Edmond Cleeman

Comparison of intra-articular lidocaine and intravenous sedation for reduction of shoulder dislocations a randomized, prospective study

Background: Acute anterior glenohumeral dislocations have been commonly treated with closed reduction and the use of intravenous sedation. Recently, the use of intra-articular lidocaine has been advocated as an alternative to sedation, since intravenous access and patient monitoring are not required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of local anesthesia compared with that of the commonly used intravenous sedation during the performance of a standardized reduction technique.Methods: In a prospective, randomized study, skeletally mature patients with an isolated glenohumeral joint dislocation and no associated fracture were randomized to receive either intravenous sedation or intra-articular lidocaine to facilitate reduction of the dislocation. Reduction was performed with the modified Stimson method. The two groups were compared with regard to the rate of successful reduction, pain as rated on a visual analog scale, time required for the reduction, time from the reduction until discharge from the emergency department, and cost.Results: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Five (two in the lidocaine group and three in the sedation group) required scapular manipulation in addition to the Stimson technique to reduce the dislocation. The lidocaine group spent significantly less time in the emergency department (average time, seventy-five minutes compared with 185 minutes in the sedation group, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to pain (p = 0.37), success of the Stimson technique (p = 1.00), or time required to reduce the shoulder (p = 0.42). The cost of the intravenous sedation was

SHOULDER DISLOCATIONS IN THE YOUNG PATIENT

97.64 per patient compared with

Releases of subscapularis contracture: an anatomic and clinical study

0.52 for use of the intra-articular lidocaine.Conclusions: Use of intra-articular lidocaine to facilitate reduction with the Stimson technique is a safe and effective method for treating acute shoulder dislocations in an emergency room setting. Intra-articular lidocaine requires less money, time, and nursing resources than does intravenous sedation to facilitate reduction with the Stimson technique.

Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for massive rotator cuff tears: a cadaveric study.

Shoulder dislocations are often seen in young patients, particularly those patients involved in collision sports. A conservative approach to treating these injuries includes protection from early re-injury, rehabilitation, and gradual return to athletics and use. It is important to recognize associated injuries such as fractures and nerve injuries. Surgical management is considered early for the small subgroup with the highest risk of recurrence: young athletes suffering a first traumatic dislocation returning to competitive athletics. Late operative repair is reserved for those who fail extensive nonoperative management.

Posterior shoulder dislocation with lesser tuberosity and scapular spine fractures

Correction of anterior subscapularis contracture is an important step in soft-tissue balancing at the time of total shoulder replacement (TSR). An anatomic and clinical investigation was undertaken to investigate the effect of steps involved in subscapularis release. In 14 cadaveric shoulders studied, the subscapularis insertion consisted of three regions: a thick superior tubular tendon (STT), a flat middle tendon, and an inferior portion where the muscle fibers insert directly into the humerus. In 16 consecutive patients undergoing primary TSR for osteoarthritis, measurements of subscapularis length were taken after different releases. An average of 0.9 cm (confidence interval, 0.7-1.1 cm) of excursion was added after anterior capsular release, and an additional 0.7 cm (confidence interval, 0.5-0.9 cm) of excursion was obtained after STT release. Incision of the STT is an alternative means of gaining subscapularis length when balancing the soft tissues in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing TSR.

Anatomy of the posterior rotator interval: implications for cuff mobilization.

Certain massive defects of the rotator cuff tendinous insertion cannot be repaired primarily to the greater tuberosity. If restoration of strength is an important treatment goal to the patient, then a tendon transfer may be considered. Ten cadaver shoulders were dissected to define the anatomy of the latissimus dorsi tendon (LDT) and its distance relationship to the axillary and radial nerves with the arm in various positions. The axillary nerve lies superior to the LDT insertion, and the radial nerve passes medial and inferior to the LDT insertion. With the arm internally rotated and the shoulder flexed, the distances from the axillary and radial nerves to the LDT insertion were 2.3 cm and 2.8 cm, respectively. With the arm internally rotated and the shoulder abducted, the distances from the axillary and radial nerves to the LDT insertion were 1.8 cm and 2.0 cm, respectively. Understanding specific anatomic relationships is one of the factors contributing to the safety of the LDT transfer procedure with respect to nerve injury.

The Influence of Incision Type on Patient Satisfaction After Plate Fixation of Clavicle Fractures

G lenohumeral fracture-dislocations are well described in the literature.7 Anterior dislocations are considerably more common than posterior dislocations and can be associated with displaced greater tuberosity fractures,2,6 which may reduce after the shoulder joint is reduced. If this occurs, the injury may be treated without surgery. We report a posterior dislocation with a concomitant displaced lesser tuberosity fracture and acromial spine fracture. The lesser tuberosity fracture reduced after closed reduction of the posterior glenohumeral dislocation.

A cadaveric study on the anatomy of the deltoid insertion and its relationship to the deltopectoral approach to the proximal humerus

Release of the posterior rotator interval between the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons may be necessary to obtain appropriate mobilization for an anatomic rotator cuff repair. Ten cadaver shoulders were dissected to expose the region between the infraspinatus and supraspinatus from the spinoglenoid notch to the greater tuberosity. Measurements were made from the spinoglenoid notch to the glenoid rim, the glenoid rim to the confluence of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus musculotendinous junction, and from the confluence of the tendons to the insertion on the humerus. The histologic features of the posterior rotator interval were examined. The posterior rotator interval is a clear structure, consisting of the glenohumeral capsule medially, which fuses with the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons laterally. The average length of the posterior rotator interval was 77.8 mm which includes the distance from the spinoglenoid notch to the glenoid rim (25 mm; standard deviation, 2.89 mm; range, 21–28 mm), from the glenoid to the tendon confluence (25 mm; standard deviation, 1.95 mm; range, 21–28 mm), and from the tendon confluence to insertion (28 mm; standard deviation, 2.36 mm; range, 24–31 mm). Release of the posterior rotator interval can be important to realign the supraspinatus tendon if it is retracted and scarred at its posterior edge.

Septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint: a review of 23 cases.

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the clavicle is a common procedure that has been shown to have improved outcomes over nonoperative treatment. Several incisions can be used to approach clavicle fractures, the decision of which is variable among surgeons. Purpose: To compare patient satisfaction and subjective outcomes between patients with a longitudinal incision versus those with a necklace incision for the treatment of diaphyseal clavicle fractures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Thirty-six patients with a diaphyseal clavicle fracture (Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 15-B) were treated by 1 of 7 orthopaedic surgeons. The intervention was ORIF with anatomic contoured plates. Patients were divided into a necklace incision group and a longitudinal incision group depending on the surgical approach used. Medical records were reviewed, and participants completed an online survey with questions related to pain, numbness, scar appearance, and satisfaction. Function was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Statistical significance was determined with P < .05. Results: There were 16 patients in the necklace incision group and 20 in the longitudinal incision group. Patients in the necklace incision group were significantly more satisfied with the appearance of their scars (P = .01), which correlated with overall satisfaction (P = .05). There were no differences in overall satisfaction, pain, numbness, or reoperation rates for hardware removal between the necklace (6%) and longitudinal groups (15%). Conclusion: Patients undergoing clavicle ORIF with a necklace incision are more satisfied with their scar appearance than those with a longitudinal incision. The overall satisfaction, rate of numbness, and plate removal were similar in both groups.