Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elena M. Stoffel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elena M. Stoffel.


Gastroenterology | 2009

Calculation of Risk of Colorectal and Endometrial Cancer Among Patients With Lynch Syndrome

Elena M. Stoffel; Bhramar Mukherjee; Victoria M. Raymond; Nabihah Tayob; Fay Kastrinos; Jennifer Sparr; Fei Wang; Prathap Bandipalliam; Sapna Syngal; Stephen B. Gruber

BACKGROUND & AIMS Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. Some previous estimates of lifetime risk for CRC and endometrial cancer (EC) did not control for ascertainment and were susceptible to bias toward overestimated risk. METHODS We studied 147 families with mismatch repair gene mutations (55 MLH1, 81 MSH2, and 11 MSH6) identified at 2 US cancer genetics clinics. Age-specific cumulative risks (penetrance) and hazard ratio (HR) estimates of CRC and EC risks were calculated and compared with the general population using modified segregation analysis. The likelihood for each pedigree was conditioned on the proband and first-degree relatives affected with CRC to reduce ascertainment bias and overestimation of penetrance. RESULTS We analyzed 628 cases of CRC, diagnosed at the median ages of 42 and 47 years for men and women, respectively. The cumulative risk of CRC was 66.08% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.47%-76.17%) for men and 42.71% (95% CI, 36.57%-52.83%) for women, with overall HRs of 148.4 and 51.1, respectively. CRC risk was highest for males with mutations in MLH1. There were 155 cases of EC, diagnosed at a median age of 47.5 years. The cumulative risk of EC was 39.39% (95% CI, 30.78%-46.94%) with an overall HR of 39.0 (95% CI, 30.4-50.2). For women, the cumulative risk of CRC or EC was 73.42% (95% CI, 63.76%-80.54%). CONCLUSIONS Lifetime risks of CRC and EC in mismatch repair gene mutation carriers are high even after adjusting for ascertainment. These estimates are valuable for patients and providers; specialized cancer surveillance is necessary.


JAMA | 2009

Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome

Fay Kastrinos; Bhramar Mukherjee; Nabihah Tayob; Fei Wang; Jennifer Sparr; Victoria M. Raymond; Prathap Bandipalliam; Elena M. Stoffel; Stephen B. Gruber; Sapna Syngal

CONTEXT Lynch syndrome is an inherited cause of colorectal cancer caused by mutations of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. A number of extracolonic tumors have been associated with the disorder, including pancreatic cancer; however, the risk of pancreatic cancer in Lynch syndrome is uncertain and not quantified. OBJECTIVE To estimate pancreatic cancer risk in families with germline MMR gene mutations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Cancer histories of probands and their relatives were evaluated in MMR gene mutation carriers in the familial cancer registries of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (n = 80), Boston, Massachusetts, and University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center (n = 67), Ann Arbor, Michigan. Families enrolled before the study start date (June 2008) were eligible. Age-specific cumulative risks and hazard ratio estimates of pancreatic cancer risk were calculated and compared with the general population using modified segregation analysis, with correction for ascertainment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Age-specific cumulative risks and hazard ratio estimates of pancreatic cancer risk. RESULTS Data on 6342 individuals from 147 families with MMR gene mutations were analyzed. Thirty-one families (21.1%) reported at least 1 case of pancreatic cancer. Forty-seven pancreatic cancers were reported (21 men and 26 women), with no sex-related difference in age of diagnosis (51.5 vs 56.5 years for men and women, respectively). The cumulative risk of pancreatic cancer in these families with gene mutations was 1.31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31%-2.32%) up to age 50 years and 3.68% (95% CI, 1.45%-5.88%) up to age 70 years, which represents an 8.6-fold increase (95% CI, 4.7-15.7) compared with the general population. CONCLUSIONS Among 147 families with germline MMR gene mutations, the risk of pancreatic cancer was increased compared with the US population. Individuals with MMR gene mutations and a family history of pancreatic cancer are appropriate to include in studies to further define the risk of premalignant and malignant pancreatic neoplasms and potential benefits and limitations of surveillance.


JAMA | 2015

Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth

Rajen Mody; Yi Mi Wu; Robert J. Lonigro; Xuhong Cao; Sameek Roychowdhury; Pankaj Vats; Kevin Frank; John R. Prensner; Irfan A. Asangani; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Jonathan R. Dillman; Raja Rabah; Laxmi Priya Kunju; Jessica Everett; Victoria M. Raymond; Yu Ning; Fengyun Su; Rui Wang; Elena M. Stoffel; Jeffrey W. Innis; J. Scott Roberts; Patricia L. Robertson; Gregory A. Yanik; Aghiad Chamdin; James A. Connelly; Sung Choi; Andrew C. Harris; Carrie L. Kitko; Rama Jasty Rao; John E. Levine

IMPORTANCE Cancer is caused by a diverse array of somatic and germline genomic aberrations. Advances in genomic sequencing technologies have improved the ability to detect these molecular aberrations with greater sensitivity. However, integrating them into clinical management in an individualized manner has proven challenging. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of integrative clinical sequencing and genetic counseling in the assessment and treatment of children and young adults with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Single-site, observational, consecutive case series (May 2012-October 2014) involving 102 children and young adults (mean age, 10.6 years; median age, 11.5 years, range, 0-22 years) with relapsed, refractory, or rare cancer. EXPOSURES Participants underwent integrative clinical exome (tumor and germline DNA) and transcriptome (tumor RNA) sequencing and genetic counseling. Results were discussed by a precision medicine tumor board, which made recommendations to families and their physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of patients with potentially actionable findings, results of clinical actions based on integrative clinical sequencing, and estimated proportion of patients or their families at risk of future cancer. RESULTS Of the 104 screened patients, 102 enrolled with 91 (89%) having adequate tumor tissue to complete sequencing. Only the 91 patients were included in all calculations, including 28 (31%) with hematological malignancies and 63 (69%) with solid tumors. Forty-two patients (46%) had actionable findings that changed their cancer management: 15 of 28 (54%) with hematological malignancies and 27 of 63 (43%) with solid tumors. Individualized actions were taken in 23 of the 91 (25%) based on actionable integrative clinical sequencing findings, including change in treatment for 14 patients (15%) and genetic counseling for future risk for 9 patients (10%). Nine of 91 (10%) of the personalized clinical interventions resulted in ongoing partial clinical remission of 8 to 16 months or helped sustain complete clinical remission of 6 to 21 months. All 9 patients and families with actionable incidental genetic findings agreed to genetic counseling and screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this single-center case series involving young patients with relapsed or refractory cancer, incorporation of integrative clinical sequencing data into clinical management was feasible, revealed potentially actionable findings in 46% of patients, and was associated with change in treatment and family genetic counseling for a small proportion of patients. The lack of a control group limited assessing whether better clinical outcomes resulted from this approach than outcomes that would have occurred with standard care.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the Familial Risk–Colorectal Cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines

Elena M. Stoffel; Pamela B. Mangu; Stephen B. Gruber; Stanley R. Hamilton; Matthew F. Kalady; Michelle Wan Yee Lau; Karen H. Lu; Nancy Roach; Paul J. Limburg

PURPOSE To provide recommendations on prevention, screening, genetics, treatment, and management for people at risk for hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS The Familial Risk-Colorectal Cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline published in 2013 on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Guidelines Working Group in Annals of Oncology was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists, with content and recommendations reviewed by an ASCO endorsement panel. RESULTS The ASCO endorsement panel determined that the recommendations of the ESMO guidelines are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. The ASCO panel endorsed the ESMO guidelines and added a few qualifying statements. RECOMMENDATIONS Approximately 5% to 6% of patient cases of CRC are associated with germline mutations that confer an inherited predisposition for cancer. The possibility of a hereditary cancer syndrome should be assessed for every patient at the time of CRC diagnosis. A diagnosis of Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, or another genetic syndrome can influence clinical management for patients with CRC and their family members. Screening for hereditary cancer syndromes in patients with CRC should include review of personal and family histories and testing of tumors for DNA mismatch repair deficiency and/or microsatellite instability. Formal genetic evaluation is recommended for individuals who meet defined criteria.


Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network | 2017

Colon cancer, version 1.2017: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology

Al B. Benson; Alan P. Venook; Lynette Cederquist; Emily Chan; Yi Jen Chen; Harry S. Cooper; Dustin A. Deming; Paul F. Engstrom; Peter C. Enzinger; Alessandro Fichera; Jean L. Grem; Axel Grothey; Howard S. Hochster; Sarah E. Hoffe; Steven R. Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha S. Krishnamurthi; Wells A. Messersmith; Mary F. Mulcahy; James D. Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M. Skibber; Constantinos T. Sofocleous; Elena M. Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G. Willett

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Bladder Cancer focuses on systemic therapy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, as substantial revisions were made in the 2017 updates, such as new recommendations for nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer addresses additional aspects of the management of bladder cancer, including non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer and nonurothelial histologies, as well as staging, evaluation, and follow-up.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2011

Colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability display unique miRNA profiles

Francesc Balaguer; Leticia Moreira; Juan José Lozano; Alexander Link; Georgina Ramirez; Yan Shen; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Mildred Arnold; Stephen J. Meltzer; Sapna Syngal; Elena M. Stoffel; Rodrigo Jover; Xavier Llor; Antoni Castells; C. Richard Boland; Meritxell Gironella; Ajay Goel

Purpose: microRNAs (miRNA) are small noncoding transcripts that play an important role in carcinogenesis. miRNA expression profiles have been shown to discriminate between different types of cancers. The aim of this study was to analyze global miRNA signatures in various groups of colorectal cancers (CRC) based on the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI). Experimental Design: We analyzed genome-wide miRNA expression profiles in 54 CRC tissues [22 with Lynch syndrome, 13 with sporadic MSI due to MLH1 methylation, 19 without MSI (or microsatellite stable, MSS)] and 20 normal colonic tissues by miRNA microarrays. Using an independent set of MSI-positive samples (13 with Lynch syndrome and 20 with sporadic MSI), we developed a miRNA-based predictor to differentiate both types of MSI by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Results: We found that the expression of a subset of nine miRNAs significantly discriminated between tumor and normal colonic mucosa tissues (overall error rate = 0.04). More importantly, Lynch syndrome tumors displayed a unique miRNA profile compared with sporadic MSI tumors; miR-622, miR-1238, and miR-192 were the most differentially expressed miRNAs between these two groups. We developed a miRNA-based predictor capable of differentiating between types of MSI in an independent sample set. Conclusions: CRC tissues show distinct miRNA expression profiles compared with normal colonic mucosa. The discovery of unique miRNA expression profiles that can successfully discriminate between Lynch syndrome, sporadic MSI, and sporadic MSS colorectal cancers provides novel insights into the role of miRNAs in colorectal carcinogenesis, which may contribute to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 17(19); 6239–49. ©2011 AACR.


Cancer Prevention Research | 2008

Missed Adenomas during Colonoscopic Surveillance in Individuals with Lynch Syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer)

Elena M. Stoffel; D. Kim Turgeon; David H. Stockwell; Lili Zhao; Daniel P. Normolle; Missy Tuck; Robert S. Bresalier; Norman E. Marcon; John A. Baron; Mack T. Ruffin; Dean E. Brenner; Sapna Syngal

Background and Aims: Lynch syndrome (also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) is associated with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, which can arise despite frequent colonoscopic exams. We evaluated the adenoma miss rate of conventional colonoscopy in patients with Lynch syndrome, and compared the sensitivity of chromoendoscopy versus intensive inspection for detecting polyps missed by conventional colonoscopy. Methods: Fifty-four subjects with Lynch syndrome underwent tandem colonoscopies at four centers of the Great Lakes-New England Clinical Epidemiology and Validation Center of the Early Detection Research Network. All participants first had a conventional colonoscopy with removal of all visualized polyps. The second endoscopy was randomly assigned as either pancolonic indigo carmine chromoendoscopy or standard colonoscopy with intensive inspection lasting >20 minutes. Size, histology, and number of polyps detected on each exam were recorded. Results: After undergoing standard colonoscopy, 28 individuals were randomized to a second exam with chromoendoscopy and 26 underwent intensive inspection. The mean interval since last colonoscopy was 17.5 months. Seventeen polyps (10 adenomas and 7 hyperplastic polyps) were identified on the first standard colonoscopies. Twenty-three additional polyps (12 adenomas and 11 hyperplastic polyps) were found on the second exams, yielding an adenoma miss rate of 55%. Fifteen polyps (5 adenomas and 10 hyperplastic polyps) were found in subjects who had chromoendoscopy and 8 polyps (7 adenomas and 1 hyperplastic polyp) in those who had intensive inspection. Chromoendoscopy was associated with more normal tissue biopsies (11 versus 5) and longer procedure times compared with intensive inspection (29.8 ± 9.5 versus 25.3 ± 5.8 minutes; P = 0.04). Controlling for age, number of previous colonoscopies, procedure time, and prior colonic resection, chromoendoscopy detected more polyps (P = 0.04), but adenoma detection was not significantly different compared with intensive inspection (P = 0.27). Conclusions: Small adenomas are frequently missed in patients with Lynch syndrome. Although chromoendoscopy did not detect more missed adenomas than intensive inspection in this pilot study, larger trials are needed to determine optimal surveillance techniques in this high-risk population.


Cancer Discovery | 2016

Whole Genome Sequencing Defines the Genetic Heterogeneity of Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Nicholas J. Roberts; Alexis L. Norris; Gloria M. Petersen; Melissa L. Bondy; Randall E. Brand; Steven Gallinger; Robert C. Kurtz; Sara H. Olson; Anil K. Rustgi; Ann G. Schwartz; Elena M. Stoffel; Sapna Syngal; George Zogopoulos; Syed Z. Ali; Jennifer E. Axilbund; Kari G. Chaffee; Yun-Ching Chen; Michele L. Cote; Erica J. Childs; Christopher Douville; Fernando S. Goes; Joseph M. Herman; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; Melissa Kramer; Alvin Makohon-Moore; Richard McCombie; K. Wyatt McMahon; Noushin Niknafs; Jennifer Parla; Mehdi Pirooznia

UNLABELLED Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States by 2020. A familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer has been established, but the cause of this aggregation in most families is unknown. To determine the genetic basis of susceptibility in these families, we sequenced the germline genomes of 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and the tumor exomes of 39 familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Our analyses support the role of previously identified familial pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA2, CDKN2A, and ATM, and identify novel candidate genes harboring rare, deleterious germline variants for further characterization. We also show how somatic point mutations that occur during hematopoiesis can affect the interpretation of genome-wide studies of hereditary traits. Our observations have important implications for the etiology of pancreatic cancer and for the identification of susceptibility genes in other common cancer types. SIGNIFICANCE The genetic basis of disease susceptibility in the majority of patients with familial pancreatic cancer is unknown. We whole genome sequenced 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and demonstrate that the genetic underpinning of inherited pancreatic cancer is highly heterogeneous. This has significant implications for the management of patients with familial pancreatic cancer.


Nature | 2017

Integrative clinical genomics of metastatic cancer

Dan R. Robinson; Yi Mi Wu; Robert J. Lonigro; Pankaj Vats; Erin F. Cobain; Jessica Everett; Xuhong Cao; Erica Rabban; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Victoria M. Raymond; Scott M. Schuetze; Ajjai Alva; Javed Siddiqui; Rashmi Chugh; Francis P. Worden; Mark M. Zalupski; Jeffrey W. Innis; Rajen Mody; Scott A. Tomlins; D. M. Lucas; Laurence H. Baker; Nithya Ramnath; Ann F. Schott; Daniel F. Hayes; Joseph Vijai; Kenneth Offit; Elena M. Stoffel; J. Scott Roberts; David C. Smith; Lakshmi P. Kunju

Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths. Although The Cancer Genome Atlas has sequenced primary tumour types obtained from surgical resections, much less comprehensive molecular analysis is available from clinically acquired metastatic cancers. Here we perform whole-exome and -transcriptome sequencing of 500 adult patients with metastatic solid tumours of diverse lineage and biopsy site. The most prevalent genes somatically altered in metastatic cancer included TP53, CDKN2A, PTEN, PIK3CA, and RB1. Putative pathogenic germline variants were present in 12.2% of cases of which 75% were related to defects in DNA repair. RNA sequencing complemented DNA sequencing to identify gene fusions, pathway activation, and immune profiling. Our results show that integrative sequence analysis provides a clinically relevant, multi-dimensional view of the complex molecular landscape and microenvironment of metastatic cancers.


Genetics in Medicine | 2011

Gastric cancer in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Serena Masciari; Akriti Dewanwala; Elena M. Stoffel; Gregory Y. Lauwers; Hui Zheng; Maria Isabel Achatz; Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson; Foretová L; Edaise M. Silva; Lisa M. DiGianni; Sigitas Verselis; Katherine A. Schneider; Frederick P. Li; Joseph F. Fraumeni; Judy Garber; Sapna Syngal

Purpose: Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a rare hereditary cancer syndrome associated with germline mutations in the TP53 gene. Although sarcomas, brain tumors, leukemias, breast and adrenal cortical carcinomas are typically recognized as Li-Fraumeni syndrome-associated tumors, the occurrence of gastrointestinal neoplasms has not been fully evaluated. In this analysis, we investigated the frequency and characteristics of gastric cancer in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.Methods: Pedigrees and medical records of 62 TP53 mutation-positive families were retrospectively reviewed from the Dana-Farber/National Cancer Institute Li-Fraumeni syndrome registry. We identified subjects with gastric cancer documented either by pathology report or death certificate and performed pathology review of the available specimens.Results: Among 62 TP53 mutation-positive families, there were 429 cancer-affected individuals. Gastric cancer was the diagnosis in the lineages of 21 (4.9%) subjects from 14 families (22.6%). The mean and median ages at gastric cancer diagnosis were 43 and 36 years, respectively (range: 24–74 years), significantly younger compared with the median age at diagnosis in the general population based on Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data (71 years). Five (8.1%) families reported two or more cases of gastric cancer, and six (9.7%) families had cases of both colorectal and gastric cancers. No association was seen between phenotype and type/location of the TP53 mutations. Pathology review of the available tumors revealed both intestinal and diffuse histologies.Conclusions: Early-onset gastric cancer seems to be a component of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, suggesting the need for early and regular endoscopic screening in individuals with germline TP53 mutations, particularly among those with a family history of gastric cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Elena M. Stoffel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen B. Gruber

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fay Kastrinos

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Baron

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge