Elaine Liversidge

Treatment of human prostate tumors PC-3 and TSU-PR1 with standard and investigational agents in SCID mice

Both the PC-3 and the TSU-PR1 prostate tumor models were found to be satisfactory for chemotherapeutic investigations in ICR-SCID mice. The 30 to 60 mg fragments implanted took in all mice (as judged by 100% takes in the controls of all experiments as well as the passage mice). The tumor volume doubling time was 4.0 days for PC-3 and 2.5 days for TSU-Pr1. Nine agents were evaluated IV against early stage subcutaneous PC-3 tumors, with Nano-piposulfan being the only agent highly active (4.9 log kill). Three other agents were moderately active: Taxol (1.5 log kill), Cryptophycin-8 (1.6 log kill), Vinblastine (1.0 log kill). Five agents were inactive: VP-16, Adriamycin, CisDDPt, 5-FUra, and Cyclophosphamide. Ten agents were evaluated IV against early stage subcutaneous TSU-Pr1 tumors. Three agent were highly active, producing > 6 log kill and cures: Taxol (5/5 cures), Cryptophycin-8 (5/5 cures), Vinblastine (2/4 cures). Two other agents were moderately active: Nano-piposulfan (1.2 log kill), and Cyclophosphamide (1.1 log kill). Five agents were inactive: VP-16, Adriamycin, CisDDPt, 5-FUra, and BCNU. In part, activity was determined by the ability of the SCID mice to tolerate meaningful dosages of the agents. Agents producing granulocyte toxicity (e.g., Adriamycin) were poorly tolerated and appeared less active than expected. Vinblastine, producing little or no granulocyte toxicity was very well tolerated and appeared to be more active than expected.

Tumor Models and the Discovery and Secondary Evaluation of Solid Tumor Active Agents

AbstractEach independently arising tumor is a separate and unique biologic entity with its own unique histologic appearance, biologic behavior, and drug response profile. Thus, in drug discovery, no single tumor has been a perfect predictor for any other tumor. For this reason, new agents are evaluated in a variety of tumor models which is known as breadth of activity testing. In recent years, human tumors implanted in athymic nude mice and SCID mice have also become available for breadth of activity testing. In studies carried out in these laboratories, it was found that 10 human tumors metastasized in the SCID mice, but failed to metastasize in nude mice. In addition, tumor growth and tumor takes were superior in the SCID mice. The strengths and weaknesses of xenograft model systems are discussed. For example, most human tumor xenograft models are excessively sensitive to alkylating agents as well as to a new class of DNA binders (XE840 and XP315). Using human tumor models that are the least sensitive t...