Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edna M. Prieto is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edna M. Prieto.


Biomaterials | 2013

Effects of local delivery of D-amino acids from biofilm-dispersive scaffolds on infection in contaminated rat segmental defects

Carlos J. Sanchez; Edna M. Prieto; Chad A. Krueger; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz; Desiree R Romano; Catherine L. Ward; Kevin S. Akers; Scott A. Guelcher; Joseph C. Wenke

Infectious complications of open fractures continue to be a significant factor contributing to non-osseous union and extremity amputation. The persistence of bacteria within biofilms despite meticulous debridement and antibiotic therapy is believed to be a major cause of chronic infection. Considering the difficulties in treating biofilm-associated infections, the use of biofilm dispersal agents as a therapeutic strategy for the prevention of biofilm-associated infections has gained considerable interest. In this study, we investigated whether local delivery of D-Amino Acids (D-AAs), a biofilm dispersal agent, protects scaffolds from contamination and reduces microbial burden within contaminated rat segmental defects in vivo. In vitro testing on biofilms of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated that D-Met, D-Phe, D-Pro, and D-Trp were highly effective at dispersing and preventing biofilm formation individually, and the effect was enhanced for an equimolar mixture of D-AAs. Incorporation of D-AAs into polyurethane scaffolds as a mixture (1:1:1 D-Met:D-Pro:D-Trp) significantly reduced bacterial contamination on the scaffold surface in vitro and within bone when implanted into contaminated femoral segmental defects. Our results underscore the potential of local delivery of d-AAs for reducing bacterial contamination by targeting bacteria within biofilms, which may represent a treatment strategy for improving healing outcomes associated with open fractures.


Biomedical Materials | 2012

Injectable reactive biocomposites for bone healing in critical-size rabbit calvarial defects

Jerald E. Dumas; Pamela Brown-Baer; Edna M. Prieto; Teja Guda; Robert G. Hale; Joseph C. Wenke; Scott A. Guelcher

Craniofacial injuries can result from trauma, tumor ablation, or infection and may require multiple surgical revisions. To address the challenges associated with treating craniofacial bone defects, an ideal material should have the ability to fit complex defects (i.e. be conformable), provide temporary protection to the brain until the bone heals, and enhance tissue regeneration with the delivery of biologics. In this study, we evaluated the ability of injectable lysine-derived polyurethane (PUR)/allograft biocomposites to promote bone healing in critical-size rabbit calvarial defects. The biocomposites exhibited favorable injectability, characterized by a low yield stress to initiate flow of the material and a high initial viscosity to minimize the adverse phenomena of extravasation and filter pressing. After injection, the materials cured within 10-12 min to form a tough, elastomeric solid that maintained mechanical integrity during the healing process. When injected into a critical-size calvarial defect in rabbits, the biocomposites supported ingrowth of new bone. The addition of 80 µg mL(-1) recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) enhanced new bone formation in the interior of the defect, as well as bridging of the defect with new bone. These observations suggest that injectable reactive PUR/allograft biocomposites are a promising approach for healing calvarial defects by providing both mechanical stability as well as local delivery of rhBMP-2.


Acta Biomaterialia | 2012

Biocompatibility and chemical reaction kinetics of injectable, settable polyurethane/allograft bone biocomposites

Jonathan M. Page; Edna M. Prieto; Jerald E. Dumas; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz; Joseph C. Wenke; Pamela Brown-Baer; Scott A. Guelcher

Injectable and settable bone grafts offer significant advantages over pre-formed implants due to their ability to be administered using minimally invasive techniques and to conform to the shape of the defect. However, injectable biomaterials present biocompatibility challenges due to the potential toxicity and ultimate fate of reactive components that are not incorporated in the final cured product. In this study the effects of stoichiometry and triethylenediamine (TEDA) catalyst concentration on the reactivity, injectability, and biocompatibility of two component lysine-derived polyurethane (PUR) biocomposites were investigated. Rate constants were measured for the reactions of water (a blowing agent resulting in the generation of pores), polyester triol, dipropylene glycol (DPG), and allograft bone particles with the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer using an in situ attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy technique. Based on the measured rate constants, a kinetic model predicting the conversion of each component with time was developed. Despite the fact that TEDA is a well-known urethane gelling catalyst, it was found to preferentially catalyze the blowing reaction with water relative to the gelling reactions by a ratio >17:1. Thus the kinetic model predicted that the prepolymer and water proceeded to full conversion, while the conversions of polyester triol and DPG were <70% after 24h, which was consistent with leaching experiments showing that only non-cytotoxic polyester triol and DPG were released from the reactive PUR at early time points. The PUR biocomposite supported cellular infiltration and remodeling in femoral condyle defects in rabbits at 8weeks, and there was no evidence of an adverse inflammatory response induced by unreacted components from the biocomposite or degradation products from the cured polymer. Taken together, these data underscore the utility of the kinetic model in predicting the biocompatibility of reactive biomaterials.


Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B | 2015

Effects of particle size and porosity on in vivo remodeling of settable allograft bone/polymer composites.

Edna M. Prieto; Anne D. Talley; Nicholas R. Gould; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz; Susan J. Drapeau; Kerem N. Kalpakci; Scott A. Guelcher

Established clinical approaches to treat bone voids include the implantation of autograft or allograft bone, ceramics, and other bone void fillers (BVFs). Composites prepared from lysine-derived polyurethanes and allograft bone can be injected as a reactive liquid and set to yield BVFs with mechanical strength comparable to trabecular bone. In this study, we investigated the effects of porosity, allograft particle size, and matrix mineralization on remodeling of injectable and settable allograft/polymer composites in a rabbit femoral condyle plug defect model. Both low viscosity and high viscosity grafts incorporating small (<105 μm) particles only partially healed at 12 weeks, and the addition of 10% demineralized bone matrix did not enhance healing. In contrast, composite grafts with large (105-500 μm) allograft particles healed at 12 weeks postimplantation, as evidenced by radial μCT and histomorphometric analysis. This study highlights particle size and surface connectivity as influential parameters regulating the remodeling of composite bone scaffolds.


Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology | 2014

Injectable foams for regenerative medicine

Edna M. Prieto; Jonathan M. Page; Andrew J. Harmata; Scott A. Guelcher

The design of injectable biomaterials has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Many injectable biomaterials, such as hydrogels and calcium phosphate cements (CPCs), have nanoscale pores that limit the rate of cellular migration and proliferation. While introduction of macroporosity has been suggested to increase cellular infiltration and tissue healing, many conventional methods for generating macropores often require harsh processing conditions that preclude their use in injectable foams. In recent years, processes such as porogen leaching, gas foaming, and emulsion-templating have been adapted to generate macroporosity in injectable CPCs, hydrogels, and hydrophobic polymers. While some of the more mature injectable foam technologies have been evaluated in clinical trials, there are challenges remaining to be addressed, such as the biocompatibility and ultimate fate of the sacrificial phase used to generate pores within the foam after it sets in situ. Furthermore, while implantable scaffolds can be washed extensively to remove undesirable impurities, all of the components required to synthesize injectable foams must be injected into the defect. Thus, every compound in the foam must be biocompatible and noncytotoxic at the concentrations utilized. As future research addresses these critical challenges, injectable macroporous foams are anticipated to have an increasingly significant impact on improving patient outcomes for a number of clinical procedures.


Tissue Engineering Part A | 2010

Synthesis and characterization of an injectable allograft bone/polymer composite bone void filler with tunable mechanical properties.

Jerald E. Dumas; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz; Shaun A. Tanner; Edna M. Prieto; Subha Bhattacharyya; Scott A. Guelcher


Tissue Engineering Part A | 2014

Balancing the Rates of New Bone Formation and Polymer Degradation Enhances Healing of Weight-Bearing Allograft/Polyurethane Composites in Rabbit Femoral Defects

Jerald E. Dumas; Edna M. Prieto; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz; Teja Guda; Joseph C. Wenke; Jesse E. Bible; Ginger E. Holt; Scott A. Guelcher


Archive | 2011

Particle/polyurethane composites and methods thereof

Scott A. Guelcher; Edna M. Prieto; Jerald E. Dumas; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz; Jonathan M. Page; Subhabrata Bhattacharyya


Archive | 2013

Composition with Biofilm Dispersal Agents

Scott A. Guelcher; Joseph C. Wenke; Jr Carlos C. Sanchez; Kevin S. Akers; Chad A. Kruger; Edna M. Prieto; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz


Archive | 2013

Synthetic Polyurethane Composite

Scott A. Guelcher; Jerald E. Dumas; Edna M. Prieto; Kerem N. Kalpakci; Anne D. Talley; Andrew J. Harmata; Katarzyna J. Zienkiewicz

Collaboration


Dive into the Edna M. Prieto's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Teja Guda

University of Texas at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catherine L. Ward

Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge