Elisabeth A. Cats

Multifocal motor neuropathy: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment strategies.

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare inflammatory neuropathy characterized by slowly progressive, asymmetric distal limb weakness without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN may mimic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, other variants of motor neuron disease, or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with asymmetric onset. Differentiation is important, as these diseases differ in prognosis and treatment. The electrophysiological finding of conduction block in the absence of abnormalities in sensory nerves is the hallmark of MMN, but can be difficult to detect. Intravenous immunoglobulin is efficacious in most patients, but long-term maintenance therapy does not prevent slowly progressive axonal degeneration. Moreover, cyclophosphamide, although effective, has substantial adverse effects, and the efficacy of other immunosuppressive drugs, including rituximab, is not established. The underlying pathological mechanisms of MMN are unclear, but IgM autoantibodies against the ganglioside GM1 may cause changes in nodal and perinodal structures that compromise nerve conduction. Further elucidation of the disease mechanisms may ultimately lead to improved treatment strategies. In this Review, we discuss the diagnostic criteria for MMN, and provide an update on the current understanding of MMN pathogenesis. We also describe available treatments and promising new therapeutic strategies.

Correlates of outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy

Reply from the Authors: We thank Dr. Nabbout et al. for their comments on our article, in which we described 13 probands, and one of their mothers, with epilepsy variably associated with mental retardation and autistic features in whom the PCDH19 gene was mutated.1 The epilepsy phenotype was variable. Seven patients exhibited DS and 6 had focal epilepsy. These figures confirm that PCDH19 mutations can cause an epileptic encephalopathy resembling DS in girls.2 Therefore, if screening for SCN1A gene mutations, deletions, amplification, or duplications yields negative results, PCDH19 should be screened. In our cohort, girls with PCDH19 mutations and focal epilepsy had early seizure onset and either normal cognitive skills or mental retardation and autistic features. The spectrum of phenotypes associated with PCDH19 mutations is broad, ranging from mild epilepsy to a severe epileptic encephalopathy. Such phenotypic diversity might be partially explained by the cosegregation of other genetic factors either rescuing or worsening the phenotype. Since our article was accepted for publication, we have observed 6 more girls with PCDH19 mutations, none having a phenotype evocative of DS (unpublished data). Another article reported 3 girls with seizure onset in infancy and varying degrees of cognitive impairment and autistic features.3 However, the core clinical features of PCDH19-related epilepsy phenotypes seem to be early onset of seizures occurring in clusters and precipitated by fever. The spectrum of associated cognitive and behavioral impairment is variable and its relationship with epilepsy severity is not obvious. PCDH19 is clearly emerging as a major epilepsy gene in females. Analysis of larger cohorts, with unbiased recruitment, will clarify the full range of phenotypes caused by alterations in this gene.

Multifocal motor neuropathy Association of anti-GM1 IgM antibodies with clinical features

Objective: To determine the prevalence and specificity of antibodies against single gangliosides and ganglioside complexes in serum from 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and to study the association with clinical features. Methods: ELISA was used to detect immunoglobulin (Ig)M, IgG, and IgA antibodies against GM1, GM2, GD1a, GD1b, GM1b, GT1a, GT1b, GQ1b, GalNAc-GD1a, and the glycolipid SGPG; absorption studies were performed to study cross-reactivity. Presence of antibodies against ganglioside complexes consisting of any of combinations of GM1, GM2, GD1a, GD1b, GT1b, and GQ1b was also tested. Results: Anti-GM1 IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies were detected in serum from 43%, 1%, and 5% of patients with MMN. Anti-GM2 IgM antibodies were detected in 6% and anti-GD1b IgM antibodies in 9% of patients. Patients with MMN with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies had more severe weakness (p < 0.01), more disability (p < 0.01), and more axon loss (p = 0.05) than patients without anti-GM1 IgM antibodies. Anti-GM1 IgM antibody titers correlated with Medical Research Council scores (correlation coefficient = 0.43; p < 0.0001). Anti-GD1b IgM antibody activity was associated with reduced vibration sense (p < 0.01). Absorption studies showed that anti-GD1b and anti-GM2 IgM antibodies cross-reacted with GM1. Antibodies against ganglioside complexes were not detected. Complexes containing GD1a, GD1b, GT1b, or GQ1b with GM1 lowered antibody activity against GM1. Conclusion: Anti-ganglioside IgM antibodies in MMN display limited specificity and are associated with severity and clinical characteristics. Results of this study suggest that anti-GM1 IgM antibodies may play a role in MMN pathogenesis.

Modifying the Medical Research Council grading system through Rasch analyses

The Medical Research Council grading system has served through decades for the evaluation of muscle strength and has been recognized as a cardinal feature of daily neurological, rehabilitation and general medicine examination of patients, despite being respectfully criticized due to the unequal width of its response options. No study has systematically examined, through modern psychometric approach, whether physicians are able to properly use the Medical Research Council grades. The objectives of this study were: (i) to investigate physicians’ ability to discriminate among the Medical Research Council categories in patients with different neuromuscular disorders and with various degrees of weakness through thresholds examination using Rasch analysis as a modern psychometric method; (ii) to examine possible factors influencing physicians’ ability to apply the Medical Research Council categories through differential item function analyses; and (iii) to examine whether the widely used Medical Research Council 12 muscles sum score in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy would meet Rasch models expectations. A total of 1065 patients were included from nine cohorts with the following diseases: Guillain–Barré syndrome (n = 480); myotonic dystrophy type-1 (n = 169); chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (n = 139); limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (n = 105); multifocal motor neuropathy (n = 102); Pompes disease (n = 62) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined related polyneuropathy (n = 8). Medical Research Council data of 72 muscles were collected. Rasch analyses were performed on Medical Research Council data for each cohort separately and after pooling data at the muscle level to increase category frequencies, and on the Medical Research Council sum score in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Disordered thresholds were demonstrated in 74–79% of the muscles examined, indicating physicians’ inability to discriminate between most Medical Research Council categories. Factors such as physicians’ experience or illness type did not influence these findings. Thresholds were restored after rescoring the Medical Research Council grades from six to four options (0, paralysis; 1, severe weakness; 2, slight weakness; 3, normal strength). The Medical Research Council sum score acceptably fulfilled Rasch model expectations after rescoring the response options and creating subsets to resolve local dependency and item bias on diagnosis. In conclusion, a modified, Rasch-built four response category Medical Research Council grading system is proposed, resolving clinicians’ inability to differentiate among its original response categories and improving clinical applicability. A modified Medical Research Council sum score at the interval level is presented and is recommended for future studies in Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

IVIg inhibits classical pathway activity and anti-GM1 IgM-mediated complement deposition in MMN

The effects of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) on anti-GM1 IgM titer and function, classical complement pathway activity, and antibody-complement interaction were investigated in 62 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). In vitro, IVIg decreased complement deposition by anti-GM1 IgM antibodies. First IVIg treatment (2 g/kg) decreased C1q and C4 concentrations and classical pathway activity in serum. In sera from patients receiving IVIg maintenance therapy (0.4 g/kg) C4 concentrations and classical pathway activity were generally lower at higher IgG concentrations. The beneficial effects of IVIg in MMN may be explained by reduced antibody-mediated complement deposition in nerves amplified by a systemically attenuated classical pathway.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy

Background Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is often responsive to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), but the optimal dose and intervals of IVIg maintenance treatment have not been established. Increase in IgG concentration (ΔIgG) after IVIg infusion has recently been identified as determinant of outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome. ΔIgG may therefore represent a potentially useful biomarker to optimise IVIg dosing in patients with MMN. Objective The aims of this study were to determine variability of IVIg pharmacokinetics in patients with MMN in relation to treatment response, and to establish whether interindividual differences in IVIg pharmacokinetics were associated with genetic polymorphisms of the endothelial IgG receptor (FcRn) which determines IgG half-life. Methods Twenty-three patients with MMN receiving their first IVIg treatment at a cumulative dose of 2.0 g/kg in 5 days were included. A good treatment response was defined as an increase in muscle strength of at least one Medical Research Council point in minimally two muscle groups. IgG concentrations in serum were determined at baseline, at day 1 and day 5 of the IVIg course, and 3 weeks after treatment. FcRn copy number variation and differences in repeat length of the variable number of tandem repeats in the FcRn gene were determined by quantitative PCR and Sanger sequencing. Results Seventeen patients (74%) had a good response to treatment. Total IgG and ΔIgG levels showed large variation between patients. Mean ΔIgG was higher in IVIg responders than in non-responders, with the largest difference on day 1 (11.1 g/L vs 4.5 g/L, p=0.06), but our study lacked power to show statistically significant differences. Genetic variation in the FcRn gene was not associated with ΔIgG levels or response to treatment. Conclusions IVIg pharmacokinetics varies in patients with MMN and may be associated with clinical response.

Increased frequency of HLA-DRB1*15 in patients with multifocal motor neuropathy

Objectives: The favorable response to treatment with IV immunoglobulins and the presence of IgM antibodies to the glycolipid GM1 are indications that inflammation underlies multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) pathogenesis. We investigated the association of MMN with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II antigens. Methods: HLA class I and II antigens of 74 Dutch patients with MMN and 700 controls were determined in a case-control study. Associations of HLA types with MMN disease characteristics were investigated. Results: Compared with controls, patients with MMN had higher frequencies of HLA-DRB1*15 (41 vs 24%, p = 0.0017). Disease characteristics were not associated with specific HLA types. Conclusions: Similar associations were found in patients with multiple sclerosis and women with chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathy, which may suggest that these demyelinating disorders share pathogenic mechanisms.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

IntroductionMultifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterized by asymmetric weakness of limbs and the electrophysiological finding of conduction block in motor nerves. Conduction block is the inability of nerves to propagate action potentials and is probably caused by immune-mediated dysfunction of the axon at the nodes of Ranvier or the myelin sheath. MMN immune pathogenesis has not been elucidated.ResultsIn approximately 50% of all patients, IgM antibodies that bind to the glycolipid GM1, which is abundantly expressed in peripheral motor nerves, can be detected. A recent study showed an association with HLA-DRB1*15, and virtually all patients respond to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in at least the early stages of the disease.ConclusionThis review aims at providing a concise overview of what is known about MMN pathogenesis, and how the beneficial effect of IVIG might be explained.

Immune Pathogenesis and Treatment of Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, probably immune-mediated chronic disorder characterized by asymmetric distal limb weakness and conduction block. The exact pathogenesis of MMN is still unclear, but IgM anti-GM1 antibodies, which can be detected in sera from approximately half of all MMN patients, are thought to play an important role. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is effective in the vast majority of patients, but, despite IVIG maintenance treatment, many patients experience a slowly progressive decline in muscle strength. In this review we will summarize the results from studies on pathogenesis. We will discuss current treatment strategies of MMN and how insight into MMN pathogenesis may translate into novel therapies in the future.

Complement activity is associated with disease severity in multifocal motor neuropathy

Objective: To investigate whether high innate activity of the classical and lectin pathways of complement is associated with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and whether levels of innate complement activity or the potential of anti-GM1 antibodies to activate the complement system correlate with disease severity. Methods: We performed a case-control study including 79 patients with MMN and 79 matched healthy controls. Muscle weakness was documented with Medical Research Council scale sum score and axonal loss with nerve conduction studies. Activity of the classical and lectin pathways of complement was assessed by ELISA. We also determined serum mannose-binding lectin (MBL) concentrations and polymorphisms in the MBL gene (MBL2) and quantified complement-activating properties of anti-GM1 IgM antibodies by ELISA. Results: Activity of the classical and lectin pathways, MBL2 genotypes, and serum MBL concentrations did not differ between patients and controls. Complement activation by anti-GM1 IgM antibodies was exclusively mediated through the classical pathway and correlated with antibody titers (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that both high innate activity of the classical pathway of complement and high complement-activating capacity of anti-GM1 IgM antibodies were significantly associated with more severe muscle weakness and axonal loss. Conclusion: High innate activity of the classical pathway of complement and efficient complement-activating properties of anti-GM1 IgM antibodies are determinants of disease severity in patients with MMN. These findings underline the importance of anti-GM1 antibody–mediated complement activation in the pathogenesis and clinical course of MMN.