Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edward H. Hinchcliffe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edward H. Hinchcliffe.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2008

Phosphorylation regulates targeting of cytoplasmic dynein to kinetochores during mitosis

Jacqueline Whyte; Jason R. Bader; Sinji B.F. Tauhata; Maurice Raycroft; Jessica E. Hornick; K. Kevin Pfister; William S. Lane; Gordon K. Chan; Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Patricia S. Vaughan; Kevin T. Vaughan

Cytoplasmic dynein functions at several sites during mitosis; however, the basis of targeting to each site remains unclear. Tandem mass spectrometry analysis of mitotic dynein revealed a phosphorylation site in the dynein intermediate chains (ICs) that mediates binding to kinetochores. IC phosphorylation directs binding to zw10 rather than dynactin, and this interaction is needed for kinetochore dynein localization. Phosphodynein associates with kinetochores from nuclear envelope breakdown to metaphase, but bioriented microtubule (MT) attachment and chromosome alignment induce IC dephosphorylation. IC dephosphorylation stimulates binding to dynactin and poleward streaming. MT depolymerization, release of kinetochore tension, and a PP1-γ mutant each inhibited IC dephosphorylation, leading to the retention of phosphodynein at kinetochores and reduced poleward streaming. The depletion of kinetochore dynactin by moderate levels of p50(dynamitin) expression disrupted the ability of dynein to remove checkpoint proteins by streaming at metaphase but not other aspects of kinetochore dynein activity. Together, these results suggest a new model for localization of kinetochore dynein and the contribution of kinetochore dynactin.


Nature | 2013

Non-vesicular trafficking by a ceramide-1-phosphate transfer protein regulates eicosanoids.

Dhirendra K. Simanshu; Ravi Kanth Kamlekar; Dayanjan S. Wijesinghe; Xianqiong Zou; Xiuhong Zhai; Shrawan K. Mishra; Julian G. Molotkovsky; Lucy Malinina; Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Charles E. Chalfant; Rhoderick E. Brown; Dinshaw J. Patel

Phosphorylated sphingolipids ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) have emerged as key regulators of cell growth, survival, migration and inflammation. C1P produced by ceramide kinase is an activator of group IVA cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α), the rate-limiting releaser of arachidonic acid used for pro-inflammatory eicosanoid production, which contributes to disease pathogenesis in asthma or airway hyper-responsiveness, cancer, atherosclerosis and thrombosis. To modulate eicosanoid action and avoid the damaging effects of chronic inflammation, cells require efficient targeting, trafficking and presentation of C1P to specific cellular sites. Vesicular trafficking is likely but non-vesicular mechanisms for C1P sensing, transfer and presentation remain unexplored. Moreover, the molecular basis for selective recognition and binding among signalling lipids with phosphate headgroups, namely C1P, phosphatidic acid or their lyso-derivatives, remains unclear. Here, a ubiquitously expressed lipid transfer protein, human GLTPD1, named here CPTP, is shown to specifically transfer C1P between membranes. Crystal structures establish C1P binding through a novel surface-localized, phosphate headgroup recognition centre connected to an interior hydrophobic pocket that adaptively expands to ensheath differing-length lipid chains using a cleft-like gating mechanism. The two-layer, α-helically-dominated ‘sandwich’ topology identifies CPTP as the prototype for a new glycolipid transfer protein fold subfamily. CPTP resides in the cell cytosol but associates with the trans-Golgi network, nucleus and plasma membrane. RNA interference-induced CPTP depletion elevates C1P steady-state levels and alters Golgi cisternae stack morphology. The resulting C1P decrease in plasma membranes and increase in the Golgi complex stimulates cPLA2α release of arachidonic acid, triggering pro-inflammatory eicosanoid generation.


Oncogene | 2002

Two for two: Cdk2 and its role in centrosome doubling.

Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Greenfield Sluder

The magic number in cell division is two: during S phase the cell makes two copies of its genome, and during mitosis the equal segregation of all sister chromosomes to the two daughter cells critically depends upon the formation of a bipolar mitotic spindle. Since spindle polarity in higher animal cells is usually dependent upon the number of centrosomes present, the cell must have exactly two centrosomes by the onset of mitosis or else mitotic defects will occur that can have disastrous consequences for the organism (reviewed in Brinkley, 2001; Rieder et al., 2001). For example, failure of the interphase centrosome to duplicate before mitosis leads to a monopolar spindle and the formation of a single polyploid daughter cell. Conversely, if a cell contains more than the normal two centrosomes, it is apt to assemble a multipolar spindle at mitosis, which randomly distributes chromosomes to multiple daughter cells. Finally, a complete lack of a centrosome does not prevent the formation of a bipolar spindle (Khodjakov et al., 2000), but does lead to an increased incidence of cleavage failure (Hinchcliffe et al., 2001; Khodjakov and Rieder, 2001; Piel et al., 2001). Thus, mis-regulation of centrosome number produces genetic imbalances that can contribute to the loss of growth regulation and the genesis of the transformed phenotype. Indeed, the multiple centrosomes found in the cells of many highgrade human tumors are thought to cause the genomic instability that allows the evolution of aggressive growth characteristics (Lingle and Salisbury, 2000). Thus, it is of obvious importance for the cell to exercise tight control over centrosome duplication. In this review we discuss the development of our understanding of how Cdk2 – cyclin E participates in the control of centrosome duplication. Basics of centrosome duplication


Cytoskeleton | 2000

Mutant Rac1B expression in Dictyostelium: effects on morphology, growth, endocytosis, development, and the actin cytoskeleton

Stephen J. Palmieri; Thomas Nebl; Robert K. Pope; David J. Seastone; Eunkyung Lee; Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Greenfield Sluder; David A. Knecht; James A. Cardelli; Elizabeth J. Luna

Rac1 is a small G-protein in the Ras superfamily that has been implicated in the control of cell growth, adhesion, and the actin-based cytoskeleton. To investigate the role of Rac1 during motile processes, we have established Dictyostelium cell lines that conditionally overexpress epitope-tagged Dictyostelium discoideum wild-type Rac1B (DdRac1B) or a mutant DdRac1B protein. Expression of endogenous levels of myc- or GFP-tagged wild-type DdRac1B had minimal effect on cellular morphologies and behaviors. By contrast, expression of a constitutively active mutant (G12-->V or Q61-->L) or a dominant negative mutant (T17-->N) generated amoebae with characteristic cellular defects. The morphological appearance of actin-containing structures, intracellular levels of F-actin, and cellular responses to chemoattractant closely paralleled the amount of active DdRac1B, indicating a role in upregulating actin cytoskeletal activities. Expression of any of the three mutants inhibited cell growth and cytokinesis, and delayed multicellular development, suggesting that DdRac1B plays important regulatory role(s) during these processes. No significant effects were observed on binding or internalization of latex beads in suspension or on intracellular membrane trafficking. Cells expressing DdRac1B-G12V exhibited defects in fluid-phase endocytosis and the longest developmental delays; DdRac1B-Q61L produced the strongest cytokinesis defect; and DdRac1B-T17N generated intermediate phenotypes. These conditionally expressed DdRac1B proteins should facilitate the identification and characterization of the Rac1 signaling pathway in an organism that is amenable to both biochemical and molecular genetic manipulations.


Microbes and Infection | 2008

Toxoplasma gondii actively remodels the microtubule network in host cells

Margaret E. Walker; Elizabeth Hjort; Sherri S. Smith; Abhishek Tripathi; Jessica E. Hornick; Edward H. Hinchcliffe; William E. Archer; Kristin M. Hager

Toxoplasma gondii infection triggers host microtubule rearrangement and organelle recruitment around the parasite vacuole. Factors affecting initial stages of microtubule remodeling are unknown. To illuminate the mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that the parasite actively remodels host microtubules. Utilizing heat-killed parasites and time-lapse analysis, we determined microtubule rearrangement requires living parasites and is time dependent. We discovered a novel aster of microtubules (MTs) associates with the vacuole within 1h of infection. This aster lacks the concentrated foci of gamma (gamma)-tubulin normally associated with MT nucleation sites. Unexpectedly, vacuole enlargement does not correlate with an increase in MT staining around the vacuole. We conclude microtubule remodeling does not result from steric constraints. Using nocodazole washout studies, we demonstrate the vacuole nucleates host microtubule growth in-vivo via gamma-tubulin-associated sites. Moreover, superinfected host cells display multiple gamma-tubulin foci. Microtubule dynamics are critical for cell cycle control in uninfected cells. Using non-confluent monolayers, we show host cells commonly fail to finish cytokinesis resulting in larger, multinucleated cells. Our data suggest intimate interactions between T. gondii and host microtubules result in suppression of cell division and/or cause a mitotic defect, thus providing a larger space for parasite duplication.


Biology of the Cell | 1999

Control of centrosome reproduction: The right number at the right time

Greenfield Sluder; Edward H. Hinchcliffe

It is of great importance for the cell to precisely coordinate the doubling of the interphase centrosome with nuclear events during the cell cycle and limit the number of centrosomes it contains at the onset of mitosis to two and only two. The penalties for mistakes are abnormal spindle assembly, inappropriate chromosome distribution, and consequently, genomic instability. We review the functional properties of the mechanisms that control when the centrosome duplicates in the cell cycle and the controls for centrosome copy number. We look to limits that are intrinsic to the centrosome itself and controls imposed by cell cycle linked changes in cytoplasmic conditions. Control of centrosome reproduction is exercised at both levels.


Current Biology | 2001

Centrosome duplication: three kinases come up a winner!

Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Greenfield Sluder

Despite over one hundred years of research, the duplication of the centrosome is a poorly understood process. Three recent papers--exploring three different kinases--may have provided the answer.


Molecular Biology of the Cell | 2011

Zwint-1 is a Novel Aurora B Substrate Required for the Assembly of a Dynein-binding Platform on Kinetochores.

James M. Kasuboski; Jason R. Bader; Patricia S. Vaughan; Sinji B.F. Tauhata; Michael Winding; Meghan A. Morrissey; Michelle V. Joyce; William C. Boggess; Larissa Vos; Gordon K. Chan; Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Kevin T. Vaughan

This study identifies zwint-1 as a novel substrate for AurB during mitosis. Phosphorylation is required for outer kinetochore assembly during prometaphase. However, zwint-1 dephosphorylation is required at metaphase for checkpoint silencing.


Nature Cell Biology | 2016

Chromosome missegregation during anaphase triggers p53 cell cycle arrest through histone H3.3 Ser31 phosphorylation

Edward H. Hinchcliffe; Charles A. Day; Kul B. Karanjeet; Sela Fadness; Alyssa Langfald; Kevin T. Vaughan; Zigang Dong

Maloriented chromosomes can evade the spindle assembly checkpoint and generate aneuploidy, a common feature of tumorigenesis. But chromosome missegregation in non-transformed cells triggers a p53-dependent fail-safe mechanism that blocks proliferation of normal cells that inadvertently become aneuploid. How this fail-safe is triggered is not known. Here we identify a conserved feedback mechanism that monitors missegregating chromosomes during anaphase through the differential phosphorylation of histone H3.3 at Ser31. We do this by inducing transient chromosome missegregation in diploid cells. During anaphase, H3.3 Ser31 is phosphorylated along the arms of lagging or misaligned chromosomes. Within minutes, Ser31 phosphorylation (Ser31P) spreads to all of the chromatids of both daughter cells, which persists into G1. Masking H3.3 Ser31P by antibody microinjection prevents nuclear p53 accumulation in the aneuploid daughters. Previous work demonstrated that prolonged prometaphase and DNA damage during abnormal mitosis can activate p53. We show that p53 activation in response to chromosome missegregation can occur without prolonged mitosis or DNA damage. Our study provides insight into how aneuploidy caused by chromosome missegregation is normally monitored and suppressed.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2008

Tektin 2 is required for central spindle microtubule organization and the completion of cytokinesis

Thomas M. Durcan; Elizabeth S. Halpin; Trisha Rao; Nicholas S. Collins; Emily Tribble; Jessica E. Hornick; Edward H. Hinchcliffe

During anaphase, the nonkinetochore microtubules in the spindle midzone become compacted into the central spindle, a structure which is required to both initiate and complete cytokinesis. We show that Tektin 2 (Tek2) associates with the spindle poles throughout mitosis, organizes the spindle midzone microtubules during anaphase, and assembles into the midbody matrix surrounding the compacted midzone microtubules during cytokinesis. Tek2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) disrupts central spindle organization and proper localization of MKLP1, PRC1, and Aurora B to the midzone and prevents the formation of a midbody matrix. Video microscopy revealed that loss of Tek2 results in binucleate cell formation by aberrant fusion of daughter cells after cytokinesis. Although a myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin, prevents actin-myosin contractility, the microtubules of the central spindle are compacted. Strikingly, Tek2 siRNA abolishes this actin-myosin–independent midzone microtubule compaction. Thus, Tek2-dependent organization of the central spindle during anaphase is essential for proper midbody formation and the segregation of daughter cells after cytokinesis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Edward H. Hinchcliffe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Greenfield Sluder

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederick J. Miller

Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sidney L. Shaw

Indiana University Bloomington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason R. Bader

University of Notre Dame

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge