Eli Muchtar

The prognostic value of multiparametric flow cytometry in AL amyloidosis at diagnosis and at the end of first line treatment

Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis has not been widely adopted and, consequently, there is little information on its clinical relevance. We studied 173 patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent MFC immunophenotyping of bone marrow sample at diagnosis and 82 patients at the end of the first line of treatment (EOT). The number of monotypic plasma cells (PCs) and the polytypic PCs/bone marrow PCs (pPCs/BMPCs) ratio were analyzed. At diagnosis, ≥2.5% monotypic PCs was associated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients with <2.5% monotypic PCs (2-year PFS 41% vs 56%, P = .007; 2-year OS 55% vs 70%; P = .01). Additionally, patients with a pPCs/BMPCs ratio of ≤5% had a shorter PFS compared with patients with pPCs/BMPCs ratio >5% (2-year PFS 43% vs 55%; P = .02), but without OS difference (2-year OS 60% vs 67%; P = .19). In a multivariate analysis, the monotypic PCs retained an independent prediction for PFS/OS, whereas the pPCs/BMPCs ratio retained significance only for PFS. At EOT, ≥0.1% monotypic PCs was associated with a shorter PFS and OS compared with patients with <0.1% monotypic PCs (2-year PFS 31% vs 87%; P < .0001; 2-year OS 87% vs 98%, P = .02). In a subgroup analysis among patients who attained a very good partial response or better, the monotypic PCs at the 0.1% cutoff was predictive for progression rate but not for PFS/OS. MFC is prognostic for AL amyloidosis at diagnosis and at EOT. MFC may have a role in the definition of hematologic response.

A practical review on carfilzomib in multiple myeloma

Carfilzomib, a second‐generation proteasome inhibitor, has been increasingly used in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) since its approval by the American food and drug administration (FDA) in the summer of 2012. The drug is active as a single agent and in combination with other antimyeloma agents. As a result of its efficacy and safety in the relapsed/refractory setting, carfilzomib is being evaluated in patients with newly diagnosed MM as well as in high‐risk smoldering MM. This review will give a comprehensive summary of the drug, including its mechanism of action, the evaluated doses and schedules as well as a summary of the main clinical trials in the relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed settings. A focus will be placed upon certain subgroups of interest as well as a description of the toxicity associated with carfilzomib use and a clinical perspective on toxicity management.

Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis: From Basics to New Developments in Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy

Immunoglobulin amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is the most common form of systemic amyloidosis, where the culprit amyloidogenic protein is immunoglobulin light chains produced by marrow clonal plasma cells. AL amyloidosis is an infrequent disease, and since presentation is variable and often nonspecific, diagnosis is often delayed. This results in cumulative organ damage and has a negative prognostic effect. AL amyloidosis can also be challenging on the diagnostic level, especially when demonstration of Congo red-positive tissue is not readily obtained. Since as many as 31 known amyloidogenic proteins have been identified to date, determination of the amyloid type is required. While several typing methods are available, mass spectrometry has become the gold standard for amyloid typing. Upon confirming the diagnosis of amyloidosis, a pursuit for organ involvement is essential, with a focus on heart involvement, even in the absence of suggestive symptoms for involvement, as this has both prognostic and treatment implications. Details regarding initial treatment options, including stem cell transplantation, are provided in this review. AL amyloidosis management requires a multidisciplinary approach with careful patient monitoring, as organ impairment has a major effect on morbidity and treatment tolerability until a response to treatment is achieved and recovery emerges.

Autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma patients 70 years or older

Autologous stem cell transplant (Auto-SCT) is increasingly used in older patients with multiple myeloma (MM), despite lack of phase 3 trials in this age-defined population. For 207 consecutive MM patients who underwent Auto-SCT and were 70 years or older at transplant (study cohort), data were analyzed and compared with a younger cohort (1764 Auto-SCT patients <70 years old). The proportion of Auto-SCT in the older patients increased from 7.8% of all transplants in 1998–2006 to 12.9% in 2007–2015. Sixty percent of patients required stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy or plerixafor. Full-dose melphalan conditioning was given to 55% of the older patients compared with 93% of the younger patients (P<0.001). Older patients were more likely to be hospitalized (64% vs 55%; P=0.01), but hospitalization duration was comparable. For newly diagnosed patients, median PFS was 33.5 months for the older cohort and 33.8 months for the younger cohort (P=0.91), and median overall survival was 6.1 and 7.8 years, respectively (P=0.11). Presumably, a smaller fraction of patients, age 70–76, is selected for Auto-SCT, but the benefits are comparable to those seen for younger patients. Reduced-dose melphalan was given to approximately half the patients to avoid excessive toxicity.

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in untreated AL amyloidosis has an independent prognostic impact by abnormality type and treatment category

The significance of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) by regimen type was assessed in 692 immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis patients with iFISH at diagnosis. First-line treatment was categorized as stem cell transplant and three non-transplant regimens. The most common abnormality was t(11;14) (49% of patients) followed by monosomy 13/del(13q) (36%) and trisomies (26%). A lower rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better was observed in patients with t(11;14) treated with bortezomib-based (52% vs 77%; P=0.004) and IMiD-based regimens (13% vs 54%; P=0.04) compared with those lacking t(11;14). This corresponded to an inferior overall survival (OS) in t(11;14)-positive bortezomib-treated (median 15 vs 27 months; P=0.05) and IMiD-treated patients (median 12 vs 32 months; P=0.05). The inferior OS associated with t(11;14) bortezomib-treated patients was restricted to patients with favorable disease. Trisomies were associated with a shorter OS (median 29 vs 69 months; P=0.001), reaching statistical significance only for melphalan (median 15 vs 32 months; P=0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent survival impact for trisomies in the entire cohort and for t(11;14) among bortezomib-treated patients. iFISH is prognostic in untreated AL amyloidosis and may influence treatment selection. Patients with t(11;14) should be considered for ASCT or standard-dose melphalan at diagnosis because the survival disadvantage may be abrogated.

How I treat cryoglobulinemia

Cryoglobulinemia is a distinct entity characterized by the presence of cryoglobulins in the serum. Cryoglobulins differ in their composition, which has an impact on the clinical presentation and the underlying disease that triggers cryoglobulin formation. Cryoglobulinemia is categorized into two main subgroups: type I, which is seen exclusively in clonal hematologic diseases, and type II/III, which is called mixed cryoglobulinemia and is seen in hepatitis C virus infection and systemic diseases such as B-cell lineage hematologic malignancies and connective tissue disorders. Clinical presentation is broad and varies between types but includes arthralgia, purpura, skin ulcers, glomerulonephritis, and peripheral neuropathy. Life-threatening manifestations can develop in a small proportion of patients. A full evaluation for the underlying cause is required, because each type requires a different kind of treatment, which should be tailored on the basis of disease severity, underlying disease, and prior therapies. Relapses can be frequent and can result in significant morbidity and cumulative organ impairment. We explore the spectrum of this heterogeneous disease by discussing the disease characteristics of 5 different patients.

Elotuzumab: the first approved monoclonal antibody for multiple myeloma treatment

Elotuzumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the SLAMF7 receptor, expressed on normal and malignant plasma cells with a lower expression on other lymphoid cells such as natural killer (NK) cells. Elotuzumab has no significant antimyeloma activity when given as a single agent to patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, when combined with other antimyeloma agents, it results in improved response and outcome. Owing to the results from the landmark ELOQUENT-2 phase III clinical trial, which compared lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without elotuzumab in patients with RRMM, elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone was approved by the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2015 for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who received one to three prior lines of therapy. This review will give a brief description of the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family receptors, the unique SLAMF7 receptor and the mechanism of action of elotuzumab. Thereafter, we will give an overview on its antimyeloma activity in preclinical and clinical trials, including its toxicity profile and management thereof.

Immunoparesis in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis is a marker for response and survival

Immunoparesis is an adverse prognostic marker in plasma cell proliferative disorders. Its impact in AL amyloidosis has not been explored in depth. Newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients (n=998) were evaluated for immunoparesis by two methods. The first method was qualitative, considering the number of suppressed uninvolved immunoglobulins below the lower limit of normal (LLN) (none, partial, all). The second method was quantitative, assessing the average relative difference (ARD) of the uninvolved immunoglobulins from the LLN. Patients with suppression of all the uninvolved immunoglobulins were less likely to achieve very good partial response (VGPR) or better to first-line treatment (44%) compared with patients with partial suppression (68%) or preserved uninvolved immunoglobulins (64%; P<0.0001). In addition, patients with suppression of all the uninvolved immunoglobulins had a shorter survival compared with the respective comparators (median 18 vs 54 vs 52 months; P<0.0001). In the quantitative method, patients with a negative ARD were less likely to achieve VGPR or better (48%) and had a shorter survival (median 24 months) compared with patients with a positive ARD (69%, 57 months, respectively; P<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis for survival, both assessment methods retained an independent impact. Significant immunoparesis has a negative impact on response and survival in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

Prevalence and predictors of thyroid functional abnormalities in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis

Data on the effect of systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) on thyroid function are limited.

Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy

Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is characterized by nondilated left or right ventricle with diastolic dysfunction. The restrictive cardiomyopathies are a heterogenous group of myocardial diseases that vary according to pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation and criteria, treatment, and prognosis. In this review, an overview of RCMs will be presented followed by a detailed discussion on 3 major causes of RCM, for which tailored interventions are available: cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis, and cardiac hemochromatosis. Each of these 3 RCMs is challenging to diagnose, and recognition of each disease entity is frequently delayed. Clinical clues to promote recognition of cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis, and cardiac hemochromatosis and imaging techniques used to facilitate diagnosis are discussed. Disease-specific therapies are reviewed. Early recognition remains a key barrier to improving survival in all RCMs.