Eduardo Aptecar

Coronary vasodilator reserve in untreated and treated hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy

OBJECTIVES This study was initiated to compare the coronary reserve in treated hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy with that in untreated patients. BACKGROUND Coronary reserve is impaired in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary arteries. Moreover, basal coronary resistance is elevated in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. METHODS Coronary reserve was measured with a coronary Doppler catheter before and after a maximally vasodilating dose of intracoronary papaverine (peak/rest flow velocity ratio) in 16 control subjects and 37 hypertensive patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries. Among 20 untreated hypertensive patients, myocardial mass was increased in 11 (group 2a) and normal in 9 (group 2b). Seventeen patients had been treated effectively for at least 1 year; nine (group 3a) had persistent left ventricular hypertrophy, and eight (group 3b) had no left ventricular hypertrophy before treatment. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were normal in all groups. RESULTS Coronary reserve was moderately reduced in group 2b (3.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.8 in control subjects, p < 0.001) and markedly diminished in groups 2a and 3a (2.5 +/- 0.5 and 2.7 +/- 0.4, respectively; all p < 0.001 vs. control subjects). In group 3b, coronary reserve was comparable to that of control subjects (5.1 +/- 1.4). CONCLUSIONS The reduction in coronary reserve observed in untreated hypertensive patients with normal myocardial mass suggests that structural abnormalities of the coronary microvasculature may occur before left ventricular hypertrophy. Treated patients with normal mass before treatment had a coronary reserve comparable to that of normotensive control subjects, whereas normalization of arterial pressure with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy was associated with a marked impairment of coronary reserve.

Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI‐CUBA study

Objectives: To compare in terms of efficacy and safety the transulnar to the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Background: Opposite to the transradial approach, which is now widely used in catheterization laboratories worldwide, the ulnar artery approach is rarely used for cardiac catheterization. Methods: Diagnostic coronarography, followed or not by angioplasty, was performed by transulnar or transradial approach, chosen at random. A positive (normal) direct or reverse Allens test was required before tempting the radial or the ulnar approach, respectively. MACE were recorded till 1‐month follow‐up. Doppler ultrasound assessment of the forearm vessels was scheduled for all the angioplastied patients. Results: Successful access was obtained in 93.1% of patients in the ulnar group (n = 216), and in 95.5% of patients in the radial group (n = 215), P = NS. One hundred and three and 105 angioplasty procedures were performed in 94 and 95 patients in ulnar and radial group, with success in 95.2% and 96.2% of procedures in ulnar and radial group, respectively (P = NS). Freedom from MACE at 1‐month follow‐up was observed in 93 patients in both groups (97.8% for ulnar group and 95.8% for radial group), P = NS. Asymptomatic access site artery occlusion occurred in 5.7% of patients after transulnar and in 4.7% of patients after transradial angioplasty. A big forearm hematoma, and a little A‐V fistula were observed, each in one patient, in the ulnar group. Conclusion: The transulnar approach for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary interventions is a safe and effective alternative to the transradial approach, as both techniques share a high success rate and an extremely low incidence of entry site complications. The transulnar approach has the potential to spare injury to the radial artery in anticipation of its use as a coronary bypass conduit.

Repeated coronary artery occlusions during routine balloon angioplasty do not induce myocardial preconditioning in humans

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the present study was to assess whether brief, repeated coronary artery occlusions during balloon angioplasty induce a myocardial ischemic protective effect. BACKGROUND In animals, brief coronary artery occlusions preceding a more prolonged occlusion result in reduced infarct size. Whether myocardial protection against ischemia could also occur in humans during angioplasty remains controversial. METHODS Thirteen patients with a proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis with no angiographic collateral circulation underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary artery balloon angioplasty. Three 120-s balloon inflations separated by a 5-min equilibration period were performed. For each inflation, intracoronary ST segment modifications, septal wall thickening (M-mode echocardiography), left ventricular pressures and time derivatives were measured at baseline and at 30, 60 and 90 s after balloon inflation and 120 s after balloon deflation. RESULTS Intracoronary electrocardiographic analysis showed that the time course of the maximal ST segment elevation was identical at each inflation, as were wall motion changes assessed by the decrease in septal wall thickening. For the first and last inflations, peak positive dP/dt decreased significantly by 13 +/- 9% (mean +/- SD) and 14 +/- 13%, whereas peak negative dP/dt increased by 23 +/- 15% and 22 +/- 10%, respectively (all p < 0.01 from baseline values). The relaxation time constant, tau, was altered similarly during the different inflations, from 44 +/- 6 to 74 +/- 13 ms and from 57 +/- 13 to 77 +/- 13 ms (all p < 0.001) for the first and last inflations, respectively. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased to the same level after each inflation. In contrast to other hemodynamic variables, tau and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure did not return to baseline values in between the inflations, which may be due to myocardial stunning. CONCLUSIONS In patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis and no evidence of collateral circulation, brief periods of ischemia, such as those used during routine coronary balloon angioplasty, do not provide any protection against myocardial ischemia.

Comparison of the Effects of Exercise and Cold Pressor Test on the Vasomotor Response of Normal and Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries and Their Relation to the Flow-Mediated Mechanism

This study was designed to assess the vasomotor response of coronary arteries to exercise and the cold pressor test, and its relationships with the endothelium-mediated dependent mechanism. Twenty-two patients were entered in the study. Group I was composed of 12 patients with a total cholesterol level < 200 mg/dl associated with angiographically smooth, normal coronary arteries. Group 2 consisted of 10 patients with both a cholesterol level > 240 mg/dl and angiographic luminal irregularities of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Coronary blood flow was assessed by a 0.018-inch tip guidewire during Doppler ultrasonography, and analysis of the coronary arterial dimension of the midportion of the left anterior descending coronary artery was performed by quantitative coronary angiography. Catecholamine concentrations were assessed at the different stages of the protocol. The rate-pressure product increased during both the cold pressure test and exercise (p < 0.001). Coronary blood flow velocity increased during the cold pressor and exercise tests by 24.5 +/- 10% and 72 +/- 42%, respectively (p < 0.001), and by 127 +/- 62% (p < 0.0001) after administration of papaverine. In group 1, the cold pressor test had a more pronounced vasodilating effect on epicardial coronary arteries (+11.2 +/- 16%) compared with group 2 (-2 +/- 9%, p < 0.05). Similarly, exercise had a vasodilating action in group 1 (11.3 +/- 15%) compared with group 2 (-1.9 +/- 8%, p < 0.05). Both responses were highly correlated (r = 0.92, p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acetylcholine-induced constriction of angiographically normal coronary arteries is not time dependent in transplant recipients : effects of stepwise infusion at 1,6,12 and more than 24 months after transplantation

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate whether acetylcholine may be a useful tool for detection of early angiographically undetectable coronary atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients. BACKGROUND Coronary artery disease is the main determinant of long-term prognosis in transplant recipients. Acetylcholine-induced constriction of angiographically normal coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients could be due to early atherosclerosis, and acetylcholine has been proposed for early detection of coronary artery disease. METHODS The responses of large coronary arteries to stepwise intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine (10(-8) to 10(-5) mol/liter) were compared in five control subjects and in four groups of transplant recipients 1, 6, 12 and > 24 months postoperatively (group 1, n = 6; group 2, n = 7; group 3, n = 6; group 4, n = 6, respectively). All patients had normal coronary arteriographic findings. Vessel dimensions were measured in four segments in each patient. RESULTS In control subjects, acetylcholine increased diameters significantly at 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/liter (all p < 0.001 vs. basal value). No significant variation was observed at 10(-5) mol/liter. Intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate increased diameters of all segments (p < 0.001). In transplant recipients, vessel diameters did not vary significantly from baseline at 10(-8) and 10(-7) mol/liter concentrations in groups 1 and 3 and at 10(-8) mol/liter in group 4. Vessels constricted significantly in all the other cases. Comparisons of each group with control subjects showed that responses were significantly different for all concentrations but 10(-8) mol/liter in groups 3 and 4. Intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate elicited coronary vasodilation similar to that of control subjects in all groups of transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that the acetylcholine response is persistently abnormal in transplant recipients compared with that in normal control subjects and that this abnormality may not be related simply to the presence of atherosclerosis. Thus, acetylcholine may not be a useful tool for early detection of coronary atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients.

Impairment of flow-dependent coronary dilation in hypertensive patients: Demonstration by cold pressor test induced flow velocity increase

In normal coronary arteries, increased flow velocity induces endothelium-dependent dilation, and dilation in response to sympathetic stimulation evoked by the cold pressor test is partly due to increased flow velocity. In arterial hypertension, angiographically normal coronary arteries were constricted by acetylcholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator. To assess the epicardial coronary artery response to the increase blood flow velocity induced by the cold pressor test in hypertensive patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries, coronary artery diameters and flow velocity were measured during cold pressor test in 12 untreated hypertensive patients and in 10 control subjects. Diameters were determined by quantitative angiography on proximal and distal segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery, and flow velocity measurements were made by Doppler testing in the distal segment. In control subjects, the proximal and distal segments dilated during cold pressor test by 12.0 +/- 4.5% and 13.9 +/- 6.5%, respectively (both P < .001), when flow velocity increased by 46.7 +/- 26.1% (P > .05). In hypertensive patients, segments were constricted, respectively, by 10.3 +/- 8.5% (P < .001) and 7.9 +/- 8.6% (P < .01), when the flow velocity was increased by 68.3 +/- 48.2% (P < .001). Intracoronary injection of an endothelium-independent dilator resulted in similar dilation in control subjects (proximal: +30.0 +/- 12.9%; distal: +32.4 +/- 15.2%) and in hypertensive patients (proximal: +22.3 +/- 7.5%; distal: +28.8 +/- 15.4%). In conclusion, in hypertensive patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and without any other coronary risk factors, endothelium-dependent flow-mediated coronary dilation evoked by the cold pressor test is impaired.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of bradykinin on coronary blood flow and vasomotion in transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of exogenous bradykinin on coronary epicardial and microcirculatory tone in transplant patients (HTXs), and to compare them with the effects of acetylcholine. BACKGROUND Coronary endothelial dysfunction has been reported to occur early after heart transplantation, most notably when acetylcholine was the endothelium-function marker used. The effects of bradykinin on coronary vasomotion are unknown in HTXs. METHODS Sixteen HTXs were compared 3.6 +/- 1.7 months after transplantation to seven control subjects. Coronary flow velocity was measured using guide-wire Doppler. Diameters (D) of three segments of the left coronary artery and coronary blood flow (CBF) were assessed at baseline, after 3-min infusions of increasing bradykinin doses (50, 150 and 250 ng/min) then of increasing acetylcholine doses (estimated blood concentrations of 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) M). RESULTS Bradykinin induced similar dose-dependent increases in D and CBF in both groups: D was 11 +/- 12%, 19 +/- 14% and 22 +/- 16% (all p < 0.0001), and CBF was 50 +/- 40%, 130 +/- 68% and 186 +/- 77% (all p < 0.0001). Acetylcholine induced significant epicardial vasodilation in control subjects and vasoconstriction in HTX, as well as a marked increase in CBF in both groups. Acute allograft rejection, present in 8 of the 16 HTXs, did not modify responses to bradykinin, but was associated with a smaller CBF increase in response to acetylcholine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The coronary vasodilating effects of bradykinin are preserved early after heart transplantation, even in the presence of acute allograft rejection. Although there is an abnormal vasoconstricting response to acetylcholine reflecting endothelium dysfunction, the endothelium remains a functionally active organ in heart transplant recipients.

Effects of time and previous acute rejection episodes on coronary vascular reserve in human heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES This study examined whether previous rejection episodes may have deleterious effects on coronary vascular reserve of heart transplant recipients months after transplantation. BACKGROUND Coronary reserve has been demonstrated to be within the normal range in long-term transplant patients without previous episodes of rejection. Conversely, acute rejection is associated with a dramatic reduction of coronary reserve, which is rapidly restored after therapy. METHODS Coronary flow velocity was measured by intracoronary Doppler catheter before and after a maximally vasodilating dose of intracoronary papaverine in 16 control subjects and in 59 transplant patients classified into three groups with respect to time after transplantation: 1 to 6 months (group 1, n = 17), 7 to 18 months (group 2, n = 22) and > 18 months (group 3, n = 20). Coronary vascular reserve was evaluated through peak/rest coronary flow velocity ratio and minimal coronary vascular resistance index. All patients had normal findings on left ventricular angiography and coronary arteriography and a normal left ventricular mass. RESULTS Arterial pressure was normal in all groups. Heart rate in the three groups of transplant patients, mean aortic pressure in groups 1 and 2, left ventricular systolic pressure in group 2 and rate-pressure product in groups 1 and 2 were higher than in control subjects. Average number of rejection episodes per patient was similar in the three groups of patients (group 1, 2.4 +/- 1.4; group 2, 2.5 +/- 1.9, and group 3, 2.1 +/- 1.3). Results showed no difference between each group of transplant patients and control subjects for peak/rest coronary flow velocity ratio (control subjects, 5.2 +/- 0.8; group 1, 5.3 +/- 1.5; group 2, 4.9 +/- 1.2, and group 3, 4.4 +/- 1.6) and for minimal coronary vascular resistance index (control subjects, 0.18 +/- 0.03; group 1, 0.18 +/- 0.04; group 2, 0.20 +/- 0.06, group 3, 0.23 +/- 0.11). In addition, patients with zero or one rejection episode had similar values of peak/rest coronary flow velocity ratio and minimal coronary vascular resistance index (4.3 +/- 1.3 and 0.23 +/- 0.10, respectively, n = 22) as did those with one or two rejection episodes (5.1 +/- 1.5 and 0.19 +/- 0.07, respectively, n = 24), and those with four or more episodes (5.2 +/- 1.4 and 0.19 +/- 0.05, respectively, n = 13). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that coronary vascular reserve remains within normal range and is independent from the number of previous episodes of rejection until late after transplantation in human heart transplant patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries.

Ventriculoarterial coupling and left ventricular efficiency in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND In heart transplants, left ventricular function may be impaired in the absence of rejection or graft atherosclerosis. Matching between left ventricle and arterial receptor, i.e., ventriculoarterial coupling, and left ventricular efficiency have never been studied. METHODS Left ventricular pressure-volume loops and single beat analysis were used to determine effective arterial elastance (Ea) and the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (end-systolic elastance; Ees). Left ventricular efficiency was evaluated by determination of external work (EW), pressure-volume area (PVA), coronary blood flow (continuous thermodilution), and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2). Measurements were made at baseline in 11 control subjects and 9 heart transplant recipients (HTX) without rejection and were repeated after phenylephrine in the latter group. RESULTS At baseline, Ees, Ees/Ea, and work efficiency (EW/PVA) were lower in HTX than in control subjects (2.51+/-0.87 vs. 3.70+/-1.15 mmHg/ml/m2, P<0.01; 0.96+/-0.21 vs. 1.47+/-0.31, P<0.001; and 0.53+/-0.08 vs. 0.59+/-0.09, P<0.01, respectively). Energy conversion efficiency (PVA/MVO2) and mechanical efficiency (EW/ MVO2) were higher in HTX (0.58+/-0.08 vs. 0.45+/-0.14, P<0.001; and 0.31+/-0.05 vs. 0.26+/-0.06, P<0.001, respectively). In HTX, phenylephrine infusion increased Ees, Ea, EW, PVA, and MVO2 without modifying Ees/Ea, EW/PVA, PVA/MVO2, and EW/MVO2. CONCLUSIONS In heart transplants, (1) left ventricular contractility is moderately depressed; (2) elevation of energy conversion efficiency compensates for the decrease in work efficiency, allowing normal mechanical efficiency; and (3) alpha 1 adrenergic stimulation does not impair ventriculoarterial coupling and mechanical efficiency.

Coronary artery response to cold-pressor test is impaired early after operation in heart transplant recipients☆

OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to evaluate the coronary vasomotor response to the cold-pressor test within 3 months after heart transplantation. BACKGROUND Normal epicardial coronary arteries dilate in response to sympathetic stimulation evoked by the cold-pressor test. In transplant recipients, abnormal coronary vasomotion has been described shortly after operation. METHODS Fourteen heart transplant recipients were compared 52 +/- 15 days (mean +/- SD) after operation with 10 control subjects. All had angiographically normal epicardial coronary arteries. Coronary blood flow velocity was measured with a Doppler catheter placed in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Four segments in each patient were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography to assess the diameter changes during the cold-pressor test and after intracoronary injection of isosorbide dinitrate. RESULTS Coronary flow velocity increased similarly during the cold-pressor test in control subjects and in transplant recipients, from 7.5 +/- 2.3 to 11.0 +/- 3.9 cm/s and from 10.3 +/- 3.2 to 13.7 +/- 4.8 cm/s (both p < 0.01). In control subjects, 39 of 40 segments analyzed dilated during the cold-pressor test. In transplant recipients, 48 of 56 segments analyzed did not change or constricted. The mean epicardial coronary diameter increased significantly during the cold-pressor test in control subjects (+13 +/- 6%, p < 0.001), whereas it did not change significantly in transplant recipients (-2 +/- 9%, p = NS). In transplant recipients, isosorbide dinitrate elicited coronary vasodilation similar to that in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that in human transplanted denervated hearts, coronary vasodilation in response to sympathetic stimulation by cold exposure is impaired shortly after operation.