is important to assess even the potential of cumulative and additive toxic effects among the drugs. Previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. The continuous monitoring of the safety signals of this drug combination from general clinical practice is important, in particular for stomatitis.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Assessment of Risk

We read with interest the paper by Morris and colleagues in which, on a much larger scale, conclusions of our small study from the Department of Dermatology of the University Hospital Spedali Civili of Brescia, Italy have been confirmed. Between January 1996 and December 2004 we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) in 50 patients with histopathologically ‘‘favourable’’ melanoma (tumor thickness less than or equal to 0.75 mm, Clark level II or III, no ulceration) showing regression according to the criteria proposed by the Pathological Group of the World Health Organization Melanoma Programme. From the 50 patients with thin melanoma, a total of 79 lymph nodes were analyzed using multilevel sections of paraffin-embedded specimens stained for melanoma markers S100 and MART-1 or HMB45, as previously described. None of the 79 nodes was found to contain melanoma metastases. We concluded that tumor regression in thin melanomas is not associated with a significant risk of sentinel lymph node involvement. Now, with the study of Morris and colleagues, our hypothesis has found a major confirmation.