Eli Mavor
University of Southern California
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eli Mavor.
Annals of Surgery | 1999
Namir Katkhouda; Michael Hurwitz; Jean Gugenheim; Eli Mavor; Rodney J. Mason; Donald J. Waldrep; Raymond T. Rivera; Mudjianto Chandra; Guilherme M. Campos; Steven Offerman; Andrew Trussler; Pascal Fabiani; Jean Mouiel
OBJECTIVE The authors present their experience in the laparoscopic management of benign liver disease. The aim of the study is to analyze technical feasibility and evaluate immediate and long-term outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Indications for the laparoscopic management of varied abdominal conditions have evolved. Although the minimally invasive treatment of liver cysts has been reported, the laparoscopic approach to other liver lesions remains undefined. METHODS Between September 1990 and October 1997, 43 patients underwent laparoscopic liver surgery. There were two groups of benign lesions: cysts (n = 31) and solid tumors (n = 12). Indications were solitary giant liver cysts (n = 16), polycystic liver disease (n = 9), hydatid cyst (n = 6), focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 3), and adenoma (n = 9). Only solid tumors, hydatid cysts, and patients with polycystic disease and large dominant cysts located in anterior liver segments were included. All giant solitary liver cysts were considered for laparoscopy. Patients with cholangitis, cirrhosis, and significant cardiac disease were excluded. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS The procedures were completed laparoscopically in 40 patients. Median size was 4 cm for solid nodules and 14 cm for solitary liver cysts. Conversion occurred in three patients (7%), for bleeding (n = 2) and impingement of a solid tumor on the inferior vena cava (n = 1). The median operative time was 179 minutes. All solitary liver cysts were fenestrated in less than 1 hour. There were no deaths. Complications occurred in 6 cases (14.1%). Two hemorrhagic and two infectious complications were noted after management of hydatid cysts. There were no complications after resection of solid tumors. Three patients received transfusions (7%). The median length of stay was 4.7 days. Median follow-up was 30 months. There was no recurrence of solitary liver or hydatid cysts. One patient with polycystic disease had symptomatic recurrent cysts at 6 months requiring laparotomy. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic liver surgery can be accomplished safely in selected patients with small benign solid tumors located in the anterior liver segments and giant solitary cysts. The laparoscopic management of polycystic liver disease should be reserved for patients with a limited number of large, anteriorly located cysts. Hydatid disease is best treated through an open approach.
Annals of Surgery | 2001
Namir Katkhouda; Eli Mavor; Melanie H. Friedlander; Rodney J. Mason; Milton Kiyabu; Steven W. Grant; Kranti Achanta; Erlinda L. Kirkman; Krishna Narayanan; Rahila Essani
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (FS) in laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and to compare it with stapled fixation. Summary Background DataLaparoscopic hernia repair involves the fixation of the prosthetic mesh in the preperitoneal space with staples to avoid displacement leading to recurrence. The use of staples is associated with a small but significant number of complications, mainly nerve injury and hematomas. FS (Tisseel) is a biodegradable adhesive obtained by a combination of human-derived fibrinogen and thrombin, duplicating the last step of the coagulation cascade. It can be used as an alternative method of fixation. MethodsA prosthetic mesh was placed laparoscopically into the preperitoneal space in both groins in 25 female pigs and fixed with either FS or staples or left without fixation. The method of fixation was chosen by randomization. The pigs were killed after 12 days to assess early graft incorporation. The following outcome measures were evaluated: macroscopic findings, including graft alignment and motion, tensile strength between the grafts and surrounding tissues, and histologic findings (fibrous reaction and inflammatory response). ResultsThe procedures were completed laparoscopically in 49 sites. Eighteen grafts were fixed with FS and 16 with staples; 15 were not fixed. There was no significant difference in graft motion between the FS and stapled groups, but the nonfixed mesh had significantly more graft motion than in either of the fixed groups. There was no significant difference in median tensile strength between the FS and stapled groups. The tensile strength in the nonfixed group was significantly lower than the other two groups. FS triggered a significantly stronger fibrous reaction and inflammatory response than in the stapled and control groups. No infection related to method of fixation was observed in any group. ConclusionAn adequate mesh fixation in the extraperitoneal inguinal area can be accomplished using FS. This method is mechanically equivalent to the fixation achieved by staples and superior to nonfixed grafts. Biologic soft fixation with FS will prevent early graft migration and will avoid the complications associated with staple use.
American Journal of Surgery | 2000
Namir Katkhouda; Melanie H. Friedlander; Steven W. Grant; Kranthi K Achanta; Rahila Essani; Peter Paik; George C. Velmahos; Guillermo Campos; Rodney J. Mason; Eli Mavor
BACKGROUND Studies suggest increased intraabdominal abscess (IA) rates following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), especially for perforated appendicitis. Consequently, an open approach has been advocated. The aim of our study is to compare IA rates following LA performed by a laparoscopic surgery and a general surgical service within the same institution. METHODS Data of LA patients treated at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California (LAC-USC) Medical Center between March 1992 and June 1997 were reviewed. The main outcome measure was postoperative IA. RESULTS In all, 645 LA were reviewed. A total of 413 LA (285 acute, 61 gangrenous, 67 perforated appendicitis) were performed by three general surgical services (10 attendings). Ten abscesses occurred postoperatively (2.4%), 6 with perforated appendicitis. After the laparoscopic service was introduced, 232 standardized LA (126 acute, 46 gangrenous, 60 perforated) were performed by two attendings. One IA occurred (gangrenous appendicitis). The IA rate for perforated appendicitis was significantly lower on the laparoscopic service (P = 0.025). There was no difference in IA rates for acute and gangrenous appendicitis. There was no mortality in either group. CONCLUSION IA rate following LA for perforated appendicitis was significantly reduced on the laparoscopic service. Mastery of the learning curve and addition of specific surgical techniques explained this improved result. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis may not be contraindicated, even for perforated appendicitis.
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2001
Namir Katkhouda; Steven W. Grant; Eli Mavor; Melanie H. Friedlander; Reginald V. Lord; Kranthi K Achanta; Rahila Essani; Rodney J. Mason
BackgroundSplenectomy has been shown to produce longterm remission in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). With the development of laparoscopic splenectomy, there is renewed interest in the surgical treatment of ITP. The aim of this study was to identify factors that are predictive of outcome after laparoscopic splenectomy for ITP.MethodsA case series of 67 consecutive patients with ITP undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy was reviewed. A positive response was defined as a postoperative platelet count greater than 150,000/μl requiring no maintenance medical therapy on follow-up evaluation. A chi-square test and a stepwise logistic regression analysis were performed for the following variables: age, gender, preoperative response to steroids, duration of disease, severity of preoperative bleeding, accessory spleens, and thrombocytosis on discharge.ResultsAt a median follow-up period of 38 months (range, 2–56 months), 52 patients (78%) had a positive response to laparoscopic splenectomy. Of the 15 patients (22%) who did not have a positive response, 11 were refractory and 4 relapsed. All relapses occurred in patients with a platelet count less than 150,000/μl at discharge. Patient age was the most significant predictive factor for success or failure of the operation. The median age of the responders (31 years; range, 19–71 years) was significantly lower than the median age of the nonresponders (49 years; range, 24–62; p<0.001). Only 5.6% of those younger than 40 years did not have a positive response, compared with 42% of patients older than 40 years (p<0.05). Patient age was significantly associated with outcome on univariable chi-square analysis (p=0.001), and was the only significant factor on multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.71–4.1). Other significant predictors of outcome on univariable analysis were preoperative response to corticosteroids and platelet count on discharge.ConclusionsA long-lasting response after splenectomy for ITP is more likely to occur in patients younger than 40 years of age. To avoid the long-term side effects of corticosteroid use, early surgical referral of younger patients with ITP should be considered.
American Journal of Surgery | 1999
Namir Katkhouda; Guilherme M. Campos; Eli Mavor; Rodney J. Mason; Mary Hume; Alvin Ting
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic lumbar spine fusion has been recently described. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure for single- and multiple-level degenerative disc disease. METHODS Twenty-four consecutive laparoscopic interbody lumbar fusions were evaluated prospectively (18 single-level were compared with 6 multiple-level procedures). Results of the laparoscopic multiple-level procedures were further compared with 12 open multiple-level operations. RESULTS Twenty procedures were completed laparoscopically. The conversions were related to iliac vein lacerations (3 cases) and a mesenteric tear. Single-level cases had lower morbidity (22% versus 83%), shorter hospital stay (2 versus 10 days), and higher fusion rate (88% versus 50%) than multiple-level procedures. Overall results in the latter group were worse than in the matched open group. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic single-level fusion (L5-S1) is safe and carries the benefits of minimal access surgery. Morbidity after multiple level approach is high, and this procedure cannot be advocated at this time.
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 1999
Namir Katkhouda; Guilherme M. Campos; Eli Mavor; A. Trussler; M. Khalil; R. Stoppa
Abstract. We have devised a reproducible approach to the preperitoneal space for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias that is based on an understanding of the abdominal wall anatomy. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy was performed on 99 hernias in 90 patients at the Los Angeles County–University of Southern California Medical Center, using a standardized approach to the preperitoneal space. Operative times, morbidity, and recurrence rates were recorded prospectively. The median operative time was 37 min (range, 28–60) for unilateral hernias and 46 min (range, 35–73) for bilateral hernias. There were no conversions to open repair, and there was only one conversion to a laparoscopic transabdominal approach. Complications were limited to urinary retention in two patients, pneumoscrotum in one patient, and postoperative pain requiring a large dose of analgesics in one patient. All patients were discharged within 23 h. There were no recurrences or neuralgias on follow-up at 2 years. A standardized approach to the preperitoneal space based on a thorough understanding of the abdominal wall anatomy is essential to a satisfactory outcome in hernia repair.
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2000
Namir Katkhouda; Eli Mavor; Rodney J. Mason
Despite advances in technical skills, common bile duct (CBD) injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not an uncommon major complication. We describe a technical step that can be taken during the dissection of the triangle of Calot to allow the junction between the cystic duct and CBD to be clearly visualized. This is a safe and simple maneuver that mimics the one done in open surgery. Its routine application serves as an additional safety measure to prevent injury to the common bile duct.
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1999
Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J. Mason; Eli Mavor; Guilherme M. Campos; Raymond T. Rivera; Michael Hurwitz; Donald J. Waldrep
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis, first described by Semm in 1982, is still a procedure under evaluation: The small incision used in the open technique approximates the one required for the insertion of a laparoscopic port. Furthermore, published data have demonstrated conflicting results or have failed to establish laparoscopy as the technique of choice for the management of acute appendicitis. The laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis is even more questionable. The technique is challenging because of the loss of tactile feeling and the difficulties in distinguishing healthy bowel from necrotic tissue. Conversion rates for attempted laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis range from 6.5% to 17.6%, mainly because of excessive inflammation, presence of adhesions, or retrocecal position of the appendix. In fact, a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis is a contraindication to laparoscopy in most centers. Adequate exposure frequently requires a large open incision. We describe a finger-assisted technique, or “fingeroscopy,” as a simple add-on procedure that can be used during laparoscopic treatment of complicated appendicitis. This technique restores the surgeon’s tactile ability and allows gentle and safe blunt dissection of appendiceal masses under laparoscopic guidance. The technique is applied without enlarging the port incision and reduces the conversion rate to an open procedure.
Archive | 2010
Joaquin A. Rodriguez; Ronald A. Hinder; Santiago Horgan; Lloyd M. Nyhus; Toni Hau; Malek Massad; Piotr Gorecki; Emma J. Patterson; Michel Gagner; Eli Mavor; Namir Katkhouda; Yves-Marie Dion; Carlos Gracia; Hassen Ben El Kadi; David S. Landau
Since its introduction to the United States in 1991, laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) has created renewed interest in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Acceptance of the reliability of the laparoscopic procedure combined with the attraction to both patients and physicians of shorter recovery and hospital stay and decreased pain has led to a dramatic increase in the numbers of these procedures being performed. We will discuss controversies in indications for surgery, necessary preoperative work-up and technical aspects of antireflux surgery.
Archives of Surgery | 1999
Namir Katkhouda; Eli Mavor; Rodney J. Mason; Guilherme M. Campos; Ardeshir Soroushyari; Thomas V. Berne