Eline P.M. Cardinaels

Acute Hemodynamic Response and Uremic Toxin Removal in Conventional and Extended Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration: A Randomized Crossover Study

BACKGROUND Intensive hemodialysis (HD) may have significant benefits. Recently, the role of extended hemodiafiltration (HDF) has gained interest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effects of extended HD and HDF on hemodynamic response and solute removal. STUDY DESIGN Randomized crossover trial. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS Stable patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing conventional HD. INTERVENTION 13 patients randomly completed a single study of 4-hour HD (HD4), 4-hour HDF (HDF4), 8-hour HD (HD8), and 8-hour HDF (HDF8), with a 2-week interval between study sessions. Between study sessions, patients received routine conventional HD treatments. OUTCOMES Acute hemodynamic effects and uremic toxin clearance. MEASUREMENTS Blood pressure and heart rate, pulse wave analysis, cardiac output, and microvascular density by sublingual capillaroscopy, as well as relative blood volume and thermal variables, were measured. Clearance and removal of uremic toxins also were studied. RESULTS Long treatments showed more stability of peripheral systolic blood pressure (change during HD4, -21.7±15.6 mm Hg; during HDF4, -23.3±20.8 mm Hg; during HD8, -6.7±15.2 mm Hg [P=0.04 vs. HD4; P=0.08 vs. HDF4]; and during HDF8, -0.5±14.4 mm Hg [P=0.004 vs. HD4; P=0.008 vs. HDF4]). A similar observation was found for peripheral diastolic and central blood pressures. Cardiac output remained more stable in extended sessions (change during HD4, -1.4±1.5 L/min; during HDF4, -1.6±1.0 L/min; during HD8, -0.4±0.9 L/min [P=0.02 vs. HDF4]; and during HDF8, -0.5±0.8 L/min [P=0.06 vs. HD4; P=0.03 vs. HDF4), in line with the decreased relative blood volume slope in long dialysis. No differences in microvascular density were found. Energy transfer rates were comparable (HD4, 13.3±4.7 W; HDF4, 16.2±5.6 W; HD8, 14.2±6.0 W; and HDF8, 14.5±4.3 W). Small-molecule and phosphate removal were superior during long treatments. β2-Microglobulin and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) reduction ratios were highest in HDF8. LIMITATIONS Small sample size, only acute effects were studied. CONCLUSIONS Treatment time, and not modality, was the determinant for the hemodynamic response. HDF significantly improved removal of middle molecules, with superior results in extended HDF.

A comprehensive review of upper reference limits reported for (high-)sensitivity cardiac troponin assays: the challenges that lie ahead

Abstract Cardiac troponins (cTn) are the preferred markers for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The guidelines recommend the use of the 99th percentile upper reference concentration of a healthy population as the diagnostic cut-off for AMI. However, a broad range of upper reference limits is still employed, complicating the diagnosis of AMI. This overview is meant to assist laboratory specialists to define an appropriate cut-off value for the diagnosis of AMI. Therefore, we provide an overview of the analytical performance and upper reference limits of seven (high-)sensitivity cTn assays: Roche high-sensitivity cTnT and ADVIA Centaur, Stratus CS, Dimension Vista, Vitros ECi, Access and Architect cTnI assays. It is shown that none of the reference populations completely met the guidelines, including those in package inserts. Forty percent of the studies collected less than the advised minimum of 300 subjects. Many studies (50%) did not report their inclusion criteria, while lower 99th percentile limits were observed when more stringent selection criteria were applied. Higher troponin cut-offs were found in men and elderly subjects, suggesting sex- and age-specific cut-offs would be considered. Therefore, there is still need for a large, rigorously screened reference population to more accurately establish cTn upper reference limits.

Cardiac troponin in ischemic cardiomyocytes: intracellular decrease before onset of cell death.

AIM Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) are the most important biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheless, they can be elevated in the absence of AMI. It is unclear if such elevations represent irreversible cardiomyocyte-damage or leakage from viable cardiomyocytes. Our objective is to evaluate whether cTn is released from viable cardiomyocytes in response to ischemia and to identify differences in the release of cTn and its molecular forms. METHODS AND RESULTS HL-1 cardiomyocytes (mouse) were subjected to ischemia (modeled by anoxia with glucose deprivation). The total contents and molecular forms of cTn were determined in culture media and cell lysates. Cell viability was assessed from the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Before the release of LDH, the intracellular cTn content in ischemic cells decreased significantly compared to control (52% for cTnI; 23% for cTnT) and was not matched by a cTn increase in the medium. cTnI decreased more rapidly than cTnT, resulting in an intracellular cTnT/cTnI ratio of 25.5 after 24 h of ischemia. Western blots revealed changes in the relative amounts of fragmented cTnI and cTnT in ischemic cells. CONCLUSIONS HL-1 cardiomyocytes subjected to simulated ischemia released cTnI and cTnT only in combination with the release of LDH. We find no evidence of cTn release from viable cardiomyocytes, but did observe a significant decrease in cTn content, before the onset of cell death. Intracellular decrease of cTn in viable cardiomyocytes can have important consequences for the interpretation of cTn values in clinical practice.

Clinical Interpretation of Elevated Concentrations of Cardiac Troponin T, but Not Troponin I, in Nursing Home Residents.

OBJECTIVE Cardiac troponins T (cTnT) and I (cTnI) are the preferred biomarkers to detect myocardial damage. The present study explores the value of measuring cardiac troponins (cTn) in nursing home residents, by investigating its relation to heart failure and 1-year mortality using 1 cTnT and 2 cTnI assays that are widely used in clinical practice. DESIGN All participants underwent extensive clinical examinations and echocardiographic assessment for the diagnosis of heart failure. cTn was measured using high-sensitive (hs)- cTnT (Roche), hs-cTnI (Abbott), and sensitive cTnI (Beckman) assays. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated (eGFR) using serum creatinine and cystatin C concentrations. Data on all-cause mortality were collected at 1-year follow-up. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Participants were 495 long-term nursing home residents, older than 65 years, of 5 Dutch nursing home organizations. RESULTS Median (IQR) concentrations were 20.6 (17.8-30.6), 6.8 (4.1-12.5), and 4.0 (2.0-8.0) ng/L for hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI, and cTnI, respectively. In total, 79% had elevated hs-cTnT concentrations, whereas only 9% and 5% of hs-cTnI and cTnI concentrations were elevated. Most important and independent determinants for higher hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI concentrations were heart failure and renal dysfunction. Whereas both heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 3.4) and eGFR lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (OR 3.6) were equal contributors to higher hs-cTnT concentrations (all P < .001), hs-cTnI and cTnI were less associated with renal dysfunction (OR of, respectively, 1.9 and 2.1; P < .01) in comparison with heart failure (OR 4.3 and 4.7, respectively, P < .001). Furthermore, residents with higher hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI concentrations (fourth quartile) had respectively 4 versus 2 times more risk of 1-year mortality compared with lower concentrations. CONCLUSION Regardless of their cardiac health, hs-cTnT but not hs-cTnI concentrations were elevated in almost all aged nursing home residents, questioning the use of the current diagnostic cutoff in elderly with high comorbidity. Nonetheless, measuring cardiac troponins, especially hs-cTnT, had a promising role in assessing future risk of mortality.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Concentrations in Patients with Chest Discomfort: Is It the Heart or the Kidneys As Well?

Background High-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTn) are the preferred biomarkers to detect myocardial injury, making them promising risk-stratifying tools for patients with symptoms of chest pain. However, circulating hs-cTn are also elevated in other conditions like renal dysfunction, complicating appropriate interpretation of low-level hs-cTn concentrations. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was performed in 1864 patients with symptoms of chest discomfort from the cardiology outpatient department who underwent cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Serum samples were analyzed using hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays. Renal function was measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), established from serum creatinine and cystatin C. On follow-up, the incidence of adverse events was assessed. Results Median hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI concentrations were 7.2(5.8–9.2) ng/L and 2.6(1.8–4.1) ng/L, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that both assay results were more strongly associated with eGFR (hs-cTnT:stβ:-0.290;hs-cTnI:stβ:-0.222) than with cardiac imaging parameters, such as coronary calcium score, CCTA plaque severity score and left ventricular mass (all p<0.01). Furthermore, survival analysis indicated lower relative risks in patients with normal compared to reduced renal function for hs-cTnT [HR(95%CI), 1.02(1.00–1.03) compared to 1.07(1.05–1.09)] and hs-cTnI [1.01(1.00–1.01) compared to 1.02(1.01–1.02)] (all p<0.001). Conclusion In patients with chest discomfort, we identified an independent influence of renal function on hs-cTn concentrations besides CAD, that affected the association of hs-cTn concentrations with adverse events. Estimating renal function is therefore warranted when interpreting baseline hs-cTn concentrations.

Acute effects of conventional and extended hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on high-sensitivity cardiac troponins

aEline P.M. Cardinaels and Tom Cornelis contributed equally to this work. *Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Otto Bekers, Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands, Phone: +31 43 3874694, Fax: +31 43 3874692, E-mail: o.bekers@mumc.nl Eline P.M. Cardinaels, Marja P. van Dieijen-Visser and Alma M.A. Mingels: Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands Tom Cornelis, Frank M. van der Sande, Karel M. Leunissen and Jeroen P. Kooman: Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands Letter to the Editor