Eiman Shafa

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute cervical spine fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurologically intact cervical spine fractures is not well defined. To our knowledge, there are no studies that clearly identify the indications for MRI in this particular scenario. Controversy remains regarding the use of MRI in at-risk patients, primarily the obtunded and elderly patients. PURPOSE The purpose of the present study was to examine the predisposing conditions where an MRI would provide additional findings that would affect management in acute cervical spine fractures. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort involving radiographic and clinical review. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients with acute cervical injuries at a single institution. OUTCOME MEASURES Neurologic recovery. METHODS A review of 830 patients with cervical spinal injuries between 2006 and 2010 was performed. Clinical information was obtained for all the patients: Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism of injury, major medical comorbidities, associated injuries, neurologic examination, neurologic symptoms, sex, age, and alertness. Two experienced fellowship-trained spine surgeons determined if the MRI study changed the management in the individual cases based on the Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injury classification system. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients with a cervical fracture were included in the final analysis: median age 54 years (interquartile range, 42 years), mean Glasgow Coma Scale 13 (standard deviation ± 3.0), 68% males, 32% females, 42% older patients (age>60 years), 30% spondylosis, 27% polytrauma, 67% alert, 28% neurologic deficit. Major medical comorbidities, prior to injury level of activity, atlantoaxial versus subaxial, and gender were not associated with changes in diagnosis and management (p>.05). Age >60 years, neurologic deficit, polytrauma status, alertness, and spondylosis were associated with having additional clinically relevant findings seen on MRI and changes in management (p<.05). The majority of the changes in management were related to MRIs illustration of the spinal cord injury and not due to an occult instability. Eighty-one percent of the changes in management were related to the depiction of the spinal cord compression seen on MRI, whereas 19% of the changes in management were related to occult instability seen on MRI. CONCLUSIONS Older age (>60 years), obtunded or temporary non-assessable status, cervical spondylosis, polytrauma, and neurologic deficit are predisposing factors for further injury found on MRI but missed on computed tomographic scan alone. These additional findings can affect the management in acute cervical spine fractures. The rational of the on-call spine surgeon to order an MRI for a cervical spine fracture is well founded and often that MRI will affect the fracture management. Magnetic resonance imaging particularly helps with better defining the type of spinal cord compression. Picking up occult instability missed on computed tomographic scan was possible with MRI but not as common.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been shown to have long-term clinical outcomes similar to those with open TLIF and decreased perioperative morbidity. This study assessed whether this procedure can be safely performed in outpatient settings. Ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing 1- or 2-level MIS-TLIFs were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into inpatient and outpatient cohorts (36%). All had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, and readmissions were examined. Early postoperative complications were stratified into wound related, infection, neurologic, implant related, and vascular injuries. Patients in the outpatient cohort were significantly younger, had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores, and had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than patients in the inpatient cohort. There were no statistically significant differences in overall postoperative complication rates, readmission rates, or final Oswestry Disability Index or visual analog scale scores between the 2 cohorts. The clinical outcomes of the outpatient TLIF procedure were similar to those of the inpatient procedure and it had an acceptable complication rate. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):e1218-e1222.].