Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edward J. Heck is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edward J. Heck.


Journal of American College Health | 1991

Developing a Screening Questionnaire for Problem Drinking in College Students

Edward J. Heck

The CAGE questionnaire is one of several brief screening instruments that has been successful in detecting alcoholism in a general population. There is evidence, however, indicating that none of these instruments has sufficient validity for detecting the less severe pattern of problem drinking that is more typical of college students. This study analyzed survey data, including CAGE questions, to identify items that would have sufficient test operating characteristics more valid for screening problem drinkers. Problem and normal drinking patterns were defined by combining certain categories of quantity-frequency data with categories of alcohol-related problems. Problem and normal drinkers were identified as those students at the ends of the quantity-frequency/alcohol-problems continuum. Differences between the two groups in response frequencies to a 17-item alcohol-use survey were examined using chi-square analyses. Five items showing highly significant differences were identified, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated at possible cutoff points. These items were (1) a positive response to any 2 of the 4 CAGE items, (2) reporting rarely or never choosing nonalcoholic beverages at social events, (3) driving under the influence at least 6 to 10 times or more in the last year, and (4) having started regular use of alcohol before the college years. At the recommended cutoff score for a positive test, the items have a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 87%, and positive predictive value of 52%. When used for screening in a population similar to this, it will fail to identify 12% of the problem drinkers and will falsely classify 13% of all normal drinkers as problem drinkers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Journal of Teacher Education | 1971

A Training and Research Model for Investigating the Effects of Sensitivity Training for Teachers.

Edward J. Heck

One of the current conceptual problems that confronts both psychology and education is the development of behavioral models formulated on the basis of personenvironment interactions. Although the need has been recognized since the time of Lewin’s formula (behavior = function of person and environment), there has been a rather slow development of models that specifically and systematically coordinate individual differences with environmental factors. Instead of continu-


Journal of Counseling Psychology | 1973

Differential Expression Of Empathy In A Counseling Analogue.

Edward J. Heck; Carl S. Davis


Journal of Counseling Psychology | 1986

Analysis of sequence and pattern in process research.

James W. Lichtenberg; Edward J. Heck


Journal of Counseling Psychology | 1979

Interactional Structure of Interviews Conducted by Counselors of Differing Levels of Cognitive Complexity.

James W. Lichtenberg; Edward J. Heck


Journal of Counseling Psychology | 1977

Differential Client Attractiveness in a Counseling Analogue.

Carl S. Davis; David A. Cook; Rick L. Jennings; Edward J. Heck


Journal of Counseling and Development | 1990

Identity Achievement or Diffusion: A Response to Van Hesteren and Ivey

Edward J. Heck


Journal of Substance Abuse | 1995

Criterion variability in problem-drinking research on college students

Edward J. Heck; Michael Williams


The Personnel and Guidance Journal | 1983

Sex Bias in Counseling: A Reply and Critique

James W. Lichtenberg; Edward J. Heck


The Counseling Psychologist | 1983

Sex Bias in Counseling: A Reply to Farmer

Edward J. Heck; James W. Lichtenberg

Collaboration


Dive into the Edward J. Heck's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge