Edward E. Allen
Wake Forest University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Edward E. Allen.
Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics | 1994
Edward E. Allen
AbstractLet R(X) = Q[x1, x2, ..., xn] be the ring of polynomials in the variables X = {x1, x2, ..., xn} and R*(X) denote the quotient of R(X) by the ideal generated by the elementary symmetric functions. Given a σ ∈ Sn, we let g
Journal of Combinatorial Theory | 1995
Edward E. Allen
acm southeast regional conference | 2005
Edward E. Allen; Jacquelyn S. Fetrow; David J. John; Stan J. Thomas
_\sigma (X) = \prod\nolimits_{\sigma _i \succ \sigma _{i + 1} } {(x_{\sigma _1 } x_{\sigma _2 } \ldots x_{\sigma _i } } )
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society | 2006
Kenneth S. Berenhaut; Edward E. Allen; Sam J. Fraser
Journal of Combinatorial Theory | 1999
Edward E. Allen
In the late 1970s I. Gessel conjectured that these monomials, called the descent monomials, are a basis for R*(X). Actually, this result was known to Steinberg [10]. A. Garsia showed how it could be derived from the theory of Stanley-Reisner Rings [3]. Now let R(X, Y) denote the ring of polynomials in the variables X = {x1, x2, ..., xn} and Y = {y1, y2, ..., yn}. The diagonal action of σ ∈ Sn on polynomial P(X, Y) is defined as
acm southeast regional conference | 2007
Edward E. Allen; Liyang Diao; Jacquelyn S. Fetrow; David J. John; Richard F. Loeser; Leslie B. Poole
acm southeast regional conference | 2006
Edward E. Allen; Anthony Pecorella; Jacquelyn S. Fetrow; David J. John; William H. Turkett
\sigma P(X,Y) = P(x_{\sigma _1 } ,x_{\sigma _2 } , \ldots ,x_{\sigma _n } ,y_{\sigma _1 } ,y_{\sigma _2 } , \ldots ,y_{\sigma _n } )
Journal of Combinatorial Theory | 2018
Edward E. Allen; Joshua Hallam; Sarah Mason
bioinformatics and bioengineering | 2010
Edward E. Allen; James L. Norris; David J. John; Stan J. Thomas; William H. Turkett; Jacquelyn S. Fetrow
Let Rρ(X, Y) be the subring of R(X, Y) which is invariant under the diagonal action. Let Rρ*(X, Y) denote the quotient of Rρ(X, Y) by the ideal generated by the elementary symmetric functions in X and the elementary symmetric functions in Y. Recently, A. Garsia in [4] and V. Reiner in [8] showed that a collection of polynomials closely related to the descent monomials are a basis for Rρ*(X, Y). In this paper, the author gives elementary proofs of both theorems by constructing algorithms that show how to expand elements of R*(X) and Rρ*(X, Y) in terms of their respective bases.
international conference on bioinformatics | 2010
Pamela F. Marcott; Jacquelyn S. Fetrow; Richard F. Loeser; Edward E. Allen
Abstract Let μ = (μ1 ⩾ μ2 ⩾ ⋯ ⩾ μk + 1) = (k, 1n − k) be a partition of n. In [GH] Garsia and Haiman show that the diagonal action of Sn on the space of harmonic polynomials H μ affords the left regular representation p of Sn. Furthermore, Garsia and Haiman define a bigraded character of the diagonal action of Sn on H μ and show that the character multiplicities are polynomials K λ, μ (q, t) that are closely related to the Macdonald-Kostka polynomials Kλ, μ(q, t). In this paper we construct a collection of polynomials B(μ) that form a basis for H μ which exhibits the decomposition of H μ into its irreducible parts. Through this connection we give a combinatorial interpretation of the polynomials K λ, μ (q, t) .