Eleanor E.R. Harris

Risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast radiotherapy for breast cancer: 5-year results for local control and overall survival from the TARGIT-A randomised trial

BACKGROUND The TARGIT-A trial compared risk-adapted radiotherapy using single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) versus fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for breast cancer. We report 5-year results for local recurrence and the first analysis of overall survival. METHODS TARGIT-A was a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Women aged 45 years and older with invasive ductal carcinoma were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive TARGIT or whole-breast EBRT, with blocks stratified by centre and by timing of delivery of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy: randomisation occurred either before lumpectomy (prepathology stratum, TARGIT concurrent with lumpectomy) or after lumpectomy (postpathology stratum, TARGIT given subsequently by reopening the wound). Patients in the TARGIT group received supplemental EBRT (excluding a boost) if unforeseen adverse features were detected on final pathology, thus radiotherapy was risk-adapted. The primary outcome was absolute difference in local recurrence in the conserved breast, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 2·5% at 5 years; prespecified analyses included outcomes as per timing of randomisation in relation to lumpectomy. Secondary outcomes included complications and mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00983684. FINDINGS Patients were enrolled at 33 centres in 11 countries, between March 24, 2000, and June 25, 2012. 1721 patients were randomised to TARGIT and 1730 to EBRT. Supplemental EBRT after TARGIT was necessary in 15·2% [239 of 1571] of patients who received TARGIT (21·6% prepathology, 3·6% postpathology). 3451 patients had a median follow-up of 2 years and 5 months (IQR 12-52 months), 2020 of 4 years, and 1222 of 5 years. The 5-year risk for local recurrence in the conserved breast was 3·3% (95% CI 2·1-5·1) for TARGIT versus 1·3% (0·7-2·5) for EBRT (p=0·042). TARGIT concurrently with lumpectomy (prepathology, n=2298) had much the same results as EBRT: 2·1% (1·1-4·2) versus 1·1% (0·5-2·5; p=0·31). With delayed TARGIT (postpathology, n=1153) the between-group difference was larger than 2·5% (TARGIT 5·4% [3·0-9·7] vs EBRT 1·7% [0·6-4·9]; p=0·069). Overall, breast cancer mortality was much the same between groups (2·6% [1·5-4·3] for TARGIT vs 1·9% [1·1-3·2] for EBRT; p=0·56) but there were significantly fewer non-breast-cancer deaths with TARGIT (1·4% [0·8-2·5] vs 3·5% [2·3-5·2]; p=0·0086), attributable to fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes and other cancers. Overall mortality was 3·9% (2·7-5·8) for TARGIT versus 5·3% (3·9-7·3) for EBRT (p=0·099). Wound-related complications were much the same between groups but grade 3 or 4 skin complications were significantly reduced with TARGIT (four of 1720 vs 13 of 1731, p=0·029). INTERPRETATION TARGIT concurrent with lumpectomy within a risk-adapted approach should be considered as an option for eligible patients with breast cancer carefully selected as per the TARGIT-A trial protocol, as an alternative to postoperative EBRT. FUNDING University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, UCLH Charities, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, Ninewells Cancer Campaign, National Health and Medical Research Council, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Late Cardiac Mortality and Morbidity in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients After Breast-Conservation Treatment

PURPOSE Several studies have reported increased cardiac mortality related to the use of left-sided breast or chest-wall irradiation. This study was undertaken as a comprehensive examination of the long-term cardiac mortality and morbidity after breast irradiation using contemporary irradiation techniques. METHODS The medical records of 961 consecutive patients presenting between 1977 and 1994 with stage I or II breast cancer treated with breast conservation treatment were reviewed. Data was recorded on baseline pretreatment patient, tumor and treatment characteristics and on subsequent cancer or cardiac related events. The median follow-up time was 12 years. RESULTS There was no difference in overall mortality from any cardiac cause (P = .25). Death from any cardiac cause occurred in 2% of right-sided patients and 3.5% of left-sided patients. However, in the second decade after treatment, there was a higher rate of cardiac deaths in left-sided patients, with a cumulative risk of 6.4% (95% CI, 3.5% to 11.5%) for left-sided compared with 3.6% (95% CI, 1.8% to 7.2%) for right-sided patients at 20 years. There were statistically higher rates of chest pain, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction diagnosed in left-sided patients (all P < or = .002). The presence of hypertension was associated with a higher risk of coronary artery disease in left-sided patients. CONCLUSION Irradiation to the left breast is not associated with a higher risk of cardiac death up to 20 years after treatment, but is associated with an increased rate of diagnoses of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction compared with right breast treatment.

Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

PURPOSE To determine the relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to outcome after breast-conservation treatment (BCT) with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 756 women with early stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ underwent BCT including definitive breast irradiation during 1992 to 2001. At the time of initial diagnosis and evaluation, routine breast imaging included conventional mammography. Of the 756 women, 215 women (28%) had also undergone a breast MRI study, and 541 women (72%) had not undergone a breast MRI study. The median follow-up after treatment was 4.6 years (range, 0.1 to 13.5 years). RESULTS For the women with a breast MRI study compared with the women without a breast MRI study, there were no differences in the 8-year rates of any local failure (3% v 4%, respectively; P = .51) or local-only first failure (3% v 4%, respectively; P = .32). There were also no differences between the two groups for the 8-year rates of overall survival (86% v 87%, respectively; P = .51), cause-specific survival (94% v 95%, respectively; P = .63), freedom from distant metastases (89% v 92%, respectively; P = .16), or contralateral breast cancer (6% v 6%, respectively; P = .39). CONCLUSION The use of a breast MRI study at the time of initial diagnosis and evaluation was not associated with an improvement in outcome after BCT with radiation.

Ten-Year Multi-Institutional Results of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy in BRCA1/2-Associated Stage I/II Breast Cancer

PURPOSE We compared the outcome of breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer versus that of matched sporadic controls. METHODS A total of 160 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer were matched with 445 controls with sporadic breast cancer. Primary end points were rates of in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and contralateral breast cancers (CBCs). Median follow-up was 7.9 years for mutation carriers and 6.7 years for controls. RESULTS There was no significant difference in IBTR overall between carriers and controls; 10- and 15-year estimates were 12% and 24% for carriers and 9% and 17% for controls, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; P = .19). Multivariate analyses for IBTR found BRCA1/2 mutation status to be an independent predictor of IBTR when carriers who had undergone oophorectomy were removed from analysis (HR, 1.99; P = .04); the incidence of IBTR in carriers who had undergone oophorectomy was not significantly different from that in sporadic controls (P = .37). CBCs were significantly greater in carriers versus controls, with 10- and 15-year estimates of 26% and 39% for carriers and 3% and 7% for controls, respectively (HR, 10.43; P < .0001). Tamoxifen use significantly reduced risk of CBCs in mutation carriers (HR, 0.31; P = .05). CONCLUSION IBTR risk at 10 years is similar in BRCA1/2 carriers treated with breast conservation surgery who undergo oophorectomy versus sporadic controls. As expected, CBCs are significantly increased in carriers. Although the incidence of CBCs was significantly reduced in mutation carriers who received tamoxifen, this rate remained significantly greater than in controls. Additional strategies are needed to reduce contralateral cancers in these high-risk women.

Coronary Artery Findings After Left-Sided Compared With Right-Sided Radiation Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To compare the incidence and distribution of coronary artery disease after left-sided versus right-sided irradiation in patients treated with breast conservation for early-stage breast cancer who subsequently underwent cardiac stress testing and/or catheterization for cardiovascular symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS The medical records of 961 stage I-II breast cancer patients treated from 1977 to 1995 at the University of Pennsylvania with conventional tangential beam radiation treatment (RT) were screened for cardiac stress tests and catheterizations performed after RT. The results of these tests were analyzed by laterality of RT and compared with baseline cardiovascular risk. RESULTS At diagnosis, patients with left-sided and right-sided breast cancer had the same estimated 10-year risk (both 7%) of developing coronary artery disease. At a median time of 12 years post-RT (range, 2 to 24 years), 46 patients with left-sided and 36 patients with right-sided breast cancer (total, N = 82) had undergone cardiac stress testing. A statistically significant higher prevalence of stress test abnormalities was found among left (27 of 46; 59%) versus right-side irradiated patients (three of 36; 8%; P = .001). Furthermore, 19 of 27 of left-sided abnormalities (70%) were in the left anterior descending artery territory. Thirteen left-side irradiated patients also underwent cardiac catheterization revealing 12 of 13 with coronary stenoses (92%) and eight of 13 with coronary stenoses (62%) solely in the left anterior descending artery. CONCLUSION Patients treated with left-sided radiation as a component of breast conservation have an increased risk of late, radiation-associated coronary damage. Treatment with modern radiation techniques may reduce the risk of cardiac injury.

An evidence based review of proton beam therapy: The report of ASTRO’s emerging technology committee

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a novel method for treating malignant disease with radiotherapy. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the state of the science of PBT and arrive at a recommendation for the use of PBT. The emerging technology committee of the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) routinely evaluates new modalities in radiotherapy and assesses the published evidence to determine recommendations for the society as a whole. In 2007, a Proton Task Force was assembled to evaluate the state of the art of PBT. This report reflects evidence collected up to November 2009. Data was reviewed for PBT in central nervous system tumors, gastrointestinal malignancies, lung, head and neck, prostate, and pediatric tumors. Current data do not provide sufficient evidence to recommend PBT in lung cancer, head and neck cancer, GI malignancies, and pediatric non-CNS malignancies. In hepatocellular carcinoma and prostate cancer and there is evidence for the efficacy of PBT but no suggestion that it is superior to photon based approaches. In pediatric CNS malignancies PBT appears superior to photon approaches but more data is needed. In large ocular melanomas and chordomas, we believe that there is evidence for a benefit of PBT over photon approaches. PBT is an important new technology in radiotherapy. Current evidence provides a limited indication for PBT. More robust prospective clinical trials are needed to determine the appropriate clinical setting for PBT.

Long-term results of local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE The outcome for women with a local failure after breast conservation treatment is not well described in the literature. Because local recurrence is a potentially salvageable event, this study was performed to evaluate the outcome of patients with local recurrence after breast conservation surgery and definitive radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study population consisted of 112 patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. There were 100 isolated local recurrences and 12 local-plus-regional recurrences. There were 93 invasive local recurrences and 19 DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) local recurrences. Local recurrences were detected by physical examination alone in 42 patients, mammography alone in 47 patients, and both modalities in 23 patients. All patients were initially treated with breast conservation treatment with or without systemic therapy and subsequently treated at the time of local recurrence with salvage mastectomy with or without systemic therapy. The mean and median follow-up times after local recurrence were 49 and 44 months, respectively. RESULTS For the entire group of 112 patients, the overall survival at 10 years after local recurrence was 69%, the cause-specific survival was 71%, and the freedom from distant metastases was 47%. For the 93 patients with an invasive local recurrence, the overall survival at 10 years was 64%, cause-specific survival was 67%, and freedom from distant metastases was 44%. For the 93 patients with an invasive local recurrence, interval from diagnosis to local recurrence (< or =2 years vs. 2.1-5 years vs. >5 years) predicted for overall survival at 5 years (65% vs. 84% vs. 89%; p = 0.03). Method of detection of local recurrence (physical examination vs. mammography vs. both methods) also predicted for 5-year overall survival (73% vs. 91% vs. 93%, respectively; p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, interval from diagnosis to local recurrence was an independent predictor of overall survival (p = 0.03). Method of detection of local recurrence (physical examination vs. mammography vs. both methods) was borderline in predicting for 5-year cause-specific survival (73% vs. 91% vs. 93%, respectively; p = 0.06). Similarly, interval from diagnosis to local recurrence (< or =2 years vs. 2.1-5 years vs. >5 years) was a borderline predictor of 5-year cause-specific survival (65% vs. 84% vs. 89%; p = 0.08). No factors that predicted for freedom from distant metastases were identified. There were three second locoregional failures on the chest wall. Two of the 19 patients with a DCIS local recurrence have died of metastatic breast cancer. Death was probably not related to their local recurrence, but rather a result of persistent risk from an invasive primary cancer. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides long-term data after salvage treatment for patients who experience local recurrence after breast conservation treatment. The variables of method of detection and interval from diagnosis to local recurrence are identified as having prognostic significance for overall and cause-specific survival. In view of the potential for long-term survival, aggressive attempt at salvage treatment is warranted for the patient with local recurrence after breast conservation treatment. Second local recurrence after salvage mastectomy is an uncommon event. Although DCIS local recurrences may not in themselves cause an increase in the risk of mortality, the risk from the primary invasive cancer persists.

The effects of sequence and type of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on cosmesis and complications after breast conservation therapy

PURPOSE Chemotherapy plays an increasingly important role in the treatment of both node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients, but the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is not well established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interaction of sequence and type of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy given with radiation therapy on the cosmetic outcome and the incidence of complications of Stage I and II breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 1053 Stage I and II breast cancer patients treated with curative intent with breast-conserving surgery, axillary dissection, and radiation therapy between 1977-1991 were reviewed. Median follow-up after treatment was 6.7 years. Two hundred fourteen patients received chemotherapy alone, 141 patients received hormonal therapy alone, 86 patients received both, and 612 patients received no adjuvant therapy. Patients who received chemotherapy +/- hormonal therapy were grouped according to sequence of chemotherapy: (a) concurrent = concurrent chemotherapy with radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy; (b) sequential = radiation followed by chemotherapy or chemotherapy followed by radiation; and (c) sandwich = chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiation followed by chemotherapy. Compared to node negative patients, node-positive patients more commonly received chemotherapy (77 vs. 9%, p < 0.0001) and/or hormonal therapy (40 vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). Among patients who received chemotherapy, the majority (243 patients) received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy with two cycles of cytoxan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered during radiation followed by six cycles of chemotherapy with cytoxan, 5-fluorouracil and either methotrexate (CMF) or doxorubicin(CAF). For analysis of cosmesis, patients included were relapse free with 3 years minimum follow-up. RESULTS The use of chemotherapy had an adverse effect on cosmetic outcome compared to no chemotherapy, which was of borderline significance at 3 years (92% excellent or good cosmetic outcome vs. 96% respectively, p = 0.057); however, cosmesis was not different at 5 years (91 vs. 93% respectively, p = 0.67). Cosmesis was not significantly different between patients treated sequentially and those treated concurrently (3 year: 87 vs. 93% respectively, p = 0.33), nor was it different between patients who received CMF vs. CAF (3 year: 92 vs. 93% respectively, p = 0.89). Hormonal therapy did not influence cosmetic outcome (p = 0.78). The incidence of Grade 4 or 5 arm edema (> or = 2 cm difference in arm circumference) was 2% without chemotherapy vs. 8% with chemotherapy (p = 0.00002). However, the incidence of arm edema was not affected by sequencing or type of chemotherapy (all p > or = 0.52). Patients treated sequentially had a 10% incidence of Grade 4 or 5 arm edema vs. 7% in the patients treated concurrently (p = 0.52). The incidence was 7 vs. 9% in patients treated with CMF vs. CAF (p = 0.73). The incidence of clinical pneumonitis and rib fracture was not influenced by use of chemotherapy, sequence of chemotherapy or use of hormonal therapy (all p > or = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy can be given concurrently with radiation therapy in the treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer with breast-conserving therapy without seriously compromising cosmetic outcome or incidence of complications compared to patients receiving other sequences of chemotherapy. Hormonal therapy did not affect cosmesis or complications. The chemotherapeutic regimen of cytoxan and 5-FU concurrent with radiation therapy followed by more chemotherapy is one reasonable option for breast conservation therapy in patients requiring chemotherapy.

Impact of Concurrent Versus Sequential Tamoxifen With Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conservation Treatment

PURPOSE To assess the impact of sequencing of tamoxifen and radiation therapy (RT) on outcomes in early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study evaluates the effect of the sequence of tamoxifen with RT on outcomes in stage I to II breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conservation treatment (BCT) and received adjuvant tamoxifen, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were grouped as concurrent (tamoxifen given during RT followed by continued tamoxifen; 174 patients) and sequential (RT followed by tamoxifen; 104 patients). RESULTS Median follow-up after RT was 8.6 years for both groups. The pathologic T and N stage, race, estrogen and progesterone status, number of positive nodes, and RT were comparable between the two groups (all P >/= .08). More women age 49 years or younger and women who received chemotherapy were in the sequential group than the concurrent group (6% and 25%, respectively; P < .0001). The sequence of tamoxifen therapy did not influence 10-year local recurrence rates (sequential, 7%; concurrent, 3%; P = .52), overall survival (sequential, 86%; concurrent, 81%; P = .64), or relapse-free survival (sequential, 76%; concurrent, 85%; P = .35). When adjusting age and chemotherapy use in the multivariable Cox model, hazard ratios comparing sequential versus concurrent tamoxifen therapy were 1.56 (95% CI, 0.87 to 2.79), 1.23 (95% CI, 0.63 to 2.41), and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.33 to 4.49) for the overall survival, relapse-free survival, and local recurrence, respectively. CONCLUSION The therapeutic regimens of tamoxifen given concurrently or sequentially with RT both appear to be reasonable options for patients treated with BCT.

Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Inactivation by Trichostatin A Defines a Mechanism for Increasing Cancer Cell Killing by Microtubule-Disrupting Agents

Microtubule-disrupting agents such as the taxanes comprise some of the most clinically useful chemotherapeutic agents and invoke the spindle checkpoint in proliferating cells. A robust spindle checkpoint in turn may forestall mitotic catastrophe, potentially providing a mechanism that permits cancer cells to survive transient exposure to these drugs. Previous reports on G2-M cell cycle progression by histone deacetylase inhibitors suggested a potential role in modulating the therapeutic efficacy of microtubule-disrupting agents. As both classes of agents are generally administered in clinical trials as pulse treatments, we investigated in human cancer cells the effects of brief treatments with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) alone or with nocodazole or paclitaxel (Taxol) on cell cycle progression and the spindle checkpoint. Treatment of synchronized cells with 200 ng/ml of TSA alone for eight hours to completely block class I and II HDACs did not interfere with progression into mitosis with chromosomal condensation as confirmed by MPM-2 expression. TSA treatment at this concentration surprisingly did not interfere with formation of the mitotic spindle or centrosomal separation, but instead led to missegregation of chromosomes, suggesting effects on the spindle checkpoint. Consistent with this hypothesis, TSA abrogated the phosphorylation and kinetochore localization of the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 and the phosphorylation of histone H3 after paclitaxel and nocodazole treatment. These effects in turn led to rapid cell death and considerably reduced clonogenic survival. These results together suggest that by inactivating the spindle checkpoint, TSA can potentiate the lethal effects of microtubule-disrupting drugs, a strategy that might be usefully exploited for optimizing anticancer therapy.