Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edward P. Sloan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edward P. Sloan.


Epilepsy Currents | 2016

Evidence-Based Guideline: Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children and Adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society

Tracy A. Glauser; Shlomo Shinnar; David Gloss; Brian K. Alldredge; Ravindra Arya; Jacquelyn Bainbridge; Mary Bare; Thomas P. Bleck; W. Edwin Dodson; Lisa Garrity; Andy Jagoda; Daniel H. Lowenstein; John M. Pellock; James J. Riviello; Edward P. Sloan; David M. Treiman

CONTEXT: The optimal pharmacologic treatment for early convulsive status epilepticus is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze efficacy, tolerability and safety data for anticonvulsant treatment of children and adults with convulsive status epilepticus and use this analysis to develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm. DATA SOURCES: Structured literature review using MEDLINE, Embase, Current Contents, and Cochrane library supplemented with article reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of anticonvulsant treatment for seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual studies were rated using predefined criteria and these results were used to form recommendations, conclusions, and an evidence-based treatment algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 38 randomized controlled trials were identified, rated and contributed to the assessment. Only four trials were considered to have class I evidence of efficacy. Two studies were rated as class II and the remaining 32 were judged to have class III evidence. In adults with convulsive status epilepticus, intramuscular midazolam, intravenous lorazepam, intravenous diazepam and intravenous phenobarbital are established as efficacious as initial therapy (Level A). Intramuscular midazolam has superior effectiveness compared to intravenous lorazepam in adults with convulsive status epilepticus without established intravenous access (Level A). In children, intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam are established as efficacious at stopping seizures lasting at least 5 minutes (Level A) while rectal diazepam, intramuscular midazolam, intranasal midazolam, and buccal midazolam are probably effective (Level B). No significant difference in effectiveness has been demonstrated between intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam in adults or children with convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). Respiratory and cardiac symptoms are the most commonly encountered treatment-emergent adverse events associated with intravenous anticonvulsant drug administration in adults with convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). The rate of respiratory depression in patients with convulsive status epilepticus treated with benzodiazepines is lower than in patients with convulsive status epilepticus treated with placebo indicating that respiratory problems are an important consequence of untreated convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). When both are available, fosphenytoin is preferred over phenytoin based on tolerability but phenytoin is an acceptable alternative (Level A). In adults, compared to the first therapy, the second therapy is less effective while the third therapy is substantially less effective (Level A). In children, the second therapy appears less effective and there are no data about third therapy efficacy (Level C). The evidence was synthesized into a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the paucity of well-designed randomized controlled trials, practical conclusions and an integrated treatment algorithm for the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus across the age spectrum (infants through adults) can be constructed. Multicenter, multinational efforts are needed to design, conduct and analyze additional randomized controlled trials that can answer the many outstanding clinically relevant questions identified in this guideline.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1990

The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: two years' experience of the Chicago Trauma System.

Robert F. Smith; Lawrence Frateschi; Edward P. Sloan; Lurene Campbell; Richard Krieg; Lonnie C. Edwards; John Barrett

The American College of Surgeons has stated that in considering the development of trauma systems it is important to ensure an appropriate volume of seriously injured patients be seen by each trauma center in order to achieve acceptable mortality rates. Clinical data supporting this recommendation are lacking. An analysis was performed on 1,643 seriously injured trauma patients to determine the relationship between volume and mortality rates. Three separate statistical methods were used: Pearson correlation coefficients, mortality odds ratios, and direct pairwise mortality comparisons. In addition, Tobit analysis was introduced as a method to analyze the relationship between volume and mortality. Mortality rates were adjusted for the confounding variable of serious head injury. Pearson correlation coefficients for volume vs. adjusted mortality was -0.65. Mortality odds ratios comparing the low-volume (less than 140 pts) trauma centers vs. the high-volume (greater than 200 pts) trauma centers was 1.3 for adjusted mortality rates (95% CI = 1.01-1.66; p = 0.04). Categorical analysis showed significantly different mortality rates in the centers before and after adjusting for patient mix. Tobit analysis showed the relationship between volume and mortality to be significant, accounting for 30-40% of the observed variation in mortality rates. In addition, Tobit analysis allowed construction of a model to predict mortality rates, given specific volumes of patients. Our data suggest that an inverse relationship exists between volume and mortality, and support the necessity of configuring trauma systems in a manner that will ensure designated trauma centers will see a high volume of seriously injured patients.


American Journal of Cardiology | 1997

Value of Posterior and Right Ventricular Leads in Comparison to the Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram in Evaluation of ST-Segment Elevation in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction

Robert J Zalenski; Robert J. Rydman; Edward P. Sloan; Kenneth Hahn; David Cooke; Joanne Fagan; Denise Fligner; William Hessions; David Justis; Linda M. Kampe; Shirish Shah; John Tucker; Diane Zwicke

In this multicenter prospective trial, we studied posterior (V7 to V9) and right ventricular (V4R to V6R) leads to assess their accuracy compared with standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients aged >34 years with suspected AMI received posterior and right ventricular leads immediately after the initial 12-lead ECG. ST elevation of 0.1 mV in 2 leads was blindly determined and inter-rater reliability estimated. AMI was diagnosed by World Health Organization criteria. The diagnostic value of nonstandard leads was determined when 12-lead ST elevation was absent and present and multivariate stepwise regression analysis was also performed. Of 533 study patients, 64.7% (345 of 533) had AMI and 24.8% received thrombolytic therapy. Posterior and right ventricular leads increased sensitivity for AMI by 8.4% (p = 0.03) but decreased specificity by 7.0% (p = 0.06). The likelihood ratios of a positive test for 12, 12 + posterior, and 12 + right ventricular ECGs were 6.4, 5.6, and 4.5, respectively. Increased AMI rates (positive predictive values) were found when ST elevation was present on 6 nonstandard leads (69.1%), on 12 leads only (88.4%), and on both 6 and 12 leads (96.8%; p <0.001). Treatment rates with thrombolytic therapy increased in parallel with this electrocardiographic gradient. Logistic regression analysis showed that 4 leads were independently predictive of AMI (p <0.001): leads I, II, V3, V5R; V9 approached statistical significance (p = 0.055). The standard ECG is not optimal for detecting ST-segment elevation in AMI, but its accuracy is only modestly improved by the addition of posterior and right ventricular leads.


Annals of Emergency Medicine | 1993

Assessing the diagnostic value of an ECG containing leads V4R, V8, and V9: The 15-Lead ECG

Robert J. Zalenski; David Cooke; Robert J. Rydman; Edward P. Sloan; Daniel G. Murphy

STUDY OBJECTIVES To assess sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios of ECG findings on leads V4R, V8, and V9 for acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN Prospective, two-stage cohort study. SETTING A 660-bed university-affiliated community hospital. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty-nine admitted patients with suspected myocardial infarction or unstable angina. INTERVENTIONS Standard 12-lead ECG followed immediately by V4R, V8, and V9. MEASUREMENTS Initial ECG findings of ST-segment displacement, Q waves, T-wave inversion, and eligibility for thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS Major abnormalities (ST-segment deviation, T-wave inversion, Q waves) were found on the extra three leads in 28.9% (43 of 149) of patients. Sensitivity of ST-segment elevation for acute myocardial infarction on 12 versus 15 leads increased from 47.1% to 58.8%, respectively, with no decrease in specificity. McNemars pair-matched analysis for ST-segment elevation on myocardial infarction subgroup showed an association of ST elevation with the 15-lead ECG (P < .05). An eightfold increase in the odds of detecting ST elevation was found (90% confidence interval, 1.42 to 14.58); 22% of patients negative for ST elevation on 12 leads were positive on 15 leads. Analysis of ECG criteria for thrombolytic therapy presenting uniquely on extra leads showed an increased sensitivity from 35.3% to 44.1% on 12 versus 15 leads, respectively; there was a sixfold increase in the odds of meeting ECG thrombolytic therapy criteria (90% confidence interval, 0.34 to 11.66); 13.5% of patients not meeting criteria on 12 leads did so on 15 leads. CONCLUSION The 15-lead ECG provides increased sensitivity and odds of detecting ST-segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction patients with no loss of specificity; its use may expand the selection of thrombolytic therapy candidates and provide a fuller ECG description of the extent of myocardial injury and necrosis.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1989

Toxicology screening in urban trauma patients: drug prevalence and its relationship to trauma severity and management

Edward P. Sloan; Robert J. Zalenski; Robert F. Smith; Charles Sheaff; Edwin H. Chen; Niko I. Keys; Marc Crescenzo; John Barrett; Eleanor Berman

Although toxicology screening is often used when treating trauma patients, its utility and significance remain controversial. Data from 623 toxicology screens performed in urban trauma center patients with mental status alterations are reported. The study patients were predominantly black and male, with a mean age of 32 (+/- 22) years. Overall, 86% of screens were positive. Substances of abuse, including ethanol, were noted in 525 (84%) of urine toxicology screens. Ethanol, cannabinoids, and cocaine were the drugs most commonly found in urine, with positivity noted in 53%, 37%, and 34% of screens. Serum analysis was 44% positive, with ethanol noted in 41% of patients. In blacks, the odds ratio of illicit drug use before trauma ranged from 1.9 to 4.2 (p less than 0.005), and in those aged 17 to 40 years, the odds ratio for illicit urine drugs ranged from 4.7 to 16.8 (p less than 0.001). In patients older than 40 years, the odds of a positive serum ethanol level were 1.7 times greater than in younger patients, and a level above 300 mg% was 3.8 times more likely in this age group (p less than 0.001). When serum ethanol was detected, the odds ratio of a head injury was 1.4 relative to patients without serum ethanol (p less than 0.06), and the odds ratio for abdominal injury was 1.6 for patients with serum ethanol (p less than 0.03). The odds of a TS less than 12 were 1.8 (p less than 0.05), and the odds of a GCS less than 12 were 3.3 (p less than 0.001) with ethanol levels greater than 100 mg%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


The American Journal of Medicine | 1993

Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection among emergency department workers

Ruthanne Marcus; David H. Culver; David M. Bell; Pamela U. Srivastava; Meryl H. Mendelson; Robert J. Zalenski; Bruce F. Farber; Denise Fligner; Joseph Hassett; Thomas C. Quinn; Charles A. Schable; Edward P. Sloan; Paulus Tsui; Gabor D. Kelen

PURPOSE To estimate (1) the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in emergency department (ED) patients, (2) the frequency of blood contact (BC) in ED workers (EDWs), (3) the efficacy of gloves in preventing BC, and (4) the risk of HIV infection in EDWs due to BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted an 8-month study in three pairs of inner-city and suburban hospital EDs in high AIDS incidence areas in the United States. At each hospital, blood specimens from approximately 3,400 ED patients were tested for HIV antibody. Observers monitored BC and glove use by EDWs. RESULTS HIV seroprevalence was 4.1 to 8.9 per 100 patient visits in the 3 inner-city EDs, 6.1 in 1 suburban ED, and 0.2 and 0.7 in the other 2 suburban EDs. The HIV infection status of 69% of the infected patients was unknown to ED staff. Seroprevalence rates were highest among patients aged 15 to 44 years, males, blacks and Hispanics, and patients with pneumonia. BC was observed in 379 (3.9%) of 9,793 procedures; 362 (95%) of the BCs were on skin, 11 (3%) were on mucous membranes, and 6 (2%) were percutaneous. Overall procedure-adjusted skin BC rates were 11.2 BCs per 100 procedures for ungloved workers and 1.3 for gloved EDWs (relative risk = 8.8; 95% confidence interval = 7.3 to 10.3). In the high HIV seroprevalence EDs studied, 1 in every 40 full-time ED physicians or nurses can expect an HIV-positive percutaneous BC annually; in the low HIV seroprevalence EDs studied, 1 in every 575. The annual occupational risk of HIV infection for an individual ED physician or nurse from performing procedures observed in this study is estimated as 0.008% to 0.026% (1 in 13,100 to 1 in 3,800) in a high HIV seroprevalence area and 0.0005% to 0.002% (1 in 187,000 to 1 in 55,000) in a low HIV seroprevalence area. CONCLUSIONS In both inner-city and suburban EDs, patient HIV seroprevalence varies with patient demographics and clinical presentation; the infection status of most HIV-positive patients is unknown to ED staff. The risk to an EDW of occupationally acquiring HIV infection varies by ED location and the nature and frequency of BC; this risk can be reduced by adherence to universal precautions.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2004

Comparison of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score.

Seow Yian Tay; Edward P. Sloan; Leslie S. Zun; Philip Zaret

BACKGROUND The New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was proposed in 1997 to replace the Injury Severity Score (ISS) because it is more sensitive for mortality. We aim to test whether this is true in our patients. METHODS This study was a retrospective review of data from 6,231 consecutive patients over 3 years in the trauma registry of a Level I trauma center studying outcome, ISS, and NISS. RESULTS Misclassification rates were 3.97% for the NISS and 4.35% for the ISS. The receiver operating characteristic curve areas were 0.936 and 0.94, respectively. Neither the ISS nor the NISS were well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, 36.11 and 49.28, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The NISS should not replace the ISS, as they share similar accuracy and calibration.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 1995

Skin and mucous membrane contacts with blood during surgical procedures: risk and prevention.

Jerome I. Tokars; David H. Culver; Meryl H. Mendelson; Edward P. Sloan; Bruce F. Farber; Denise Fligner; Mary E. Chamberland; Ruthanne Marcus; Penny S. McKibben; David M. Bell

OBJECTIVE To study the epidemiology and preventability of blood contact with skin and mucous membranes during surgical procedures. DESIGN Observers present at 1,382 surgical procedures recorded information about the procedure, the personnel present, and the contacts that occurred. SETTING Four US teaching hospitals during 1990. PARTICIPANTS Operating room personnel in five surgical specialties. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Numbers and circumstances of contact between the patients blood (or other infective fluids) and surgical personnels mucous membranes (mucous membrane contacts) or skin (skin contacts, excluding percutaneous injuries). RESULTS A total of 1,069 skin (including 620 hand, 258 body, and 172 face) and 32 mucous membrane (all affecting eyes) contacts were observed. Surgeons sustained most contacts (19% had > or = 1 skin contact and 0.5% had > or = 1 mucous membrane-eye contact). Hand contacts were 72% lower among surgeons who double gloved, and face contacts were prevented reliably by face shields. Mucous membrane-eye contacts were significantly less frequent in surgeons wearing eyeglasses and were absent in surgeons wearing goggles or face shields. Among surgeons, risk factors for skin contact depended on the area of contact: hand contacts were associated most closely with procedure duration (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 9.4; > or = 4 versus < 1 hour); body contacts (arms, legs, and torso) with estimated blood losses (adjusted OR, 8.4; > or = 1,000 versus < 100 mL); and face contacts, with orthopedic service (adjusted OR, 7.5 compared with general surgery). CONCLUSION Skin and mucous membrane contacts are preventable by appropriate barrier precautions, yet occur commonly during surgery. Surgeons who perform procedures similar to those included in this study should strongly consider double gloving, changing gloves routinely during surgery, or both.


Annals of Emergency Medicine | 1989

Complications and protocol considerations in carbon monoxide-poisoned patients who require hyperbaric oxygen therapy: Report from a ten-year experience

Edward P. Sloan; Daniel G. Murphy; Raymond Hart; Mary Ann Cooper; Timothy Turnbull; Ronald S. Barreca; Barry Ellerson

We conducted a study to determine the type, incidence, and timing of complications that occur in patients who have a carbon monoxide (CO) exposure serious enough to require hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Complication data were retrospectively collected from a ten-year period for 297 consecutive CO-poisoned emergency department patients who received HBOT. HBOT was indicated for 41% of the patients because of an elevated carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level alone. Central nervous system dysfunction, including loss of consciousness, and/or cardiovascular dysfunction, was the criteria for HBOT in 59% of patients, regardless of their COHb level. The mean peak COHb level was 38 mg%, with 88% of patients having a peak COHb level greater than 25 mg%. The mortality rate was 6% in this case series. Cardiac arrest occurred in 8% of patients; all experienced their first arrest prior to HBOT. The 3% of patients who sustained an isolated respiratory arrest and those who had a myocardial infarction did so prior to HBOT. Several complications, however, occurred for the first time or as a recurrent event during HBOT. These included emesis (6%), seizures (5%), agitation requiring restraints or sedation (2%), cardiac dysrhythmias or arrests (2%), and arterial hypotension (2%). No patients level of consciousness deteriorated subsequent to the initial resuscitation except for those who later had a generalized seizure. The most significant complication attributable to HBOT was tension pneumothorax, noted in three patients (1%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


American Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2003

Documentation of ED patient pain by nurses and physicians

Stephen Eder; Edward P. Sloan; Knox H. Todd

The purpose of this study was to evaluate ED documentation of patient pain in light of the Joint Commission of Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations emphasis on pain assessment and management. A prospectively designed pain management survey was offered to patients on ED discharge. Documentation of pain intensity by ED nurses and physicians was retrospectively reviewed. Of 302 patients surveyed, 261 (86%) complete charts were available for review. Initial pain assessments were noted on 94% of the charts, but a pain scale was used for only 23% of the patients. Documentation of pain subsequent to therapy was noted on 39% of the charts, but a pain scale was used only 19% of the time. Subsequent to therapy, nurses were 2.2 x more likely to document pain assessments than physicians (30% vs 16%, P <.001). Patients with severe pain on arrival (46% vs 31%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, P <.02), chest pain (72% vs 32%, OR = 5.4, P <.001), or those receiving powerful analgesics (62% vs 32%, 3.5, P <.001) were more likely to receive a documented subsequent pain assessment than other patients. Pain severity is not consistently documented in ED patients, especially after therapy has been provided. Patients with severe pain and those receiving powerful analgesics were more likely to have a pain assessment subsequent to ED therapy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Edward P. Sloan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Max Koenigsberg

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Barrett

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Rydman

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Zalenski

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert F. Smith

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andy Jagoda

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Cooke

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.Bradshaw Bunney

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge