Elaine J. Abrams
Columbia University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elaine J. Abrams.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2001
John P. A. Ioannidis; Elaine J. Abrams; Arthur J. Ammann; Marc Bulterys; James J. Goedert; Linsay Gray; Bette T. Korber; Marie Jeanne Mayaux; Lynne M. Mofenson; Marie-Louise Newell; David Shapiro; Jean Paul Teglas; Catherine M. Wilfert
In a collaboration of 7 European and United States prospective studies, 44 cases of vertical human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission were identified among 1202 women with RNA virus loads <1000 copies/mL at delivery or at the measurement closest to delivery. For mothers receiving antiretroviral treatment during pregnancy or at the time of delivery (or both), there was a 1.0% transmission rate (8 of 834; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4%-1.9%), compared with 9.8% (36 of 368; 95% CI, 7.0%-13.4%) for untreated mothers (risk ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.21). In multivariate analysis adjusting for study, transmission was lower with antiretroviral treatment (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; P<.001), cesarean section (OR, 0.30; P=.022), greater birth weight (P=.003), and higher CD4 cell count (P=.039). In 12 of 44 cases, multiple RNA measurements were obtained during pregnancy or at the time of delivery or within 4 months after giving birth; in 10 of the 12 cases, the geometric mean virus load was >500 copies/mL. Perinatal HIV-1 transmission occurs in only 1% of treated women with RNA virus loads <1000 copies/mL and may be almost eliminated with antiretroviral prophylaxis accompanied by suppression of maternal viremia.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2010
Paul Palumbo; Jane C. Lindsey; Michael D. Hughes; Mark F. Cotton; Raziya Bobat; Tammy Meyers; Mutsawashe Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Benjamin H. Chi; Philippa Musoke; Portia Kamthunzi; Werner Schimana; Lynette Purdue; Susan H. Eshleman; Elaine J. Abrams; L. Millar; Elizabeth Petzold; Lynne M. Mofenson; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Avy Violari
BACKGROUND Single-dose nevirapine is the cornerstone of the regimen for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in resource-limited settings, but nevirapine frequently selects for resistant virus in mothers and children who become infected despite prophylaxis. The optimal antiretroviral treatment strategy for children who have had prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine is unknown. METHODS We conducted a randomized trial of initial therapy with zidovudine and lamivudine plus either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 6 to 36 months of age, in six African countries, who qualified for treatment according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Results are reported for the cohort that included children exposed to single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24. Enrollment in this cohort was terminated early on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board. RESULTS A total of 164 children were enrolled. The median percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes was 19%; a total of 56% of the children had WHO stage 3 or 4 disease. More children in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group reached a primary end point (39.6% vs. 21.7%; weighted difference, 18.6 percentage-points; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 33.6; nominal P=0.02). Baseline resistance to nevirapine was detected in 18 of 148 children (12%) and was predictive of treatment failure. No significant between-group differences were seen in the rate of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Among children with prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine for perinatal prevention of HIV transmission, antiretroviral treatment consisting of zidovudine and lamivudine plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir resulted in better outcomes than did treatment with zidovudine and lamivudine plus nevirapine. Since nevirapine is used for both treatment and perinatal prevention of HIV infection in resource-limited settings, alternative strategies for the prevention of HIV transmission from mother to child, as well as for the treatment of HIV infection, are urgently required. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2006
Athena P. Kourtis; Francis K. Lee; Elaine J. Abrams; Denise J. Jamieson; Marc Bulterys
This article provides a synthesis of clinical trial data with an aim to deduce the timing of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. Because transmission of the infection to the infant through breastfeeding is one of the main challenges in fighting paediatric HIV/AIDS in the developing world, we present separate estimates for the timing of HIV transmission for non-breastfeeding and breastfeeding populations. Our estimates predict that, for non-breastfeeding populations, 50% of HIV infections are transmitted to the infant at the very end of pregnancy, near to the time of labour. For breastfeeding populations, the postnatal period accounts for most of the HIV infections transmitted to the infant. We discuss the potential benefit of exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life as a policy to decrease the magnitude of HIV transmission. Furthermore, we present the hypothesis, based on recent research findings of viral latency, that the time when a fetus initially encounters the virus might not be when infection is established. We discuss the implications of this hypothesis and how it could lead to new interventions for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission.
PLOS Medicine | 2010
Landon Myer; Rosalind J. Carter; Monica Katyal; Patricia L Toro; Wafaa El-Sadr; Elaine J. Abrams
A multicountry cohort study in sub-Saharan Africa by Landon Myer and colleagues reveals higher pregnancy rates in HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry | 2002
Claude A. Mellins; Elizabeth Brackis-Cott; Curtis Dolezal; Ana Richards; Stephen W. Nicholas; Elaine J. Abrams
Increasing numbers of perinatally HIV-infected children are surviving into their teens and beyond. Research and clinical reports suggest that many HIV-infected children, particularly those younger than 13 years, do not know they are HIV infected owing to parental concerns about the impact on their mental health. This study examines patterns of HIV status disclosure to 77 perinatally HIV-infected ethnic minority children (aged 3–13 years), and explores the association between knowledge of HIV status and emotional and behavioral outcomes. The majority of children in this study (70%) did not know their HIV status. On average, children who knew their HIV status were older and tended to have lower CD4%. Child knowledge of HIV status was not associated with gender, ethnicity, caregiver education, parent–child relationship factors, type of placement (biological vs adoptive), or other health status indicators. As hypothesized, HIV status disclosure to infected children did not result in increased mental health problems. There was a statistical trend for children who knew their HIV status to be less depressed than children who did not know. Also, greater social disclosure (e.g. communication of child’s status to family and friends) was found when the child had an AIDS diagnosis or lower CD4%, as well as when the caregiver was HIV negative, African American and not the child’s biological parent. In conclusion, pediatric HIV infection remains a highly stigmatized issue that is difficult to discuss with the infected child and others. Yet, contrary to the beliefs of many caregivers, disclosure did not result in increased mental health problems.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012
Avy Violari; F. C. Paed; Jane C. Lindsey; Michael D. Hughes; Hilda Mujuru; Linda Barlow-Mosha; Portia Kamthunzi; Benjamin H. Chi; Mark F. Cotton; Harry Moultrie; Sandhya Khadse; Werner Schimana; Raziya Bobat; Lynette Purdue; Susan H. Eshleman; Elaine J. Abrams; L. Millar; Elizabeth Petzold; Lynne M. Mofenson; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Paul Palumbo
BACKGROUND Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is the predominant (and often the only) regimen available for children in resource-limited settings. Nevirapine resistance after exposure to the drug for prevention of maternal-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is common, a problem that has led to the recommendation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in such settings. Regardless of whether there has been prior exposure to nevirapine, the performance of nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in young children has not been rigorously established. METHODS In a randomized trial conducted in six African countries and India, we compared the initiation of HIV treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 2 to 36 months of age who had no prior exposure to nevirapine. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24. RESULTS A total of 288 children were enrolled; the median percentage of CD4+ T cells was 15%, and the median plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level was 5.7 log(10) copies per milliliter. The percentage of children who reached the primary end point was significantly higher in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (40.8% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). Among the nevirapine-treated children with virologic failure for whom data on resistance were available, more than half (19 of 32) had resistance at the time of virologic failure. In addition, the time to a protocol-defined toxicity end point was shorter in the nevirapine group (P=0.04), as was the time to death (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes were superior with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir among young children with no prior exposure to nevirapine. Factors that may have contributed to the suboptimal results with nevirapine include elevated viral load at baseline, selection for nevirapine resistance, background regimen of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and the standard ramp-up dosing strategy. The results of this trial present policymakers with difficult choices. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; P1060 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).
AIDS | 1998
R. J. Simonds; Richard W. Steketee; Steven Nesheim; Pamela B. Matheson; Paul Palumbo; Lindsay S. Alger; Elaine J. Abrams; Sherry Orloff; Michael K. Lindsay; Arlene Bardeguez; Peter E. Vink; Robert H. Byers; Martha F. Rogers
Objectives:To evaluate the impact of perinatal zidovudine use on the risk of perinatal transmission of HIV and to determine risk factors for transmission among women using perinatal zidovudine. Design:Prospective cohort study of 1533 children born to HIV-infected women between 1985 and 1995 in four US cities. Methods:The association of potential risk factors with perinatal HIV transmission was assessed with univariate and multivariate statistics. Results:The overall transmission risk was 18% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16–21]. Factors associated with transmission included membrane rupture > 4 h before delivery [relative risk (RR), 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6–2.7], gestational age < 37 weeks (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4–2.2), maternal CD4+ lymphocyte count < 500 × 106cells/l (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3–2.2), birthweight < 2500 g (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3–2.1), and antenatal and neonatal zidovudine use (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4–0.9). For infants exposed to zidovudine antenatally and neonatally, the transmission risk was 13% overall but was significantly lower following shorter duration of membrane rupture (7%) and term delivery (9%). The transmission risk declined from 22% before 1992 to 11% in 1995 (P < 0.001) in association with increasing zidovudine use and changes in other risk factors. Conclusions:Perinatal HIV transmission risk has declined with increasing perinatal zidovudine use and changes in other factors. Further reduction in transmission for women taking zidovudine may be possible by reducing the incidence of other potentially modifiable risk factors, such as long duration of membrane rupture and prematurity.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1994
Stephen A. Spector; Richard D. Gelber; Nuala McGrath; Diane W. Wara; Asher Barzilai; Elaine J. Abrams; Yvonne J. Bryson; Wayne M. Dankner; Robert A. Livingston; Edward M. Connor
BACKGROUND Serious bacterial infections are common in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Studies performed before zidovudine became standard therapy found that intravenous immune globulin decreases the number of serious bacterial infections in these children. We designed a multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous immune globulin in children with advanced HIV infection who were receiving zidovudine. METHODS In a double-blind trial 255 children between 3 months and 12 years of age who had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-related complex were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous immune globulin (400 mg per kilogram of body weight) (n = 129) or placebo (0.1 percent albumin) (n = 126) every 28 days. All children received 180 mg of zidovudine per square meter of body-surface area orally four times daily. Treatment assignment was stratified according to whether the patients had a history of one or more serious bacterial infections, had previously been treated with zidovudine, or were currently receiving prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The median length of follow-up was 30.6 months. RESULTS The estimated two-year rates of serious bacterial infections with confirmed pathogens were 16.9 percent for the immune globulin group and 24.3 percent for the placebo group (relative risk, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.35 to 1.04; P = 0.07). The treatment effect was seen primarily among the 174 children who were not receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis at entry; the estimated two-year rates of infection were 11.3 percent for the immune globulin group and 26.8 percent for the placebo group (relative risk, 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.91; P = 0.03). For the 81 children who were receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis initially, the rates were 27.7 percent in the immune globulin group and 17.7 percent in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.44 to 3.66; P = 0.67). The two-year survival was similar in the two groups: 79.2 percent among immune globulin recipients and 75.4 percent among placebo recipients (P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS In children with advanced HIV disease who are receiving zidovudine, intravenous immune globulin decreases the risk of serious bacterial infections. However, this benefit is apparent only in children who are not receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as prophylaxis.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 1999
Louise Kuhn; Richard W. Steketee; Jeremy Weedon; Elaine J. Abrams; Marukh Bamji; Ellie E. Schoenbaum; John Farley; Steve Nesheim; Paul Palumbo; R. J. Simonds; Donald M. Thea; Perinatal Aids Collaborative Transmission Study
Predictors and prognosis of intrauterine and intrapartum human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission were investigated among 432 children of HIV-infected women in the Perinatal AIDS Collaborative Transmission Study. Timing of transmission was inferred from polymerase chain reaction or viral culture within 2 days of birth. Proportions of infections due to intrauterine transmission were similar among women using (29%) or not using zidovudine (30%). Preterm delivery was strongly associated with intrapartum transmission (relative risk, 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-6.1), particularly among infants delivered longer after membrane rupture, but was not associated with intrauterine transmission. Progression to AIDS or death increased 2.5-fold (95% CI, 1.1-5.8) among intrauterine infected children, adjusting for preterm delivery, and maternal CD4 cell count. Early transmission appears unlikely to explain instances of zidovudine failure. Preterm infants may be more vulnerable to HIV acquisition at delivery, especially if membrane rupture is prolonged. Intrauterine infection does not appear to increase risk of preterm delivery.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 1998
Elaine J. Abrams; Jeremy Weedon; Richard W. Steketee; Mahrukh Bamji; Theresa Brown; Marcia L. Kalish; Ellie E. Schoenbaum; Pauline A. Thomas; Donald M. Thea
The utility of RNA virus load to predict progression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 disease was assessed in 89 HIV-1-infected children. Of 22 virus load values during week 1 of life, 17 were below the detection threshold. Geometric mean virus load increased to approximately 7 x 10(5) copies/mL by week 4, was sustained throughout the first 6 months of life, and then declined to 1.6 x 10(5) copies/mL during the third year. Samples from week 1 of life had little predictive value, but virus load during days 7-30 strongly predicted progression to CDC-3 classification or death (P = .024; risk ratio = 1.6), and virus load during months 2-3 predicted progression to CDC-C or death within the first 6 months of life (P = .002, risk ratio = 11). Virus load was highly associated with imminent vulnerability to CDC-C or death (P = .002) during the first 18 months of life. Except for values from the first week of life, virus load at any age through 18 months is strongly associated with risk of HIV disease progression.