Edvard Mortsell
Stockholm University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Edvard Mortsell.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
Tamara M. Davis; Edvard Mortsell; Jesper Sollerman; Andrew Cameron Becker; Stephane Blondin; Peter M. Challis; Alejandro Clocchiatti; Alexei V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; Peter Marcus Garnavich; Saurabh W. Jha; Kevin Krisciunas; Robert P. Kirshner; Bruno Leibundgut; Weidong Li; Thomas Matheson; Gajus A. Miknaitis; G. Pignata; A. Rest; Adam G. Riess; Brian Paul Schmidt; R. C. Smith; Jason Spyromilio; Christopher W. Stubbs; Nicholas B. Suntzeff; John L. Tonry; William Michael Wood-Vasey; A. Zenteno
The first cosmological results from the ESSENCE supernova survey (Wood-Vasey and coworkers) are extended to a wider range of cosmological models including dynamical dark energy and nonstandard cosmological models. We fold in a greater number of external data sets such as the recent Higher-z release of high-redshift supernovae (Riess and coworkers), as well as several complementary cosmological probes. Model comparison statistics such as the Bayesian and Akaike information criteria are applied to gauge the worth of models. These statistics favor models that give a good fit with fewer parameters. Based on this analysis, the preferred cosmological model is the flat cosmological constant model, where the expansion history of the universe can be adequately described with only one free parameter describing the energy content of the universe. Among the more exotic models that provide good fits to the data, we note a preference for models whose best-fit parameters reduce them to the cosmological constant model.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2012
Mikael von Strauss; Angnis Schmidt-May; Jonas Enander; Edvard Mortsell; S. F. Hassan
We obtain the general cosmological evolution equations for a classically consistent theory of bimetric gravity. Their analytic solutions are demonstrated to generically allow for a cosmic evolution ...
The Astrophysical Journal | 2009
Jesper Sollerman; Edvard Mortsell; Tamara M. Davis; M. Blomqvist; Bruce A. Bassett; Andrew Cameron Becker; D. Cinabro; A. V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; Joshua A. Frieman; Peter Marcus Garnavich; Hubert Lampeitl; John P. Marriner; R. Miquel; Robert C. Nichol; Michael W. Richmond; Masao Sako; Donald P. Schneider; M. Smith; Jake Vanderplas; J. C. Wheeler
We use the new Type Ia supernovae discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II supernova survey, together with additional supernova data sets as well as observations of the cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic oscillations to constrain cosmological models. This complements the standard cosmology analysis presented by Kessler et al. in that we discuss and rank a number of the most popular nonstandard cosmology scenarios. When this combined data set is analyzed using the MLCS2k2 light-curve fitter, we find that more exotic models for cosmic acceleration provide a better fit to the data than the ΛCDM model. For example, the flat Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model is ranked higher by our information-criteria (IC) tests than the standard model with a flat universe and a cosmological constant. When the supernova data set is instead analyzed using the SALT-II light-curve fitter, the standard cosmological-constant model fares best. This investigation of how sensitive cosmological model selection is to assumptions about, and within, the light-curve fitters thereby highlights the need for an improved understanding of these unresolved systematic effects. Our investigation also includes inhomogeneous Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) models. While our LTB models can be made to fit the supernova data as well as any other model, the extra parameters they require are not supported by our IC analysis. Finally, we explore more model-independent ways to investigate the cosmic expansion based on this new data set.
Physical Review D | 2002
Steen Hannestad; Edvard Mortsell
We have reanalyzed constraints on the equation of state parameter,
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2006
Ariel Goobar; Steen Hannestad; Edvard Mortsell; Huitzu Tu
{w}_{Q}\ensuremath{\equiv}P/\ensuremath{\rho},
Physics of the Dark Universe | 2016
Philip Bull; Yashar Akrami; Julian Adamek; Tessa Baker; Emilio Bellini; Jose Beltrán Jiménez; Eloisa Bentivegna; Stefano Camera; Sebastien Clesse; Jonathan H. Davis; Enea Di Dio; Jonas Enander; Alan Heavens; Lavinia Heisenberg; Bin Hu; Claudio Llinares; Roy Maartens; Edvard Mortsell; Seshadri Nadathur; Johannes Noller; Roman Pasechnik; Marcel S. Pawlowski; Thiago S. Pereira; Miguel Quartin; Angelo Ricciardone; Signe Riemer-Sørensen; Massimiliano Rinaldi; Jeremy Sakstein; Ippocratis D. Saltas; Vincenzo Salzano
of the dark energy, using several cosmological data sets and relaxing the usual constraint
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2012
Marcus Berg; Igor Buchberger; Jonas Enander; Edvard Mortsell; Stefan Sjörs
{w}_{Q}g~\ensuremath{-}1.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2004
Steen Hannestad; Edvard Mortsell
We find that combining cosmic microwave background, large scale structure, and type Ia supernova data yields a nontrivial lower bound on
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Tamara M. Davis; Lam Hui; Joshua A. Frieman; Troels Haugbølle; Richard Kessler; Benjamin Sinclair; Jesper Sollerman; Bruce A. Bassett; John P. Marriner; Edvard Mortsell; Robert C. Nichol; Michael W. Richmond; Masao Sako; Donald P. Schneider; Mathew Smith
{w}_{Q}.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2005
Linda Ostman; Edvard Mortsell
At 95.4% confidence we find, assuming a flat geometry of the universe, a bound of