Edgar S. Steenstra
VU University Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Edgar S. Steenstra.
American Mineralogist | 2017
Edgar S. Steenstra; Yanhao Lin; Nachiketa Rai; Max Jansen; Wim van Westrenen
Abstract Geophysical and geochemical observations point to the presence of a light element in the lunar core, but the exact abundance and type of light element are poorly constrained. Accurate constraints on lunar core composition are vital for models of lunar core dynamo onset and demise, core formation conditions (e.g., depth of the lunar magma ocean or LMO) and therefore formation conditions, as well as the volatile inventory of the Moon. A wide range of previous studies considered S as the dominant light element in the lunar core. Here, we present new constraints on the composition of the lunar core, using mass-balance calculations, combined with previously published models that predict the metal–silicate partitioning behavior of C, S, Ni, and recently proposed new bulk silicate Moon (BSM) abundances of S and C. We also use the bulk Moon abundance of C and S to assess the extent of their devolatilization. We observe that the Ni content of the lunar core becomes unrealistically high if shallow (<3 GPa) LMO scenarios are assumed, and therefore only deeper (>3 GPa) LMO scenarios are considered for S and C. The moderately siderophile metal–silicate partitioning behavior of S during lunar core formation, combined with the low BSM abundance of S, yields only <0.16 wt% S in the core, virtually independent of the pressure (P) and temperature (T) conditions during core formation. Instead, our analysis suggests that C is the dominant light element in the lunar core. The siderophile behavior of C during lunar core formation results in a core C content of ~0.6–4.8 wt%, with the exact amount depending on the core formation conditions. A C-rich lunar core could explain (1) the existence of a present-day molten outer core, (2) the estimated density of the lunar outer core, and (3) the existence of an early lunar core dynamo driven by compositional buoyancy due to core crystallization. Finally, our calculations suggest the C content of the bulk Moon is close to its estimated abundance in the bulk silicate Earth (BSE), suggesting more limited volatile loss during the Moon-forming event than previously thought.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Edgar S. Steenstra; N. Agmon; Jasper Berndt; Stephan Klemme; S. Matveev; W. van Westrenen
The depletions of potassium (K) and sodium (Na) in samples from planetary interiors have long been considered as primary evidence for their volatile behavior during planetary formation processes. Here, we use high-pressure experiments combined with laser ablation analyses to measure the sulfide-silicate and metal-silicate partitioning of K and Na at high pressure (P) – temperature (T) and find that their partitioning into metal strongly increases with temperature. Results indicate that the observed Vestan and Martian mantle K and Na depletions can reflect sequestration into their sulfur-rich cores in addition to their volatility during formation of Mars and Vesta. This suggests that alkali depletions are not affected solely by incomplete condensation or partial volatilization during planetary formation and differentiation, but additionally or even primarily reflect the thermal and chemical conditions during core formation. Core sequestration is also significant for the Moon, but lunar mantle depletions of K and Na cannot be reconciled by core formation only. This supports the hypothesis that measured isotopic fractionations of K in lunar samples represent incomplete condensation or extensive volatile loss during the Moon-forming giant impact.
Nature Geoscience | 2017
Yanhao Lin; Elodie Tronche; Edgar S. Steenstra; Wim van Westrenen
Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2016
Edgar S. Steenstra; Nachiketa Rai; J.S. Knibbe; Yanhao Lin; W. van Westrenen
Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2017
Yanhao Lin; E.J. Tronche; Edgar S. Steenstra; Wim van Westrenen
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta | 2016
Edgar S. Steenstra; J.S. Knibbe; Nachiketa Rai; W. van Westrenen
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta | 2017
Edgar S. Steenstra; A.B. Sitabi; Yanhao Lin; Nachiketa Rai; J.S. Knibbe; Jasper Berndt; S. Matveev; W. van Westrenen
Advances in Space Research | 2016
Edgar S. Steenstra; Dayl J. P. Martin; Francesca E. McDonald; Sarinya Paisarnsombat; Christian Venturino; Sean O’Hara; Abigail Calzada-Diaz; Shelby Bottoms; Mark K. Leader; Kurt K. Klaus; Wim van Westrenen; Debra Needham; David A. Kring
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta | 2018
Edgar S. Steenstra; A.X. Seegers; J. Eising; B.G.J. Tomassen; F.P.F. Webers; Jasper Berndt; Stephan Klemme; S. Matveev; W. van Westrenen
Icarus | 2018
Edgar S. Steenstra; Wim van Westrenen