Elena Santagostino

International workshop on immune tolerance induction: Consensus recommendations

Summary.  Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) has been used for 30 years to eliminate inhibitors and restore normal factor pharmacokinetics in patients with hemophilia, there is a paucity of scientific evidence to guide therapeutic decision‐making. In an effort to provide direction for physicians and hemophilia treatment center staff members, an international panel of hemophilia opinion leaders met to develop consensus recommendations for ITI in patients with severe and mild hemophilia A and hemophilia B. These recommendations draw on the available published literature and the collective clinical experience of the group and are rated based on the level of supporting evidence .

Environmental risk factors for inhibitor development in children with haemophilia A: a case-control study

This case–control study investigated the interactions between genetic and environmental factors and inhibitor development in 108 children with haemophilia A exclusively treated with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). Sixty patients with inhibitors were compared with 48 inhibitor‐free controls. Family history of inhibitors and null mutations in the FVIII gene were more prevalent in cases than in controls (20% vs. 2%, P = 0·001 and 83% vs. 64%, P = 0·04, respectively). On the other hand, there was no difference between cases and controls for such putative risk factors of inhibitor development as amniocentesis/villocentesis, premature/caesarean birth, breast‐feeding, treatment during infections/vaccinations, surgical procedures and central nervous system bleeding. A trend was found for an increased risk of inhibitor development in children first treated at a young age (<11 months); however, this was not confirmed after adjusting for genetic factors. The implementation of prophylaxis was evaluated as a putative risk factor in a subgroup of 25 cases: seven who started prophylaxis prior to inhibitor development and 18 potentially eligible for prophylaxis because they were inhibitor‐free up to the age of 35 months (i.e. the upper limit of the age range at prophylaxis onset in cases and the median age at prophylaxis onset in controls). Patients who started prophylaxis had a lower inhibitor risk than those treated on demand (adjusted odds ratio 0·2, 95% confidence interval 0·06–0·9). The protective effect on inhibitor development shown by prophylaxis may represent an additional advantage prompting its use in haemophilic children.

A prospective randomized trial of high and standard dosages of recombinant factor VIIa for treatment of hemarthroses in hemophiliacs with inhibitors.

Summary.  Aim: A multicenter randomized open‐label crossover prospective trial was designed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of standard and high dosages of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for home treatment of hemarthroses in hemophiliacs with inhibitors. Methods: Patients were instructed to treat, within 6 h from the onset of bleeding, four consecutive hemarthroses of ankles, knees, or elbows, either with the rFVIIa standard dose of 90 μg kg−1 (repeated as necessary every 3 h) or with a single high dose of 270 μg kg−1. Patients who did not achieve a clinical success within 9 h continued rFVIIa treatment with repeated standard doses. Response to treatment was assessed for up to 48 h by patients/caregivers, who reported on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 100 the improvement in symptoms and also rated the responses as effective, partially effective or ineffective. Success was defined a treatment course rated as effective and with a VAS score ≥70 and failure a treatment course rated as ineffective and VAS score ≤30, whereas treatment courses that did not fulfill these criteria were considered partial responses. Results: Twenty hemophiliacs with inhibitors were originally enrolled (median age: 27 years), 18 of them treated 32 hemarthroses assigned to the standard‐dosage and 36 to the high‐dosage regimen, during the study period of 18 months. Forty‐eight hemarthroses (71%) occurred in target joints. Success rates for standard‐ and high‐dosage regimens were similar: 31% and 25% at 9 h, 53% and 50% at 24 h, 66% and 64% at 48 h, the end point for outcome assessment. The median number of rFVIIa infusions needed to achieve a successful course was significantly greater for the standard‐dosage (n = 3) than for the high‐dosage regimen (n = 1), and the median amount of rFVIIa ultimately used per successful course was identical (270 μg kg−1). Conclusion: Our results indicate that a high‐dosage regimen with rFVIIa for home treatment of hemarthroses is effective, safe, does not imply an increased consumption of rFVIIa and requires the infusion of a smaller number of rFVIIa doses. Its convenience is particularly relevant in cases with difficult venous access and in hemorrhages into target joints.

How I treat age-related morbidities in elderly persons with hemophilia

In persons with hemophilia, life expectancy is now approaching that of the general male population, at least in countries that can afford regular replacement therapy with coagulation factor concentrates. The new challenges for comprehensive treatment centers are thus to provide optimal health care for this aging population of patients, who often present not only with the comorbidities typically associated with hemophilia (arthropathy, chronic pain, blood-borne infections), but also with common age-related illnesses such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. There are no evidence-based guidelines for the management of these conditions, which often require drugs that interfere with hemostasis, enhance the bleeding tendency, and warrant more intensive replacement therapy. At the moment, elderly patients with hemophilia affected by other diseases should be managed like their age-group peers without hemophilia, provided replacement therapy is tailored to the heightened risk of bleeding associated with the need for invasive procedures and drugs that further compromise the deranged hemostasis. More detailed advice is provided on the schedules of replacement therapy needed to tackle cardiovascular diseases, such as acute coronary syndromes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, because these conditions will become more and more frequent challenges for the comprehensive treatment centers.

Home treatment with recombinant activated factor VII in patients with factor VIII inhibitors: the advantages of early intervention.

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of home treatment with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), 10 inhibitor patients (all haemophiliacs except one acquired post‐partum) self‐administered up to four doses of 90 μg/kg rFVIIa every 3 ± 1 h. The response was rated by the patient as effective (haemorrhage stopped or decreased substantially), partially effective (reduced) or ineffective (unchanged or worsened). 45 haemarthroses and eight haematomas were treated within a median time of 1.0 h (range 0.3–11.9) from the onset of bleeding, with a median of two rFVIIa doses per course (range 1–4). rFVIIa was effective in 42 episodes (79%), partially effective in six (11%) and failed in five (10%). Compared with partially effective and ineffective treatments, effective treatments started earlier (median time: 0.6 v 2.7 h, P = 0.02) and required a smaller number of doses (median: 1.5 v 3, P = 0.007). The risk of a partially effective or ineffective treatment was smaller for treatments started within 6 h from the onset of bleeding than for those which started later (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.63). Mild side‐effects were reported only after 3/113 self‐infusions (2.6%). Early home treatment with rFVIIa is safe, feasible and effective, inducing and maintaining haemostasis with a small number of doses.

Severe hemophilia with mild bleeding phenotype: molecular characterization and global coagulation profile

Summary.  Background: Patients with severe hemophilia may show very varied bleeding tendencies, and the reasons for this heterogeneous clinical expression are unclear. The factor VIII/FIX genotype is the main determinant of the residual factor activity; however, different bleeding phenotypes have also been reported in patients sharing the same mutation. Such global coagulation tests as thrombin generation assays are tools with which to investigate different coagulation profiles among severe hemophiliacs. Objectives, patients and methods: This case–control study was aimed at comprehensively evaluating the role of genotype and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) as predictors of the clinical phenotype in severe hemophiliacs with an extremely mild bleeding tendency (cases, n = 22), in comparison with those showing a typical bleeding tendency (controls, n = 50). Results: Cases were more frequently affected by hemophilia B than by hemophilia A, and showed a lower incidence of severe FVIII/FIX gene defects (referred to as null mutations), higher FVIII and FIX antigen levels and higher ETP values in platelet‐rich plasma than controls (P < 0.05). By multivariate logistic regression, only non‐null mutations were confirmed as an independent predictor of a mild clinical phenotype. Conclusions: These results indicate that non‐null mutations represent the main determinant of the bleeding tendency, and that ETP measurement in platelet‐rich plasma is able to identify severe hemophiliacs with a mild clinical phenotype.

Health status and quality of life of elderly persons with severe hemophilia born before the advent of modern replacement therapy

Summary.  Background: More and more people with severe hemophilia reach an old age thanks to an effective treatment. There is no information on the health status and quality of life of elderly people with hemophilia born at a time when replacement therapy was hardly available. Methods: Italian patients with severe hemophilia, aged ≥65 years and hence born in 1942 or earlier, were compared with elderly men without bleeding disorders matched for age, sex, geography and social status. The following aspects were evaluated: concomitant illness, orthopedic status, physical functioning and cognitive status. Measurements of generic and disease‐specific health‐related quality of life were also obtained, together with the presence or absence of depression. Results: Thirty‐nine patients, aged 65–78 years, were investigated; 33 had hemophilia A. All patients had started regular treatment on demand only when they were already 25–30 years of age. Patients were compared with 43 men without hemophilia, aged 65–79 years. More patients with hemophilia had chronic hepatitis B and C, HIV infection and hypertension. On the other hand, their elderly peers without hemophilia were more frequently hypercholesterolemic and had more cardiovascular diseases. Most hemophiliacs had arthropathy and worse values for physical functioning, but their cognitive status was similar to that of elderly non‐hemophiliacs. Hemophiliacs reported greater depression and lower health‐related quality of life. Conclusions: Elderly patients with hemophilia have more co‐morbidities and problems in daily living, but similar cognitive status as age‐matched non‐hemophilic peers. They have more chronic viral infections and hypertension but fewer cardiovascular diseases. These observations should help to optimize health care delivery in this increasing and neglected population of people with hemophilia.

Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation and risk of inhibitor development in nonsevere hemophilia A

Neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) toward factor VIII form a severe complication in nonsevere hemophilia A, profoundly aggravating the bleeding pattern. Identification of high-risk patients is hampered by lack of data that take exposure days to therapeutic factor VIII concentrates into account. In the INSIGHT study, we analyzed the association between F8 mutation and inhibitor development in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (factor VIII 2-40 IU/dL). This analysis included 1112 nonsevere hemophilia A patients from 14 centers in Europe and Australia that had genotyped at least 70% of their patients. Inhibitor risk was calculated as Kaplan-Meier incidence with cumulative number of exposure days as the time variable. During 44 800 exposure days (median, 24 exposure days per patient; interquartile range [IQR], 7-90), 59 of the 1112 patients developed an inhibitor; cumulative incidence of 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-6.6) after a median of 28 exposure days (IQR, 12-71). The inhibitor risk at 50 exposure days was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.5-8.9) and at 100 exposure days the risk further increased to 13.3% (95% CI, 9.6-17.0). Among a total of 214 different F8 missense mutations 19 were associated with inhibitor development. These results emphasize the importance of F8 genotyping in nonsevere hemophilia A.

Transmission of parvovirus B19 by coagulation factor concentrates exposed to 100°C heat after lyophilization

BACKGROUND: Double inactivation by solvent/detergent treatment plus heating at 100°C for 30 minutes after lyophilization has been adopted to improve viral safety of factor VIII and factor IX concentrates, particularly with respect to non‐lipid‐enveloped viruses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of concentrates exposed to these virucidal methods.

Joint protection in haemophilia

Summary.  Haemarthroses (intra‐articular haemorrhages) are a frequent finding typically observed in patients with haemophilia. Diagnosis and treatment of these bleeding episodes must be delivered as early as possible. Additionally, treatment should ideally be administered intensively (enhanced on‐demand treatment) until the resolution of symptoms. Joint aspiration plays an important role in acute and profuse haemarthroses as the presence of blood in the joint leads to chondrocyte apoptosis and chronic synovitis, which will eventually result in joint degeneration (haemophilic arthropathy). Ultrasonography (US) is an appropriate diagnostic technique to assess the evolution of acute haemarthrosis in haemophilia, although magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard as far as imaging techniques are concerned. Some patients experience subclinical haemarthroses, which eventually tend to result in some degree of arthropathy, especially in the ankles. Nowadays, the most effective way of protecting these patients is primary prophylaxis, which in practice changes severe haemophilia into moderate haemophilia, preventing or at least minimizing the occurrence of haemarthrosis. If primary prophylaxis is, for whatever reason not an option, secondary prophylaxis and enhanced on demand treatment should be considered. Two alternatives are available for inhibitor patients: (i) control of haemostasis using by‐passing agents (rFVIIa or aPCCs) either as enhanced on demand treatment or secondary prophylaxis, as appropriate, following the same basic principles used for non‐inhibitor patients and (ii) immune tolerance induction (ITI) to eradicate the inhibitor.