Eliot Lawrence Friedman

Assessing the Development of Multidisciplinary Care: Experience of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program

PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) began in 2007 with a goal of expanding cancer research and delivering quality care in communities. The NCCCP Quality of Care (QoC) Subcommittee was charged with developing and improving the quality of multidisciplinary care. An assessment tool with nine key elements relevant to MDC structure and operations was developed. METHODS Fourteen NCCCP sites reported multidisciplinary care assessments for lung, breast, and colorectal cancer in June 2010, June 2011, and June 2012 using an online reporting tool. Each site evaluated their level of maturity (level 1 = no multidisciplinary care, level 5 = highly integrated multidisciplinary care) in nine elements integral to multidisciplinary care. Thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative responses was also conducted. RESULTS The proportion of sites that reported level 3 or greater on the assessment tool was tabulated at each time point. For all tumor types, sites that reached this level increased in six elements: case planning, clinical trials, integration of care coordination, physician engagement, quality improvement, and treatment team integration. Factors that enabled improvement included increasing organizational support, ensuring appropriate physician participation, increasing patient navigation, increasing participation in national quality initiatives, targeting genetics referrals, engaging primary care providers, and integrating clinical trial staff. CONCLUSIONS Maturation of multidisciplinary care reflected focused work of the NCCCP QoC Subcommittee. Working group efforts in patient navigation, genetics, and physician conditions of participation were evident in improved multidisciplinary care performance for three common malignancies. This work provides a blueprint for health systems that wish to incorporate prospective multidisciplinary care into their cancer programs.

Effectiveness of a thoracic multidisciplinary clinic in the treatment of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Introduction The Institute of Medicine, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the European Society of Medical Oncology promote a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of cancer. Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases necessitating coordination of care among medical, radiation, and surgical oncology. The optimal care of stage III NSCLC underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach. Methods From tumor registry data, we identified all cases of stage III NSCLC seen at Lehigh Valley Health Network between March 2010 and March 2013. The care received by patients when seen in the thoracic multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) was compared with the care received when not seen in the thoracic MDC. Results All patients seen in the MDC, compared to <50% of patients seen outside the MDC, were evaluated by more than one physician prior to beginning the treatment. Time to initiate treatment was shorter in MDC patients than in non-MDC patients. Patients seen in the MDC had a greater concordance with clinical pathways. A greater percentage of patients seen in the thoracic MDC had pathologic staging of their mediastinum. Patients seen in the MDC were more likely to receive all of their care at Lehigh Valley Health Network. Conclusion Multidisciplinary care is essential in the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC. Greater utilization of MDCs for this complex group of patients will result in more efficient coordination of care, pretreatment evaluation, and therapy, which in turn should translate to improve patients’ outcomes.

Cystic Brain Metastases in NSCLC Harboring the EML4-ALK Translocation after Treatment with Crizotinib

1116 Journal of Thoracic Oncology ® • Volume 10, Number 7, July 2015 CASE OF THE MONTH SUBMISSION A 39-year-old woman nonsmoker presented in August 2007 with chest wall discomfort. Computed tomography (CT) revealed right upper lobe parenchymal and pleural abnormalities as well as mediastianal lymphadenopathy. Bronchoscopy and mediastinoscopy yielded a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the lung. No mutations in KRAS or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were identified. She received four cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab and erlotinib. Her tissue was reanalyzed and an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was detected. After disease progression in March 2011, she began crizotinib 250 mg orally twice daily on a phase II clinical trial (PROFILE 1005), ultimately achieving a complete remission. Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging of the brain was negative. In July 2011, she developed pupil asymmetry. MRI of the brain revealed multiple, bilateral, cystic lesions without pathological enhancement. Lumbar puncture was unremarkable. Crizotinib was continued. She received Cyberknife therapy to a lesion in the thalamus and the other lesions were observed. In September 2013, MRI of the brain demonstrated progression in size and number of the parenchymal cystic brain lesions (Fig. 1A, B). A CT scan of the chest and abdomen done at that time demonstrated disease stability. She underwent image-guided frontal craniotomy with biopsy of two cystic lesions. Pathology confirmed metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The patient declined whole brain radiation therapy and began treatment with ceritinib (LDK387) in January 2014. An MRI of the brain performed in September 2014 demonstrated reduction of the previously noted brain metastases (Fig. 2). A chest-CT scan demonstrated continued stability of her systemic disease at that time.

Exploring Therapeutic Decisions in Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results and Conclusions from North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0222

How do oncologists choose therapy for the elderly? Oncologists assigned patients aged 65 years or older with incurable non-small cell lung cancer to: (a) carboplatin (AUC = 2) + paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 (28-day cycle × 4) followed by gefitinib; or (b) gefitinib 250 mg/day. With (a), 12 of 34 were progression-free at 6 months; median time to cancer progression was 3.9 months. With (b), the same occurred in 11 of 28 patients with the latter being 4.9 months. The most common reason for conventional chemotherapy was oncologists’ opinion that the cancer was aggressive, and for gefitinib alone, patients’ reluctance to receive chemotherapy. Interestingly, age had no influence.

Measuring clinical pathway compliance using a simulated patient approach with clinical performance and value (CPV) vignettes.

96 Background: Although clinical pathways have the promise to improve the quality of care, they have had limited success changing practice or standardizing care. Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) has > 40 pathways incorporating interdisciplinary care strategies linked to evidence and decision support tools. METHODS To improve compliance with pathways we used an innovative measure to quantify quality of care, CPV vignettes. CPV vignettes are validated, simulated clinical scenarios constructed so that adherence to pathways is clear-cut. Providers care for identical cases so there is no need for case mix adjustment. After completing each case, providers are given personalized feedback. Twelve breast cancer (ca) vignettes were developed by MCC breast medical oncologists and surgeons and QURE, a healthcare measurement company. The cases were developed using MCC pathways, other evidence and core issues such as diagnostic work-up. The vignettes were randomized at the department level and given to all MCC providers who care for breast ca patients. A total of 18 providers took 34 CPVs: 7 medical oncologists, 6 advanced practitioners and 5 surgeons. QURE-trained physician abstractors blinded to the CPV-takers identity scored each vignette and provided confidential feedback. RESULTS Total scores for providers averaged 55.4%, s.d. 12.5%, a typical score for a CPV baseline study. Adherence to pathways varied by area with the highest concordance for radiation and hormonal therapy and the lowest for management of axillary lymph nodes (see Table). CONCLUSIONS Adherence to pathways varied among providers and by clinical domain. Ongoing efforts will evaluate the impact of serial CPV measurement on pathway adherence. Simulations simplified the task of determining pathway adherence making pathway compliance at the physician level a reasonable expectation and standardization at the group level scientifically rigorous and feasible. [Table: see text].

Value of thoracic multidisciplinary clinic (TMDC) in determining appropriate treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

82 Background: Treatment of stage III NSCLC involves surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Treatment depends on the size and location of the primary tumor and lymph nodes as well as clinical status of the patient. Evaluation of these patients should take place in a multidisciplinary clinic, where treating physicians and pulmonary medicine provide a unified treatment plan. METHODS All patients with Stage III NSCLC seen at the Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN) between March of 2010 and March of 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. We compared initial treatment of out-patients seen in our TMDC with those out-patients seen outside the TMDC. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were seen in TMDC (34 treated at LVHN) and 44 patients were seen outside TMDC (34 treated at LVHN). Eleven patients were treated elsewhere or were not treatable. Of patients with stage III NSCLC, 37.5% were seen in TMDC year 1 (March 2010 - March 2011) compared to 61% of patients year 2 (March 2011 - March 2012) (p = 0.05). Patients were seen by physicians from at least two specialties 100% of the time when seen in TMDC, but only 64.7% of the time when seen outside TMDC (p < 0.001). Mediastinal staging (EBUS or mediastinoscopy) was performed more frequently in patients seen in TMDC; 58.9% compared to 23.5% outside TMDC (p = 0.009). The LVHN clinical pathway for stage III NSCLC recommends initial therapy with concomitant chemoradiation, either in the neo-adjuvant setting or as definitive treatment. Eighty-eight percent of patients seen in TMDC followed our clinical pathway while 46% of patients seen outside TMDC conformed to the clinical pathway (p < 0.001). The time from first contact with a treating physician to initiation of treatment was reduced by almost 30% (29.03 days outside TMDC; 20.62 days at TMDC). CONCLUSIONS All patients with stage III NSCLC should be seen in a multidisciplinary setting. At LVHN we saw an increase in these patients being referred to our TMDC over time. These patients were more likely to have mediastinal staging and enjoyed quicker initiation of their therapy. They were more likely to have at least two physicians involved in their initial treatment plan and were more likely to conform to our clinical pathways.

Improving quality of care within the NCI Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) network.

178 Background: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) was initiated to expand cancer research and deliver quality cancer care in communities. A program goal was support of quality care initiatives. Twenty-one community sites in 16 states participated in the network providing care to approximately 40,000 cancer patients/year. We describe strategies for implementation of a structured quality program within our network. METHODS Four components served as the foundation for quality efforts: 1) increasing multidisciplinary care (MDC) programs; 2) ASCO QOPI participation; 3) Commission on Cancer Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS) participation; and 4) expansion of genetic counseling/services. A Quality of Care subcommittee formed to guide quality efforts within the network. Clinicians from the network served as subcommittee leadership and each site designated a quality of care lead. The subcommittee met by teleconference monthly, developed goals, shared best practices, developed processes to accomplish goals and documented improvements in priority areas. RESULTS Strategies employed to improve quality included: assessment tool development, participation in national quality reporting initiatives, review and monitoring of network data, and network performance improvement projects. CONCLUSIONS The NCCCP identified areas of needed quality improvement. In addition, the network developed implementation strategies and created benchmarks that measure program quality. Participants benefitted from the opportunity to interface with one another and set network goals, while adopting strategies to best fit their own practices and community sites. [Table: see text].