Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eleanor Fitzpatrick is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eleanor Fitzpatrick.


BMJ | 2013

Predictors of severe H1N1 infection in children presenting within Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN): retrospective case-control study.

Stuart R Dalziel; John M. D. Thompson; Charles G. Macias; Ricardo M. Fernandes; David W. Johnson; Yehezkel Waisman; Nicholas Cheng; Jason Acworth; James M. Chamberlain; Martin H. Osmond; Amy C. Plint; Paolo Valerio; Karen J. L. Black; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Amanda S. Newton; Nathan Kuppermann; Terry P Klassen

Objective To identify historical and clinical findings at emergency department presentation associated with severe H1N1 outcome in children presenting with influenza-like illness. Design Multicentre retrospective case-control study. Setting 79 emergency departments of hospitals associated with the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks in 12 countries. Participants 265 children (<16 years), presenting between 16 April and 31 December 2009, who fulfilled Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for influenza-like illness and developed severe outcomes from laboratory confirmed H1N1 infection. For each case, two controls presenting with influenza-like illness but without severe outcomes were included: one random control and one age matched control. Main outcome measures Severe outcomes included death or admission to intensive care for assisted ventilation, inotropic support, or both. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to compare cases and controls, with effect sizes measured as adjusted odds ratios. Results 151 (57%) of the 265 cases were male, the median age was 6 (interquartile range 2.3-10.0) years, and 27 (10%) died. Six factors were associated with severe outcomes in children presenting with influenza-like illness: history of chronic lung disease (odds ratio 10.3, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 69.8), history of cerebral palsy/developmental delay (10.2, 2.0 to 51.4), signs of chest retractions (9.6, 3.2 to 29.0), signs of dehydration (8.8, 1.6 to 49.3), requirement for oxygen (5.8, 2.0 to 16.2), and tachycardia relative to age). Conclusion These independent risk factors may alert clinicians to children at risk of severe outcomes when presenting with influenza-like illness during future pandemics.


Pediatrics | 2010

Treatment of Children With Migraine in Emergency Departments: National Practice Variation Study

Lawrence Richer; Keri Laycock; Kelly Millar; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Simi Khangura; Maala Bhatt; Chantal Guimont; Gina Neto; Steve Noseworthy; Ron Siemens; Serge Gouin; Brian H. Rowe

OBJECTIVE: Children with migraine may present to an emergency department (ED) when outpatient management has failed; however, only limited research has examined migraine-abortive medications among children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of ED presentations for migraine or headache between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005, in 10 Canadian pediatric EDs was conducted. A priori, evidence-based treatments were defined as any treatment that was based on high-quality evidence and an absence of opioids as first-line agents. RESULTS: A total of 2515 records were screened, and 1694 (67.4%) met inclusion criteria. The average age of patients was 12.1 years, 14.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.1%–17.2%) of patients experienced headache >15 days per month, and 62.6% (95% CI: 55.7%–68.9%) had already used migraine-abortive therapy. Significant variations in practice for all classes of migraine-abortive medications were observed. Dopamine receptor antagonists (prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, or chlorpromazine) (39% [95% CI: 28.4%–50.8%]) and orally administered analgesics (acetaminophen and ibuprofen) (24.5% [95% CI: 23.9%–46.8%]) were prescribed most commonly. Predictors for the use of evidence-based treatment included older age (odds ratio: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.07–1.24]) and a discharge diagnosis of migraine (odds ratio: 1.84 [95% CI: 1.11–3.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Children presenting to EDs for treatment often have frequent attacks and have experienced failure of outpatient, migraine-abortive efforts. Practice variations were impressive for the care of children with migraine in these Canadian EDs.


Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2013

Performance of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: A multicenter database study

Jocelyn Gravel; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Serge Gouin; Kelly Millar; Sarah Curtis; Gary Joubert; Kathy Boutis; Chantal Guimont; Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky; Robert Porter; Darcy Beer; Quynh Doan; Martin H. Osmond

STUDY OBJECTIVE We evaluate the association between triage levels assigned using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and surrogate markers of validity for real-life children triaged in multiple emergency departments (EDs). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the triage assessment and outcomes of all children presenting to 12 pediatric EDs, all of which are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada group, during a 1-year period (2010 to 2011). Anonymous data were retrieved from the ED computerized databases. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children hospitalized for each triage level. Other outcomes were ICU admission, proportion of patients who left without being seen by a physician, and length of stay in the ED. Evaluation of all children visiting these EDs during 1 year was expected to provide more than 1,000 patients in each triage category. RESULTS A total of 550,940 children were included. Pooled data demonstrated hospitalization proportions of 61%, 30%, 10%, 2%, and 0.9% for patients in Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was a strong association between triage level and admission to the ICU, probability of leaving without being seen by a physician, and length of stay. CONCLUSION The strong association between triage level and multiple markers of severity in 12 Canadian pediatric EDs suggests validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children.


Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2012

The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for Children: A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation

Jocelyn Gravel; Serge Gouin; Martin H. Osmond; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Kathy Boutis; Chantal Guimont; Gary Joubert; Kelly Millar; Sarah Curtis; Douglas Sinclair; Devendra K. Amre

STUDY OBJECTIVE The aims of the study are to measure both the interrater agreement of nurses using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in children and the validity of the scale as measured by the correlation between triage level and proxy markers of severity. METHODS This was a prospective multicenter study of the reliability and construct validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in 9 tertiary care pediatric emergency departments (EDs) across Canada during 2009 to 2010. Participants were a sample of children initially triaged as Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale level 2 (emergency) to level 5 (nonurgent). Participants were recruited immediately after their initial triage to undergo a second triage assessment by the research nurse. Both triages were performed blinded to the other. The primary outcome measures were the interrater agreement between the 2 nurses and the association between triage level and hospitalization. Secondary outcome measures were the association between triage level and health resource use and length of stay in the ED. RESULTS A total of 1,564 patients were approached and 1,464 consented. The overall interrater agreement was good, as demonstrated by a quadratic weighted κ score of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.76). Hospitalization proportions were 30%, 8.3%, 2.3%, and 2.2% for patients triaged at levels 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was also a strong association between triage levels and use of health care resources and length of stay. CONCLUSION The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale demonstrates a good interrater agreement between nurses across multiple pediatric EDs and is a valid triage tool, as demonstrated by its good association with markers of severity.


The Journal of Pediatrics | 2013

Medication-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Admissions in Pediatric Patients: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Peter J. Zed; Christopher Haughn; Karen J. L. Black; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz; Nancy Murphy; Neil J. MacKinnon; Janet Curran; Doug Sinclair

OBJECTIVE To review and describe the current literature pertaining to the incidence, classification, severity, preventability, and impact of medication-related emergency department (ED) and hospital admissions in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN A systematic search of PubMED, Embase, and Web of Science was performed using the following terms: drug toxicity, adverse drug event, medication error, emergency department, ambulatory care, and outpatient clinic. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of cited references. English language, full-reports of pediatric (≤18 years) patients that required an ED visit or hospital admission secondary to an adverse drug event (ADE) were included. RESULTS We included 11 studies that reported medication-related ED visit or hospital admission in pediatric patients. Incidence of medication-related ED visits and hospital admissions ranged from 0.5%-3.3% and 0.16%-4.3%, respectively, of which 20.3%-66.7% were deemed preventable. Among ED visits, 5.1%-22.1% of patients were admitted to hospital, with a length of stay of 24-72 hours. The majority of ADEs were deemed moderate in severity. Types of ADEs included adverse drug reactions, allergic reactions, overdose, medication use with no indication, wrong drug prescribed, and patient not receiving a drug for an indication. Common causative agents included respiratory drugs, antimicrobials, central nervous system drugs, analgesics, hormones, cardiovascular drugs, and vaccines. CONCLUSION Medication-related ED visits and hospital admissions are common in pediatric patients, many of which are preventable. These ADEs result in significant healthcare utilization.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Gastroenteritis Therapies in Developed Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stephen B. Freedman; Dion Pasichnyk; Karen J. L. Black; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Serge Gouin; Andrea Milne; Lisa Hartling

Context Gastroenteritis remains a leading cause of childhood morbidity. Objective Because prior reviews have focused on isolated symptoms and studies conducted in developing countries, this study focused on interventions commonly considered for use in developed countries. Intervention specific, patient-centered outcomes were selected. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, trial registries, grey literature, and scientific meetings. Study Selection Randomized controlled trials, conducted in developed countries, of children aged <18 years, with gastroenteritis, performed in emergency department or outpatient settings which evaluated oral rehydration therapy (ORT), antiemetics, probiotics or intravenous fluid administration rate. Data Extraction The study was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines. Data were independently extracted by multiple investigators. Analyses employed random effects models. Results 31 trials (4,444 patients) were included. ORT: Compared with intravenous rehydration, hospitalization (RR 0.80, 95%CI 0.24, 2.71) and emergency department return visits (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.39, 1.89) were similar. Antiemetics: Fewer children administered an antiemetic required intravenous rehydration (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.26, 0.60) While the data could not be meta-analyzed, three studies reported that ondansetron administration does increase the frequency of diarrhea. Probiotics: No studies reported on the primary outcome, three studies evaluated hospitalization within 7 days (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.25, 2.98). Rehydration: No difference in length of stay was identified for rapid vs. standard intravenous or nasogastric rehydration. A single study found that 5% dextrose in normal saline reduced hospitalizations compared with normal saline alone (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53, 0.92). Conclusions There is a paucity of patient-centered outcome evidence to support many interventions. Since ORT is a low-cost, non-invasive intervention, it should continue to be used. Routine probiotic use cannot be endorsed at this time in outpatient children with gastroenteritis. Despite some evidence that ondansetron administration increases diarrhea frequency, emergency department use leads to reductions in intravenous rehydration and hospitalization. No benefits were associated with ondansetron use following emergency department discharge.


Pediatrics | 2015

Medication-Related Emergency Department Visits in Pediatrics: a Prospective Observational Study

Peter J. Zed; Karen J. L. Black; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz; Nancy Murphy; Janet Curran; Neil J. MacKinnon; Doug Sinclair

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are few data on the rate and characterization of medication-related visits (MRVs) to the emergency department (ED) in pediatric patients. We sought to evaluate the frequency, severity, preventability, and classification of MRVs to the ED in pediatric patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of pediatric patients presenting to the ED over a 12-month period. A medication-related ED visit was identified by using pharmacist assessment, emergency physician assessment, and an independent adjudication committee. RESULTS: In this study, 2028 patients were enrolled (mean age, 6.1 ± 5.0 years; girls, 47.4%). An MRV was found in 163 patients (8.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0%–9.3%) of which 106 (65.0%; 95% CI: 57.2%–72.3%) were deemed preventable. Severity was classified as mild in 14 cases (8.6%; 95% CI: 4.8%–14.0%), moderate in 140 cases (85.9%; 95% CI: 79.6%–90.8%), and severe in 9 cases (5.5%; 95% CI: 2.6%–10.2%). The most common events were related to adverse drug reactions 26.4% (95% CI: 19.8%–33.8%), subtherapeutic dosage 19.0% (95% CI: 13.3%–25.9%), and nonadherence 17.2% (95% CI: 11.7%–23.9%). The probability of hospital admission was significantly higher among patients with an MRV compared with those without an MRV (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI: 4.3–9.6) and, if admitted, the median (interquartile range) length of stay was longer (3.0 [5.0] days vs 1.5 [2.5] days, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A medication-related cause was found in ∼1 of every 12 ED visits by pediatric patients, of which two-thirds were deemed preventable. Pediatric patients who present to the ED with an MRV are more likely to be admitted to hospital and when admitted have a longer length of stay.


Academic Emergency Medicine | 2015

Variation in the Diagnosis and Management of Appendicitis at Canadian Pediatric Hospitals

Graham C. Thompson; Suzanne Schuh; Jocelyn Gravel; Sarah Reid; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Troy Turner; Maala Bhatt; Darcy Beer; Geoffrey K. Blair; Robin Eccles; Sarah Jones; Jennifer Kilgar; Natalia Liston; John Martin; Brent Edward Hagel; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre

OBJECTIVES The objective was to characterize the variations in practice in the diagnosis and management of children admitted to hospitals from Canadian pediatric emergency departments (EDs) with suspected appendicitis, specifically the timing of surgical intervention, ED investigations, and management strategies. METHODS Twelve sites participated in this retrospective health record review. Children aged 3 to 17 years admitted to the hospital with suspected appendicitis were eligible. Site-specific demographics, investigations, and interventions performed were recorded and compared. Factors associated with after-hours surgery were determined using generalized estimating equations logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 619 children meeting eligibility criteria, surgical intervention was performed in 547 (88%). After-hours surgery occurred in 76 of the 547 children, with significant variation across sites (13.9%, 95% confidence interval = 7.1% to 21.6%, p < 0.001). The overall perforation rate was 17.4% (95 of 547), and the negative appendectomy rate was 6.8% (37 of 547), varying across sites (p = 0.004 and p = 0.036, respectively). Use of inflammatory markers (p < 0.001), blood cultures (p < 0.001), ultrasound (p = 0.001), and computed tomography (p = 0.001) also varied by site. ED administration of narcotic analgesia and antibiotics varied across sites (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), as did the type of surgical approach (p < 0.001). After-hours triage had a significant inverse association with after-hours surgery (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Across Canadian pediatric EDs, there exists significant variation in the diagnosis and management of children with suspected appendicitis. These results indicate that the best diagnostic and management strategies remain unclear and support the need for future prospective, multicenter studies to identify strategies associated with optimal patient outcomes.


European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2010

Pediatric Emergency Research Networks: a global initiative in pediatric emergency medicine.

Terry P Klassen; Jason Acworth; Liza Bialy; Karen J. L. Black; James M. Chamberlain; Nicholas Cheng; Stuart R Dalziel; Ricardo M. Fernandes; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; David W. Johnson; Nathan Kuppermann; Charles G. Macias; Mandi Newton; Martin H. Osmond; Amy C. Plint; Paolo Valerio; Yehezkel Waisman

Objectives The objectives of the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN) meeting were to (i) learn about each of the participating networks missions, goals, and infrastructure; (ii) share important contributions that each network has made to the creation of new knowledge; (iii) discuss ‘best practices’ to improve each networks effectiveness and (iv) explore the potential for a collaborative research project as proof-of-concept that would help promote quality of care of the acutely ill and injured child/youth globally. Methods In October 2009 a multiday meeting was attended by 18 delegates representing the following pediatric emergency medicine research networks: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (USA); Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (USA); Pediatric Emergency Research of Canada (Canada); Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (Australia and New Zealand); and Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine (15 countries in Europe and the Middle East). Results The inaugural meeting of PERN showed that there is a common desire for high-quality research and the dissemination of this research to improve health and outcomes of acutely ill and injured children and youths throughout the world. At present, the PERN group is in the final stages of developing a protocol to assess H1N1 risk factors with the collection of retrospective data. Conclusion Several members of PERN will be gathering at the International Conference on Emergency Medicine in Singapore, where the group will be presenting information about the H1N1 initiative. The PERN group is planning to bring together all five networks later in 2010 to discuss future global collaborations.


CJEM | 2017

Evaluating mental health service use during and after emergency department visits in a multisite cohort of Canadian children and youth

Mario Cappelli; Paula Cloutier; Amanda S. Newton; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; Samina Ali; Kathryn Dong; Clare Gray; Allison Kennedy; John S. Lyons; Christine Polihronis; Rhonda J. Rosychuk

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to examine the mental health needs of children and youth who present to the emergency department (ED) for mental health care and to describe the type of, and satisfaction with, follow-up mental health services accessed. METHODS A 6-month to 1.5-year prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian pediatric EDs and one general ED, with a 1-month follow-up post-ED discharge. Measures included 1) clinician rating of mental health needs, 2) patient and caregiver self-reports of follow-up services, and 3) interviews regarding follow-up satisfaction. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and the Fishers exact test to compare sites. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 373 children and youth (61.1% female; mean age 15.1 years, 1.5 standard deviation). The main reason for ED presentations was a mental health crisis. The three most frequent areas of need requiring action were mood (43.8%), suicide risk (37.4%), and parent-child relational problems (34.6%). During the ED visit, 21.6% of patients received medical clearance, 40.9% received a psychiatric consult, and 19.4% were admitted to inpatient psychiatric care. At the 1-month post-ED visit, 84.3% of patients/caregivers received mental health follow-up. Ratings of service recommendations were generally positive, as 60.9% of patients obtained the recommended follow-up care and 13.9% were wait-listed. CONCLUSIONS Children and youth and their families presenting to the ED with mental health needs had substantial clinical morbidity, were connected with services, were satisfied with their ED visit, and accessed follow-up care within 1-month with some variability.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eleanor Fitzpatrick's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen J. L. Black

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin H. Osmond

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Serge Gouin

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jocelyn Gravel

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary Joubert

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge