Elber S. Camacho
University of Rochester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elber S. Camacho.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008
Jonathan W. Friedberg; Philip R. Cohen; Ling Chen; K. Sue Robinson; Andres Forero-Torres; Ann S. La Casce; Luis Fayad; Alberto Bessudo; Elber S. Camacho; Michael Williams; Richard H. van der Jagt; Jennifer W. Oliver; Bruce D. Cheson
PURPOSE Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating agent with novel mechanisms of action. This phase II multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) refractory to rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 2 of each 21-day cycle. Outcomes included response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety. RESULTS Seventy-six patients, ages 38 to 84 years, with predominantly stage III/IV indolent (80%) or transformed (20%) disease were treated; 74 were assessable for response. Twenty-four (32%) were refractory to chemotherapy. Patients received a median of two prior unique regimens. An overall response rate of 77% (15% complete response, 19% unconfirmed complete response, and 43% partial) was observed. The median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 9.9 months), 9.0 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 16.7) for patients with indolent disease, and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.1) for those with transformed disease. Thirty-six percent of these responses exceeded 1 year. The most frequent nonhematologic adverse events included nausea and vomiting, fatigue, constipation, anorexia, fever, cough, and diarrhea. Grade 3 or 4 reversible hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (54%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and anemia (12%). CONCLUSION Single-agent bendamustine produced durable objective responses with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with rituximab-refractory, indolent NHL. These findings are promising and will serve as a benchmark for future clinical trials in this novel patient population.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1987
Robert Rentschler; David W. Wilbur; George H. Petti; George D. Chonkich; Dennis A. Hilliard; Elber S. Camacho; Ric B. Thorpe
To determine if adjuvant methotrexate (MTX), escalated weekly to toxicity, could improve disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival by preventing recurrent disease, 60 patients with potentially resectable stage III or IV squamous head and neck carcinomas were stratified by primary site, stage, and nutritional status, then randomized by pairs to receive or not receive adjuvant MTX. All received standard surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. Five patients were taken off study because of unresectability at the time of surgery, leaving 55 evaluable patients. There were no statistically significant imbalances in known prognostic factors between the two treatment arms. MTX was begun at 40 mg/m2 and escalated 10 mg/m2 weekly (four doses preoperatively; four doses postoperatively, preradiation therapy; eight doses postradiation therapy) to mucosal or hematologic toxicity. The median peak MTX dose achieved was 80 mg/m2. Although three patients were hospitalized with MTX toxicity, none died of MTX toxicity. No patient receiving MTX had disease progression during treatment, and there was no increase in postoperative complications. Thirty-two patients died (median survival, 19 months); 23 patients are alive with median follow-up of 43 months. There was no statistically significant difference in actuarial DFS (P = 1.0) or overall survival (P = .61). Although patients on the MTX arm appeared to have less local and regional recurrences at first recurrence (thus more distant metastases), this did not reach statistical significance (P = .06). There was no significant difference between the sites of recurrence at death or last follow-up (P = .38).
British Journal of Haematology | 2010
William Bensinger; Sundar Jagannath; Robert Vescio; Elber S. Camacho; Jeffrey L. Wolf; David M. Irwin; Gerardo Capo; Marti McKinley; Phyllis Potts; David H. Vesole; Amitabha Mazumder; John Crowley; Pam Becker; Jacqueline Hilger; Brian G. M. Durie
Novel sequential combination therapy for induction may improve the quality of response and therefore prolong survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We report results from a phase 2 study of two sequential three‐drug combinations. Forty‐four previously untreated, symptomatic MM patients received: bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11), cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 (days 1, 8), plus dexamethasone 40 mg (day of and day after bortezomib) for three 21‐day cycles, followed by bortezomib 1·0 mg/m2, dexamethasone 40 mg and thalidomide 100 mg daily for three cycles. Overall response rate for 42 evaluable patients was 95%, including 19% stringent complete response (sCR), 26% CR, and 57%≥ very good partial response. Twenty‐two patients have undergone stem‐cell transplantation. After a median follow‐up of 20·9 months, five patients have died; none was induction therapy‐related. Median event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached; estimated 1‐year EFS and OS rates were 81% and 91% respectively. Both three‐drug combinations were well tolerated; 82% of patients completed all six cycles. Toxicities were predictable and manageable; the most‐commonly reported grade 3/4 toxicity was neuropathy (11%). This novel sequential three‐drug combination therapy is effective and well‐tolerated in previously untreated MM patients.
Blood | 2006
Sundar Jagannath; Brian G. M. Durie; Jeffrey L. Wolf; Elber S. Camacho; David M. Irwin; Jose Lutzky; Marti McKinley; Afshin Eli Gabayan; Amitabha Mazumder; John Crowley; Robert Vescio
Blood | 2007
William Bensinger; Sundar Jagannath; Robert Vescio; Elber S. Camacho; Jeffrey L. Wolf; David Irwin; Gerardo Capo; Marti McKinley; Phyllis Potts; David H. Vesole; Amitabha Mazumder; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Pamela S. Becker; John Crowley; Brian G. M. Durie
Blood | 2005
Jonathan W. Friedberg; Philip R. Cohen; Bruce D. Cheson; K. Sue Robinson; Andres Forero-Torres; Luis Fayad; Ann S. La Casce; Alberto Bessudo; Elber S. Camacho; Michael E. Williams; Richard H. van der Jagt; Jennifer W. Oliver; Ely Benaim
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2004
Sundar Jagannath; Brian G. M. Durie; Jeffrey L. Wolf; Elber S. Camacho; David M. Irwin; Jose Lutzky; M. McKinley; E. Gabayan; John Crowley; David P. Schenkein
Blood | 2014
William I. Bensinger; Robert Vescio; Cristina Gasparetto; Elber S. Camacho; Rajneesh Nath; Christina L. Gomes; David D. Smith; Jatin J. Shah; Brian G. M. Durie
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Bernardo Rapoport; Cindy Weinstein; Elber S. Camacho; Saleem Khanani; Elizabeth Beckford-Brathwaite; Lydia Kevill; Waldimir Vallejos; Li Wen Liang; Stephen J. Noga
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Stephen J. Noga; Cindy Weinstein; Elber S. Camacho; Saleem Khanani; Elizabeth Beckford-Brathwaite; Waldimir Vallejos; Kelly McGowan; Grace Tamburri; Joanne Force; Arlene Taylor