Edmund V. Capparelli

Validation of the CNS Penetration-Effectiveness Rank for Quantifying Antiretroviral Penetration Into the Central Nervous System

OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether penetration of a combination regimen into the central nervous system (CNS), as estimated by the CNS Penetration-Effectiveness (CPE) rank, is associated with lower cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) viral load. DESIGN Data were analyzed from 467 participants who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive and who reported antiretroviral (ARV) drug use. Individual ARV drugs were assigned a penetration rank of 0 (low), 0.5 (intermediate), or 1 (high) based on their chemical properties, concentrations in CSF, and/or effectiveness in the CNS in clinical studies. The CPE rank was calculated by summing the individual penetration ranks for each ARV in the regimen. RESULTS The median CPE rank was 1.5 (interquartile range, 1-2). Lower CPE ranks correlated with higher CSF viral loads. Ranks less than 2 were associated with an 88% increase in the odds of detectable CSF viral load. In multivariate regression, lower CPE ranks were associated with detectable CSF viral loads even after adjusting for total number of ARV drugs, ARV drug adherence, plasma viral load, duration and type of the current regimen, and CD4 count. CONCLUSIONS Poorer penetration of ARV drugs into the CNS appears to allow continued HIV replication in the CNS as indicated by higher CSF HIV viral loads. Because inhibition of HIV replication in the CNS is probably critical in treating patients who have HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, ARV treatment strategies that account for CNS penetration should be considered in consensus treatment guidelines and validated in clinical studies.

Summary Proceedings From the Neonatal Pain-Control Group

Recent advances in neurobiology and clinical medicine have established that the fetus and newborn may experience acute, established, and chronic pain. They respond to such noxious stimuli by a series of complex biochemical, physiologic, and behavioral alterations. Studies have concluded that controlling pain experience is beneficial with respect to short-term and perhaps long-term outcomes. Yet, pain-control measures are adopted infrequently because of unresolved scientific issues and lack of appreciation for the need for control of pain and its long-term sequelae during the critical phases of neurologic maturation in the preterm and term newborn. The neonatal pain-control group, as part of the Newborn Drug Development Initiative (NDDI) Workshop I, addressed these concerns. The specific issues addressed were (1) management of pain associated with invasive procedures, (2) provision of sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation, and (3) mitigation of pain and stress responses during and after surgery in the newborn infant. The cross-cutting themes addressed within each category included (1) clinical-trial designs, (2) drug prioritization, (3) ethical constraints, (4) gaps in our knowledge, and (5) future research needs. This article provides a summary of the discussions and deliberations. Full-length articles on procedural pain, sedation and analgesia for ventilated infants, perioperative pain, and study designs for neonatal pain research were published in Clinical Therapeutics (June 2005).

Virologic effects of broadly neutralizing antibody VRC01 administration during chronic HIV-1 infection

A single infusion with broadly neutralizing antibody VRC01 resulted in lowered plasma virus load in HIV-1–infected subjects. Passive aggression for HIV Antibodies that neutralize HIV could add to the therapeutic arsenal to prevent and treat disease. Lynch et al. have now tested one such antibody—VRC01—in HIV-infected individuals. Although little difference was observed in viral reservoir in individuals on antiretroviral therapy, plasma viremia was reduced in untreated subjects with a single infusion of VRC01, preferentially suppressing neutralization-sensitive strains. Passive immunization with neutralizing antibodies could therefore aid in viral suppression in HIV-infected individuals. Passive immunization with HIV-1–neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is being considered for prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. As therapeutic agents, mAbs could be used to suppress active virus replication, maintain suppression induced by antiretroviral therapy (ART), and/or decrease the size of the persistent virus reservoir. We assessed the impact of VRC01, a potent human mAb targeting the HIV-1 CD4 binding site, on ART-treated and untreated HIV-1–infected subjects. Among six ART-treated individuals with undetectable plasma viremia, two infusions of VRC01 did not reduce the peripheral blood cell–associated virus reservoir measured 4 weeks after the second infusion. In contrast, six of eight ART-untreated, viremic subjects infused with a single dose of VRC01 experienced a 1.1 to 1.8 log10 reduction in plasma viremia. The two subjects with minimal responses to VRC01 were found to have predominantly VRC01-resistant virus before treatment. Notably, two subjects with plasma virus load <1000 copies/ml demonstrated virus suppression to undetectable levels for over 20 days until VRC01 levels declined. Among the remaining four subjects with baseline virus loads between 3000 and 30,000 copies, viremia was only partially suppressed by mAb infusion, and we observed strong selection pressure for the outgrowth of less neutralization-sensitive viruses. In summary, a single infusion of mAb VRC01 significantly decreased plasma viremia and preferentially suppressed neutralization-sensitive virus strains. These data demonstrate the virological effect of this neutralizing antibody and highlight the need for combination strategies to maintain virus suppression.

Reduced lopinavir exposure during pregnancy.

Background:Optimal antiretroviral exposure during pregnancy is critical for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission and for maternal health. Pregnancy can alter antiretroviral pharmacokinetics. Our objective was to describe lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) pharmacokinetics during pregnancy. Methods:We performed intensive steady-state 12-h pharmacokinetic profiles of lopinavir and ritonavir (three capsules: LPV 400 mg/r 100 mg) at 30–36 weeks gestation and 6–12 weeks postpartum. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were obtained at delivery. We measured LPV and ritonavir by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Target LPV area under concentration versus time curve (AUC) was ≥ 52 μg h/ml, the estimated 10th percentile LPV AUC in non-pregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 83 μg h/ml). Results:Seventeen women completed antepartum evaluations; average gestational age was 35 weeks. Geometric mean antepartum LPV AUC was 44.4 μg h/ml [90% confidence interval (CI), 38.7–50.9] and 12-h post-dose concentration (C12h) was 1.6 μg/ml (90% CI, 1.1–2.5). Twelve women completed postpartum evaluations; geometric mean LPV AUC was 65.2 μg h/ml (90% CI, 49.7–85.4) and C12h was 4.6 μg/ml (90% CI, 3.7–5.7). The geometric mean ratio of antepartum/postpartum LPV AUC was 0.72 (90% CI, 0.54–0.96). Fourteen of 17 (82%) pregnant and three of 12 (25%) postpartum women did not meet our target LPV AUC. The ratio of cord blood/maternal LPV concentration in ten paired detectable samples was 0.2 ± 0.13. Conclusions:LPV/r exposure during late pregnancy was lower compared to postpartum and compared to non-pregnant historical controls. Small amounts of lopinavir cross the placenta. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and effectiveness of increased LPV/r dosing during the third trimester of pregnancy should be investigated.

Model Appropriateness and Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling

The purpose of this study was to define model appropriateness, identifying the individual elements thereof, and to set out a framework within which model appropriateness could be determined for population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models. Model appropriateness was defined by stating the problem to be solved, with the intended use of the model being the pivotal event. The elements of model appropriateness were identified with the type of model (descriptive vs. predictive) determining which elements of model appropriateness need to be executed. An example is presented to show how model appropriateness is determined for the optimal application of PPK models. It was determined that PPK models are developed to solve problems. Model appropriateness depends on identifying the problem, as well as stating the intended use of the model, and requires evaluation of the model for goodness of fit, reliability, and stability if intended for descriptive purposes; for predictive models, validation would be an additional requirement. Descriptive models are used to explain variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a drug, while predictive models are developed to extrapolate beyond the immediate study population. For those models used for predictive purposes, strong assumptions are made about the relationship to the underlying population from which the data were collected. As an example of determining model appropriateness, a PPK model for 5‐fluorocytosine was developed, using NONMEM, version IV. The model was evaluated and validated by the process of percentile bootstrapping. From the PPK model, the range of expected serum concentrations based on two widely used dosing methods (Sanford and the University of California at San Diego [UCSD]) was simulated (Pharsight Trial Designer software). These results indicated that the UCSD method performed well and has the advantage of recommending convenient dosing intervals. In conclusion, considering and applying the principles of model appropriateness to PPK models will result in models that can be applied for their intended use with confidence. Model appropriateness was efficiently established and determined to address the problem of comparing competing dosing strategies.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in pregnant women

Antiretroviral treatment of HIV-infected pregnant women is widely used to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission and as primary therapy of maternal HIV infection. The physiological changes associated with pregnancy have a large impact on drug disposition, and changes in antiretroviral pharmacokinetics during pregnancy must be understood for these drugs to be used safely and effectively in pregnant women.Zidovudine and didanosine, two of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, demonstrate an increase in clearance and decrease in area under the concentration-time curve during pregnancy. The clinical significance of these changes is unknown due to the lack of a clear relationship between plasma concentrations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and clinical effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters of lamivudine, stavudine and abacavir are not significantly changed during pregnancy. There are no data describing the effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of the other nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (zalcitabine, emtricitabine and tenofovir). Pregnancy does not appear to have a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine and there are no data describing the pharmacokinetics of the other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (efavirenz and delavirdine) during pregnancy.Reduced plasma concentrations during pregnancy have been described for several of the protease inhibitors, including nelfinavir (with administration of 750mg three times daily), indinavir, saquinavir and Kaletra® (a co-formulation of lopinavir and ritonavir). Plasma concentrations equivalent to those in nonpregnant adults have been reported in pregnant women receiving nelfinavir at doses of 1250mg twice daily, and the addition of ritonavir to saquinavir greatly increases saquinavir exposure to therapeutic concentrations in pregnant women. No pregnancy pharmacokinetic data are available for the newer protease inhibitors atazanavir and fosamprenavir, or with other dual protease inhibitor combinations that include low dose ritonavir to boost concentrations of the coadministered protease inhibitor. Further investigations of antiretroviral pharmacology during pregnancy, including protein binding studies, are urgently needed.

Pharmacokinetics of Acetaminophen-Protein Adducts in Adults with Acetaminophen Overdose and Acute Liver Failure

Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver toxicity occurs with formation of APAP-protein adducts. These adducts are formed by hepatic metabolism of APAP to N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine, which covalently binds to hepatic proteins as 3-(cystein-S-yl)-APAP adducts. Adducts are released into blood during hepatocyte lysis. We previously showed that adducts could be quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection following proteolytic hydrolysis, and that the concentration of adducts in serum of overdose patients correlated with toxicity. The following study examined the pharmacokinetic profile and clinical associations of adducts in 53 adults with acute APAP overdose resulting in acute liver failure. A population pharmacokinetic analysis using nonlinear mixed effects (statistical regression type) models was conducted; individual empiric Bayesian estimates were determined for the elimination rate constant and elimination half-life. Correlations between clinical and laboratory data were examined relative to adduct concentrations using nonparametric statistical approaches. Peak concentrations of APAP-protein adducts correlated with peak aminotransferase concentrations (r = 0.779) in adults with APAP-related acute liver failure. Adducts did not correlate with bilirubin, creatinine, and APAP concentration at admission, international normalized ratio for prothrombin time, or reported APAP dose. After N-acetylcysteine therapy, adducts exhibited first-order disappearance. The mean elimination rate constant and elimination half-life were 0.42 ± 0.09 days–1 and 1.72 ± 0.34 days, respectively, and estimates from the population model were in strong agreement with these data. Adducts were detected in some patient samples 12 days postingestion. The persistence and specificity of APAP-protein adducts as correlates of toxicity support their use as specific biomarkers of APAP toxicity in patients with acute liver injury.

Low atazanavir concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid

Objective:Protease inhibitors may not penetrate into the central nervous system in therapeutic concentrations, which may allow ongoing HIV replication and injury. The objective of this study was to determine atazanavir penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Design:Single random plasma or paired plasma and CSF samples were drawn from participants enrolled in a multicenter, observational cohort study and taking atazanavir with or without ritonavir between October 2003 and October 2005. Methods:Plasma samples were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography and immunoassay; lower limit of detection was 45 ng/ml. CSF samples were assayed by immunoassay (ARK ATV-test); lower limit of detection was 5 ng/ml. Results:One hundred and seventeen participants (43 ± 7.7 years, 79% men, 81 ± 15 kg) had plasma or plasma and CSF paired samples drawn a median (interquartile range) of 10 (5–17) h postdose. Median (interquartile range) plasma atazanavir concentrations with or without ritonavir were 1278 (525–2265) and 523 (283–1344) ng/ml. The median (interquartile range) CSF concentrations with or without ritonavir were 10.3 (<5–21.1) and 7.9 (6.6–22) ng/ml. Nineteen of 79 (24%) CSF samples were less than 5 ng/ml. CSF concentrations were less than 1% of plasma concentrations and near the atazanavir wild-type IC50 of 1–11 ng/ml. Conclusion:Atazanavir CSF concentrations are highly variable and 100-fold lower than plasma concentrations, even with ritonavir boosting. CSF concentrations of atazanavir do not consistently exceed the wild-type IC50 of atazanavir and may not protect against HIV replication in the CSF.

CYP2B6 genetic variants are associated with nevirapine pharmacokinetics and clinical response in HIV-1-infected children

Background:Cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6)-G516T genotype is associated with altered activity of hepatic CYP2B6 and efavirenz pharmacokinetics, but the relationship between the CYP2B6-G516T genotype and nevirapine (NVP) pharmacokinetics in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is limited. Methods:In 126 children who received NVP and protease inhibitors from PACTG 366 and 377 cohorts, CYP2B6 and ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B, member 1 (ABCB1) gene polymorphisms were analyzed using real-time PCR. Plasma NVP pharmacokinetics and clinical data were collected and levels of NVP in CSF were evaluated in children with HIV-related neurologic diseases. Results:NVP oral clearance in children with the CYP2B6-516-T/T genotype (homozygous variant, n = 14) was 1.6 l/h per m2, which was significantly decreased compared to 2.3 l/h per m2 in those with the -G/G (wild type, n = 49, P = 0.002) and 2.1 l/h per m2 in those with the -G/T genotype (heterozygous variants, n = 63, P = 0.008). Furthermore, children with the -T/T genotype had a significant increase in CD4+ T-cell percentage (+9.0%) compared with those with the -G/G (+3.2%, P = 0.01) and -G/T genotype (+5.0%, P = 0.04) from baseline to week 12. The same trend continued at week 24. Although ABCB1-C3435T genotypes did not affect plasma NVP pharmacokinetics (P = 0.39), the NVP CSF: plasma ratios were significantly higher in children with the ABCB1-3435-C/T or -T/T genotypes (0.62, n = 9) in comparison with those with the ABCB1-3435-C/C genotype (0.43, n = 5) (P = 0.01). Conclusions:The CYP2B6-G516T genotype alters NVP pharmacokinetics and the immunologic response to NVP-containing HAART regimens in children. These data suggest that the CYP2B6-G516T is an important genetic variant that alters the pharmacokinetics and response to HAART regimens containing NVP.

Antiretroviral Concentrations in Breast-Feeding Infants of Women in Botswana Receiving Antiretroviral Treatment

BACKGROUND The magnitude of infant antiretroviral (ARV) exposure from breast milk is unknown. METHODS We measured concentrations of nevirapine, lamivudine, and zidovudine in serum and whole breast milk from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected women in Botswana receiving ARV treatment and serum from their uninfected, breast-feeding infants. RESULTS Twenty mother-infant pairs were enrolled. Maternal serum concentrations of nevirapine were high (median, 9534 ng/mL at a median of 4 h after nevirapine ingestion). Median breast-milk concentrations of nevirapine, lamivudine, and zidovudine were 0.67, 3.34, and 3.21 times, respectively, those in maternal serum. The median infant serum concentration of nevirapine was 971 ng/mL, at least 40 times the 50% inhibitory concentration and similar to peak concentrations after a single 2-mg/kg dose of nevirapine. The median infant serum concentration of lamivudine was 28 ng/mL, and the median infant serum concentration of zidovudine was 123 ng/mL, but infants were also receiving zidovudine prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS HIV-1 inhibitory concentrations of nevirapine are achieved in breast-feeding infants of mothers receiving these ARVs, exposing infants to the potential for beneficial and adverse effects of nevirapine ingestion. Further study is needed to understand the impact of maternal ARV treatment on breast-feeding HIV-1 transmission, infant toxicity, and HIV-1 resistance mutations among infected infants.