Eirini Agapidaki
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eirini Agapidaki.
International journal of health policy and management | 2017
Kyriakos Souliotis; Eirini Agapidaki; Lily Evangelia Peppou; Chara Tzavara; Dimitrios Varvaras; Oreste Buonomo; Dominique Debiais; Stanimir Hasurdjiev; Francois Sarkozy
Background: Even though there are many patient organizations across Europe, their role in impacting health policy decisions and reforms has not been well documented. In line with this, the present study endeavours to fill this gap in the international literature. To this end, it aims to validate further a previously developed instrument (the Health Democracy Index - HDI) measuring patient organization participation in health policy decision-making. In addition, by utilizing this tool, it aims to provide a snapshot of the degree and impact of cancer patient organization (CPO) participation in Italy and France. Methods: A convenient sample of 188 members of CPOs participated in the study (95 respondents from 10 CPOs in Italy and 93 from 12 CPOs in France). Participants completed online a self-reported questionnaire, encompassing the 9-item index and questions enquiring about the type and impact of participation in various facets of health policy decisionmaking. The psychometric properties of the scale were explored by performing factor analysis (construct validity) and by computing Cronbach α (internal consistency). Results: Findings indicate that the index has good internal consistency and the construct it taps is unidimensional. The degree and impact of CPO participation in health policy decision-making were found to be low in both countries; however in Italy they were comparatively lower than in France. Conclusion: In conclusion, the HDI can be effectively used in international policy and research contexts. CPOs participation is low in Italy and France and concerted efforts should be made on upgrading their role in health policy decision-making.
Forum of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Kyriakos Souliotis; Eirini Agapidaki; Manto Papageorgiou
Abstract Background: Despite the documentation of addressing healthcare disparities in detection and treatment of cancer and health outcomes for cancer patients, the inequalities persist. Cancer patients of several vulnerable groups suffer disproportionally the effect of economic crisis on health and healthcare. Patients & Methods: A cross sectional survey was carried out between July and October 2014 in order to assess the cancer patients’ barriers to healthcare access. A total of 426 cancer patients, members of cancer patient organization participated in the study. Data were collected by using an online, self reported questionnaire evaluating three main areas: healthcare access (7 items), economic status and financial burden of the disease (17 items) and the alteration on several aspects related to the disease (8 items) from 2009 to 2014. Results: Approximately 31% of cancer patients reported that they faced barriers to healthcare access for cancer treatment during the last 12 months. The main barriers included long waiting time for a medical appointment (51%) and inability to visit a private physician due to the incapability to pay the out of pocket cost (44%). One in four patient encountered obstacles in medication access which resulted to treatment delay (46%), worsened health status (96%) and increased out of pocket costs (39%). Conclusions: Results suggest that there are vulnerable groups among cancer patients in Greece who suffer disproportionally more the impact of economic crisis on health and healthcare. Healthcare reforms and targeted interventions should be implemented in order to effectively address the inequities in access for cancer patients.
BMJ Open | 2018
Kyriakos Souliotis; Lily-Evangelia Peppou; Chara Tzavara; Eirini Agapidaki; Dimitrios Varvaras; Oreste Buonomo; Dominique Debiais; Stanimir Hasurdjiev; Francois Sarkozy
Objectives Even though patient involvement in health policy decision-making is well documented, studies evaluating the degree and impact of this participation are scarce. This is even more conspicuous in the case of cancer. There is evidence showing that patients with the same type of cancer and at the same stage of the disease will receive different treatments in different countries. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the degree of patient participation in health policy decision-making across Europe, as it may result in health inequalities across countries. In a response to this research call, the present study aimed to provide a snapshot of cancer patients’ organisation (CPO) participation in health policy processes in European Union (EU)-28 countries. Setting CPOs from the EU-28 countries. Participants Primary and secondary outcome measures: information about participants’ sociodemographic characteristics and their involvement in their CPO was collected as well as data about the CPO. A 17-item index containing questions about the type and impact of participation in various facets of health policy decision-making was used to assess the degree of CPOs participation in health policy decision-making processes and its impact.
International Journal of Mental Health Systems | 2017
Kyriakos Souliotis; Eirini Agapidaki; Chara Tzavara; Marina Economou
BackgroundAlthough the need for integration of mental health services into primary care is well established little has been done. The outbreak of the recession found the Greek mental health system in transition. As a response to the crisis, governments implemented horizontal budget cuts instead of health reforms. This resulted in an unfavorable situation for mental health which was set once again on the sidelines of the health policy agenda. Previous studies suggest that the most prevalent disorders in the years of financial crisis in Greece are depression and anxiety while a general increase of the psychiatric morbidity is observed does not follow the population’ needs.MethodsThe present descriptive study was carried out between March and June of 2015. A convenience sample of 174 psychiatrists and psychiatry residents who met the inclusion criteria were finally selected to participate. Data were collected by using a 40-items questionnaire consisted of three sections: (a) nine questions about demographics, (b) nine questions pertaining to general aspects of administrative regulations related to primary care, (c) 22 questions about psychiatrists attitudes and perceptions towards their role in primary care. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean values, while qualitative variables as absolute and relative frequencies.ResultsThe vast majority of participants perceives the public primary care services and mental health services in their community as inadequate and considers psychiatrists’ participation in primary care as important in order to improve the detection and management rates of people demonstrating mental health symptoms. They also believe that: (a) primary care practitioners’ usually fail to detect the mental health conditions of patients; (b) their participation in primary care will decrease the social stigmatization for mental health conditions; (c) patients receiving pharmaceutical treatment for mental health problems by GPs and other primary care professionals usually fail to comply.ConclusionsRespondents in the present study are receptive to participate in primary care. They believe that their inclusion to primary care will result to decreased social stigmatization for mental health problems, increased patient’ access and improved detection and management rates for common mental health conditions.
European Psychiatry | 2015
Eirini Agapidaki; Kyriakos Souliotis; Y. Zervas; Suzanne F. Jackson; Yannis Tountas
Background The need for integration of maternal mental health into primary health care (PHC) is well documented. However, research evidence suggest that maternal depression still remains uderrecognized and untreated. The help seeking bevaviour of mothers with depression remains an insufficiently investigated issue. Objectives The present qualitative study’s objective has been to investigate, identify and interpret the help seeking behavior of mothers of young children experiencing depressive symptoms. Aim Our aim was to inform policies and practices so as to improve the detection and management of maternal depression within the primary health care, in particular in countries of weak PHC systems and limited resources. Methods Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted to a purposeful sample of thirty mothers living in Athens. The selection of participants’ was based on socioeconomic status and depression severity. Qualitative content analysis was conducted independently by two researchers. Results Two broad themes influencing mothers’ help seeking behavior were identified. Barriers and enablers related to PHC system aspects and psychosocial factors emerged. Barriers were associated to several aspects of the weak PHC system, such as the fragmentation of services, the lack of team based care, but also the perceived low quality and availability of community mental health services. The main psychosocial factors identified were stigma related issues, unfavorable attitudes toward mental health, and perceived social expectations regarding the mothering role. Conclusion Apart from the psychosocial factors, several aspects of the weak primary health care system could mediate the help seeking behavior of mothers experiencing depressive symptoms.
BMC Psychiatry | 2014
Eirini Agapidaki; Kyriakos Souliotis; Suzanne F. Jackson; Vassiliki Benetou; Stylianos Christogiorgos; Christina Dimitrakaki; Yannis Tountas
International Journal for Equity in Health | 2017
Kyriakos Souliotis; Eirini Agapidaki; Manto Papageorgiou; Niki Voudouri; Xenophon Contiades
International journal of health policy and management | 2016
Kyriakos Souliotis; Eirini Agapidaki; Lily Evangelia Peppou; Chara Tzavara; George Samoutis; Mamas Theodorou
Annals of General Psychiatry | 2013
Eirini Agapidaki; Kyriakos Souliotis; Stylianos Christogiorgos; lannis Zervas; Angeliki Leonardou; Gerasimos Kolaitis; George Giannakopoulos; Christina Dimitrakaki; Yannis Tountas
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | 2017
Antonis Farmakas; Mamas Theodorou; Petros Galanis; Georgios Karayiannis; Stefanos Ghobrial; Nikos Polyzos; Evridiki Papastavrou; Eirini Agapidaki; Kyriakos Souliotis