Edina Magyarosy

Chemotherapy versus allogeneic transplantation for very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission: comparison by genetic randomisation in an international prospective study

BACKGROUND The dismal prognosis of very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could be improved by allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation. We compared this strategy with intensified chemotherapy protocols, with the aim to improve the outcome of children with very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission. METHODS A cooperative prospective study was set up in seven countries. Very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission was defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: (1) failure to achieve complete remission after the first four-drug induction phase; (2) t(9;22) or t(4;11) clonal abnormalities; and (3) poor response to prednisone associated with T immunophenotype, white-blood-cell count of 100x10(9)/L or greater, or both. Children were allocated treatment by genetic chance, according to the availability of a compatible related donor, and assigned chemotherapy or haemopoietic-cell transplantation. The primary outcome was disease-free survival and analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS Between April, 1995, and December, 2000, 357 children entered the study, of whom 280 were assigned chemotherapy and 77 related-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation. 5-year disease-free survival was 40.6% (SE 3.1) in children allocated chemotherapy and 56.7% (5.7) in those assigned transplantation (hazard ratio 0.67 [95% CI 0.46-0.99]; p=0.02); 5-year survival was 50.1% (3.1) and 56.4% (5.9), respectively (0.73 [0.49-1.09]; p=0.12). INTERPRETATION Children with very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia benefit from related-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation compared with chemotherapy. The gap between the two strategies increases as the risk profile of the patient worsens.

Long-term results of a randomized trial on extended use of high dose L-asparaginase for standard risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE Between September 1991 and May 1997, within the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster Study Group (I-BFM-SG), a randomized study was performed aimed at assessing the efficacy of prolonged use of high-dose l-asparaginase (HD-l-ASP) during continuation therapy in children with standard risk (SR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), treated with a reduced BFM-type chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Italian, Dutch, and Hungarian groups participated in this study denominated IDH-ALL-91, and 494 children were enrolled. Treatment consisted of a BFM-type modified backbone with omission of the IB part in induction and elimination of two doses of anthracyclines during reinduction in both arms at the beginning of continuation therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive (YES-ASP) or not (NO-ASP) 20 weekly HD-l-ASP (25,000 IU/m2). RESULTS The event-free-survival and overall survival probabilities at 10 years for the entire group were 82.5% (1.8) and 90.3% (1.3), respectively. Of the 490 patients eligible for random assignment, 355 (72.4%) were randomly assigned (178 YES-ASP and 177 NO-ASP). After a median follow-up of 9 years, the probability of disease-free survival at 10 years was 87.5% (SE, 2.5) for YES-ASP arm versus 78.7% (SE, 3.3) for NO-ASP arm (P = .03). In multivariate analysis, NO-ASP arm (P = .03), male sex (P = .004), and age older than 10 years (P = .0003) had a significantly adverse impact on outcome. CONCLUSION In this subset of patients, selected with criteria not including monitoring of minimal residual disease, application of extended HD-l-ASP may improve prognosis, compensating reduced leukemia control that results from adoption of a reduced-intensity BFM-backbone for treatment of children with SR ALL.

Pulses of vincristine and dexamethasone in addition to intensive chemotherapy for children with intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND Studies in the 1970s and 1980s suggested that the outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) could be improved by intensification of conventional continuation chemotherapy with pulses of vincristine sulfate and steroids. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxic effects of vincristine-dexamethasone pulses as an addition to the continuation-therapy phase in a large cohort of children with intermediate-risk disease who were treated with the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) treatment strategy. METHODS 3109 children, diagnosed with ALL and intermediate-risk features, were enrolled by eight participating organisations in eleven countries. All were treated with very similar protocols based on the BFM treatment strategy, which included induction, consolidation, reinduction, and continuation-therapy phases. At the beginning of the continuation-therapy phase, those patients in complete remission were randomly assigned to either a treatment or a control group. Control patients were given conventional mercaptopurine and methotrexate chemotherapy only. Patients in the treatment arm were also given pulses of vincristine (1.5 mg/m2 weekly for 2 weeks) and dexamethasone (6 mg/m2 daily for 7 days) every 10 weeks for six cycles. The primary outcome measure was disease-free survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT00411541. FINDINGS 174 patients (5.6%) relapsed or died in complete remission before randomisation. Of the remaining 2935 patients, 2618 (89.2%) were randomly assigned: 1325 to the treatment group and 1293 to the control group. With median follow-up of 4.8 years, 240 children in the treatment group and 241 in the control group had relapses; 15 in the treatment group and 14 controls died in complete remission or developed second malignant neoplasms. The 5-year and 7-year disease-free survival estimates were 79.8% (SE 1.2) and 77.5% (1.5) in the treatment group and 79.2% (1.2) and 78.4% (1.3) in the control group, respectively. Treatment with pulses of vincristine and dexamethasone was associated with a non-significant 3% relative-risk reduction (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.81-1.15; p=0.70). INTERPRETATION Children with intermediate-risk ALL who received intensive chemotherapy based on BFM protocols did not benefit from intensification of the continuation-therapy phase with a schedule of pulses of vincristine and dexamethasone.

Intensive Chemotherapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of the Randomized Intercontinental Trial ALL IC-BFM 2002

PURPOSE From 2002 to 2007, the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial (ALL IC-BFM 2002) for the management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 15 countries on three continents. The aim of this trial was to explore the impact of differential delayed intensification (DI) on outcome in all risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS For this trial, 5,060 eligible patients were divided into three risk groups according to age, WBC, early treatment response, and unfavorable genetic aberrations. DI was randomized as follows: standard risk (SR), two 4-week intensive elements (protocol III) versus one 7-week protocol II; intermediate risk (IR), protocol III × 3 versus protocol II × 1; high risk (HR), protocol III × 3 versus either protocol II × 2 (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica [AIEOP] option), or 3 HR blocks plus single protocol II (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster [BFM] option). RESULTS At 5 years, the probabilities of event-free survival and survival were 74% (± 1%) and 82% (± 1%) for all 5,060 eligible patients, 81% and 90% for the SR (n = 1,564), 75% and 83% for the IR (n = 2,650), and 55% and 62% for the HR (n = 846) groups, respectively. No improvement was accomplished by more intense and/or prolonged DI. CONCLUSION The ALL IC-BFM 2002 trial is a good example of international collaboration in pediatric oncology. A wide platform of countries able to run randomized studies in ALL has been established. Although the alternative DI did not improve outcome compared with standard treatment and the overall results are worse than those achieved by longer established leukemia groups, the national results have generally improved.

Eligibility for allogeneic transplantation in very high risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the impact of the waiting time

The advantage of allogeneic transplant from compatible related donors versus chemotherapy in children with very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission was previously demonstrated in an international prospective trial. This study quantified the impact of time elapsed in first remission in the same cohort. Of 357 pediatric patients with very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 259 received chemotherapy, 55 transplantation from compatible related and 43 from unrelated donors. The 5-year disease-free survival was 44.2% overall and 42.5% for chemotherapy only patients. The chemotherapy conditional 5-year disease-free survival increased to 44.4%, 47.6%, 51.7%, and 60.4% in patients who maintained their first remission for at least 3, 6, 9, and 12 months respectively. The overall outcome was superior to that obtained with chemotherapy-only at any time-point. The relative advantage of transplant from compatible related donors in very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia was consistent for any time elapsed in first remission.

Long-term survivors of childhood cancer: Cure and care. The Erice Statement

ZusammenfassungIn den letzten Jahren ist die Anzahl von Patienten, die erfolgreich wegen einer Krebserkrankung im Kindesalter behandelt wurden, stetig angestiegen. Mitglieder des Früh- und Spättoxizitäts- sowie Ausbildungskomitees der internationalen Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Studien-Gruppe (I-BFM-SG-ELTEC) haben 45 pädiatrische Krebsspezialisten (Onkologen, Psychologen, Pflegepersonal, Epidemiologen, Eltern und Überlebende) aus 13 europäischen Ländern (zusätzlich 5 Experten aus Nordamerika) vom 27.–29.10.2006 nach Erice (Sizilien) eingeladen, um die Lebenssituation der Kinder nach einer Krebserkrankung zu besprechen, eine Definition von Heilung festzulegen sowie die Notwendigkeit und die Organisation der Nachbeobachtung und Nachsorge zu diskutieren. Es war das erklärte Ziel der Konferenz, mit Hilfe der persönlichen und professionellen Erfahrung der Teilnehmer ein generelles Dokument zu erarbeiten, das die Meinung dieser Arbeitsgruppe zur Heilung und Nachsorge von Überlebenden einer Krebserkrankung im Kindesalter wiedergibt. Dies ist in den 10 Punkten des Erice-Dokuments zusammengefasst.AbstractThe number of individuals who have successfully completed treatment for a cancer diagnosed during childhood and are entering adulthood has been increasing. Members of the International Berlin–Frankfurt–Munster Early and Late Toxicity Educational Committee (ELTEC) invited 45 paediatric cancer experts – representing oncologists, psychologists, nurses, epidemiologists, parents, and survivors – from 13 European countries, with five additional experts from North America, to Erice, Sicily, on October 27–29, 2006, to discuss the circumstances in which the word “cure” should be used when speaking about children with cancer, and when and why continuing follow-up and care may be required. The objective of the gathering was to generate from the participants’ personal and professional experiences an overview statement of the group’s philosophy of cure and care of survivors of childhood cancer. The 10 points reflect what the group considers essential for the survivors’ cure and care.