Edoardo Missiaglia

The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a frequently lethal disease with heterogeneous outcomes and drug responses. To resolve inconsistencies among the reported gene expression–based CRC classifications and facilitate clinical translation, we formed an international consortium dedicated to large-scale data sharing and analytics across expert groups. We show marked interconnectivity between six independent classification systems coalescing into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) with distinguishing features: CMS1 (microsatellite instability immune, 14%), hypermutated, microsatellite unstable and strong immune activation; CMS2 (canonical, 37%), epithelial, marked WNT and MYC signaling activation; CMS3 (metabolic, 13%), epithelial and evident metabolic dysregulation; and CMS4 (mesenchymal, 23%), prominent transforming growth factor–β activation, stromal invasion and angiogenesis. Samples with mixed features (13%) possibly represent a transition phenotype or intratumoral heterogeneity. We consider the CMS groups the most robust classification system currently available for CRC—with clear biological interpretability—and the basis for future clinical stratification and subtype-based targeted interventions.

Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors: Expression Profiling Evidences a Role for AKT-mTOR Pathway

PURPOSE We investigated the global gene expression in a large panel of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) aimed at identifying new potential targets for therapy and biomarkers to predict patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using a custom microarray, we analyzed 72 primary PETs, seven matched metastases, and 10 normal pancreatic samples. Relevant differentially expressed genes were validated by either quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. RESULTS Our data showed that: tuberous sclerosis 2 (TSC2) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) were downregulated in most of the primary tumors, and their low expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival; somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) was absent or very low in insulinomas compared with nonfunctioning tumors; and expression of fibroblast growth factor 13 (FGF13) gene was significantly associated with the occurrence of liver metastasis and shorter disease-free survival. TSC2 and PTEN are two key inhibitors of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and the specific inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin or RAD001 inhibited cell proliferation of PET cell lines. CONCLUSION Our results strongly support a role for PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in PET, which ties in with the fact that mTOR inhibitors have reached phase III trials in neuroendocrine tumors. The finding of differential SSTR expression raises the potential for SSTR expression to be evaluated as a marker of response to somatostatin analogs. Finally, we identified FGF13 as a new prognostic marker that predicted poorer outcome in patients who were clinically considered free from disease.

Fusion Gene–Negative Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Is Clinically and Molecularly Indistinguishable From Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma

PURPOSE To determine whether the clinical and molecular biologic characteristics of the alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) subtypes have relevance independent of the presence or absence of the PAX/FOXO1 fusion gene. PATIENTS AND METHODS The fusion gene status of 210 histopathologically reviewed, clinically annotated rhabdomyosarcoma samples was determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess event-free survival and overall survival in fusion gene-negative ARMS (ARMSn; n = 39), fusion gene-positive ARMS (ARMSp; n = 94), and ERMS (n = 77). A total of 101 RMS samples were also profiled for whole-genome expression, and 128 were profiled for genomic copy number imbalances. Profiling data were analyzed by supervised and unsupervised methods to compare features related to histopathology and fusion gene status. Results were also projected by meta-analysis techniques across three separate publically available data sets. RESULTS Overall and event-free survival, frequency of metastases, and distribution of site at initial presentation were not significantly different between ARMSn and ERMS. Consistent with this, analysis of gene expression signatures could not reproducibly distinguish ARMSn from ERMS whereas fusion gene-positive cases were distinct. ARMSn and ERMS frequently show whole-chromosome copy number changes, notably gain of chromosome 8 with associated high levels of expression of genes from this chromosome. CONCLUSION The clinical behavior and molecular characteristics of alveolar cases without a fusion gene are indistinguishable from embryonal cases and significantly different from fusion-positive alveolar cases. This implies that fusion gene status irrespective of histology is a critical factor in risk stratification of RMS.

Characterization of Gene Expression Profiles in Intraductal Papillary-Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas

The molecular pathology of precursor lesions leading to invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas remains relatively unknown. We have applied cDNA microarray analysis to characterize gene expression profiles in a series of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors (IPMTs) of the pancreas, which represents one of the alternative routes of intraepithelial progression to full malignancy in the pancreatic duct system. Using a cDNA microarray containing 4992 human genes, we screened a total of 13 IPMTs including nine noninvasive and four invasive cases. Expression change in more than half of the tumors was observed for 120 genes, ie, 62 up-regulated and 58 down-regulated genes. Some of the up-regulated genes in this study have been previously described in classical pancreatic carcinomas such as lipocalin 2, galectin 3, claudin 4, and cathepsin E. The most highly up-regulated genes in IPMTs corresponded to three members of the trefoil factor family (TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3). Immunohistochemistry performed on five genes found to be differentially expressed at the RNA level (TFF1, TFF2, TFF3, lipocalin 2, and galectin 3) showed a good concordance between transcript level and protein abundance, except for TFF2. Hierarchical clustering organized the cases according to the dysplastic and invasive phenotype of theIPMTs. This analysis has permitted us to implicate several genes (caveolin 1, glypican 1, growth arrest-specific 6 protein, cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61) in tumor progression. The observation that several genes are differentially expressed both in IPMTs and pancreatic carcinomas suggests that they may be involved at an early stage of pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Molecular alterations in pancreatic carcinoma: expression profiling shows that dysregulated expression of S100 genes is highly prevalent

In order to expand our understanding of the molecular changes underlying the complex pathology of pancreatic malignancy, global gene expression profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared with normal pancreatic tissue was performed. Human cDNA arrays comprising 9932 elements were interrogated with fluorescence‐labelled normal and adenocarcinoma samples (nine tumours, three normal pancreata, and three cell lines). The data were analysed for differential gene expression, which was confirmed by serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), digital differential display (DDD) analysis, and immunohistochemistry for selected cases. The array data were filtered to produce lists of a total of 75 genes significantly up‐regulated or down‐regulated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Two of those showing the highest differential were members of the S100 family of Ca‐binding proteins, namely S100P and S100A6, and therefore the S100 genes were studied in more detail. By immunohistochemical analysis of custom‐built, pancreas‐specific tissue arrays and commercially available, normal/cancer tissue arrays that included a wide variety of different tumour types, differential expression of S100P protein was found to be almost exclusive to pancreatic cancer. S100P could therefore represent a useful biomarker for pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Copyright

Analysis of gene expression in cancer cell lines identifies candidate markers for pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive type of malignancy and the prognosis for disease presenting typically at a late stage is extremely poor. A comprehensive understanding of its molecular genetics is required in order to develop new approaches to clinical management. To date, serial analysis of gene expression and more recently oligo/cDNA microarray technologies have been employed in order to identify genes involved in pancreatic neoplasia that can be developed as diagnostic markers and drug targets for this dismal disease. This study describes the expression profile obtained from 20 pancreatic cell lines using cDNA microarrays containing 9,932 human gene elements. Numerous genes were identified as being differentially expressed, some of which have been previously implicated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (S100P, S100A4, prostate stem cell antigen, lipocalin 2, claudins 3 and 4, trefoil factors 1 and 2) as well as several novel genes. The differentially expressed genes identified are involved in a variety of cellular functions, including control of transcription, regulation of the cell cycle, proteolysis, cell adhesion and signaling. Validation of our array results was performed by exploring the SAGEmap database and by immunohistochemistry for a selection of 4 genes that have not previously been studied in pancreatic cancer: anterior gradient 2 homologue (Xenopus laevis), insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 3 and 4 and Forkhead box J1. Immunostaining was performed using pancreas‐specific tissue microarrays containing core biopsies from 305 clinical specimens. In addition, using statistical group comparison and hierarchical clustering, a selection of genes was identified that may be linked to the site of metastasis from which these cell lines were isolated.

Distal and proximal colon cancers differ in terms of molecular, pathological and clinical features

BACKGROUND Differences exist between the proximal and distal colon in terms of developmental origin, exposure to patterning genes, environmental mutagens, and gut flora. Little is known on how these differences may affect mechanisms of tumorigenesis, side-specific therapy response or prognosis. We explored systematic differences in pathway activation and their clinical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Detailed clinicopathological data for 3045 colon carcinoma patients enrolled in the PETACC3 adjuvant chemotherapy trial were available for analysis. A subset of 1404 samples had molecular data, including gene expression and DNA copy number profiles for 589 and 199 samples, respectively. In addition, 413 colon adenocarcinoma from TCGA collection were also analyzed. Tumor side-effect on anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy was assessed in a cohort of 325 metastatic patients. Outcome variables considered were relapse-free survival and survival after relapse (SAR). RESULTS Proximal carcinomas were more often mucinous, microsatellite instable (MSI)-high, mutated in key tumorigenic pathways, expressed a B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)-like and a serrated pathway signature, regardless of histological type. Distal carcinomas were more often chromosome instable and EGFR or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplified, and more frequently overexpressed epiregulin. While risk of relapse was not different per side, SAR was much poorer for proximal than for distal stage III carcinomas in a multivariable model including BRAF mutation status [N = 285; HR 1.95, 95% CI (1.6-2.4), P < 0.001]. Only patients with metastases from a distal carcinoma responded to anti-EGFR therapy, in line with the predictions of our pathway enrichment analysis. CONCLUSIONS Colorectal carcinoma side is associated with differences in key molecular features, some immediately druggable, with important prognostic effects which are maintained in metastatic lesions. Although within side significant molecular heterogeneity remains, our findings justify stratification of patients by side for retrospective and prospective analyses of drug efficacy and prognosis.

PAX3/FOXO1 Fusion Gene Status Is the Key Prognostic Molecular Marker in Rhabdomyosarcoma and Significantly Improves Current Risk Stratification

PURPOSE To improve the risk stratification of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) through the use of clinical and molecular biologic data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two independent data sets of gene-expression profiling for 124 and 101 patients with RMS were used to derive prognostic gene signatures by using a meta-analysis. These and a previously published metagene signature were evaluated by using cross validation analyses. A combined clinical and molecular risk-stratification scheme that incorporated the PAX3/FOXO1 fusion gene status was derived from 287 patients with RMS and evaluated. RESULTS We showed that our prognostic gene-expression signature and the one previously published performed well with reproducible and significant effects. However, their effect was reduced when cross validated or tested in independent data and did not add new prognostic information over the fusion gene status, which is simpler to assay. Among nonmetastatic patients, patients who were PAX3/FOXO1 positive had a significantly poorer outcome compared with both alveolar-negative and PAX7/FOXO1-positive patients. Furthermore, a new clinicomolecular risk score that incorporated fusion gene status (negative and PAX3/FOXO1 and PAX7/FOXO1 positive), Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study TNM stage, and age showed a significant increase in performance over the current risk-stratification scheme. CONCLUSION Gene signatures can improve current stratification of patients with RMS but will require complex assays to be developed and extensive validation before clinical application. A significant majority of their prognostic value was encapsulated by the fusion gene status. A continuous risk score derived from the combination of clinical parameters with the presence or absence of PAX3/FOXO1 represents a robust approach to improving current risk-adapted therapy for RMS.

Distinct roles for miR-1 and miR-133a in the proliferation and differentiation of rhabdomyosarcoma cells

Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in the pediatric population. As this tumor has an undifferentiated myogenic phenotype, agents that promote differentiation hold particular promise as part of a novel therapeutic approach to combat this type of cancer. In this report, we focus on the contribution of two microRNAs (miRNAs) in rhabdomyosarcomas. Levels of miR‐1 and miR‐133a are drastically reduced in representative cell lines from each major rhabdomyosarcoma subtype (embryonal and alveolar). Introduction of miR‐1 and miR‐133a into an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma‐derived cell line is cytostatic, thereby suggesting a tumor suppressor‐like role for these myogenic miRNAs. Transcriptional profiling of cells after miR‐1 and miR‐133a expression reveals that miR‐1 (but not miR‐133a) exerts a strong promyogenic influence on these poorly differentiated tumor cells. We identify mRNAs that are down‐regulated by these miRNAs and propose roles for miR‐1 and miR‐133a in repressing isoforms of genes that are normally not expressed in muscle. Finally, we show that mRNA targets of miR‐1 and miR‐133a are up‐regulated in rhabdomyosarcomas, suggesting a causative role for these miRNAs in the development of rhabdomyosarcomas. More important, these results point to the promise of enhancing rhabdomyosarcoma therapy using miRNAs as agents that mediate cytostasis and promote muscle differentiation.—Rao, P. K., Missiaglia, E., Shields, L., Hyde, G., Yuan, B., Shepherd, C. J., Shipley, J., Lodish, H. F. Distinct roles for Mir‐1 and Mir‐133a in the proliferation and differentiation of rhabdomyosarcoma cells. FASEB J. 24, 3427–3437 (2010). www.fasebj.org

MicroRNA-206 expression levels correlate with clinical behaviour of rhabdomyosarcomas

Background:Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs) are primarily paediatric sarcomas that resemble developing skeletal muscle. Our aim was to determine the effects of microRNAs (miRNA) that have been implicated in muscle development on the clinical behaviour of RMSs.Methods:Expression levels of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133a and miR-133b were quantified by RT–PCR in 163 primary paediatric RMSs, plus control tissues, and correlated with clinico-pathological features. Correlations with parallel gene expression profiling data for 84 samples were used to identify pathways associated with miR-206. Synthetic miR-206 was transfected into RMS cell lines and phenotypic responses assessed.Results:Muscle-specific miRNAs levels were lower in RMSs compared with skeletal muscle but generally higher than in other normal tissues. Low miR-206 expression correlated with poor overall survival and was an independent predictor of shorter survival in metastatic embryonal and alveolar cases without PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion genes. Low miR-206 expression also significantly correlated with high SIOP stage and the presence of metastases at diagnosis. High miR-206 expression strongly correlated with genes linked to muscle differentiation and low expression was associated with genes linked to MAPkinase and NFKappaB pathway activation. Increasing miR-206 expression in cell lines inhibited cell growth and migration and induced apoptosis that was associated with myogenic differentiation in some, but not all, cell lines.Conclusion:miR-206 contributes to the clinical behaviour of RMSs and the pleiotropic effects of miR-206 supports therapeutic potential.