Eduardo Dunayevich

Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Despite increasing public health concerns regarding obesity, few safe and effective drug treatments are available. Combination treatment with sustained-release naltrexone and bupropion was developed to produce complementary actions in CNS pathways regulating bodyweight. The Contrave Obesity Research I (COR-I) study assessed the effect of such treatment on bodyweight in overweight and obese participants. METHODS Men and women aged 18-65 years who had a body-mass index (BMI) of 30-45 kg/m(2) and uncomplicated obesity or BMI 27-45 kg/m(2) with dyslipidaemia or hypertension were eligible for enrolment in this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial undertaken at 34 sites in the USA. Participants were prescribed mild hypocaloric diet and exercise and were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive sustained-release naltrexone 32 mg per day plus sustained-release bupropion 360 mg per day combined in fixed-dose tablets (also known as NB32), sustained-release naltrexone 16 mg per day plus sustained-release bupropion 360 mg per day combined in fixed-dose tablets (also known as NB16), or matching placebo twice a day, given orally for 56 weeks. The trial included a 3-week dose escalation. Randomisation was done by use of a centralised, computer-generated, web-based system and was stratified by study centre. Co-primary efficacy endpoints at 56 weeks were percentage change in bodyweight and proportion of participants who achieved a decrease in bodyweight of 5% or more. The primary analysis included all randomised participants with a baseline weight measurement and a post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug (last observation carried forward). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00532779. FINDINGS 1742 participants were enrolled and randomised to double-blind treatment (naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion, n=583; naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion, n=578; placebo, n=581). 870 (50%) participants completed 56 weeks of treatment (n=296; n=284; n=290, respectively) and 1453 (83%) were included in the primary analysis (n=471; n=471; n=511). Mean change in bodyweight was -1.3% (SE 0.3) in the placebo group, -6.1% (0.3) in the naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion group (p<0.0001 vs placebo) and -5.0% (0.3) in the naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion group (p<0.0001 vs placebo). 84 (16%) participants assigned to placebo had a decrease in bodyweight of 5% or more compared with 226 (48%) assigned to naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion (p<0.0001 vs placebo) and 186 (39%) assigned to naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion (p<0.0001 vs placebo). The most frequent adverse event in participants assigned to combination treatment was nausea (naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion, 171 participants [29.8%]; naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion, 155 [27.2%]; placebo, 30 [5.3%]). Headache, constipation, dizziness, vomiting, and dry mouth were also more frequent in the naltrexone plus bupropion groups than in the placebo group. A transient increase of around 1.5 mm Hg in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was followed by a reduction of around 1 mm Hg below baseline in the naltrexone plus bupropion groups. Combination treatment was not associated with increased depression or suicidality events compared with placebo. INTERPRETATION A sustained-release combination of naltrexone plus bupropion could be a useful therapeutic option for treatment of obesity. FUNDING Orexigen Therapeutics.

Weight Loss With Naltrexone SR/Bupropion SR Combination Therapy as an Adjunct to Behavior Modification: The COR-BMOD Trial

This 56‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial examined the efficacy and safety of naltrexone plus bupropion as an adjunct to intensive behavior modification (BMOD). A total of 793 participants (BMI = 36.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2) was randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to: (i) placebo + BMOD (N = 202); or (ii) naltrexone sustained‐release (SR, 32 mg/day), combined with bupropion SR (360 mg/day) plus BMOD (i.e., NB32 + BMOD; N = 591). Both groups were prescribed an energy‐reduced diet and 28 group BMOD sessions. Co‐primary end points were percentage change in weight and the proportion of participants who lost ≥5% weight at week 56. Efficacy analyses were performed on a modified intent‐to‐treat population (ITT; i.e., participants with ≥1 postbaseline weight while taking study drug (placebo + BMOD, N = 193; NB32 + BMOD, N = 482)). Missing data were replaced with the last observation obtained on study drug. At week 56, weight loss was 5.1 ± 0.6% with placebo + BMOD vs. 9.3 ± 0.4% with NB32 + BMOD (P < 0.001). A completers analysis revealed weight losses of 7.3 ± 0.9% (N = 106) vs. 11.5 ± 0.6% (N = 301), respectively (P < 0.001). A third analysis, which included all randomized participants, yielded losses of 4.9 ± 0.6 vs. 7.8 ± 0.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Significantly more NB32 + BMOD‐ vs. placebo + BMOD‐treated participants lost ≥5 and ≥10% of initial weight, and the former had significantly greater improvements in markers of cardiometabolic disease risk. NB32 + BMOD was generally well tolerated, although associated with more reports of nausea than placebo + BMOD. The present findings support the efficacy of combined naltrexone/bupropion therapy as an adjunct to intensive BMOD for obesity.

A randomized, phase 3 trial of naltrexone SR/bupropion SR on weight and obesity-related risk factors (COR-II).

To examine the effects of naltrexone/bupropion (NB) combination therapy on weight and weight‐related risk factors in overweight and obese participants.

Efficacy and Tolerability of an mGlu2/3 Agonist in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

LY354740, a potent and selective mGlu (metabotropic glutamate receptor)2/3 agonist, has shown efficacy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). LY544344 is a LY354740 prodrug that increases LY354740 bioavailability. This 8-week study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LY544344 in the treatment of GAD. Participants had a diagnoses of GAD, baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale scores ⩾10, and moderate illness severity. Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with LY544344 16 mg b.i.d. (n=28), LY544344 8 mg b.i.d. (n=36), or placebo (n=44). LY544344 16 mg b.i.d.-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement from baseline in Hamilton Anxiety and Clinical Global Impression—Improvement scores, as well as response and remission rates compared with placebo-treated patients. LY544344 was well tolerated and there were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events among the three treatment groups. However, the trial was discontinued early based on findings of convulsions in preclinical studies. In conclusion, the findings of this study support the potential efficacy of mGlu2/3 receptor agonist agents in the treatment of GAD. Additional studies will be needed to further assess the toxicological and clinical profile of LY354740/LY544344.

Comparison of Combined Bupropion and Naltrexone Therapy for Obesity with Monotherapy and Placebo

CONTEXT The efficacy of current centrally acting obesity pharmacotherapies is limited by compensatory mechanisms that mitigate weight loss. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine whether opioid receptor antagonism (naltrexone) plus pro-opiomelanocortin activation (bupropion) causes greater weight loss than placebo or monotherapy. DESIGN/SETTING A randomized, placebo- and monotherapy-controlled, double-blind, dose-finding trial was conducted from August 2005 to December 2006 in seven U.S. outpatient clinics. PARTICIPANTS A total of 419 patients with uncomplicated obesity participated. INTERVENTIONS Interventions included 24 wk of sustained-release bupropion (400 mg/d), immediate-release naltrexone (48 mg/d), placebo, and three combination therapy [naltrexone/bupropion (NB)] groups consisting of immediate-release naltrexone, 16, 32, or 48 mg/d, plus sustained-release bupropion (400 mg/d) with a 24-wk extension. A minimal diet and exercise component was also included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Percent weight change from baseline at wk 24 in the intent-to-treat population for NB48 vs. placebo and monotherapy was assessed. Other measurements included body mass index, waist circumference, fasting lipids, glycemic variables, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS At wk 24, placebo-subtracted weight loss was -4.62% [95% confidence interval (CI) -6.24 to -2.99; P < 0.001] for NB16, -4.65% (95% CI -6.20 to -3.09; P < 0.001) for NB32, and -3.53% (95% CI -5.15 to -1.90; P < 0.001) for NB48. Weight loss was statistically significant vs. monotherapy for all three NB combinations with the exception of NB48 vs. bupropion. Weight loss with NB continued after wk 24. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was mild transient nausea. CONCLUSIONS NB caused gradual sustained weight loss over 48 wk; NB32 and NB16 demonstrated greater weight loss in the intent-to-treat population due to lower attrition rates. Further study is needed to demonstrate long-term efficacy and safety of NB.

Duloxetine as an SNRI treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: Results from a placebo and active-controlled trial

This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine 60–120 mg/day for the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo and active-controlled (venlafaxine extended-release 75–225 mg/day) trial designed to assess duloxetine 60–120 mg/day during 10 weeks of treatment in adults with Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV-defined generalized anxiety disorder. The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score assessed using analysis of covariance. A total of 487 patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine (n=162), venlafaxine XR (n=164), or placebo (n=161). Significantly greater improvement on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score occurred in the duloxetine (P=0.007) and venlafaxine XR (P<0.001) groups compared with the placebo group. Overall discontinuation rates did not differ among the three groups, but adverse event-related discontinuation was significantly higher in the duloxetine (14.2%, P<0.001) and venlafaxine XR (11.0%, P=0.001) groups than in the placebo group (1.9%). During the 2-week drug-tapering phase, discontinuation-emergent adverse events were significantly greater in the venlafaxine XR group (26.9%, P=0.04), but not in the duloxetine group (19.4%, P=0.448) compared with placebo (15.8%). Duloxetine 60–120 mg/day and venlafaxine XR 75–225 mg/day were each efficacious treatments for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

All-cause treatment discontinuation in schizophrenia during treatment with olanzapine relative to other antipsychotics: an integrated analysis.

Objectives: Treatment continuation, as measured by time to all-cause treatment discontinuation, is a broad measure of overall treatment effectiveness. This integrated analysis compared the likelihood of discontinuation from olanzapine treatment versus other antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Clinical trials of all sponsors were included if they met the following criteria: double-blind, randomized, comparative; duration of 12 weeks or longer; no mandatory discontinuation before 12 weeks; and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders; 20 patients or more per treatment. Weighted mean hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from discontinuation time. Meta-analyses were performed for the following comparators that had at least 2 studies: haloperidol (5 studies), risperidone (5 studies), ziprasidone (2 studies), clozapine (3 studies), and perphenazine (2 studies) (13 studies in total; 3 included more than 1 comparator). Only 1 eligible published study was found for fluphenazine, amisulpride, and quetiapine; therefore, meta-analyses could not be performed for these comparators. Results: Significantly (P < 0.05) greater likelihood of discontinuation relative to olanzapine treatment (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was observed for haloperidol (1.4 [1.2-1.7]), risperidone (1.3 [1.1-1.6]), ziprasidone (1.6 [1.4-2.0]), and quetiapine (1.4 [1.1-1.9]), but not clozapine (1.2 [0.9-1.6]), fluphenazine (1.8 [0.8-4.3]), perphenazine (1.3 [0.7-2.1]), or amisulpride (1.1 [0.8-1.6]). Conclusions: These data suggest that patients with schizophrenia and related disorders may continue olanzapine treatment longer than haloperidol, risperidone, ziprasidone, or quetiapine treatment.

An open-label study of naltrexone and bupropion combination therapy for smoking cessation in overweight and obese subjects

A combination of sustained release (SR) naltrexone (32 mg/day) and bupropion SR (360 mg/day) plus behavioral counseling was evaluated for the treatment of smoking cessation and mitigation of nicotine withdrawal and weight gain. Thirty overweight or obese nicotine-dependent subjects were enrolled in a 24-week, open-label study; 85% and 63% completed 12 and 2 4weeks, respectively. The target quit date was Week 4. Week 4-12 continuous abstinence rate was 48%, 78% of subjects achieved CO < or = 10 ppm, serum cotinine decreased from 185 to 48 microg/L, and tobacco use decreased from 129 to 14 cigarettes/week. Similar results were seen at Week 24. Body weight was essentially unchanged (Week 12: -0.1%; Week 24: +0.4%). Except for a transient significant increase 1 week after the target quit date (p<0.05), nicotine withdrawal scores did not change. The most common adverse events were nausea, insomnia, and constipation. These tended to be transient and mild or moderate in severity. In overweight or obese smokers, naltrexone/bupropion combination therapy with behavioral counseling was associated with decreased nicotine use, limited nicotine withdrawal symptoms, and no significant weight gain.

Characteristics of two alternative schizophrenia remission definitions: Relationship to clinical and quality of life outcomes

BACKGROUND The goal of these secondary analyses of clinical trial data was to characterize clinical outcomes in patients with schizophrenia who met symptom severity or duration thresholds for two alternative definitions of remission, and to explore their relationships to improvement duration and quality of life outcomes. METHODS Definition 1 used threshold criteria for selected PANSS items sustained over at least 6-months Definition 2 used Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) % change, a threshold score for the Clinical Global Improvement-Severity (CGI-S) maintained for at least 8 weeks, and threshold scores for selected BPRS items. Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) and Quality of Life scale (QLS) total scores were pooled from 6 clinical trials. The extent to which the alternative severity thresholds from these two definitions and duration of clinical improvement were associated with different clinical and QLS outcomes was explored. Regression analysis also assessed the relative contribution of each of the components of the two definition severity thresholds to improvements in QLS Total score. RESULTS Increases in QLS scores were greater for those patients who met either threshold criteria relative to those who met neither (p<.0001). Significantly greater improvements in QLS scores were observed for patients who met either threshold criteria at the 8-, 16- and 24-week visits relative to those who met criteria at weeks 16 and 24, or at week 24 only (p<0.001), as well as for the subset of patients who met threshold criteria at both 24 and 52 weeks relative to those who met criteria at only one of these 2 time points. Only 31% to 47% of patients meeting threshold criteria for either definition at the 8-, 16- or 24-week visits remained in remission at the 52-week visit. Among the severity threshold components analyzed, BPRS total % change from baseline was the strongest predictor of improvement in QLS scores. CONCLUSIONS Quality of life improved most for patients who achieved severity thresholds associated with either remission criteria and who stayed improved for longer periods. Total BPRS change scores accounted for the greatest percentage of the QLS scores variance. Only a fraction of patients who meet severity criteria for either remission definition early in treatment will remain at that level of improvement within the subsequent 9-12 months.

A retrospective comparison of cumulative time spent in remission during treatment with olanzapine or risperidone among patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND Available studies suggest comparable efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia over the short term. METHOD This retrospective analysis of data from a 28-week, double-blind, schizophrenia trial compared the cumulative amount of time that patients met severity criteria for remission during olanzapine (10-20 mg/day) or risperidone (4-12 mg/day) treatment. RESULTS The percentage cumulative time spent in remission was 40% for olanzapine- and 31% for risperidone-treated patients (P = 0.03) using Definition 1 (PANSS items P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5, G9 < or = 3), and 18% and 11% (P = 0.01), respectively, using Definition 2 (BPRS Total reduced 50%, BPRS psychosis items < or = 3, CGI-severity < or = 3). CONCLUSION During 28 weeks of treatment, olanzapine-treated patients spent more cumulative time in remission than risperidone-treated patients.