Eleanor M. Osborne

Predictors of Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients Receiving Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE Few studies to date have evaluated factors associated with the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), especially in patients treated with contemporary radiation techniques. These patients represent a unique group owing to the often large radiation target volumes within the mediastinum and to the potential to receive several lines of chemotherapy that add to pulmonary toxicity for relapsed or refractory disease. Our objective was to determine the incidence and clinical and dosimetric risk factors associated with RP in lymphoma patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed clinical charts and radiation records of 150 consecutive patients who received mediastinal IMRT for HL and NHL from 2009 through 2013. Clinical and dosimetric predictors associated with RP according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity criteria were identified in univariate analysis using the Pearson χ(2) test and logistic multivariate regression. RESULTS Mediastinal radiation was administered as consolidation therapy in 110 patients with newly diagnosed HL or NHL and in 40 patients with relapsed or refractory disease. The overall incidence of RP (RTOG grades 1-3) was 14% in the entire cohort. Risk of RP was increased for patients who received radiation for relapsed or refractory disease (25%) versus those who received consolidation therapy (10%, P=.019). Several dosimetric parameters predicted RP, including mean lung dose of >13.5 Gy, V20 of >30%, V15 of >35%, V10 of >40%, and V5 of >55%. The likelihood ratio χ(2) value was highest for V5 >55% (χ(2) = 19.37). CONCLUSIONS In using IMRT to treat mediastinal lymphoma, all dosimetric parameters predicted RP, although small doses to large volumes of lung had the greatest influence. Patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma who received salvage chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were at higher risk for symptomatic RP.

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (non-leg type) has excellent outcomes even after very low dose radiation as single-modality therapy.

Primary cutaneous B cell lymphomas (PCBCL) are rare; although data on outcomes and treatment are limited, traditionally they have been treated with radiation doses in excess of 24 Gy. We retrospectively identified and reviewed all cases of PCBCL treated at our institution from 2002–2014. Thirty-nine patients with PCBCL (42 lesions) were identified. Radiation was the only treatment for most patients. All lesions had a complete response and none had in-field failures; seven patients had out-of-field relapses, three of which were salvaged with radiation therapy. No differences in PFS or OS were found for patients given low-dose (≤ 12 Gy) versus high-dose (> 12 Gy) radiation. PCBCL is an indolent entity with a long clinical course and excellent response to radiation therapy and successful salvage of recurrent disease, even when doses are as low as 4 Gy. Given the above findings, we recommend the initial use of low-dose irradiation for PCBCL.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes After Therapy for Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Diagnosed During Pregnancy

IMPORTANCE The management of lymphoma diagnosed during pregnancy is controversial and has been guided largely by findings from case reports and small series. OBJECTIVE To determine maternal and fetal outcomes of women diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) during pregnancy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective analysis studied a cohort of 39 pregnant women diagnosed with HL and NHL (31 HL and 8 NHL) at a single specialized cancer institution between January 1991 and December 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We examined data on disease and treatment characteristics, as well as maternal and fetal complications and outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to receipt of antenatal therapy and other clinical factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by using Cox proportional hazard regression models to identify potential associations between clinical and treatment factors and survival. RESULTS The median (range) age of the 39 women in the patient cohort was 28 (19-38) years; 32 women (82%) had stage I or II disease at diagnosis, and 13 had bulky disease. Three women electively terminated the pregnancy to allow immediate systemic therapy; of the remaining 36 women, 24 received antenatal therapy (doxorubicin based combination chemotherapy in 20 of 24 patients), and 12 deferred therapy until after delivery. Four women experienced miscarriage, all of whom had received antenatal systemic therapy and 2 during the first trimester. Delivery occurred at a median (range) of 37 (32-42) weeks and was no different based on receipt of antenatal (median [range], 37 [33-42] weeks) vs postnatal (median [range], 37 [32-42] weeks) therapy (P = .21). No gross fetal malformations or anomalies were detected. At a median (range) follow-up time of 67.9 (8.8-277.5) months since the diagnosis of lymphoma, 5-year rates of PFS and OS were 74.7% and 82.4%, respectively; these rates did not differ according to timing of therapy. On univariate analysis, bulky disease (>10 cm), extranodal nonbone marrow involvement, and poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, ≥2) predicted increased risk of disease progression. On multivariate analysis, extranodal nonbone marrow disease and performance status remained significant for both PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Systemic therapy given for lymphoma after the first trimester of pregnancy is likely safe and results in acceptable maternal and fetal outcomes.

Pre-treatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio are prognostic of progression in early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma

To determine whether pre‐treatment neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR) or platelet/lymphocyte ratios (PLR) are predictive for progression in early‐stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), we derived NLR and PLR values for 338 stage I/II cHL patients and appropriate cut‐off point values to define progression. Two‐year freedom from progression (FFP) for patients with NLR ≥6·4 was 82·2% vs. 95·7% with NLR <6·4 (P < 0·001). Similarly, 2‐year FFP was 84·3% for patients with PLR ≥266·2 vs. 96·1% with PLR <266·2 (P = 0·003). On univariate analysis, both NLR and PLR were significantly associated with worse FFP (P = 0·001). On multivariate analysis, PLR remained a significant, independent prognostic factor (P < 0·001).

Early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma outcomes after combined modality therapy according to the post-chemotherapy 5-point score: can residual pet-positive disease be cured with radiotherapy alone?

Early‐stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are evaluated by an end‐of‐chemotherapy positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (eoc‐PET‐CT) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) and before radiation therapy (RT). We determined freedom from progression (FFP) in patients treated with ABVD and RT according to the eoc‐PET‐CT 5‐point score (5PS). Secondarily, we assessed whether patients with a positive eoc‐PET‐CT (5PS of 4–5) can be cured with RT alone. The cohort comprised 174 patients treated for stage I‐II HL with ABVD and RT alone. ABVD was given with a median of four cycles and RT with a median dose of 30·6 Gy. Five‐year FFP was 97%. Five‐year FFP was 100% (0 relapses/98 patients) for patients with a 5PS of 1–2, 97% (2/65) for a 5PS of 3, 83% (1/8) for a 5PS of 4, and 67% (1/3) for a 5PS of 5 (P < 0·001). Patients with positive eoc‐PET‐CT scans who were selected for salvage RT alone had experienced a very good partial response to ABVD. Risk factors for recurrence in this subgroup included a small reduction in tumour size and a ‘bounce’ in ≥1 PET‐CT parameter (reduction then rise from interim to final scan). Thus, a positive eoc‐PET‐CT is associated with inferior FFP; however, appropriately selected patients can be cured with RT alone.

Reclassifying patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma based on functional radiographic markers at presentation

The presence of bulky disease in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), traditionally defined with a 1-dimensional measurement, can change a patients risk grouping and thus the treatment approach. We hypothesized that 3-dimensional measurements of disease burden obtained from baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), would more accurately risk-stratify patients. To test this hypothesis, we reviewed pretreatment PET-CT scans of patients with stage I-II HL treated at our institution between 2003 and 2013. Disease was delineated on prechemotherapy PET-CT scans by 2 methods: (1) manual contouring and (2) subthresholding of these contours to give the tumor volume with standardized uptake value ≥2.5. MTV and TLG were extracted from the threshold volumes (MTVt, TLGt) and from the manually contoured soft-tissue volumes. At a median follow-up of 4.96 years for the 267 patients evaluated, 27 patients were diagnosed with relapsed or refractory disease and 12 died. Both MTVt and TLGt were highly correlated with freedom from progression and were dichotomized with 80th percentile cutoff values of 268 and 1703, respectively. Consideration of MTV and TLG enabled restratification of early unfavorable HL patients as having low- and high-risk disease. We conclude that MTV and TLG provide a potential measure of tumor burden to aid in risk stratification of early unfavorable HL patients.

Hyperfractionated Accelerated Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Anal Cancer Previously Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation

Objectives: Although chemoradiation is the standard of care for anal cancer, limited data exist regarding pelvic reirradiation (re-RT) for recurrent disease. We investigated toxicity and outcomes in patients who received prior pelvic radiation therapy (RT), and subsequently underwent hyperfractionated accelerated re-RT to the pelvis for recurrent anal cancer. Materials and Methods: We reviewed records of 10 patients with recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma who previously received pelvic RT to at least 30 Gy as a component of their chemoradiation and underwent re-RT in 1.5 Gy twice daily fractions to the pelvis, with either preoperative (N=7) or definitive (N=3) intent. Results: The 3-year disease-free survival and 3-year overall survival rates were 40% and 60%. Four patients recurred within the reirradiated field, with a 3-year freedom from local progression rate of 56%. Of the 7 patients treated with preoperative intent, 5 proceeded to surgery, of whom 3 are alive and disease-free at a median duration of 43 months. Of the 3 patients treated definitively with no surgery, all are alive and disease-free at a median duration of 84 months. Re-RT resulted in one grade 3 acute toxicity and no grade 3 or higher late complications. Conclusions: Hyperfractionated accelerated re-RT was well-tolerated in patients with previously irradiated anal cancer. Patients treated with either definitive re-RT or re-RT followed by surgical resection had excellent rates of overall survival and freedom from local progression.

Impact of treatment year on survival and adverse effects in patients with cervical cancer and paraortic lymph node metastases treated with definitive extended-field radiation therapy

PURPOSE Treatment for locoregionally advanced cervical cancer has changed dramatically since 2000. In that year, delivery of radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy became standard, and in the early 2000s, use of intensity modulated RT (IMRT) and positron emission tomography (PET) became more prevalent. We sought to determine the impact of these changes on disease-specific survival (DSS) and treatment-related adverse effects in patients with cervical cancer with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastases treated with definitive extended-field radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the medical records of 103 patients with cervical cancer with PAN metastases treated with curative intent at our institution during 2000 to 2013. DSS, disease control in PANs, and treatment-associated adverse effects were compared between patient groups defined by treatment year. RESULTS The 5-year DSS rate was 23% (95% confidence interval, 9%-38%) for the 34 patients treated from 2000 to 2004, and 47% (95% confidence interval, 36%-59%) for the 69 patients treated from 2005 to 2013 (P = .005). Factors associated with improved DSS included concurrent chemoradiation (P = .001), baseline PET imaging (P = .01), and treatment of PANs with IMRT (P = .02). Only 3 patients (4%) treated from 2005 to 2013 versus 6 patients (18%) treated from 2000 to 2004 had recurrence in PANs (P = .03). Most recurrences in patients treated from 2005 to 2013 were at distant sites. The crude rate of grade 3 or higher late treatment-related adverse effects was 17%; of the 18 patients who developed serious adverse effects, 8 were being treated for recurrent disease at the time. Adverse effects most frequently involved the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes for patients with cervical cancer with PAN metastases have improved concurrently with advances in treatment, including PET and IMRT. Future studies should focus on ways to improve systemic treatments and reduce late adverse effects without compromising local control.

Anal Cancer: Background and Clinical Evidence

The incidence of squamous cell anal carcinoma is rising rapidly. The primary treatment for localized anal cancer is chemoradiation, with surgery used for salvage. This chapter reviews the epidemiology, prognostic factors, molecular biology, patterns of failure, and multidisciplinary treatment of anal cancer, along with a summary of key clinical trials.

Anal Cancer: Radiation Therapy Planning

Chemoradiation is the primary treatment for anal cancer. The goal of radiation therapy is to cover the primary tumor, involved lymph nodes, and at-risk regional lymph nodes. This chapter reviews radiation techniques, and principles of radiotherapy field design and treatment planning, for anal cancer.