Elaine P. Kelley

Brimonidine Tartrate: A One-month Dose Response Study

BACKGROUND Brimonidine tartrate is a relatively selective alpha2-agonist that effectively reduces mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and the incidence of IOP spikes after laser trabeculoplasty. The authors were interested in evaluating the dose response of brimonidine when applied topically for a longer duration in patients with elevated IOPs. METHODS The authors conducted a 1-month, multicentered, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel clinical study in 194 patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma (mean IOP, 25.6 +/- 3.2 mmHg). The authors administered three concentrations of brimonidine (0.08%, 0.2%, and 0.5%) or placebo bilaterally every 12 hours for 1 month. The authors evaluated the following parameters: IOP, heart rate, blood pressure, visual acuity, pupil size, basal tear secretion as well as patient comfort at baseline, day 1, week 1, week 3, and week 4. RESULTS All concentrations of brimonidine significantly reduced IOP, compared to baseline and placebo, at all follow-up visits. Maximum mean IOP decreases from baseline of 20.8%, 27.2%, and 30.1% were observed for the 0.08%, 0.20%, and 0.5% treatment groups, respectively. On days 1 and 21, the 0.2% and 0.5% treatment groups exhibited significantly greater IOP decreases than did the 0.08% group. After the initial steep decline in IOP, the effect decreased slightly and stabilized at day 14 at the level that was maintained throughout the study. The most frequent side effects reported were fatigue and dry mouth. No significant changes in heart rate were reported. Statistically significant decreases in mean blood pressure without clinical symptoms were observed within the 0.2% and 0.5% treatment groups. CONCLUSION Brimonidine 0.2% is well tolerated, efficacious, and shows potential as an agent in the long-term treatment of elevated IOP.

The Efficacy of Brimonidine in Decreasing Elevations in Intraocular Pressure after Laser Trabeculoplasty

PURPOSE The authors explored the empirical dosing requirement for administration of an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, brimonidine, and determined its efficacy in decreasing elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP) after 360 degrees argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). METHODS This vehicle-controlled, double-masked, multicenter trial evaluated three dosing regimens of brimonidine. Two hundred thirty-two patients for whom 360 degrees ALT was indicated were randomized into one of four treatment groups: 0.5% brimonidine both before and after ALT; brimonidine before but vehicle after ALT; vehicle before but brimonidine after ALT; or vehicle at both times. RESULTS During the first 3 hours after 360 degrees ALT, the overall incidence of IOP elevations of 5 mmHg or greater was 38% (23 of 60 eyes) in the group receiving vehicle only, and it ranged from 3% to 9% (2 of 62 to 5 of 53 eyes) in the groups receiving any brimonidine treatment. There was little difference in efficacy between the three dosing regimens of brimonidine. Brimonidine was well tolerated by the patients. CONCLUSION Based on this large, controlled, multicenter study, 0.5% brimonidine was an effective agent for reducing elevations in IOP after 360 degrees ALT. Only one dose, administered either before or after 360 degrees ALT, was required.

Prophylactic treatment of intraocular pressure elevations after neodymium: YAG laser posterior capsulotomies and extracapsular cataract extractions with levobunolol.

The prophylactic effect of topical 0.5% levobunolol on intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations after neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomies and extracapsular cataract extractions (ECCEs) was investigated in two separate, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies. In study 1, 42 patients received either levobunolol or vehicle 1 hour before a unilateral Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Elevated IOP (greater than or equal to 10 mmHg) occurred in up to 38% of those in the vehicle group and none in the levobunolol group. Mean IOP increased up to 6 mmHg in the vehicle group, whereas it decreased up to 3 mmHg in the levobunolol group. In study 2, 41 patients received either levobunolol or vehicle immediately after a unilateral ECCE involving the use of a viscoelastic preparation and the implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL). The incidence of IOP elevations (greater than or equal to 10 mmHg) was up to 40% in the vehicle group and 19% in the levobunolol group. Mean IOP increased up to 9 mmHg in the vehicle group and up to 2 mmHg in the levobunolol group. Thus, marked elevations in IOP after posterior capsulotomies or ECCEs may be minimized by prophylactic treatment with levobunolol.

Evaluation of Once-Daily Levobunolol 0.25% and Timolol 0.25% Therapy for Increased Intraocular Pressure

In a three-month, double-masked, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the once-daily ocular hypotensive efficacy of 0.25% levobunolol and 0.25% timolol in 80 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Thirty-seven of the 39 patients (95%) in the 0.25% levobunolol group and 35 of the 41 patients (85%) in the 0.25% timolol group successfully completed the three-month study period. The overall mean decrease in intraocular pressure was 5.3 mm Hg (22%) in the 0.25% levobunolol group and 5.4 mm Hg (22%) in the 0.25% timolol group. This difference was not statistically significant. In both treatment groups, effects on mean heart rate and blood pressure were minimal. The data suggest that levobunolol 0.25% and timolol 0.25%, administered once daily, are equally effective in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Flurbiprofen 0.03% for the control of inflammation following cataract extraction by phacoemulsification

ABSTRACT We conducted a double‐masked, vehicle‐controlled study to evaluate the anti‐inflammatory effect of topical flurbiprofen in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. The 233 patients were randomized to receive either flurbiprofen or vehicle immediately prior to and for two weeks following surgery. No concomitant corticosteroid use was allowed. The flurbiprofen group had significantly less anterior chamber cells and flare at day 7 and significantly less conjunctival erythema, corneal edema, and lid edema at day 14. The investigators global effectiveness rating was higher in the flurbiprofen group at day 14. Blood‐aqueous barrier disruption, as measured by aqueous fluorophotometry, was statistically significantly diminished in the flurbiprofen group. Burning and stinging were rated significantly greater in the flurbiprofen group than in the vehicle group. Foreign‐body sensation and photophobia were significantly more severe in the vehicle group than in the flurbiprofen group. Flurbiprofen provided postsurgical anti‐inflammatory efficacy in clinical signs of inflammation and in blood‐aqueous barrier disruption, and also showed improved subjective signs.

Once-daily versus twice-daily levobunolol (0.5%) therapy : a crossover study

The authors executed a two-period, randomized, double-masked, crossover study comparing once-daily to twice-daily levobunolol hydrochloride (0.5%) in 20 patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Modified diurnal curves were performed at four times for each study arm: baseline, day 1, day 14, and day 28. The mean diurnal corrected decrease in IOP from baseline ranged from 16% +/- 11% to 22% +/- 9% when the subjects were treated twice daily, and from 14% +/- 10% to 18% +/- 8% when the same subjects were treated once daily. At day 1, patients had a significantly greater IOP lowering after twice-daily therapy than after once-daily therapy (P less than 0.05). At 14 and 28 days, there was no clinically significant difference between the two treatment regimens. The results of our crossover study suggest that once-daily treatment with levobunolol (0.5%) is as effective as twice-daily treatment.

Ocular hypotensive efficacy of 0.25% levobunolol instilled once daily.

The authors evaluated the efficacy of once-daily treatment with levobunolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in an open-labeled, two-phase titration clinical trial. All patients started the study using 0.25% levobunolol administered once daily for 3 months (phase I). If a patients intraocular pressure (IOP) was not controlled with this concentration of levobunolol, the concentration was increased to 0.5% administered once daily for 3 months (phase II). During phase I, a significant reduction in IOP was observed in 21 of the 29 patients (72%), with an average IOP reduction of 24%. During phase II, in six patients whose IOP was reduced inadequately with 0.25% levobunolol, one had a significant reduction in IOP with 0.5% levobunolol. The authors concluded that levobunolol, instilled once daily at a concentration of 0.25%, was effective in significantly reducing IOP in the majority of the patients evaluated.

Plasma Levobunolol Levels following Topical Administration with Reference to Systemic Side Effects

We determined the plasma level of levobunolol in normal volunteers after a single topical instillation of 0.5 or 1% levobunolol in both eyes, and after twice-daily instillations for 1 week. Levobunolol levels were detected within 1 h following acute instillation. During the study, mean plasma levels ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 ng/ml for the 0.5% group and 0.3 to 0.6 ng/ml for the 1% group. The highest individual plasma level was 1.2 ng/ml, which occurred in 1 patient receiving 1% levobunolol. After 1 week of twice-daily instillation mean plasma levels were similar to those observed after acute instillation. Minimal cardiovascular changes were observed in the 0.5% group while decreases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure were observed in the 1% treatment group.

Levobunolol 0.5% and timolol 0.5% to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy

Purpose: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of levobunolol 0.5%, timolol 0.5%, or vehicle in reducing the incidence of postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes of 5 and 10 mm Hg or more in patients having neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy. Setting: Miami Vision Center, Coral Gables, Florida; Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio; South Texas Cataract and Glaucoma Center, San Antonio, Texas; Mid‐South Eye Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. Methods: This prospective, double‐masked, randomized study comprised 144 patients having Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy in one eye. One drop of the test medication was administered preoperatively and one drop on the evening after surgery; IOP was measured preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Intraocular pressure elevations of 5 mm Hg or more were seen in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the levobunolol group, 4 of 54 (7%) in the timolol group, and 10 of 28 (36%) in the vehicle group. These elevations occurred significantly more frequently in the vehicle group than in the levobunolol (P < .001) or timolol (P < .004) groups. Elevations of 10 mm Hg or more were found in 2 of 28 patients (7%) treated with vehicle but were not observed in the patients treated with levobunolol or timolol. Conclusions: Levobunolol 0.5% or timolol 0.5% administered preoperatively and again in the evening after Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy effectively blunted the IOP rise that frequently follows laser surgery.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Levobunolol (Vistagan®) in Germany

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobunolol HC1 (Vistagan) in 2,041 glaucoma patients at 143 sites in the Federal Republic of Germany. This study was a 3-month, open-label, noncomparative trial of levobunolol administered twice daily. Eighty-five percent of the patients completed the study period with well-controlled intraocular pressure (IOP). Treatment was discontinued in the remaining 15%: 7% for adverse reactions, 1% for lack of drug efficacy, and 7% for reasons unrelated to the study treatment. Efficacy, ocular drug tolerance, and systemic safety were judged as good to very good in approximately 80% of the patients. This large, postapproval study confirms previous findings of several well-controlled clinical trials indicating that levobunolol is an effective drug for the treatment of elevated IOP and is safe and comfortable for most patients.