Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edwin E. Spencer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edwin E. Spencer.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2013

Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study

John E. Kuhn; Warren R. Dunn; Rosemary Sanders; Qi An; Keith M. Baumgarten; Julie Y. Bishop; Robert H. Brophy; James L. Carey; Brian G. Holloway; Grant L. Jones; C. Benjamin Ma; Robert G. Marx; Eric C. McCarty; Sourav Poddar; Matthew Smith; Edwin E. Spencer; Armando F. Vidal; Brian R. Wolf; Rick W. Wright

PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of a specific nonoperative physical therapy program in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a multicenter prospective cohort study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears who consented to enroll provided data via questionnaire on demographics, symptom characteristics, comorbidities, willingness to undergo surgery, and patient-related outcome assessments (Short Form 12 score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Shoulder Activity Scale). Physicians recorded physical examination and imaging data. Patients began a physical therapy program developed from a systematic review of the literature and returned for evaluation at 6 and 12 weeks. At those visits, patients could choose 1 of 3 courses: (1) cured (no formal follow-up scheduled), (2) improved (continue therapy with scheduled reassessment in 6 weeks), or (3) no better (surgery offered). Patients were contacted by telephone at 1 and 2 years to determine whether they had undergone surgery since their last visit. A Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction was used to compare initial, 6-week, and 12-week outcome scores. RESULTS The cohort consists of 452 patients. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly at 6 and 12 weeks. Patients elected to undergo surgery less than 25% of the time. Patients who decided to have surgery generally did so between 6 and 12 weeks, and few had surgery between 3 and 24 months. CONCLUSION Nonoperative treatment using this physical therapy protocol is effective for treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears in approximately 75% of patients followed up for 2 years.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2004

Biomechanical analysis of reconstructions for sternoclavicular joint instability.

Edwin E. Spencer; John E. Kuhn

BACKGROUND A variety of reconstructive methods have been described for the treatment of sternoclavicular joint instability, yet none have been analyzed in the laboratory, to our knowledge. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate three different reconstruction techniques with use of a cadaveric model: (1) intramedullary ligament reconstruction, (2) subclavius tendon reconstruction, and (3) reconstruction with use of a semitendinosus graft placed in a figure-of-eight fashion through drill-holes in the clavicle and manubrium. METHODS Thirty-six fresh cadaveric specimens were mounted supine on a materials testing machine in a custom testing fixture and were subjected to anterior and posterior subfailure translation to determine stiffness in the intact state after preloading. One of the three reconstruction methods was performed, and the specimens were subjected to anterior or posterior translation to failure. Changes in stiffness compared with the intact state were analyzed statistically. RESULTS In the anterior direction, the stiffness of the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction was significantly greater than that of the intramedullary ligament reconstruction but was not significantly different from that of the subclavius tendon reconstruction. The peak load to failure (as defined by translation equal to the anteroposterior diameter of the medial head of the clavicle) was 230.3 +/- 146.1 N for the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction, 84.6 +/- 45.7 N for the intramedullary ligament reconstruction, and 75.6 +/- 19.0 N for the subclavius tendon reconstruction. In the posterior direction, the stiffness of the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction was significantly greater than those of both of the other reconstructions. The peak load to failure was 241.4 +/- 49.7 N for the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction, 85.0 +/- 22.8 N for the intramedullary ligament reconstruction, and 51.5 +/- 28.9 N for the subclavius tendon reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS The figure-of-eight semitendinosus reconstruction for sternoclavicular joint instability has initial biomechanical properties that are superior to those of the intramedullary ligament reconstruction and subclavius tendon reconstruction techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE While it is difficult to extrapolate in vitro data to the clinical situation, the figure-of-eight semitendinosus technique has superior initial biomechanical properties and may produce improved clinical outcomes in the surgical treatment of sternoclavicular joint instability.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2008

Interobserver Agreement in the Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Edwin E. Spencer; Warren R. Dunn; Rick W. Wright; Brian R. Wolf; Kurt P. Spindler; Eric C. McCarty; C. Benjamin Ma; Grant L. Jones; Marc R. Safran; G. Brian Holloway; John E. Kuhn

Background Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard method of assessing the extent and features of rotator cuff disease, the authors are not aware of any studies that have assessed the interobserver agreement among orthopaedic surgeons reviewing MRI scans for rotator cuff disease. Hypothesis Fellowship-trained orthopaedic shoulder surgeons will have good interobserver agreement in predicting the more salient features of rotator cuff disease such as tear type (full thickness versus partial thickness), tear size, and number of tendons involved but only fair agreement with more complex features such as muscle volume, fat content, and the grade of partial-thickness cuff tears. Study Design Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods Ten fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgery shoulder specialists reviewed 27 MRI scans of 27 shoulders from patients with surgically confirmed rotator cuff disease. The ability to interpret full-thickness versus partial-thickness tears, acromion type, acromioclavicular joint spurs or signal changes, biceps lesions, size and grade of partial-thickness tears, acromiohumeral distance, number of tendons involved and amount of retraction for full-thickness tears, size of full-thickness tears, and individual muscle fatty infiltration and atrophy were assessed. Surgeons completed a standard evaluation form for each MRI scan. Interobserver agreement was determined and a kappa level was derived. Results Interobserver agreement was highest (>80%) for predicting full- versus partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff, and for quantity of the teres minor tendon. Agreement was slightly less (>70%) for detecting signal in the acromioclavicular joint, the side of the partial-thickness tear, the number of tendons involved in a full-thickness tear, and the quantity of the subscapularis and infraspinatus muscle bellies. Agreement was less yet (60%) for detecting the presence of spurs at the acromioclavicular joint, a tear of the long head of the biceps tendon, amount of retraction of a full-thickness tear, and the quantity of the supraspinatus. The best kappa statistics were found for detecting the difference between a full- and partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (0.77), and for the number of tendons involved for full-thickness tears (0.55). Kappa for predicting the involved side of a partial-thickness tear was 0.44; for predicting the grade of a partial-thickness tear, it was −0.11. Conclusions Fellowship-trained, experienced orthopaedic surgeons had good agreement for predicting full-thickness rotator cuff tears and the number of tendons involved and moderate agreement in predicting the involved side of a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear, but poor agreement in predicting the grade of a partial-thickness tear.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2007

Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears

John E. Kuhn; Warren R. Dunn; Benjamin Ma; Rick W. Wright; Grant L. Jones; Edwin E. Spencer; Brian R. Wolf; Marc R. Safran; Kurt P. Spindler; Eric C. McCarty; Brian T. Kelly; Brian G. Holloway

Background Six classification systems have been proposed for describing rotator cuff tears designed to help understand their natural history and make treatment decisions. Purpose To assess the interobserver variation for these classification systems and identify the method with the best interob-server agreement. Study Design Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods Six rotator cuff tear classification systems were identified in a literature search. The components of these systems included partial-thickness rotator cuff tears and classification by size, shape, configuration, number of tendons involved, and by extent, topography, and nature of the biceps. Twelve fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons who each perform at least 30 rotator cuff repairs per year reviewed arthroscopy videos from 30 patients with a random assortment of rotator cuff tears and classified them by the 6 classification systems. Interobserver variation was determined by a kappa analysis. Results Interobserver agreement was high when distinguishing between full-thickness and partial-thickness tears (0.95, [UNKNOWN]=0.85). The investigators agreed on the side (articular vs bursal) of involvement for partial-thickness tears (observed agreement 0.92, [UNKNOWN]= 0.85) but could not agree when classifying the depth of the partial-thickness tear (observed agreement 0.49, [UNKNOWN]= 0.19). The best agreement for full-thickness tears was seen when the tear was classified by topography (degree of retraction) in the frontal plane (observed agreement 0.70, [UNKNOWN]= 0.54). Conclusion With the exception of distinguishing partial-thickness from full-thickness rotator cuff tears and identifying the side (articular vs bursal) of involvement with partial-thickness tears, currently described rotator cuff classification systems have little interobserver agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons. Researchers should consider describing full-thickness rotator cuff tears by topography (degree of retraction) in the frontal plane.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2011

Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in 2 active, healthy patients

Benjamin W. Sears; Edwin E. Spencer; Charles L. Getz

Pathology involving the long head of the biceps tendon is a common and significant cause of shoulder pain. For active patients with refractory biceps tendinosis, tenodesis of the tendon to either soft tissue or the humerus is the preferred surgical treatment. 2,7,9,11 Subpectoral biceps tenodesis to the humeral diaphysis with an interference screw has been gaining popularity as an effective method for treating biceps pathology, as clinical studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes with low rates of postsurgical complications with this technique. 8,14 This procedure involves drilling a cortical hole distal to the bicipital groove for placement of the tendon and bioabsorbable screw. 9 The size, depth, and location of this hole create a stress riser effect in the humerus, which previously was thought to be insignificant; however, several case reports exist in the literature describing postoperative fracture through the humeral drill hole. 3,4,16 This report presents 2 patients with postoperative humeral fractures involving the subpectoral tenodesis drill hole that occurred within 6 months of surgery. This finding suggests that this complication may be more prevalent in active patients than previously thought.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2014

Symptoms of pain do not correlate with rotator cuff tear severity: a cross-sectional study of 393 patients with a symptomatic atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear.

Warren R. Dunn; John E. Kuhn; Rosemary Sanders; Qi An; Keith M. Baumgarten; Julie Y. Bishop; Robert H. Brophy; James L. Carey; G. Brian Holloway; Grant L. Jones; C. Benjamin Ma; Robert G. Marx; Eric C. McCarty; Sourav Poddar; Matthew Smith; Edwin E. Spencer; Armando F. Vidal; Brian R. Wolf; Rick W. Wright

BACKGROUND For many orthopaedic disorders, symptoms correlate with disease severity. The objective of this study was to determine if pain level is related to the severity of rotator cuff disorders. METHODS A cohort of 393 subjects with an atraumatic symptomatic full-thickness rotator-cuff tear treated with physical therapy was studied. Baseline pretreatment data were used to examine the relationship between the severity of rotator cuff disease and pain. Disease severity was determined by evaluating tear size, retraction, superior humeral head migration, and rotator cuff muscle atrophy. Pain was measured on the 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) in the patient-reported American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. A linear multiple regression model was constructed with use of the continuous VAS score as the dependent variable and measures of rotator cuff tear severity and other nonanatomic patient factors as the independent variables. Forty-eight percent of the patients were female, and the median age was sixty-one years. The dominant shoulder was involved in 69% of the patients. The duration of symptoms was less than one month for 8% of the patients, one to three months for 22%, four to six months for 20%, seven to twelve months for 15%, and more than a year for 36%. The tear involved only the supraspinatus in 72% of the patients; the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, with or without the teres minor, in 21%; and only the subscapularis in 7%. Humeral head migration was noted in 16%. Tendon retraction was minimal in 48%, midhumeral in 34%, glenohumeral in 13%, and to the glenoid in 5%. The median baseline VAS pain score was 4.4. RESULTS Multivariable modeling, controlling for other baseline factors, identified increased comorbidities (p = 0.002), lower education level (p = 0.004), and race (p = 0.041) as the only significant factors associated with pain on presentation. No measure of rotator cuff tear severity correlated with pain (p > 0.25). CONCLUSIONS Anatomic features defining the severity of atraumatic rotator cuff tears are not associated with the pain level. Factors associated with pain are comorbidities, lower education level, and race. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2005

The effect of humeral component anteversion on shoulder stability with glenoid component retroversion.

Edwin E. Spencer; Antonio Valdevit; Helen Kambic; John J. Brems; Joseph P. Iannotti

BACKGROUND Posterior glenoid bone loss is often seen in association with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. This posterior asymmetric wear can lead to retroversion of the glenoid component and posterior instability after total shoulder arthroplasty. Options for the treatment of this asymmetric wear include eccentric reaming of the so-called high side, bone-grafting, and/or anteverting the humeral component. Although anteverting the humeral component has been advocated by many, it has not been substantiated on the basis of biomechanical data. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether anteverting the humeral component increases the stability of a total shoulder replacement with a retroverted glenoid component. METHODS A total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in eight human cadaveric shoulders. The glenoid component was placed in 15 degrees of retroversion. Two humeral versions were tested for each specimen: anatomic version and 15 degrees of anteversion relative to anatomic version. The specimens were mounted supine in a custom fixture on a servohydraulic testing system. The humerus was translated posteriorly by one-half of the width of the glenoid. Three positions of humeral rotation were tested for each position of humeral version. Both the energy and the peak load were analyzed as measures of joint stability. RESULTS There was no significant difference in either energy or peak load between the tests performed with the humeral component in 15 degrees of anteversion and those performed with the component in anatomic version in any of the three rotational positions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Although anteverting the humeral component during total shoulder arthroplasty to compensate for glenoid retroversion has been advocated, these data suggest that compensatory anteversion of the humeral component does not increase the stability of a shoulder replacement with a retroverted glenoid component.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2014

The Duration of Symptoms does not correlate with Rotator Cuff Tear Severity or Other Patient Related Features. A Cross Sectional Study of Patients with Atraumatic, Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Kenneth P. Unruh; John E. Kuhn; Rosemary Sanders; Qi An; Keith M. Baumgarten; Julie Y. Bishop; Robert H. Brophy; James L. Carey; Brian G. Holloway; Grant L. Jones; Benjamin C. Ma; Robert G. Marx; Eric C. McCarty; Souray K. Poddar; Matthew Smith; Edwin E. Spencer; Armando F. Vidal; Brian R. Wolf; Rick W. Wright; Warren R. Dunn

HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to determine whether the duration of symptoms influences the features seen in patients with atraumatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Our hypothesis is that an increasing duration of symptoms will correlate with more advanced findings of rotator cuff tear severity on magnetic resonance imaging, worse shoulder outcome scores, more pain, decreased range of motion, and less strength. METHODS We enrolled 450 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears in a prospective cohort study to assess the effectiveness of nonoperative treatment and factors predictive of success. The duration of patient symptoms was divided into 4 groups: 3 months or less, 4 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, and greater than 12 months. Data collected at patient entry into the study included (1) demographic data, (2) history and physical examination data, (3) radiographic imaging data, and (4) validated patient-reported measures of shoulder status. Statistical analysis included a univariate analysis with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson test to identify statistically significant differences in these features for different durations of symptoms. RESULTS A longer duration of symptoms does not correlate with more severe rotator cuff disease. The duration of symptoms was not related to weakness, limited range of motion, tear size, fatty atrophy, or validated patient-reported outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS There is only a weak relationship between the duration of symptoms and features associated with rotator cuff disease.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2016

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Simpliciti Canal-Sparing Shoulder Arthroplasty System: A Prospective Two-Year Multicenter Study.

R. Sean Churchill; Christopher Chuinard; J. Michael Wiater; Richard J. Friedman; Michael Q. Freehill; Scott Jacobson; Edwin E. Spencer; G. Brian Holloway; Jocelyn Wittstein; Tally Lassiter; Matthew Smith; Theodore A. Blaine; Gregory P. Nicholson

BACKGROUND Stemmed humeral components have been used since the 1950s; canal-sparing (also known as stemless) humeral components became commercially available in Europe in 2004. The Simpliciti total shoulder system (Wright Medical, formerly Tornier) is a press-fit, porous-coated, canal-sparing humeral implant that relies on metaphyseal fixation only. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study was performed to evaluate the two-year clinical and radiographic results of the Simpliciti prosthesis in the U.S. METHODS One hundred and fifty-seven patients with glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled at fourteen U.S. sites between July 2011 and November 2012 in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)-approved protocol. Their range of motion, strength, pain level, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score were compared between the preoperative and two-year postoperative evaluations. Statistical analyses were performed with the Student t test with 95% confidence intervals. Radiographic evaluation was performed at two weeks and one and two years postoperatively. RESULTS One hundred and forty-nine of the 157 patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The mean age and sex-adjusted Constant, SST, and ASES scores improved from 56% preoperatively to 104% at two years (p < 0.0001), from 4 points preoperatively to 11 points at two years (p < 0.0001), and from 38 points preoperatively to 92 points at two years (p < 0.0001), respectively. The mean forward elevation improved from 103° ± 27° to 147° ± 24° (p < 0.0001) and the mean external rotation, from 31° ± 20° to 56° ± 15° (p < 0.0001). The mean strength in elevation, as recorded with a dynamometer, improved from 12.5 to 15.7 lb (5.7 to 7.1 kg) (p < 0.0001), and the mean pain level, as measured with a visual analog scale, decreased from 5.9 to 0.5 (p < 0.0001). There were three postoperative complications that resulted in revision surgery: infection, glenoid component loosening, and failure of a subscapularis repair. There was no evidence of migration, subsidence, osteolysis, or loosening of the humeral components or surviving glenoid components. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated good results at a minimum of two years following use of the Simpliciti canal-sparing humeral component. Clinical results including the range of motion and the Constant, SST, and ASES scores improved significantly, and radiographic analysis showed no signs of loosening, osteolysis, or subsidence of the humeral components or surviving glenoid components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2011

Agreement in the Classification and Treatment of the Superior Labrum

Brian R. Wolf; Carla L. Britton; David A. Vasconcellos; Edwin E. Spencer

Background: The Snyder classification scheme is the most commonly used system for classifying superior labral injuries. Although this scheme is intended to be used for arthroscopic visual classification only, it is thought that other nonarthroscopic historical variables also influence the classification. Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the intrasurgeon and intersurgeon agreement in classifying variable presentations of the superior labrum and to evaluate the influence of clinical variables on the classification and treatment choices of surgeons. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A group of arthroscopic shoulder surgeons were asked to rank in order of importance clinical variables considered in diagnosing and treating the superior labrum. The surgeons then watched 50 arthroscopic videos of the superior labrum, ranging from normal to pathologic, on 3 different occasions. The first and third viewings were accompanied by no clinical information. The second viewing was accompanied by a detailed clinical vignette for each video. The surgeons selected a classification and treatment for each video. Results: A patient’s job/sport, age, and physical examination findings were considered the most important clinical variables surgeons consider during management of the superior labrum. Comparing the 2 viewings without clinical information, surgeons selected a different classification 28.5% of the time from the first to the second time. A different classification was chosen 71.5% of the time when the surgeon was supplied a clinical vignette at the subsequent viewing. Similarly, the treatment selected changed in 36% and 69.1% of cases when viewed again without vignettes and with vignettes, respectively. Intersurgeon agreement was moderate without clinical vignettes and fair with vignettes. Historical, physical examination, and surgical observations were found to influence the odds of change of classification. Conclusion: There is significant intrasurgeon and intersurgeon variability in classification and treatment of the superior labrum. Clinical historical, examination, and surgical findings influence classification and treatment choices.

Collaboration


Dive into the Edwin E. Spencer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John E. Kuhn

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian R. Wolf

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric C. McCarty

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rick W. Wright

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Warren R. Dunn

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Benjamin Ma

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keith M. Baumgarten

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Armando F. Vidal

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge