Edward Feinberg

Bevacizumab vs Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Early Results of a Prospective Double-Masked, Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE To report early outcomes of a prospective, double-masked, controlled trial comparing bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA) to ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech Inc) for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN Prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial. METHODS This is a single-center, randomized clinical trial at the Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Patients who met inclusion criteria were randomized 2:1 to bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Each patient contributed 1 eye to the study. All subjects and investigators (except for the pharmacist responsible for study assignments) were masked to treatment arms. Visual acuity (VA) was checked on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Patients were given either bevacizumab or ranibizumab every month for the first 3 months, followed by optical coherence tomography-guided, variable-dosing schedule. Main outcomes measured were VA and foveal thickness. RESULTS Twenty patients completed the 6-month follow up. Thirteen patients received bevacizumab and 7 patients received ranibizumab. No subjects in either group lost more than 15 letters on ETDRS chart. The average preoperative VA was 31.6 letters in the bevacizumab group and 30.4 letters in the ranibizumab group. At 6 months follow-up, mean vision was 46.4 letters in the bevacizumab group and 37.4 letters in the ranibizumab group. Two-tailed ttest failed to show statistical significance between the two groups. Patients in the bevacizumab group underwent an average of 5 injections, while patients in the ranibizumab group underwent a mean of 4 injections. CONCLUSION Early results of a head-to-head, randomized, double-masked, prospective, single-center controlled trial between bevacizumab and ranibizumab show no difference in efficacy between the two treatments for choroidal neovascularizaton in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. As this study conveys results of a small number of patients, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed in order to establish statistical significance.

Bevacizumab vs ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration: 1-year outcomes of a prospective, double-masked randomised clinical trial

PurposeTo report 1-year visual and anatomic outcomes of a prospective, double-masked randomised clinical trial comparing bevacizumab with ranibizumab for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).MethodsPatients who met inclusion criteria were randomised 2 : 1 to bevacizumab or ranibizumab. All subjects and investigators (except for the pharmacist responsible for study assignments) were masked to treatment arms. Visual acuity was taken on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Patients were given either bevacizumab or ranibizumab every month for the first 3 months, followed by an optical coherence tomography-guided, variable-dosing treatment schedule. Main outcomes measured included visual acuity, foveal thickness, and total number of injections over the 1-year treatment period.ResultsIn total, 15 patients received bevacizumab and 7 patients received ranibizumab. The average pre-operative visual acuity was 34.9 letters in the bevacizumab group, and 32.7 letters in the ranibizumab group. At 1-year follow-up, mean vision was 42.5 letters in the bevacizumab group, and 39.0 letters in the ranibizumab group. Two-tailed t-test failed to showed statistical significance between the two groups (P=0.5). Patients in the bevacizumab group underwent an average of eight injections, whereas patients in the ranibizumab group underwent a mean of four injections (P=0.001).ConclusionThe 1-year outcomes of a prospective, double-masked, randomised clinical trial comparing bevacizumab with ranibizumab failed to show a difference in visual and anatomic outcomes between the two treatments for choroidal neovascularisation in AMD. Total injections given over the treatment period were significantly different between the two groups. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Vitreous evaluation: a diagnostic challenge.

PURPOSE To categorize vitrectomy cytologic diagnoses and ancillary tests to address appropriate processing of low-volume vitreous samples. DESIGN Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS Five thousand seven hundred thirty-six vitreous samples. METHODS Cytologic diagnoses of therapeutic and diagnostic vitrectomy samples and their processing protocols from 3 teaching institutions were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic results were categorized as negative for malignancy, suspicious for malignancy, and positive for malignancy. All ancillary studies performed were documented, including special stains, immunohistochemistry analysis, cytokine levels, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. RESULTS Of the 5736 vitreous samples analyzed, 4683 (81.64%) were from Tufts Medical Center (TMC), 955 (16.65%) were from Boston Medical Center (BMC), and 98 (1.70%) were from Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI). Cases from TMC and BMC were therapeutic and diagnostic vitrectomies, and MERSI cases were diagnostic vitrectomies. Most vitrectomies showed negative results for malignancy: 99.47% of TMC cases, 99.89% of BMC cases, and 79.6% of MERSI cases. These included vitreous hemorrhage and inflammatory or infectious findings. Ancillary studies performed in this category included Periodic Acid-Schiff staining for fungi, PCR analysis for toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus I and II, and vitreous cultures for infections (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Candida, Fusarium, and Propionibacterium species). Interleukin (IL) 10-to-IL-6 ratios were performed on 38.7% of cases from MERSI. Fourteen cases from TMC were suspicious for malignancy based on cytologic evaluation. Eleven cases from TMC, 1 case from BMC, and 20 cases from MERSI showed positive results for malignancy and included B-cell lymphoma, retinoblastoma, melanoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. The ancillary testing included PCR for heavy chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangements, immunohistochemistry for EBV, in situ hybridization for κ and λ light chains, and cytogenetics. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest data pool of reported cytologic diagnoses of diagnostic and therapeutic vitrectomy samples. Cytologic evaluation of therapeutic vitrectomy samples provides a valuable baseline of nonpathologic findings that assist in differentiation between malignancy, infections, and inflammatory conditions. Allocation of small-volume vitreous samples to select ancillary testing from the plethora of available diagnostic tests requires preoperative communication between surgeons and pathologists to ensure appropriate and timely treatment methods.

Increased Intraocular Pressure and Hyperglycemic Level in Diabetic Patients

Purpose To determine whether hyperglycemic levels as determined from high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels influence intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on subjects with a diagnosis of NPDR and a corresponding HbA1c level measured within 90 days before or after an IOP measurement over a two-year period. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of glaucoma or treatment with IOP lowering medications or oral or topical steroids. Results Using 14.5mmHg as a baseline mean value for IOP, 42 subjects had an IOP < 14.5mmHg and mean HbA1c of 8.1±1.1, while 72 subjects had an IOP ≥ 14.5mmHg and a mean HbA1c of 9.0±2.1. Although there was an overlap in the confidence intervals, a significant difference (P = 0.01) in the mean HbA1c level was observed in regression analysis between the two groups. Importantly, diabetic subjects with elevated HbA1c levels rarely (<1%) exhibited reduced IOP levels. Conclusions Diabetic subjects with elevated HbA1c levels exhibited significantly higher IOPs compared to those with lower HbA1c levels. Findings from this study indicate an association between hyperglycemia and elevated IOP and that poor glycemic control may contribute to increased IOP levels in long-term diabetic patients.

Ocular manifestations of torture: solar retinopathy as a result of forced solar gazing

Solar retinopathy as a result of sun gazing has been well documented and occurs as a result of thermal and photochemical processes after solar exposure.1 Although solar exposure is usually a result of deliberate sun gazing, forced sun gazing can also be used as a torture method. Torture is prevalent worldwide. In 2007, the Amnesty International documented cases of “torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” in 81 countries.2 It is important for clinicians to be aware of the physical manifestations of torture because they are not always obvious. Torture methods are often devised to leave minimal long-term physical indications but often have tremendous psychological impact.3 Survivors will often not disclose the experience of their torture with their physician, and the diagnosis may be missed.4 A 58-year-old West African man was referred to an ophthalmology clinic by his primary care physician with a …

The role of intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of acute retinal necrosis.

PURPOSE To describe a case of successful treatment of acute retinal necrosis with a combination of antivirals and intravenous immunoglobulin. METHODS This is a case report of a 77-year-old white man diagnosed with unilateral acute retinal necrosis. RESULTS Combination therapy with systemic antivirals, prophylactic laser retinopexy, and intravenous immunoglobulin halted progression of retinitis and preserved visual acuity. CONCLUSION Acute retinal necrosis is an aggressive disease with significant risk of vision loss even when treated with appropriate therapy. In this report, the authors describe a case of successful treatment with a combination of systemic antivirals and intravenous immunoglobulin. Intraocular antiviral injection plus systemic treatment remain to be a more cost-effective option.