Elaine Weiner

Adjunctive risperidone for partially responsive people with schizophrenia treated with clozapine.

The large numbers of partial clozapine responders represent a major therapeutic challenge. Unfortunately, there are no clear data to support how best to treat these patients. This study examines the efficacy and safety of adjunctive risperidone in a well-defined treatment-resistant population optimally treated with clozapine. A total of 69 inpatients and outpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entered a 16-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Of them, 33 participants were randomized to risperidone and 36 were randomized to placebo. There was no significant group difference in the predefined response criteria. There were modest group differences for Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive symptoms, which were significant in the completer analysis (F=5.70; df=1, 70.3; p=0.02; ES=0.27) but not the intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses (F=3.01; df=1, 77.5; p=0.09; ES=0.19). A similar pattern was found for the BPRS total score, with the completer analysis showing a significant improvement in the risperidone group (F=5.21; df=1, 64.9; p=0.03; ES=0.27), whereas the ITT analysis was not significant (F=3.52; df=1, 71.3; p=0.06; ES=0.22). In addition, there was a small, but significant, group difference for negative symptoms, as measured by the SANS total score, which favored the risperidone group (F=5.67; df=1, 78.7; p=0.02; ES=0.24). There were no significant group differences on safety measures, including neuropsychological test and extrapyramidal symptom scores. A significant elevation of prolactin in the risperidone group was observed. The study results suggest that adjunctive risperidone may have a modest benefit for treatment-resistant clozapine patients. The study results are discussed in the context of previous double-blind studies of adjunctive risperidone. (clinicaltrials.gov, trial number: NCT00056498).

Lack of beneficial galantamine effect for smoking behavior: A double-blind randomized trial in people with schizophrenia

Cigarette smoking is in schizophrenia is prevalent and may be due to self-medicating attempts to improve cognitive deficits related to alpha7 and alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor dysregulation. Galantamine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that acts as a positive allosteric modulator of nicotine acetylcholine receptors including both the alpha4beta2 and alpha7 subunits. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial galantamine was compared to placebo for its effects on cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. This manuscript reports findings for galantamines effect on smoking behavior in people from this 12-week trial who were smokers (18 galantamine, 25 placebo). Expired CO was measured every 2 weeks and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) was administered at baseline and endpoint. Expired CO measures in galantamine subjects were 23.0+/-9.7 ppm and 21.1+/-10.3 ppm at baseline and Week 12, respectively, compared to 20.1+/-8.5 ppm and 21.0+/-10.3 ppm at baseline and Week 12 in placebo subjects. The mean tau-b correlation between expired CO level and visit was -0.05+/-0.41 in the galantamine group and 0.13+/-0.42 in the placebo group (F=0.73, df=1,38, p=0.40), suggesting that there were no trends toward increased or decreased smoking in either group. Mean FTND scores in the galantamine group were 4.9+/-2.5 at baseline and 5.2+/-2.2 at Week 12, compared to 4.1+/-2.6 at baseline and 3.7+/-2.6 at Week 12 in the placebo group (Mantel-Haenszel chi2=5.53, df=1, p=0.019), for an effect size of 0.4. These results suggest that galantamine has no effect on cigarette smoking and that during galantamine treatment nicotine dependency scores worsen.

Mazindol Treatment of Negative Symptoms

Hypodopaminergic and hyponoradrenergic pathophysiology may be a basis for primary and/or secondary negative symptoms in schizophrenia. The hypothesis that enhanced neurotransmission in these systems would be therapeutic for negative symptoms was tested by comparing mazindol and placebo in a double-blind, cross-over design trial. Outcome following mazindol supplementation was comparable to placebo supplementation (F(1,30) = 0.9; p = .57). Results for deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia subjects were similar, and were not affected by whether concurrent the antipsychotic drug treatment was clozapine, fluphenazine, or haloperidol. The efficacy hypothesis was not supported for either primary or secondary negative symptoms.

Rasagiline in the Treatment of the Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE The current study examined the efficacy and safety of rasagiline, a selective MAO-B inhibitor, for the treatment of persistent negative symptoms. METHODS Sixty people with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, who met a priori criteria for persistent negative symptoms, were randomized to receive rasagiline, 1mg/d (n = 31) or placebo (n = 29) in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score was used to assess change in negative symptoms. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), N-Back test, a probabilistic learning task, and a delayed discounting task were used to assess cognition. RESULTS In a mixed model analysis of covariance (MM-ANCOVA), with time as a continuous variable, there was a significant treatment × time effect for SANS total score (F = 5.61(df = 1,40.3), P = .023). The treatment × time interaction effect was also significant for the SANS avolition subscale score (F(1,40.2) = 10.41, P = .002). In a post hoc MM-ANCOVA analyses, with time as a categorical variable, group differences were significant at week 12 for SANS total score (t(37.3) = 2.15; P = .04; d = -0.41) and SANS avolition subscale score (t(49.0) = 3.06; P = .004; d = -0.46). There was a significant difference in number of participants with a ≥20% reduction in SANS avolition score (χ(2)(1) = 10.94; P = .0009), but not in SANS total score (χ(2)(1) = 1.11; P = .29). There were no significant group differences on the RBANS, N-Back, probabilistic learning, or delayed discounting tasks. CONCLUSIONS Study results support future studies of the utility of rasagiline for the treatment of negative symptoms, including avolition (clinicaltrials.gov trial number: NCT00492336).

Remission in schizophrenia: the relationship to baseline symptoms and changes in symptom domains during a one-year study

Abstract The concepts of partial recovery and remission have become increasingly important for the evaluation of the effectiveness of schizophrenia therapeutics. The relationship of baseline symptoms and changes in symptoms to remission of psychosis was evaluated. Fifty-six outpatients with residual schizophrenia completed a double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol and were then enrolled into a one-year open-label trial of olanzapine. Out of these 56 subjects, 13 (23%) met remission criteria at the beginning of the open-label treatment and were excluded. During the one-year study, 7/43 (16%) subjects met remission criteria. These subjects had significantly lower baseline ratings for tardive dyskinesia (TD) than subjects who did not achieve remission (1.8 ± 1.5 vs. 4.2 ± 4.6, P = 0.03). As expected, remitted subjects had significantly greater improvements in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total scores, positive subscale scores and scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total scores. Remitted subjects also experienced a significantly greater improvement in depressive symptoms (P = 0.001), activation (P = 0.005), and Clinical Global Impressions scores (P < 0.001), as well as greater improvements in extrapyramidal symptoms (P = 0.007) and TD (P < 0.001). These results suggest that the relationship of depressive symptoms and improved side effects to the construct of remission in schizophrenia may deserve special attention. Future studies should aim to relate remission criteria to functional outcomes, cognition, and other important symptom domains.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Oxytocin or Galantamine for the Treatment of Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Impairments in People With Schizophrenia.

Purpose/Background Negative symptoms and cognitive impairments tend to co-occur in people with schizophrenia. If their association with each other is due, in part, to shared pathophysiology, then this suggests that a single drug could potentially be effective for both domains. The current study was designed to examine this hypothesis. Methods/Procedures Fifty-eight participants with either Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entered into a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial of intranasal oxytocin and galantamine. Seventeen participants were randomized to intranasal oxytocin, 20 were randomized to galantamine, and 21 were randomized to placebo. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total score was used to assess change in negative symptoms (the primary outcome measure for oxytocin). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score was used to assess cognition (the primary outcome measure for galantamine). Findings/Results There were no significant group differences for negative symptoms (oxytocin vs placebo: F2,47.4 = 0.19, P = 0.83; galantamine vs placebo: F2,52.5 = 0.41, P = 0.67). There were no significant group differences for cognitive impairments (galantamine vs placebo: t40 = 0.71, P = 0.48; oxytocin vs placebo: t40 = 0.50, P = 0.62). There were also no significant group differences for the functional capacity or ancillary symptom measures. Implications/Conclusions The lack of an efficacy signal for either compound precluded our ability to test whether pharmacological treatment pathways for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments overlap or are independent.

Olanzapine treatment of residual positive and negative symptoms

OBJECTIVE Olanzapine has been hypothesized to have superior efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The authors examined the comparative efficacy and safety of olanzapine and haloperidol in outpatients with partially responsive schizophrenia. METHOD Sixty-three outpatients with schizophrenia who met retrospective and prospective criteria for either residual positive or residual negative symptoms entered a 16-week double-blind, parallel-groups comparison of olanzapine and haloperidol. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effect on positive or negative symptoms. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups on measures of social and functional outcome. Olanzapine-treated patients had a significant reduction in extrapyramidal symptoms and subjective measures of stiffness and dry mouth, but the increases in systolic blood pressure and weight in olanzapine-treated patients were significantly greater than they were in haloperidol-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Olanzapine has limited differential benefit for either positive or negative symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Although olanzapine is associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms, other side effects may offset this benefit.

Antipsychotic Treatment and Tobacco Craving in People With Schizophrenia

ABSTRACT Objective: Nicotine dependence is high in schizophrenia, and craving is known to impact relapse during quit attempts. Methods: We compared tobacco craving in smokers with schizophrenia treated with different antipsychotics. Results: Mean craving scores were lowest in participants receiving first-generation antipsychotics, although these differences were not statistically significant. Craving with clozapine was not lower than with other antipsychotics. Conclusions: Further research is needed to determine whether differences in craving exist between antipsychotic classes.

Clozapine Levels Lowered by Modafinil: A Case Report and Brief Review of Modafinil in Schizophrenia

We present a case report of a probable modafinil-clozapine interaction resulting in decreased clozapine levels, followed by a brief review of modafinil in schizophrenia. Modafinil is a wakefulness-promoting agent that seems to act selectively on centers of circadian rhythm in the brain and does not increase dopamine release. For this reason, it has been used in schizophrenia to address sedation, activity level, negative symptoms, and cognition. Results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) generally do not support the use of modafinil for these indications.