Ei-Suke Saito

Inhibitory effect of ghrelin on food intake is mediated by the corticotropin-releasing factor system in neonatal chicks

It is known that, in rats, central and peripheral ghrelin increases food intake mainly through activation of neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons. In contrast, intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of ghrelin inhibits food intake in neonatal chicks. We examined the mechanism governing this inhibitory effect in chicks. The ICV injection of ghrelin or corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), which also inhibits feeding and causes hyperactivity in chicks. Thus, we examined the interaction of ghrelin with CRF and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The ICV injection of ghrelin increased plasma corticosterone levels in a dose-dependent or a time-dependent manner. Co-injection of a CRF receptor antagonist, astressin, attenuated ghrelin-induced plasma corticosterone increase and anorexia. In addition, we also investigated the effect of ghrelin on NPY-induced food intake and on expression of hypothalamic NPY mRNA. Co-injection of ghrelin with NPY inhibited NPY-induced increase in food intake, and the ICV injection of ghrelin did not change NPY mRNA expression. These results indicate that central ghrelin does not interact with NPY as seen in rodents, but instead inhibits food intake by interacting with the endogenous CRF and its receptor.

Chicken ghrelin and growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 inhibit food intake of neonatal chicks.

Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor. Ghrelin stimulates feeding in rats, however, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of rat ghrelin inhibits feeding of neonatal chicks. In the present study, the effect of i.c.v. injection of different ghrelins including chicken and bullfrog ghrelin, and synthetic GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) on feeding of neonatal chicks was investigated. Chicken ghrelin strongly suppressed feeding. To compare the inhibitory effect, chicken and rat ghrelin were examined. The suppressive effect of feeding by chicken and rat ghrelin was almost identical. Bullfrog ghrelin contains a change in the acylated amino acid from Ser to Thr, strongly suppressed feeding. The i.c.v. injection of GHRP-2 (KP-102), a synthetic GHS, also inhibited feeding. These results indicate that the chicken GHS receptor is affected by several forms of GHS, and that food intake of neonatal chicks is inhibited by GHS receptor agonists.

Intracerebroventricular injection of vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide inhibits feeding in chicks

Previous research has indicated an involvement of glucagon superfamily peptides in the regulation of feeding in the domestic chick brain. However the possible roles of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP) have not yet been investigated. We therefore examined the effect of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of VIP or PACAP on food intake in chicks. ICV injection of both VIP and PACAP significantly inhibited food intake over 4 h at doses ranging from 12 to 188 pmol. Subsequently, we compared the anorexic effect the glucagon superfamily peptides VIP, PACAP, growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) after ICV injection at an equimolar dose (12 pmol). All four peptides significantly inhibited food intake, although the anorexic effects of VIP and PACAP were weaker than those of GRF and GLP-1. These findings support the hypothesis that glucagon superfamily peptides play an important role in the regulation of appetite in the chick brain.

Comparison of brain arginine-vasotocin and corticotrophin-releasing factor for physiological responses in chicks

Arginine-vasotocin (AVT), a non-mammalian homologue of mammalian arginine-vasopressin, is a stress-related peptide in the brain of birds. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of AVT on feeding behavior, body temperature, corticosterone release and several behavioral parameters in chicks. These effects were compared with those of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF), another stress-related peptide. The ICV injection of AVT inhibited feeding behavior, increased rectal temperature, and increased plasma corticosterone concentrations, but these effects were weaker than those of CRF. AVT induced hypoactivity as evidenced by decreased vocalization and stepping while CRF induced hyperactivity. The present results demonstrate that some functions of brain AVT are similar to those of CRF, although these effects are weaker than those induced by CRF. However, some AVT-induced behaviors were different from CRF, indicating that the physiological roles of AVT in the regulation of stress behavior are different from those of CRF in chicks.

Effect of central administration of carnosine and its constituents on behaviors in chicks

Even though their contents in the brain are high, the function of brain carnosine and its constituents has not been clarified. Both carnosine and anserine inhibited food intake in a dose dependent fashion when injected intracerebroventricularly. The constituents of carnosine, beta-alanine (beta-Ala) and l-histidine (His), also inhibited food intake, but their effects were weaker than carnosine itself. Co-administration with beta-Ala and His inhibited food intake similar to carnosine, but also altered other behaviors. Injection of carnosine induced hyperactivity and increased plasma corticosterone level, whereas beta-Ala plus His induced hypoactivity manifested as sleep-like behavior. This later effect seemed to be derived from beta-Ala, not His. These results suggest that central carnosine may act in the brain of chicks to regulate brain function and/or behavior in a manner different from its constituents.

Anorexigenic effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide in the chick brain are mediated by corticotrophin-releasing factor.

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP) or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) inhibits feeding in chicks. However, the underlying anorexigenic mechanism(s) has not yet been investigated. The present study investigated whether these peptides influence the activity of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) neural pathways in the brain of chicks. Firstly, we found that ICV injections of PACAP and VIP increased plasma corticosterone concentrations. The corticosterone-releasing effect of PACAP was completely attenuated by co-injection of astressin, a CRF receptor antagonist, but this effect was only partial for VIP. These results demonstrated that CRF neurons mediate the actions of PACAP and, to a lesser extent, VIP, and suggest that the signaling mechanisms differ between the two peptides. This difference may arise from the two peptides interacting with different receptors because the corticosterone-releasing effect of PACAP, but not VIP, was completely attenuated by co-injection of PACAP (6-38), a PACAP receptor antagonist. Finally, we examined the effect of ICV co-injection of astressin on the anorexigenic effects of PACAP and VIP and found that the effects of both peptides were attenuated by astressin. Overall, the present study suggests that the anorexigenic effects of PACAP and VIP are mediated by the activation of CRF neurons.

Effect of central administration of prolactin-releasing peptide on feeding in chicks

Prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP) is one of the inhibitory factors in feeding regulation of mammals. However, no information is available for avian species. The present study was done to clarify the effect of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of PrRP on feeding in chicks. Firstly, we found that ICV injection of PrRP (94-1500 pmol) significantly increased food intake in chicks. The result was completely different from those obtained in mammals. The orexigenic effect of PrRP was significantly weaker than that of neuropeptide Y (NPY), a potent orexigenic peptide, on an equimolar basis. The orexigenic effect of NPY was further enhanced with coinjection of PrRP. These results suggest the existence of a novel orexigenic mechanism in the chick brain, which might differ from NPY-involved feeding regulatory pathway. In addition, ICV injection of PrRP significantly decreased the rectal temperature, but the effect was weaker than that of NPY, suggesting that PrRP may inhibit energy expenditure in chicks. Taken together, we showed here that PrRP may be involved in the regulation of both feeding behavior and energy metabolism in the chick brain.

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide inhibit feeding in the chick brain by different mechanisms

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) inhibit feeding in chicks. However, the precise anorexigenic mechanisms have not been investigated, since both peptides activate the VPAC receptor in mammals. We investigated which receptor mediates the anorexigenic effects of these peptides in chicks. ICV co-injection of PACAP (6-38), a PAC1 receptor antagonist, attenuated the anorexigenic effect of PACAP but not VIP. On the other hand, ICV co-injection of [D-p-Cl-Phe6, Leu17]-VIP, a VPAC receptor antagonist, did not affect the effects of both peptides. Although these results imply that the effect of VIP was not specific, a subsequent experiment demonstrated that ICV injection of anti-chicken VIP antiserum stimulated feeding and suggested that endogenous VIP inhibits feeding in the chick brain. Collectively, the data suggest that the anorexigenic mechanism of PACAP is different from that of VIP and that an undiscovered VIP receptor may be present in the chicken brain.

Differences in catecholamine metabolism and behaviour in neonatal broiler and layer chicks

1. To clarify the difference in behavioural activities and catecholamine metabolism between layer and broiler-type chicks two experiments were conducted. 2. In experiment 1, 1-d-old male layer and broiler chicks were placed in an open-field area and their responses were investigated for 10 min. The responses of the two strains were remarkably different, with broilers being less active than layers. Vocalisations rapidly decreased in broilers whereas those of layers remained elevated during the 10 min. 3. In experiment 2, 1-d-old chicks of both strains were killed and brain catecholamine concentrations were determined in three parts of the brain: telencephalon, optic lobe and brain stem. 4. In the whole brain, dopamine (DA) and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were significantly higher in broilers. However, the values for norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E) and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylacetic acid (HVA) were similar between strains. The ratios of metabolite/precursor were also calculated: HVA/DOPAC was higher in layers, while NE/DA, E/NE and DOPAC/DA were not significantly different between strains. 5. These results suggest that behavioural activities differ greatly, while there are some differences in catecholamine metabolism between the two strains.

Intracerebroventricular administration of GABA-A and GABA-B receptor antagonists attenuate feeding and sleeping-like behavior induced by L-pipecolic acid in neonatal chicks

It has been demonstrated that L‐pipecolic acid (L‐PA), a major metabolic intermediate of L‐lysine (L‐Lys) in the mammalian and chicken brain, is involved in the functioning of the GABAergic system. A previous study has shown that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of L‐PA suppressed feeding and induced sleep‐like behavior in neonatal chicks; however, the precise relationship between the GABAergic system and L‐PA has not been clarified. In the present study, the role of the GABA‐A or GABA‐B receptors in the suppression of food intake and induction of sleeping‐like behavior by L‐PA was investigated. Chicks were injected i.c.v. with the GABA‐A antagonist picrotoxin or GABA‐B antagonist CGP54626 along with L‐PA. Although suppression of food intake by L‐PA was restored partially by co‐injection with CGP54626, but not picrotoxin, sleep‐like behavior induced by L‐PA was suppressed significantly by both antagonists. These results suggested that L‐PA activated both GABA‐A and GABA‐B receptors, and GABA‐B receptors alone contributed to food intake whereas both receptors contributed to sleep‐like behavior.