Elie Choufani

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: Lesional level diagnosis.

BACKGROUND In spinal deformity surgery, iatrogenic spinal cord injury is the most feared complication. Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) of the spinal cord assesses its functional integrity and allows significant reduction of the rate of spinal cord injury. HYPOTHESIS In case of severe IOM alert, lesional level diagnosis constitutes supplementary and useful information. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was retrospective and monocentric. In our institution, 1062 pediatric spinal deformity surgeries have been monitored since 2004. We review the records of the six patients who presented a severe and prolonged IOM alert with lesional level determination. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), neurogenic mixed evoked potentials (NMEP) and D-waves were performed. In cases of IOM alert, sequentially moving an epidural electrode along the spinal cord allows lesional level determination, using this electrode either for stimulation or recording. RESULTS Six patients, aged 12 to 17 years, characterized by severe IOM alerts during spinal deformity surgery are reported. Postoperative neurological examination was normal for five out of six cases. For patient 2, lesional level diagnosis allowed to determine a bi-laminar claw between T2 and T3 as the etiology of IOM alert. This IOM alert was delayed in time, being detectable only 30minutes after the placement of this claw. Postoperative neurological examination was normal. For patient 6, a Stagnara wake-up test demonstrated paraplegia. Lesional level was established. Following corrective surgical maneuvers, postoperative neurologic deficit was limited to a pyramidal syndrome in one lower limb. Postoperative MRI demonstrated a spinal cord lesion at the determined lesional level. CONCLUSION During an IOM alert, lesional level determination allows localization of spinal cord dysfunction. This data, obtainable whatever the IOM device, constitutes supplementary information in order to rapidly identify the etiology of IOM alert and thus to react in the most appropriate way. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, retrospective study.

How Sublaminar Bands Affect Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in AIS Patients with Preoperative Hypokyphosis? Results of a Series of 34 Patients with 2-Year Follow-Up

Hypokyphosis is currently observed in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. The use of sublaminar bands allows a good restoration of sagittal balance of the spine. The aim of the study was to provide a middle-term radiographic analysis of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with preoperative hypokyphosis treated by posterior arthrodesis with sublaminar bands. This retrospective study included 34 patients with Lenke 1 scoliosis associated with hypokyphosis (TK < 20°). A radiographic evaluation was performed with a 2-year follow-up. Cobb angle, cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 6-month and 2-year follow-up. The mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 10.5° versus 24.1° postoperatively (p < 0.001), representing a mean gain of 13°. Cobb angle ranged from 59.3° to 17.9° postoperatively (mean correction 69%, p < 0.001). Cobb angle increased between the immediate postoperative measurement and the 6-month follow-up (17.9 versus 19.9, p = 0.03). Cervical curvature changed from a 5.6° kyphosis to a 3.5° lordosis (p = 0.001). Concerning lumbar lordosis, preoperative measurement was 39.7° versus 41.3° postoperatively (p = 0.27). At 6-month follow-up, lumbar lordosis significantly increased to 43.6° (p = 0.03). All parameters were stable at final follow-up. Correction performed by sublaminar bands is efficient for both fontal and sagittal planes. Moreover, the restoration of normal thoracic kyphosis is followed by an adaptation of the adjacent curvatures with improved cervical lordosis and lumbar lordosis.

Operative management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children: Comparison of five fixation methods

BACKGROUND The best method for stabilising supracondylar humeral fractures (SHFs) in children remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of five different fixation methods for SHFs in children. HYPOTHESIS Differences in intra-operative and short-term post-operative parameters can be demonstrated across different fixation methods for SHFs in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the medical files of paediatric patients managed at our centre between 2006 and 2016 for SHF with major displacement (type 3 or 4 in the Lagrange-Rigault classification). Clinical and radiological parameters collected post-operatively and at last follow-up included Baumanns angle, anteversion of the distal humeral epiphysis, and operative time. Over the 11-year study period, 251 patients were included; mean age was 6.4 years and mean follow-up 4.7 months. The five fixation methods used were elastic stable intra-medullary nailing (ESIN, n=16), two pins in an X configuration (n=33), two lateral pins and one medial pin (n=144), two lateral pins (n=33), and three lateral pins (n=25). A minimally invasive 2-cm approach was used to insert the medial pins. Immediate instability of the fixation was considered in patients with an at least 15° deficit in Baumanns angle or anteversion, or with rotational malalignment, on the radiographs taken on day 1. Outcomes were analysed in each of the five internal fixation groups. RESULTS Immediate instability showed no significant differences across the five groups. Operative time was significantly shorter with two lateral pins (33min, P=0.046). Time to hardware removal was longer in the ESIN group (54 days, P=0.03). Use of a medial pin was associated with a lower risk of secondary displacement (2.0% vs. 8.6%, P=0.04) but did not affect the risk of nerve injury (4% vs. 3%, P=0.86). DISCUSSION This is one of the largest retrospective cohort studies of outcomes according to the fixation technique used to treat SHFs in children. Adding a medial pin through a minimally invasive approach is associated with a longer operative time but limits the risk of secondary displacement without increasing the frequency of iatrogenic nerve injury and improves fracture site stability. Use of a medial pin therefore deserves to be considered in paediatric SHFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, retrospective cohort study.

Experience and volume are determinantive factors for operative management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children

BACKGROUND We compared radiographic and operative results of pediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fracture (SCHF) according to the surgeons experience. METHODS During an 11-year period (2006-2016), we reviewed the medical records of 236 patients operated on for Gartland III SCHF in our institution. Operative (operative time, time to implants removal) and radiographic parameters (Baumann and lateral capitellohumeral angles) were assessed. A malalignment was defined if there was a difference in the Baumann angle or lateral capitellohumeral angles >15° or if malrotation existed compared with normative values. We compared surgeon experience and volume (number of patients operated on by year). RESULTS In patients operated on by less experienced surgeons (<1 year, n = 69), operative time (61 vs. 41 minutes) and time to implant removal (48 vs. 40 days) were significantly longer (P < .001). Radiographic parameters did not differ between less and more experienced surgeons. Operative parameters improved through the 20 first cases of the younger surgeons. In surgeons managing fewer than 5 patients per year, malalignment and conversion to open reduction were more frequent (all P < .05). CONCLUSION Experience and volume are 2 crucial parameters influencing the quality of management of pediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment for displaced SCHF. They should be taken into account in daily practice, especially when making the decision to operate on these patients out of day time.

Calcifications discales intervertébrales chez l’enfant: à propos de deux cas

Disc calcifications are usually revealed in children by pain crises that affect the spine. The most common location for disc calcifications is the cervical spine. However, other locations are less symptomatic and they may well go unnoticed. We here report two cases of children hospitalized with symptomatic cervical disc calcifications. The first case involves a girl aged four and a half suffering from torticollis revealing the migration of a previously asymptomatic disc calcification ; the second case, instead, involves a 5-year old boy presenting for acute neck pain and in whom calcification disc was detected. Treatment was essentially conservative. Intervertebral disc calcifications in children are a rare condition whose etiopathogenesis remains unknown. In the case of children with unexplained back pain the diagnosis should not be made without careful neurological examination and imaging tests.